Active Measurement Project on KREONET & APAN 2002. 1. 24 Manhee Lee Supercomputing Center Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
INDIANAUNIVERSITYINDIANAUNIVERSITY HPIIS Performance Review October 25, 2000 Jim Williams.
Advertisements

Surveyor IP Performance Measurements Matt Zekauskas June, 1999 NLANR/I2 Joint Techs.
Technology and Administrative Coordination Issues Pacific Rim Networking Workshop Guy Almes Manoa Valley, Oahu 22 February 2002.
Ronn Ritke Tony McGregor NLANR/MNA (UCSD/SDSC) Funded by the National Science Foundation/CISE/SCI cooperative agreement no. ANI
Network Monitoring System In CSTNET Long Chun China Science & Technology Network.
Lee, Seungjun ( ) Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology August 28, 2003 APAN Measurement WG meeting eTOP End-to-end.
High Performance Research Network. Development Lab. / Supercomputing Center 1 Design of the Detection and Response System against DDoS attacks Yoonjoo.
E2E performance measurement
Ronn Ritke Tony McGregor NLANR/MNA (UCSD/SDSC) Funded by the National Science Foundation/CISE/SCI cooperative agreement no. ANI
GridPP Meeting, Cambridge, 14 Feb 2002 Paul Mealor, UCL Networking Paul Mealor.
INTRODUCTION TO COMPUTER NETWORKS Zeeshan Abbas. Introduction to Computer Networks INTRODUCTION TO COMPUTER NETWORKS.
Pushing Up Performance for Everyone Matt Mathis 7-Dec-99.
QoS Solutions Confidential 2010 NetQuality Analyzer and QPerf.
PingER Management1 Error Reporting Model for Ping End-to-End Reporting (PingER Management)
MAGGIE NIIT- SLAC On Going Projects Measurement & Analysis of Global Grid & Internet End to end performance.
1 AMTv6: Active Measurement Tool in IPv6 Network Jaehoon Jeong, ETRI
NetFlow Analyzer Drilldown to the root-QoS Product Overview.
Internet Bandwidth Measurement Techniques Muhammad Ali Dec 17 th 2005.
The StarNet Analyzer. Contact SNA Department x172
Network Measurement Bandwidth Analysis. Why measure bandwidth? Network congestion has increased tremendously. Network congestion has increased tremendously.
Network Monitoring grid network performance measurement, simulation & analysis Presented by Warren Matthews at the Performance.
31/08/05Network Traffic Management1 Network Traffic Management LtCdr Samit Mehra (05IT 6018) Guided By Dr. SK Ghosh.
Internet Traffic Management Prafull Suryawanshi Roll No - 04IT6008.
Routing Measurements Matt Zekauskas, ITF Meeting 2006-Apr-24.
Network Performance Measurement Atlas Tier 2 Meeting at BNL December Joe Metzger
Network Monitoring School of Electronics and Information Kyung Hee University. Choong Seon HONG Selected from ICAT 2003 Material of James W. K. Hong.
Performance Measurement Tools August 9 th 2011, OSG Site Admin Workshop Jason Zurawski – Internet2 Research Liaison.
Reading Report 14 Yin Chen 14 Apr 2004 Reference: Internet Service Performance: Data Analysis and Visualization, Cross-Industry Working Team, July, 2000.
Fundamental of IP network ~ ping, traceroute ~ Practice 1 Information and Communications Technology Internet Engineering.
ECE498 Introduction to Network Engineering Professor Bruce Segee Fall 2000.
Active Measurement Project for KREONET & APAN Manhee Lee KISTI/Supercomputing Center
User-Perceived Performance Measurement on the Internet Bill Tice Thomas Hildebrandt CS 6255 November 6, 2003.
Advanced Network Architecture Research Group 2001/11/149 th International Conference on Network Protocols Scalable Socket Buffer Tuning for High-Performance.
Chapter 4. After completion of this chapter, you should be able to: Explain “what is the Internet? And how we connect to the Internet using an ISP. Explain.
Internet Traffic Management. Basic Concept of Traffic Need of Traffic Management Measuring Traffic Traffic Control and Management Quality and Pricing.
1 Investigating Internet Performance USF 2003 RET Program Tahvia Shaw.
POSTECH DP&NM Lab. Internet Traffic Monitoring and Analysis: Methods and Applications (1) 2. Network Monitoring Metrics.
POSTECH DP&NM Lab. Internet Traffic Monitoring and Analysis: Methods and Applications (1) 4. Active Monitoring Techniques.
Definitions What is a network? A series of interconnected computers, linked together either via cabling or wirelessly. Often linked via a central server.
Advanced Network Architecture Research Group 2001/11/74 th Asia-Pacific Symposium on Information and Telecommunication Technologies Design and Implementation.
Measurement & Analysis of Global Grid & Internet End to end performance (MAGGIE) Network Performance Measurement.
Introduction1-1 Data Communications and Computer Networks Chapter 1 CS 3830 Lecture 1 Omar Meqdadi Department of Computer Science and Software Engineering.
1 ESnet/HENP Active Internet End-to-end Performance & ESnet/University performance Les Cottrell – SLAC Presented at the ESSC meeting Albuquerque, August.
© 2004 AARNet Pty Ltd Measurement in aarnet3 4 July 2004.
Network Measurement Tools ESnet Site Coordinators Meeting 26 April 2000 Tracie Monk, UCSD/SDSC/CAIDA -
1 Network Measurement Summary ESCC, Feb Joe Metzger ESnet Engineering Group Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory.
1 Capacity Dimensioning Based on Traffic Measurement in the Internet Kazumine Osaka University Shingo Ata (Osaka City Univ.)
1 Evaluating NGI performance Matt Mathis
Ronn Ritke Tony McGregor NLANR/MNA (UCSD/SDSC) Funded by the National Science Foundation/CISE/SCI cooperative agreement no. ANI
The Front Range GigaPop (FRGP) Jeff Custard Network Engineer for the Network Engineering and Technology Section at NCAR CHECO Presentation September.
정하경 MMLAB Fundamentals of Internet Measurement: a Tutorial Nevil Brownlee, Chris Lossley, “Fundamentals of Internet Measurement: a Tutorial,” CMG journal.
High Performance Research Network Dept. / Supercomputing Center 1 DDoS Detection and Response System NetWRAP : Running on KREONET Yoonjoo Kwon
Internet Connectivity and Performance for the HEP Community. Presented at HEPNT-HEPiX, October 6, 1999 by Warren Matthews Funded by DOE/MICS Internet End-to-end.
DataGrid WP7 Network Monitoring Robin Tasker, Daresbury Laboratory, 8 March 2001 Network Monitoring Requirements document produced,
05 October 2001 End-to-End Performance Initiative Network Measurement Matt Zekauskas, Fall 2001 Internet2 Member Meeting Network Measurement.
1 IEPM / PingER project & PPDG Les Cottrell – SLAC Presented at the NGI workshop, Berkeley, 7/21/99 Partially funded by DOE/MICS Field Work Proposal on.
1 Deploying Measurement Systems in ESnet Joint Techs, Feb Joseph Metzger ESnet Engineering Group Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory.
June 11, 2002 Abilene Route Quality Control Initiative Aaron D. Britt Guy Almes Route Optimization.
Voice Performance Measurement and related technologies
Graciela Perera Introduction Graciela Perera
Measurements on Internet2
Measurement Projects Overview
Chapter 1: Introduction
i-Path : Network Transparency Project
ExaO: Software Defined Data Distribution for Exascale Sciences
A tool for locating QoS failures on an Internet path
NLANR’s Active Measurement Program (AMP)
Advanced Networking Collaborations at SLAC
MAGGIE NIIT- SLAC On Going Projects
AMP Update and OC192 Monitor
Presentation transcript:

Active Measurement Project on KREONET & APAN Manhee Lee Supercomputing Center Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information

Objectives of this presentation  Introduction to KREONET  Network Analysis Infrastructure of KREONET  Introduction to AMP  Interesting results of AMP  Proposal to make AMP APAN

Introduction to KREONET  Korea Research Environment Open Network  one of the Korea ’ s national core networks since 1988  Providing an advanced S&T and R&D infrastructure to 300 R&D institutes and universities  KREONet2, next generation research network, NGI(Next Generation Internet) technologies through interconnection with STAR TAP  Help researchers process large capacity of data in supercomputers and provide activation of world-class collaborative application service

Role of KREONET High-Tech S&T devices (Supercomputers, CAVE,DB Servers…) High-Tech S&T applications based KREONET/KREONet2/HPCNet

Why Network Measurement?  Network Operators ’ View  Is the network reliable?  How is the network used?  When should the network be upgraded?  Network Users ’ View  How much do I use the network?  Should I invest more or not?  Does the Service Provider abide by its agreement?

Active Measurement  Method  inject measurement traffic into the network  Metrics  Round Trip Time, Packet loss, Topology  Tools  Ping, Traceroute, NIMI, Surveyor, PingER, AMP

Passive Measurement  Method  Do not inject measurement traffic but just observe traffic passively  Metrics  Link Utilization, Traffic amount, Traffic classification, Traffic pattern  Tools  Tcpdump, MRTG, Flowscan, OC3MON(CoralReef), Flowscan+

Network Analysis Infrastructure(NAI) for KREONET ATM Switch KOREN/KREONet2 Router KOREN/KREONet2 -STAR TAP KREONET Router STAR TAP FlowScan+ OC3MON AMP PingER Netflow AMP PingER Destination hosts Passive Measurement Active Measurement MRTG

AMP (Active Measurement Project)  Developed by NLANR/MOAT(SDSC)  A distributed network of over 120 active monitors  Systematically performing scheduled measurements(fping, traceroute) between each other monitor  All monitors send data to central data collector periodically located in SDSC  Raw and analysis data available by Web

What can AMP tell us?  Round trip time once a minute  Traces between monitors every 10 minute  Distribution of RTT  Packet Loss  History of changes of traces  Yearly, weekly, daily RTT graph

Deployment Map of AMP U.S

Structure of AMP Analysis machine active monitor Other target Analysis machine Cichlid 3D Web Browser active monitor

AMP Architecture System cron process fping traceroute AMPlets ping traceroute ping results traceroute results am_master am_slave ping results traceroute results apache cgi-bin trigger File read TCP connection ping results traceroute results ping results traceroute results File write File read am_slave AMPlet1 AMPlet2 AMPlet3 am_slave TCP connection File write HTTP Request Web Service AMP Server ping traceroute

How to use AMP?  First, select an interested AMP monitor  Currently, there are over 120 monitors  For example, let ’ s click on amp-arizona

 You can see brief traffic analysis from amp-arizona to all other monitors  yesterday ’ s minimum, mean, and max RTT, and packet loss rate  If you want to know specific traffic analysis, click the interested monitor  For example, let ’ s click on Harvard University How to use AMP?

 You can see yearly and weekly RTT graphs from Arizona State Univ. to Harvard Univ.  If you want to know more details about a specific day, click any date  For example, let ’ s click on 17 Dec 2001 How to use AMP?

 You can see more details of the day from Arizona to Harvard  Daily RTT : around 62ms  Hop count: 11  Jitter: around 1ms  RTT distribution: mostly 62ms  packet loss: many times, 10% How to use AMP?

 If click route, you can see all routes of the day  If there is any changes, you can see all the changes How to use AMP?

amp-korea  NLANR/MOAT(SDSC) gave a monitor to KISTI and allowed it to be joined the AMP infrastructure for international collaboration.  amp-korea is monitoring the performance from Korea to about 120 amp U.S sites via STAR TAP.  Those amp U.S sites are doing so in the same way. 

amp-korea HPC results

Routing Anomaly at

Problem Analysis in  From amp-korea to amp-ncsa  RTT anomaly detected. Why?

Problem Analysis in  First compare with other network.  From amp-korea to amp-sdsc  Nearly same results.

Problem Analysis in  Compare with other network.  From amp-korea to amp-ucsd  Totally different results  We can assume that this problem may not be KOREN/KREONet2-STAP TAP link problem but STAR TAP network problem.

Problem Analysis in  Take a look at STAR TAP network.  From amp-startap to amp-ncsa  At normal case, its RTT is about 2,3 ms  Why? Are there any routing changes?

Problem Analysis in  Take a look at its routing, but clean  Then, we can assume that the reason is not routing problem but may be congestion or router ’ s low performance

Problem Analysis in  Compare other network from STAR TAP  Then, we can know that all traffic patterns STAR TAP to vBNS, Abilene, and CA*net are same  So we can conclude that the problem of low network performance might be in STAR TAP routers or inside network.

AMP KREONET  To build an AMP infrastructure in KREONET  Last year, we set up two servers and 4 test AMP monitors at KREONET NOC  This year, we plan to install dozens of AMP monitors in KREONET network centers and major supercomputer users.  This AMP infrastructure will monitor the performance of the KREONET  URL: (under construction)  Software and Server Installing Guide :

Proposal to make AMP APAN  APAN ’ s individual networks, institutes, and universities have been doing their own measurements  But there is no APAN-wide or Asia-wide measurement infrastructure  Because of increasing collaboration within Asia, it will be very useful to actively measure network performance of APAN  AMP may be a good candidate for APAN performance measurement infrastructure

Expected benefits from AMP APAN  RTT, Packet loss, connectivity among APAN countries  Same information with U.S and other countries by peering with AMP U.S  Optional performance test for APAN  Performance testbed for future project such as End-to-end Performance Initiative in APAN

Is it difficult to join or make AMP APAN?  Absolutely NOT!!!!!!!!!!!  Making AMP APAN is very easy because it is cheap and easy to install  You just need one FreeBSD system  Please send us an any time, then we can help you install software  Easy to join, easy to collaborate, easy to get information and cheap to start!!  AMP APAN will be very useful for APAN  Why don ’ t you join us now?

Conclusions  With AMP, we can know RTT, Packet loss, traces, and throughput(optional)  AMP APAN will be very useful measurement infrastructure  Just one FreeBSD system is needed.  Small Investment, Big Benefit!!

Links and Contacts  Links  NLANR:  AMP: amp.nlanr.net  amp-korea: watt.nlanr.net//active  AMP KREONET: matthew.kreonet2.net (under construction)  Contacts  Engineer: Manhee Lee  Director: Okhwan Byeon  AMP US director: Ronn Ritke  Developer: Tony McGregor

Comments or Questions?  Thanks …