CAPA Best Practices Open Discussion

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
TWO STEP EQUATIONS 1. SOLVE FOR X 2. DO THE ADDITION STEP FIRST
Advertisements

INTERREG IVC Introduction to programme & application process
Basic Principles of GMP
You have been given a mission and a code. Use the code to complete the mission and you will save the world from obliteration…
ax2 + bx + c 2x2 + 11x + 5 ac 2(5) = b =11 ( ) 2x2 + 10x + 1x
MSS 01DEC06 1 Compliance Activities 2006 New England District Office FDA CAPT Mutahar Shamsi, USPHS Director, Compliance Branch
Freedom M.S. Data Delve Session II October 6, 2010.
Slide 1 Insert your own content. Slide 2 Insert your own content.
Supplemental Web Fig. 2 mos10/mos10, grown on 100 mm plate SLAS27 medium, day 1.
Building a Cradle-to-Grave Approach with Your Design Documentation and Data Denise D. Dion, EduQuest, Inc. and Gina To, Breathe Technologies, Inc.
What FDA Looks for When Inspecting IRBs and Sponsors Marian J. Serge Nurse Consultant Division of Bioresearch Monitoring Office of Compliance Center for.
By D. Fisher Geometric Transformations. Reflection, Rotation, or Translation 1.
for Cabin Safety Inspectors
/4/2010 Box and Whisker Plots Objective: Learn how to read and draw box and whisker plots Starter: Order these numbers.
1 RA I Sub-Regional Training Seminar on CLIMAT&CLIMAT TEMP Reporting Casablanca, Morocco, 20 – 22 December 2005 Status of observing programmes in RA I.
Human Performance Improvement Process
Jeopardy Q 1 Q 6 Q 11 Q 16 Q 21 Q 2 Q 7 Q 12 Q 17 Q 22 Q 3 Q 8 Q 13
Jeopardy Q 1 Q 6 Q 11 Q 16 Q 21 Q 2 Q 7 Q 12 Q 17 Q 22 Q 3 Q 8 Q 13
Title Subtitle.
February, 2010 LEA Support Advisory Council. Agenda 2:30-3:00Discuss plan revision process (feedback and support) 3:00-3:30Discuss February workshops.
You will need some paper!
0 - 0.
2 pt 3 pt 4 pt 5 pt 1 pt 2 pt 3 pt 4 pt 5 pt 1 pt 2 pt 3 pt 4 pt 5 pt 1 pt 2 pt 3 pt 4 pt 5 pt 1 pt 2 pt 3 pt 4 pt 5 pt 1 pt Time Money AdditionSubtraction.
DIVIDING INTEGERS 1. IF THE SIGNS ARE THE SAME THE ANSWER IS POSITIVE 2. IF THE SIGNS ARE DIFFERENT THE ANSWER IS NEGATIVE.
MULT. INTEGERS 1. IF THE SIGNS ARE THE SAME THE ANSWER IS POSITIVE 2. IF THE SIGNS ARE DIFFERENT THE ANSWER IS NEGATIVE.
Addition Facts
Year 6 mental test 10 second questions Numbers and number system Numbers and the number system, fractions, decimals, proportion & probability.
Around the World AdditionSubtraction MultiplicationDivision AdditionSubtraction MultiplicationDivision.
Welcome to Who Wants to be a Millionaire
ZMQS ZMQS
Company Confidential Registration Management Committee (RMC) Report on Oasis Data Long Beach, CA September , 2011 R. Darrell Taylor.
EXAMPLE 1 Factor when b is negative and c is positive
Lecture 11: Algorithms and Time Complexity I Discrete Mathematical Structures: Theory and Applications.
Fact-finding Techniques Transparencies
Quality Assurance/Quality Control Plan Evaluation February 16, 2005.
Device Initiatives FY 2005 Karen A. Coleman FDA Device National Expert.
REGULATIONS for SUPPLIES, EQUIPMENT, REAGENTS and TESTING JILL HOAG BS, SBB(ASCP) CQA(ASQ) AABB STAFF LEAD ASSESSOR 1.
Mental Math Math Team Skills Test 20-Question Sample.
CS 3630 Database Design and Implementation. Where Clause and Aggregate Functions -- List all rooms whose price is greater than the -- average room price.
Multiplication Tables Test 3 and 5 Times Tables 3 and 5 times tables There are 10 questions. Each one will stay on the screen for 15 seconds. Write down.
Effects on UK of Eustatic sea Level rise GIS is used to evaluate flood risk. Insurance companies use GIS models to assess likely impact and consequently.
Checking & Corrective Action
5.9 + = 10 a)3.6 b)4.1 c)5.3 Question 1: Good Answer!! Well Done!! = 10 Question 1:
Environmental Management Systems Refresher
Squares and Square Root WALK. Solve each problem REVIEW:
Sets Sets © 2005 Richard A. Medeiros next Patterns.
Before Between After.
Addition 1’s to 20.
25 seconds left…...
Subtraction: Adding UP
Test B, 100 Subtraction Facts
Week 1.
Number bonds to 10,
Let’s take a 15 minute break Please be back on time.
1 Experience Sharing of Accreditation Criteria Stanley Ng from ING Life.
We will resume in: 25 Minutes.
Bell Schedules Club Time is available from 8:05-8:20  1 st 8:20 – 9:15  2 nd 9:20 – 10:10  3 rd 10:15 – 11:05  4 th 11:10 – 12:50 A(11:10)
Partial Products. Category 1 1 x 3-digit problems.
Bottoms Up Factoring. Start with the X-box 3-9 Product Sum
PREPARATION FOR FDA INSPECTION
Web Interface for Star Databases of the „Pi of the Sky” Experiment Marek Biskup Warsaw University On behalf of the „Pi of the Sky” collaboration.
FDA Warning Letter CAPA September 2010 Dr. Guido Heinrichs.
Effective CAPA Program, a Valuable Tool in Quality Improvement Dharmi Trivedi.
Five Star Quality Consultants Implementing ISO 9001 Corrective and Preventive Action.
Top 10 Medical Device Citations
Creating a Risk-Based CAPA Process
Kimberly A. Trautman FDA’s Medical Device Quality System Expert
Corrective and Preventive Action
Presentation transcript:

CAPA Best Practices Open Discussion MWDG May 2007 Meeting CAPA Best Practices Open Discussion

Agenda Introduction of new faces – 10 min (Jon Speer) Overview of meeting format – 10 min (Jon Speer) High level review of 2005 FDA CAPA Cites – 15 min (John Freije) Breakout Groups Open Discussion on CAPA Best Practices – 50 min Summary of Breakout Groups – 20 min (John Freije) Wrap up / Meeting format feedback – 15 min (Jon Speer)

Meeting Format Open discussion in small breakout groups Understand some redundancy in discussions Pair with the individuals having the same color dot as you Each group selects a scribe for note taking Six high level topics on CAPA for group discussion

Data Analysis Analysis of data from FDA’s Turbo EIR database Time frame 1/1/2005 to 12/31/2005 3872 observations were cited on the FDA-483s for 21 CFR 820 deficiencies 243 observations were cited for 21 CFR 803 deficiencies 45 observations were cited for 21 CFR 806 deficiencies 6 observations were cited for 21 CFR 821 deficiencies

Number of Observations (n=3872) 1/1/2005 to 12/31/2005

Observations by Subsystem 1/1/05 to 12/31/05

CAPA Observations by CFR citation – 2005

CAPA Observations (109) Failure to analyze processes, work operations, concessions, quality audit reports, quality records, service records, complaints, returned product and other sources of quality data - §820.100(a)(1). (40) Failure to investigate the cause of nonconformities - §820.100(a)(2). (61) Failure to identify the action(s) needed to correct and prevent the recurrence of nonconforming product and other quality problems - §820.100(a)(3). (40) Failure to verify or validate the corrective and/ or preventive action to ensure it is effective - §820.100(a)(4). (14) Failure to implement changes to correct/prevent quality problems - §820.100(a)(5). (9) Failure to disseminate information related to quality problems or nonconforming product to those directly responsible for assuring the quality of the such product - §820.100(a)(6). (12) Failure to submit relevant CAPA information for Management Review - §820.100(a)(7). (126) Failure to document all activities required under this part - §820.100(b). 85/97 2005 Warning Letters contained cites for CAPA deficiencies

CAPA Topic #1 How do you feel your company is using CAPA? Too much Too Little Just right

CAPA Topic #2 Does your company analyze the following? (if they are how?) Processes Work operations Concessions Quality audits Records, etc 10

CAPA Topic #3 What tools/approach does your company use to conduct Root Cause or are they conducting Root Cause? 11

CAPA Topic #4 Does your company take a risk based approach to determine if a CAPA or trending is needed? 12

CAPA Topic #5 How does your company check for effectiveness? How is it determined effective When do you check it What tools are used 13

CAPA Topic #6 Do your CAPAs only look at nonconforming products or poor processes? 14

Wrap Up/Feedback Summary of discussions Feedback on meeting format