Load Impacts And Marketing Effectiveness from The Countrys Largest Dynamic Pricing Program Load Impacts And Marketing Effectiveness from The Countrys Largest.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 Case Study of Demand Response: Con Edison Business Program by Eileen Egan-Annechino Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc.
Advertisements

BGE’s Smart Energy Pricing The National Town Meeting on Demand Response and Smart Grid Cheryl Hindes Director -- Load Analysis and Settlement July 14,
Enabling Customer Demand Management Kevin Evans President & CEO June 24, 2010.
Utility Planning Perspective For A Solar Feed In Tariff (FIT) February 3, 2009 Gainesville Regional Utilities.
1 Density/Cost Allocation Study April 15, 2009 Michael Roger Manager, Distribution Pricing.
Media Planning Client provides relevant information to agency in the form of a media brief. Market Profile Brand Media Profile Competitor Media Usage Target.
SmartPOWER Critical Peak Pricing (CPP) June 3, 2008.
Recent Successes in Demand Response
Technologies for Demand Response: Enabling Efficiency and Prices to Devices Dr. Arshad Mansoor Vice President, Power Delivery & Utilization 2010 National.
1 Arizona Public Service Company |June 24, 2010 Integration of Residential Demand Response & Smart Grid Programs.
DISPUTES & INVESTIGATIONS ECONOMICS FINANCIAL ADVISORY MANAGEMENT CONSULTING Can Today's Demand Response Programs Support Integration of Renewable Energy.
Defaulting Customers onto CPP – Lessons from Actual Experience, 2009 Defaulting Customers onto CPP – Lessons from Actual Experience Josh Bode, FSC July.
PG&Es 2009 Participating Load Pilot. 2 Overview Regulatory Context Pilot Characteristics Lessons Next Steps.
Smart Streetlighting National Town Hall Lorraine Hariton July 14, 2009
National Town Meeting on Demand Response Focus on Pepcos Washington, DC Residential Smart Meter Pilot Program Presented By Steve Sunderhauf July 14, 2009.
1 April 2006 Collaborative Labeling and Appliance Standards Program (CLASP) The Rationale for Energy Efficiency Standards and Labels.
How Does Smart Growth Impact Climate Change Emissions? Bay Area Air Quality Management District Advisory Councils Air Quality Planning Committee 11 April.
Dynamic Pricing - Potential and Issues Joe Wharton and Ahmad Faruqui Kansas Corporation Commission Workshop on Energy Efficiency March 25, 2008.
1 Comments for Workshop on EEU Budget for August 6, 2008.
FPSC Ten Year Plan Workshop Nuclear Panel Steven Scroggs Senior Director, Project Development Florida Power & Light Company August 15, 2007.
F LORIDA S OLAR E NERGY C ENTER Creating Energy Independence Since 1975 A Research Institute of the University of Central Florida 1 Taking Charge of Our.
ENERGY STAR ® SALES ASSOCIATE TRAINING Room Air Conditioners (Updated: September 2010)
New Jersey Board of Public Utilities and New Jerseys Clean Energy Program Mike Winka.
Building a Better Future Stretch Building Code October 15, 2009.
1 Building Use Study Plattsburgh City School District Advisory Committee Meeting September 18, 2013 Castallo and Silky- Education Consultants Bill Silky.
Discussion Topics Overview of Water Rates in California Legal Framework of Water Rates Water Consumption Patterns Empirical Data – City of Fresno The.
1 Working Together to Lessen the Impact of Rising Energy Prices on Our Customers June 17, 2008 Delaware Public Service Commission Gary Stockbridge, President.
The Likely Impact of Smart Electricity Meters in Ireland Seán Lyons (with Conor Devitt & Anne Nolan) ESRI/EPA Environmental Economics Seminar, 30 May 2011.
Glenn R. Jennings Chairman, President & CEO Delta Natural Gas Company, Inc. 1.
401(k) Participant Behavior in a Volatile Economy Prepared for the 14 th Annual RRC Conference, August 2, 2012 by Barbara Butrica and Karen Smith 1.
Winter Heating Season Presentation To: Delaware Public Service Commission June 17, 2008.
Chapter 12 Capturing Surplus.
Section 26.2 Setting Prices
AIR TRAFFIC MARKET OF MOSCOW AVIATION HUB DME Connections Vladimir Kamynin Marketing Director.
Page 1 Peng Xu, Philip Haves, James Braun, MaryAnn Piette January 23, 2004 Sponsored by the California Energy Commission and the California Institute for.
California Roundup: Summary of DR Activity in California John Goodin Lead, Demand Response 2008 National Town Meeting on Demand Response June 3, 2008.
Load Impact Estimation for Demand Response Resources Nicole Hopper, Evaluation Manager July 14, 2009 National Town Meeting on Demand Response and Smart.
Smart Buildings for a Smart Grid Technology & Services to Make Buildings Grid Responsive James Dagley, Vice President of Channel Marketing and Strategy.
Introduction Customer-Facing Subcommittee MA DPU Grid Modernization Subcommittee January 9, 2013 Tim Woolf | ©2013 Synapse Energy.
Energy Saving in Hospitals: Hong Kong Initiatives
EDISON INTERNATIONAL® SM Green Technology and Renewable Energy Opportunities 4 th Annual India Trade Conference, June 23, 2011 Cerritos CA Gary Barsley.
Bottoms Up Factoring. Start with the X-box 3-9 Product Sum
Introduction Build and impact metric data provided by the SGIG recipients convey the type and extent of technology deployment, as well as its effect on.
California AB 2244 Applicants Under Age 19 Final Starting March 2, 2011.
BG&E’s PeakRewards SM Demand Response Program Successful Approaches for Engaging Customers August 20, 2014.
The Power to Make a Difference PPL Electric Utilities April 2010.
Time-of-Use and Critical Peak Pricing
SmartMeter Program July 2007 NARUC Summer Meeting Tom Bottorff, Sr. VP Regulatory Relations.
Automated Demand Response Pilot 2005/2004 Load Impact Results and Recommendations Final Report © 2005 Rocky Mountain Institute (RMI) Research & Consulting.
2013 SDG&E Summer Saver Load Impact Evaluation Dr. Stephen George DRMEC Spring 2014 Load Impacts Evaluation Workshop San Francisco, California May 7, 2014.
Smart Meters, Demand Response and Energy Efficiency GRIDSCHOOL 2010 MARCH 8-12, 2010  RICHMOND, VIRGINIA INSTITUTE OF PUBLIC UTILITIES ARGONNE NATIONAL.
Energy Efficiency and Demand Response: Separate Efforts or Two Ends of a Continuum? A Presentation to: Association of Edison Illuminating Companies Reno,
1 PG&E’s Operating Experience with TVP Rates Best Practices and Lessons Learned in Time-Variant Pricing R Residential Rate Workshop Gregory B.
Presentation Overview
HOME ENERGY USAGE REPORTS: DOES INCREASED FEEDBACK LEAD TO SIGNIFICANT ENERGY REDUCTIONS AND REDUCED COSTS? NASUCA MID YEAR MEETING JUNE 25, 2012 Ricky.
California Statewide Pricing Pilot Lessons Learned Roger Levy Demand Response Research Center NARUC Joint Meeting Committee on Energy.
Overview of Residential Pricing/Advanced Metering Pilots Charles Goldman Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory SMPPI Board Meeting August 3, 2005.
Colorado Rural Electric Association Energy Innovations Summit Demand Response: Are Customers Ready to Change Their Ways? Confidential October 27, 2014.
CPUC Workshop on Best Practices & Lessons Learned in Time Variant Pricing TVP Pilot Design and Load Impact M&V Dr. Stephen George Senior Vice President.
CPUC Workshop on Best Practices & Lessons Learned in Time Variant Pricing TVP Load & Bill Impacts, Role of Technology & Operational Consideration Dr. Stephen.
Idaho Power Company Demand Response & Dynamic Pricing Programs PNDRP December 5, 2008 Darlene Nemnich Pete Pengilly.
California’s Statewide Pricing Pilot Summer 2003 Impact Evaluation 17 th Annual Western Conference, San Diego, California Ahmad Faruqui and Stephen S.
Dynamic Pricing Case Studies. Digi International.
2010 NASUCA Mid-Year Meeting NASUCA 2010 Mid-Year Conference Presented by: Lee Smith Senior Economist and Managing Consultant Presented to: June ,
DRMEC Spring 2016 Load Impacts Evaluation Workshop San Francisco, California May 10, SDG&E Summer Saver Load Impact Evaluation.
2013 Load Impact Evaluation of Southern California Edison’s Peak Time Rebate Program Josh Schellenberg DRMEC Spring 2014 Load Impact Evaluation Workshop.
Introducing Smart Energy Pricing Cheryl Hindes
Time of Use Rates: A Practical Option – If Done Well
National Grid Rhode Island: Piloting Wireless Alternatives
Allegheny Power Residential Demand Response Program
Presentation transcript:

Load Impacts And Marketing Effectiveness from The Countrys Largest Dynamic Pricing Program Load Impacts And Marketing Effectiveness from The Countrys Largest Dynamic Pricing Program National Town Meeting on Demand Response and Smart Grid Stephen S. George Freeman, Sullivan & Co. June 23-24, 2010

PG&Es SmartRate tariff has the highest enrollment of any dynamic tariff in the country There were roughly 25,000 active customers at end of summer 2009 A time varying rate on event days only Overlay of surcharges and credits on top of the standard five-tier, increasing block tariff (E-1) E-1 prices vary with usage and block sizes vary by climate zone SmartRate has a 60 ¢/kWh adder from 2 to 7 pm on up to 15 event days each summer Price ratio varies depending on what rate tier you are in SmartRate customers also enrolled in load control program (SmartAC) can have air conditioner cycled on SmartRate days Page 1

PG&Es residential tariffs are complex CARE stands for California Alternative Rates for Energy CARE provides lower rates for qualifying low income customers Page 2

Average SmartRate Load Impact for 2009 Average Impact Per Customer 0.31 kW 14.9% Average Reference Load and Load Impact Across 15 SmartRate Days Page 3

A relatively small % of customers provide large load reductions Page 4

PG&E tried a variety of marketing strategies for SmartRate which allowed us to determine the relative effectiveness of various marketing options Page 5

A model was developed to determine the likelihood of enrollment as a function of marketing features and customer characteristics MARKETING FEATURES Sign up incentive Number of touches Timing (seasonal) Message Format Enabling technology CUSTOMER CHARACTERISTICS Annual energy use Likelihood of A/C ownership CARE Census block group variables Energy efficiency rebate When using the features tied to customer characteristics, its important to recognize that not all characteristics are independent of each other Page 6

A modest marketing incentive can make a very significant difference in enrollment rates KEY ASSUMPTIONS No Enabling Technology 30% CARE 50% Central A/C Incentive Offered on All Three Touches 1 st Touch Pre-summer 2 nd Touch Early Summer 3 rd Touch Late Summer #10 Letter With Business Reply Envelope Multilingual Letter Page 7

Sending second and third direct mail pieces to the same customer increases enrollment KEY ASSUMPTIONS 1 st Touch Pre-Summer 2 nd Touch Mid-Summer 3 rd Touch Late Summer No Enabling Technology 30% CARE 50% Central A/C $25 Incentive on Each Touch #10 Letter With Business Reply Envelope Multilingual Letter The marketing hit rate falls with each touch but cumulative enrollment grows Page 8

The timing of the marketing campaign matters KEY ASSUMPTIONS Single Touch No Enabling Technology 30% CARE 50% Central A/C $25 Incentive #10 Letter With Business Reply Envelope Multilingual Letter Customers are more likely to sign up before the summer begins than in mid- or late summer Page 9

Offering a dynamic rate to customers that already have a load control device that can be used to automate response has a dramatic impact KEY ASSUMPTIONS Single Touch Pre-Summer Marketing 25% CARE 73% Likelihood of Owning Central A/C $25 Incentive #10 Letter With Business Reply Envelope Multilingual Letter Page 10

Whether you use a standard letter or a glossy brochure influences enrollment, with the former more effective than the latter KEY ASSUMPTIONS Single Touch No enabling technology Pre-Summer Marketing 30% CARE $25 Incentive 50% Likelihood of Owning Central A/C Multilingual Letter Page 11

Customers who own central air conditioning are less likely to enroll in dynamic tariffs KEY ASSUMPTIONS No Enabling Technology Pre-Summer Marketing $25 Incentive #10 Letter With Business Reply Envelope Multilingual Letter Other Customer Characteristics Vary Significantly Across A/C Ownership Likelihood Page 12

Key conclusions Marketing matters Customer enrollment varies significantly with variation in the features, timing and targeting of the marketing offer A modest incentive dramatically improves enrollment based on direct mail, but doubling or tripling the incentive has a small incremental effect Take rates for customers that are already enrolled in a load control program are dramatically higher than for customers that are not in a load control program The timing of your market offer impacts enrollment Customers that you most want to enroll (those with central air conditioning) are the hardest to attract Page 13

Page 14 For questions, please contact Stephen S. George Principal Consultant, Director Energy Practice Freeman, Sullivan & Co. 101 Montgomery Street 15 th Floor San Francisco, CA