Global Observation of Forest Cover (GOFC): Fire S. E. Asia Fire Cal/Val Workshop A special session of the APAN Earth Monitoring Working Group Summary of.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Lab for Remote Sensing Hydrology and Spatial Modeling Dept. of Bioenvironmental Systems Engineering, NTU Satellite Remote Sensing for Land-Use/Land-Cover.
Advertisements

Integrated Risk Management Components in the GEO Architecture Implementation Pilot Phase 2 (AIP-2) ICT for Earth Observation Anwar Vahed.
CEOS Working Group on Information Systems and Services - 1 Core Site WGISS Test Facility WGCV & WGISS Efforts John Faundeen & Stu Doescher, USGS WGISS-15.
U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Agency Report, WGISS #22 September 15, 2006 Lyndon R. Oleson U.S. Geological Survey Center for Earth.
U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Agency Report, WGISS #24 October 19, 2007 Lyndon R. Oleson U.S. Geological Survey Center for Earth.
Future Directions and Initiatives in the Use of Remote Sensing for Water Quality.
GEO Work Plan Symposium 2011 Day 3 DS-11 Global Forest Observation.
Center for Satellite Applications and Research (STAR) Review 09 – 11 March 2010 Image: MODIS Land Group, NASA GSFC March 2000 A Cloud Object Based Volcanic.
1 Quality Indicators for Device Demonstrations April 21, 2009 Lisa Kosh Diana Carl.
GOFC/GOLD - Fire Requirements for Fire Observations.
Accuracy Assessment in Remote Sensing: Methods for Positional and Thematic Accuracy Assessment, the Role of Reference Data Chris Elvidge NOAA National.
Earth Observation and Disaster Warning Working Group Meeting January 27, 2005.
Earth Monitoring Working Group Meeting Pakorn Apaphant EMWG Co-chair 24 th APAN Meeting August 28-31, 2007 Xi-An, China.
LANDSAT Program Update Tim Newman Coordinator, USGS Land Remote Sensing Program National Geospatial Advisory Committee December 3, 2014.
Predicting and mapping biomass using remote sensing and GIS techniques; a case of sugarcane in Mumias Kenya Odhiambo J.O, Wayumba G, Inima A, Omuto C.T,
Toward Near Real Time Forest Fire Monitoring in Thailand Honda Kiyoshi and Veerachai Tanpipat Space Technology Applications and Research, School of Advanced.
INITIAL PLANS FOR 2002 CALIBRATION VALIDATION ACTIVITIES for INDONESIA & MALAYSIA (JULY-OCTOBER 2002) by Mastura Mahmud.
Change Detection. Digital Change Detection Biophysical materials and human-made features are dynamic, changing rapidly. It is believed that land-use/land-cover.
Active Fire Detection using Geostationary Satellites L. Giglio SSAI/University of Maryland GOFC Global Geostationary Fire Monitoring Applications Workshop.
Carbon Cycle and Ecosystems Important Concerns: Potential greenhouse warming (CO 2, CH 4 ) and ecosystem interactions with climate Carbon management (e.g.,
ACRoRS, SAT, AIT January 22, 2002 Phuket Thailand: The Fieldwork Plan for the Forest Fire 2002 Season at Huai-Kha-Khaeng Wildlife.
Multiple Criteria for Evaluating Land Cover Classification Algorithms Summary of a paper by R.S. DeFries and Jonathan Cheung-Wai Chan April, 2000 Remote.
Session 131 Hazard Mapping and Modeling Supporting Emergency Response Operations using GIS and Modeling.
Earth MONITORING and DISASTER WARNING WG Natural Resource Area Report APAN Conference 2002 Phuket, Thailand 23 rd -24 th January 2002.
Fire Products Training Workshop in Partnership with BAAQMD Santa Clara, CA September 10 – 12, 2013 Applied Remote SEnsing Training (ARSET) – Air Quality.
Module 2.1 Monitoring activity data for forests using remote sensing REDD+ training materials by GOFC-GOLD, Wageningen University, World Bank FCPF 1 Module.
Accuracy Assessment. 2 Because it is not practical to test every pixel in the classification image, a representative sample of reference points in the.
2010 CEOS Field Reflectance Intercomparisons Lessons Learned K. Thome 1, N. Fox 2 1 NASA/GSFC, 2 National Physical Laboratory.
MODIS: Moderate-resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer National-Scale Remote Sensing Imagery for Natural Resource Applications Mark Finco Remote Sensing.
Global Observation of Forest Cover (GOFC): Fire S. E. Asia Fire Cal/Val Workshop January 22-24, 2002 Phuket, Thailand A special session of the APAN Earth.
APAN/AG-WG Report AG Honolulu, 2008 –10 presentations Ontology and textmining:1 Sensor network:8 Global crop modelling:1 –Main topic Field monitoring.
15-18 October 2002 Greenville, North Carolina Global Terrestrial Observing System GTOS Jeff Tschirley Programme director.
Options for access to multi- source fire data John Owens Department of Geography University of Maryland.
GOFC Fire S.E. Asia Regional Workshop Overview Chris Elvidge NOAA National Geophysical Data Center Boulder, Colorado, USA
Outline of a shared online fire information system for S.E. Asia Chris Elvidge NOAA National Geophysical Data Center January 21,
GOFC-Fire S.E. Asia Regional Workshop Wrap-Up Session January 24, 2003 Review of online fire information system developments and plans (Elvidge) Demo of.
Recommendations from the GEO TASK AG Community of Practice Image: NASA, ASTER Science Team Minnesota Kansas Germany Bolivia Thailand Brazil.
2005 ARM Science Team Meeting, March 14-18, Daytona Beach, Florida Canada Centre for Remote Sensing - Centre canadien de télédétection Geomatics Canada.
Global Terrestrial Observing System linking the world’s terrestrial monitoring systems to provide a global vision of the Earth we share.
The University of Mississippi Geoinformatics Center NASA MRC RPC – 11 July 2007 Rapid Prototyping of NASA Next Generation Sensors for the SERVIR System.
14 ARM Science Team Meeting, Albuquerque, NM, March 21-26, 2004 Canada Centre for Remote Sensing - Centre canadien de télédétection Geomatics Canada Natural.
Assessing the Phenological Suitability of Global Landsat Data Sets for Forest Change Analysis The Global Land Cover Facility What does.
Example of an identified burned area comparing conditions before and after fires broke out Results Measuring Burned Areas with Landsat Data to Monitor.
Systematic Terrestrial Observations: a Case for Carbon René Gommes with C. He, J. Hielkema, P. Reichert and J. Tschirley FAO/SDRN.
Some Examples of Research Results and Activities Related to Forest Fires in Indonesia Agus Hidayat (National Institute of Aeronautics and Space Republic.
Some thoughts on the validation of fire products Ivan Csiszar UMd.
Land Product Validation subgroup activity in support of LAI inter-comparison.
1 Joint Agency Commercial Imagery Evaluation (JACIE) 7 th Annual Workshop held March 25-27, 2008  USGS, NGA, USDA, and NASA Collaboration Next Workshop.
Citation: Moskal., L. M. and D. M. Styers, Land use/land cover (LULC) from high-resolution near infrared aerial imagery: costs and applications.
MAFF Satellite Data Archives and Access System – MAFFIN Current Activities – MAFF Satellite Data Archives and Access System – MAFFIN Current Activities.
USDA Forest Service, Remote Sensing Applications Center, FSWeb: WWW: National Geospatial Fire.
References: 1)Ganguly, S., Samanta, A., Schull, M. A., Shabanov, N. V., Milesi, C., Nemani, R. R., Knyazikhin, Y., and Myneni, R. B., Generating vegetation.
Fire, Smoke & Air Quality: Tools for Data Exploration & Analysis : Data Sharing/Processing Infrastructure This project integrates.
AT Remote Sensing by: Dr. Kiyoshi Honda Semester: August RS&GIS School of Advanced Technologies Asian Institute of Technology.
Temporal Classification and Change Detection
VEGA-GEOGLAM Web-based GIS for crop monitoring and decision support in agriculture Evgeniya Elkina, Russian Space Research Institute The GEO-XIII Plenary.
Land Cover Side Event: A new path forward for generating products
Factsheet # 12 Understanding multiscale dynamics of landscape change through the application of remote sensing & GIS Land use/land cover (LULC) from high-resolution.
Global Agricultural Monitoring Task AG 0703 Progress
Global Terrestrial Observing System
Kansas Minnesota Germany
USGS Status Frank Kelly, USGS EROS CEOS Plenary 2017 Agenda Item #4.14
Land Cover Land Use Change (LCLUC) training initiatives
World Cover 2017 Conference
Medhavy Thankappan and Lan-Wei Wang
Overview of the validation of active fire products
Planning a Remote Sensing Project
GEO-XIII Plenary St. Petersburg Russian Federation
GOFC/GOLD Fire Implementation Team
Igor Appel Alexander Kokhanovsky
Presentation transcript:

Global Observation of Forest Cover (GOFC): Fire S. E. Asia Fire Cal/Val Workshop A special session of the APAN Earth Monitoring Working Group Summary of January 22 session

Attendees: Pakorn ApaphantJohn Owens Chaowalit SilapathongVeerachai Tanpitat Treechada TawornmasHoracio T. Cadiz Krisanadej JaroensutasineePeera Chernchit Agus HidayatChanchai Sitabutr Mastura MahmudAlias Mohm Sood Khen Rong DenPisuth Paiboonrat Do Xuan Lan Soo Chin Liew Panarat Sareewattana Panjit Musik Renato L. Lapitan Bruno Margerin

Background to GOFC •Developed originally under the Committee on Earth Observation Satellites (CEOS) initially as a pilot to test the concept of an Integrated Global Observing System •IGOS goals – To improve use of Earth Observation data to address major problems of global concern; – To improve coordination of national programs; – To improve co-operation between providers and users of Earth Observation data for regional and global applications. •Has become one of the Panels of the Global Terrestrial Observing System GTOS (FAO GTOS Secretariat)

The Organization of GOFC Scientific and Technology Board Implementation Teams, Activities and Projects * Fire Monitoring and Mapping…….. * Cover Characteristics and Changes.. * Biophysical Parameters…………… Regional Activities and Networks Collaborations e.g. WGISS and WGCV

GOFC Fire Implementation Team The GOFC Forest Fire Monitoring and Mapping Implementation Team is responding to a critical need by fire management agencies, international agencies, and policy makers at national, regional and global levels, for accurate and timely information regarding wildfires in forestland and other vegetated areas. The Fire IT consists of a number of contributory activities from different research groups and organizations, which demonstrate the operational utility of satellite observations of fire, making the case for long-term observations of fire and the research and development necessary to improve these capabilities to meet user needs.

Fire in S.E. Asia * Fire affects all of the nations in S.E. Asia. * Nearly all the fires in the region are man made. * During dry years fires can rage uncontrollably. *Fire is widely used to dispose of agricultural residues, short term enhancement of crop growth conditions, and in the conversion of forests to agricultural land. *Fire is one of the major factors in the region associated with global change. * Impacts include transboundary smoke, loss of forests, loss of biodiversity, land degradation. * Fire management is now recognized as an important function of government, requiring local and regional communication and cooperative effort. * Fire management includes prediction of risk, prevention, detection, suppression, post fire assessment and recovery.

Workshop Objectives While a number of resource management and scientific applications for satellite fire observations have been identified, little is known about the accuracy and validity of the various data sources and products or how they might be used together for an improved depiction of fire events. The objective of the workshop is to initiate and plan the intercomparison, calibration, and validation of active fire and burn scar products from primary sensor systems capable of making frequent wide area observations of S.E. Asia. In addition, the topics of building a regional capability to generate satellite fire products and widening the use of these products through open access and interactive overlay of multiple data sources will be explored.

Why Accuracy Assessment? "There are many reasons for performing an accuracy assessment. Perhaps the simplest reason is curiosity - the desire to know how good something is. In addition to the satisfaction gained from knowledge, we also need to increase the quality of the map information by identifying and correcting the sources of errors. Third, analysts often need to compare various techniques, algorithms, analysts, or interpreters to test which is best. Finally, if the information derived from the remotely sensed data is to be used in some decision-making process, then it is critical that some measure of its quality be known." Quotation from " Assessing the Accuracy of Remotely Sensed Data: Principles an Practices", Russell G. Congalton and Kass Green, 1999, Lewis Publishers.

Importance of Accuracy Assessment for Fire and Burn Scar Products * Documenting the detection limits for various sensors. * Understanding the errors for each sensor. * Improving the algorithms. * Developing confidence in the use of the data. * Developing calibrations for more accurate input into models. * Others.....

Initial set of objectives of GOFC cal/val in S.E. Asia. A) What are the practical reference data sources, their collection methods, uses, and limitations. B) How well do active fire detections from course resolution environmental satellites (MODIS, AVHRR, DMSP and others) match the location and extent of fires found in reference data. C) How well do burn scar products from course resolution environmental satellites match the location and extent of burn scar found in reference data. D) How well do fire risk predictions match the fire observations (active fires and burn scars).

Review of satellite data and product sources for fire and burn scar monitoring in S.E. Asia Who has what data? What products are being generated? How are the data distributed or accessed? Develop an inclusive table summarizing as many of the data sources and activities as possible.

Positional Accuracy Reference:U.S. Federal Geographic Data Committee (FGDC) Geospatial Positioning Accuracy Standards Part 3: National Standards for Spatial Data Accuracy (NSSDA) The NSSDA uses root-mean-square error (RMSE) to estimate positional accuracy. RMSE is the square root of the average of the set of squared differences between dataset coordinate values and coordinate values from an independent source of higher accuracy for identical points.

Thematic Accuracy Reference: "Assessing the Accuracy of Remotely Sensed Data: Principles an Practices", Russell G. Congalton and Kass Green, 1999, Lewis Publishers. "The purpose of quantitative accuracy assessment is the identification and measurement of map errors. Quantitative accuracy assessment involves the comparison of a site on a map against reference information for the same site. The reference data is assumed to be correct. Because comparison of every spatial point is impractical, sample comparisons are used to estimate the accuracy of maps."

For the thematic accuracy assessment of active fires what types of reference data could be used? * The best reference data would be simultaneously (or near simultaneously) satellite observations at much finer spatial resolution. Ideally this source exhibit many fires, allowing detection limits in the coarse resolution data source to be analyzed. E.g. MODIS & ASTER (simultaneous), 10 am Landsat and 10 am MODIS, 10 pm Landsat and 9 pm DMSP. * Accuracy assessment of cumulative fire detections performed using the burn scar increment is flawed due to the fact that much of the burning is “unobserved” due the the discrete nature of the active fire observations (once or twice per day). * Field data

For the thematic accuracy assessment of burn scars what types of reference data could be used? * Burn scars derived for the same time period from fine resolution satellite imagery (ETM, SPOT, ASTER, BIRD) * Field data

Pilot Study - Datasets assembled: Landsat 7 ETM of Landsat Path/Row 131/47 February 2, 2000 and March 5,2000 AVHRR fire detections from World Fire Web, Bangkok Node ( thailand.acrors.ait.ac.th/wfw/) thailand.acrors.ait.ac.th/wfw/ ATSR fire detections from World Fire Atlas ( TRMM VIRS fire detections from Louis Giglio (NASA-GSFC) DMSP-OLS fire detections from NGDC

Pilot Study – Data Analaysis: Burn scar map produced for each date. Color image generated to show new burn scar added from February 2 to March 5, burn scar present in both dates, and burn scar found in February 2 image but not in the marhc 5 image. Fire pixels overlayed on burn scar image. Preliminary Results and Conclusions: TRMM VIRS and ATSR had very few fire detects, bu associated with burn scars, but did appear to be associated with burn scar. AVHRR had a moderate number of fire detections, and were geenerally associated with burn scars. DMSP had a large number of fire detects, most of which were associated with burn scars. Fresh burn scars tend to have high DN in TM bands 5 and 7 and low DN in bans 1,2,3 and 4.

Regional and Technology Presentations CRISP experiences in active fire and burn scar cal/val (Dr. Liew) Research results and activities related to forest fires in Indonesia (Mr. Agus Hidayat, Indonesia) Fire cal/val activities and plans for the Huai-Kha-Keang Wildlife Sanctuary, Thailand (Veerachai Tanpipat and Dr. Kiyoshi Honda, Thailand) Options for on-line access to regional fire data (John Owens, University of Maryland). Satella: A tool for peer-to-peer Landsat data sharing (Mr. Bruno Margerin, USA)

Two Sets of GOFC Cal/Val Activities Planned for 2002: Thailand (January – March) Indonesia – Malaysia (May – September)

Thailand (January – March) 1.Landsat Path/Row 131/47 (Chang Mai) used in CEOS WGISS Demo and Pilot Study. Daytime Landsat acquisitions scheduled on 1/31, 2/16, ¾, and 3/20. Nighttime Landsat acquisitions on 2/8, 2/24, 3/12 and 3/ Landsat Path/Row 130/49 (Huai-Kha-Keang Wildlife Sanctuary). RFD is collecting extensive field data on active fire and burn scar timing and location. Daytime Landsat acquisitions scheduled on 2/7, 2/23, 3/11, 3/27.. Nighttime Landsat acquisitions on 2/8, 2/24, 3/12 and 3/28. Other requested data ASTER, MODIS fire and burn scar (Umd/NASA), AVHRR fire detects (AIT), DMSP fire detects (NOAA-NGDC), fire risk map (TBD). Analysis plan Active fires from Landsat and ASTER data will be used to perform an accuracy assessment of fires detected in MODIS, AVHRR, and DMSP-OLS. The two best Landsat scenes will be used to perform an accuracy assessment of a MODIS burn scar product for the same time period: Data hosting for ftp access: AIT?

Indonesia - Malaysia (May-September) 1. Riau, Sumatra 2. Selangor, Malaysia Data sets to be requested: Day and night Landsat ETM, SPOT (CRISP), ASTER, MODIS fire and burn scar (CRISP), AVHRR fire detects (multiple sources), DMSP fire detects (NOAA-NGDC), FDRS fire risk maps, LAPAN fire risk maps. Analysis plan: 1) Active fires from Landsat and ASTER data will be used to perform an accuracy assessment of fires detected in MODIS, AVHRR, and DMSP-OLS. 2) Active fires detections will be compared against fire risk maps. 3) The two best Landsat scenes will be used to perform an accuracy assessment of a MODIS burn scar product for the same time period: Data hosting for ftp access: UKM?

Outstanding Issues: 1. How can we determine the accuracy of burn scar maps to be used as reference data sources? Questions were raised in the pilot that dry grass and clearings were mapped as burn scar. 2. How do we know how many active fires are missed in reference data sets, especially daytime Landsat and ASTER? 3. Should we have a follow on workshop. If so, when and where? APAN 2003?