USNG Standard United States National Grid (USNG).

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

The New online Scar Map Catalogue Australian Antarctic Data Centre Australian Antarctic Division.

Advertisements

Chris Cialek & Mark Kotz Standards Committee January 11, 2011.

Chris Cialek Statewide Advisory March 31, YearStandard 1997Codes for MN Counties 1998State Agency Coordinate Interchange 1998Geographic Metadata.

MN Parcel Data Standard State Standards Process and Useful Insights DCDC 12/04/2009Mark Kotz.

Chris Cialek & Mark Kotz Standards Committee February 8, 2011.

Chris Cialek MnGeo December 3, 2010 DCDC Committee.

Agenda Introduction Advisory Circular Changes Consultant Selection Procedures Contract Format and Provisions Methods of Contracting and Allowable Costs.

Metadata Workshop Frank Roberts, Coeur d’Alene Tribe GIS Bruce Godfrey, U of I, Inside Idaho Project (Funded by FGDC)

FGDC & ISO: What is the Current Status and Considerations when Moving Forward? Viv Hutchison USGS Core Science Systems November 10, 2010 Salem, OR.

Using Mitigation Planning to Reduce Disaster Losses Karen Helbrecht and Kathleen W. Smith United States: Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) May.

Maryland Spatial Data Infrastructure and MD iMap Kaushik Dutta, IT Program Manager GIS World Conference 2011 Hyderabad, India.

Canada’s Offset System for Greenhouse Gases Dean Stinson O’Gorman New Brunswick Climate Change Hub meeting October 7, 2009.

Applying the NSDI Framework Transportation Standard for Data Exchange Facts and Fallacies.

The Address Data Content Standard: A Presentation to the FGDC Coordination Group, April 1, 2003 By: Anne O’Connor, Matthew McCready And April Avnayim.

Code Comparison Changes 2012 IBC to 2012 NPFA 101 Developed for the Florida Department of Business And Professional Regulation Building Codes and Standards.

Oregon Spatial Data Library Partnership Metadata Training OU Knight Library Eugene, Oregon December 3, 2009 Kuuipo Walsh Institute for Natural Resources.

David A. Swanson University of California Riverside The American Community Survey: Some Considerations Regarding its use as a Substitute.

1 ISO – Metadata Next Generation International consensus being built on structured metadata within a broader Geomatics Standard under ISO Technical.

Grants & Acquisition Data Elements An Exercise in Standardization Presentation at the DATA Act Town Hall September 2014.

October 23, Expanding the Serials Family Continuing resources in the library catalogue.

Introduction to Geospatial Metadata – ISO 191** Metadata National Coastal Data Development Center A division of the National Oceanographic Data Center.

Using Digital Flood Hazard Data in the National Flood Insurance Program FGDC Coordination Working Group Scott McAfee Paul Rooney April 5 th, 2005.

Geography Update U. S. Census Bureau SDC/BIDC Midyear Meeting New York City March 27, 2007.

Urban Growth and Structure Kreg Walvoord And Hillary Campbell.

State and local governments State governments State governments in the United States is generally structured in accordance with the.

September 18-19, 2006 – Denver, Colorado Sponsored by the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development Using Geographic Information Systems (GIS) as.

U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey NWIS, STORET, and XML National Water Quality Monitoring Council August 20, 2003.

Structural Collapse Awareness U.S. National Grid.

1 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS REDISTRICTING 2011.

GIS 1 GIS Lecture 4 Geodatabases. GIS 2 Outline Administrative Data Example Data Tables Data Joins Common Datasets Spatial Joins ArcCatalog Geodatabases.

R&R Enhancements Brett Grumbine

Handshake across the border… The North American Profile Sharon Shin Federal Geographic Data Committee.

U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey NWIS, STORET, and XML Advisory Committee on Water Information September 10, 2003 Kenneth J. Lanfear,

Independence and the Federal Statistical System Robert M. Groves Georgetown University.

1 Dan Widner VGIN Coordinator VGIN Advisory Board January 9,

12/04/07FGDC Vegetation Subcommittee Briefing Federal Geographic Data Committee Vegetation Subcommittee Briefing for the FGDC Coordination Group December.

Mid-Course Adjustment Overview. Flood Map Modernization The Question “The committee understands that the 5-year, $1,000,000,000 program will not update.

1 American Community Survey Categories of Frequently Asked Questions –Purpose –Scope –Content –Operations.

Amherst County Comprehensive Plan (Update)

Transitioning from FGDC CSDGM Metadata to ISO 191** Metadata

NSDI Implementing The National Spatial Data Infrastructure Its Role in Indian Country Bonnie Gallahan American Indian Liaison Federal Geographic Data Committee.

Introduction to Geospatial Metadata – FGDC CSDGM National Coastal Data Development Center A division of the National Oceanographic Data Center Please .

Dallas Animal Services GOVERNANCE, FRIENDS POLICY & WORK POLICIES QUALITY OF LIFE & ENVIRONMENT COMMITTEE OCTOBER 26, 2015.

U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey The National Map West Virginia Geographic Names in May 12, 2004.

FGDC Steering Committee December 16, 2008 FGDC Business Update Ken Shaffer FGDC Deputy Staff Director

Proposed Policy on Endorsement or Recommendation of External Standards Presented by Julie Binder Maitra FGDC Standards Coordinator To FGDC Coordination.

ESRI Education User Conference – July 6-8, 2001 ESRI Education User Conference – July 6-8, 2001 Introducing ArcCatalog: Tools for Metadata and Data Management.

Fifty States Initiative NSDI Future Directions Fifty States Initiative June 23, 2005 Bill Burgess Washington Liaison National States Geographic Information.

Technology Services – National Institute of Standards and Technology Implementing the National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act in the Federal Government.

A look to the past for the future- The North American Profile Sharon Shin Metadata Coordinator Federal Geographic Data Committee.

Community Wildfire Protection Planning: HFRA and Beyond.

Public Libraries Survey Data File Overview. 2 What We’ll Talk About PLS: Public Library Survey State level data Public library data (Administrative Entities)

Standardized Metadata Standardized Metadata The FGDC Content Standard For Digital Geospatial Metadata The FGDC Content Standard For Digital Geospatial.

The division of lands by legislative regulations, into areas or zones, which specify allowable land uses and size restrictions.

Subcommittee For Cultural and Demographic Data Activities Update Randy Fusaro Chair, SCDD9 February, 2010.

Sharing Personal Information Programme Wales Accord on the Sharing of Personal Information (WASPI) for organisations involved in the protection, safety,

Geog. 377: Introduction to GIS - Lecture 16 Overheads 1 5. Metadata 6. Summary of Database Creation 7. Data Standards 8. NSDI Topics Lecture 16: GIS Database.

Understanding the Value and Importance of Proper Data Documentation 5-1 At the conclusion of this module the participant will be able to List the seven.

FGDC Address Data Standard Scope, Status, and Structure  United States Street, Landmark, and Postal Address Data Standard"  Scope: Street, landmark,

OFFICIAL PLAN 5-YEAR REVIEW & TAKE ACTION FOR SUSTAINABLE HURON.

Geospatial metadata Prof. Wenwen Li School of Geographical Sciences and Urban Planning 5644 Coor Hall

Florida Codes and Standards

Pat Nestor MSCSI MRICS Head of Building Control Dublin City Council

THURSDAY TARGETED TRAINING: Reporting Regulations and Requirements

Implementing the Surface Transportation Domain

Industry IT Standards in DoD

NORTH CAROLINA state and local government METADATA PROFILE

Response to Comments Received on the a PAR and CSD

Updates about Work Track 5 Geographic Names at the Top-Level

Creating Geospatial Metadata for the Long-term

Presentation transcript:

USNG Standard United States National Grid (USNG)

Purpose ► Adopt existing FGDC USNG Standard  To encourage the use of the USNG on all appropriate map products in the state  To specify how the USNG should be presented on maps when it is used

The Standard ► What Randy said…

Compliance ► When Minnesota state agencies present the USNG on printed map products that claim conformance to this standard, they shall provide a means for people to accurately locate a USNG coordinate on the map and for people to extract, for any point on the map, an accurate USNG coordinate. This will usually mean that the USNG will be printed on the map according to the guidance in FGDC- STD ► County, municipal and other local governments and private organizations are encouraged to use this standard when producing similar map products.

Public Review ► Five responders ► Summary  Two letters of support from public safety officials  Title suggest a style guide (we simplified the title)  Don’t change federal standard  Implementation suggestions (beyond scope) ► No dissenting views ► Added paragraph describing practical advantages

The Standards Committee Asks for your Approval United States National Grid (USNG)

CTU Code Standard Codes for the Identification of Cities, Townships & Unorganized Territories (CTUs) in Minnesota

Purpose ► Single, common coding scheme to identify  Cities  Townships  Unorganized Territories (Census Bureau defined)

The Standard ► Official federal government code  USGS  Census Bureau  ANSI ► Geographic Names Information System (GNIS) ► Replaces retired FIPS 55

The Standard ► Six to eight digit code ► Unique nationally ► GNIS = integers (St. Cloud = ) ► Census = text (St. Cloud = ) ► Both formats are considered to be in compliance

GNIS Feature ID Text Format GNIS Feature ID Integer Format City, Township or Unorganized Territory Name CTU Type Forest LakeCity Forest Lake Township (historical) Township ForestonCity Forest Prairie TownshipTownship Forestville TownshipTownship Fort RipleyCity Fort Ripley TownshipTownship Fort Snelling (unorganized territory) Unorganized Territory FosstonCity Fossum TownshipTownship

Compliance ► Use of this standard is mandatory when both of the following two conditions exist:  a state agency is transferring data to another entity, AND  no other previously-agreed-to coding scheme for CTUs has been designated.

Compliance ► Transfer standard = no mandate for internal storage. ► Use by others is strongly encouraged, but voluntary.

Resolved Problems ► 7 years later we are really ready ► Update frequency of FIPS ► GNIS updated locally (LMIC & Met. Council) ► Coalition of state agencies finding and validating changes to CTUs ► Met. Council and LMIC databases online

Public Review ► Four responders ► Summary  Why two formats?  Specify field names, types, widths?  Historic data?  Improve clarity of text & examples ► No dissenting views ► Clarified language in standard document

The Standards Committee Asks for your Approval Codes for the Identification of Cities, Townships & Unorganized Territories (CTUs) in Minnesota