Peter Athron David Miller In collaboration with Fine Tuning.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
SUSY Higgs with Non-perturbative effects Yukihiro Mimura (National Taiwan University) Based on PLB718 (2013) Collaboration with N. Haba, K. Kaneta,
Advertisements

Fine Tuning Standard Model and Beyond Peter Athron Dr David Miller In collaboration with.
THE FINE-TUNING PROBLEM IN SUSY AND LITTLE HIGGS
Kiwoon Choi PQ-invariant multi-singlet NMSSM
Lecture 8 TexPoint fonts used in EMF. Read the TexPoint manual before you delete this box.: AAAAA A A A A A A A.
Peter Athron David Miller In collaboration with Measuring Fine Tuning.
Peter Athron David Miller In collaboration with Fine Tuning In Supersymmetric Models.
Peter Athron David Miller In collaboration with Quantifying Fine Tuning (arXiv: , Phys.Rev.D76:075010, arXiv: [hep-ph], AIP Conf.Proc.903: ,2007.
Peter Athron David Miller In collaboration with Quantifying Fine Tuning (arXiv: )
Can we experimentally test seesaw and leptogenesis? Hitoshi Murayama (IPMU Tokyo & Berkeley) Melbourne Neutrino WS, Jun 4, 2008 With Matt Buckley.
Effective Operators in the MSSM Guillaume Drieu La Rochelle, LAPTH.
KET-BSM meeting Aachen, April 2006 View from the Schauinsland in Freiburg a couple of weeks ago View from the Schauinsland in Freiburg a couple of weeks.
Black Holes and Particle Species Gia Dvali CERN Theory Division and New York University.
Joe Sato (Saitama University ) Collaborators Satoru Kaneko,Takashi Shimomura, Masato Yamanaka,Oscar Vives Physical review D 78, (2008) arXiv:1002.????
Higgs Boson Mass In Gauge-Mediated Supersymmetry Breaking Abdelhamid Albaid In collaboration with Prof. K. S. Babu Spring 2012 Physics Seminar Wichita.
Comprehensive Analysis on the Light Higgs Scenario in the Framework of Non-Universal Higgs Mass Model M. Asano (Tohoku Univ.) M. Senami (Kyoto Univ.) H.
The Top Quark and Precision Measurements S. Dawson BNL April, 2005 M.-C. Chen, S. Dawson, and T. Krupovnikas, in preparation M.-C. Chen and S. Dawson,
Nailing Electroweak Physics (aka Higgs Hunting) with the Next Linear Collider Bob Wilson High Energy Physics Group CSU Physics Research Evening November.
Hunting for New Particles & Forces. Example: Two particles produced Animations: QPJava-22.html u u d u d u.
Looking for SUSY Dark Matter with ATLAS The Story of a Lonely Lepton Nadia Davidson Supervisor: Elisabetta Barberio.
6/28/2015S. Stark1 Scan of the supersymmetric parameter space within mSUGRA Luisa Sabrina Stark Schneebeli, IPP ETH Zurich.
.. Particle Physics at a Crossroads Meenakshi Narain Brown University.
The Higgs boson and its mass. LHC : Higgs particle observation CMS 2011/12 ATLAS 2011/12.
CERN, 21 February 2001 Egil Lillestøl, CERN & Univ. of Bergen Recorded at
SUSY Dark Matter Collider – direct – indirect search bridge. Sabine Kraml Laboratoire de Physique Subatomique et de Cosmologie Grenoble, France ● 43. Rencontres.
 Collaboration with Prof. Sin Kyu Kang and Prof. We-Fu Chang arXiv: [hep-ph] submitted to JHEP.
The Electroweak Phase Transition within natural GNMSSM models Presenter: Christopher Harman Supervisor: Dr. Stephan Huber University of Sussex Image courtesy.
Geneva, October 2010 Dark Energy at Colliders? Philippe Brax, IPhT Saclay Published papers :
A.F.Kord Sabzevar Tarbiat Moallem University (Iran) September 2011.
Associated production of the Higgs boson and a single top quark in the littlest Higgs model at Large Hadron Collier Shuo Yang.
What do we know about the Standard Model? Sally Dawson Lecture 2 SLAC Summer Institute.
Center for theoretical Physics at BUE
Low scale gravity mediation in warped extra dimensions and collider phenomenology on sector hidden sector LCWS 06, March 10, Bangalore Nobuchika.
Name, Location/Meeting,Date LHC Big Questions. Name, Location/Meeting,Date String Theory! p+p+ p+p+
Wednesday, Apr. 23, 2003PHYS 5326, Spring 2003 Jae Yu 1 PHYS 5326 – Lecture #24 Wednesday, Apr. 23, 2003 Dr. Jae Yu Issues with SM picture Introduction.
Supersymmetric Models with 125 GeV Higgs Masahiro Yamaguchi (Tohoku University) 17 th Lomonosov Conference on Elementary Particle Physics Moscow State.
Oct, 2003WIN'03, Katri Huitu1 Probing the scalar sector with ZZH outline: Introduction Models: higher representations radion (nonSUSY/SUSY) Conclusions.
Neutralino Dark Matter in Light Higgs Boson Scenario (LHS) The scenario is consistent with  particle physics experiments Particle mass b → sγ Bs →μ +
DARK MATTER CANDIDATES Cody Carr, Minh Nguyen December 9 th, 2014.
Dark matter in split extended supersymmetry in collaboration with M. Quiros (IFAE) and P. Ullio (SISSA/ISAS) Alessio Provenza (SISSA/ISAS) Newport Beach.
1 Supersymmetry Yasuhiro Okada (KEK) January 14, 2005, at KEK.
1 THEORETICAL PREDICTIONS FOR COLLIDER SEARCHES “Big” and “little” hierarchy problems Supersymmetry Little Higgs Extra dimensions G.F. Giudice CERN.
Low scale supergravity mediation in brane world scenario and hidden sector phenomenology Phys.Rev.D74:055005,2006 ( arXiv: hep-ph/ ) ACFA07 in Beijing:
Nonlinear Supersymmetric Higgs bosons Sun Kun Oh (Konkuk Univ) APCTP 2010 LHC Physics Workshop at Korea 10-12, August, 2010, Konkuk University.
Compelling Scientific Questions The International Linear Collider will answer key questions about matter, energy, space and time We sample some of these.
INVASIONS IN PARTICLE PHYSICS Compton Lectures Autumn 2001 Lecture 8 Dec
The mass of the Higgs boson and the great desert to the Planck scale.
WHAT BREAKS ELECTROWEAK SYMMETRY ?. We shall find the answer in experiments at the LHC? Most likely it will tells us a lot about the physics beyond the.
22 December 2006Masters Defense Texas A&M University1 Adam Aurisano In Collaboration with Richard Arnowitt, Bhaskar Dutta, Teruki Kamon, Nikolay Kolev*,
Electroweak Symmetry Breaking without Higgs Bosons in ATLAS Ryuichi Takashima Kyoto University of Education For the ATLAS Collaboration.
Particle Physics: Status and Perspectives Part 9: Energy Frontier and Open Questions Manfred Jeitler SS 2015.
1 Prospect after discoveries of Higgs/SUSY Yasuhiro Okada (KEK) “Discoveries of Higgs and Supersymmetry to Pioneer Particle Physics in the 21 st Century”
Latest New Phenomena Results from Alexey Popov (IHEP, Protvino) For the DO Collaboration ITEP, Moscow
Compelling Scientific Questions The International Linear Collider will answer key questions about matter, energy, space and time We now sample some of.
Supersymmetry Basics: Lecture II J. HewettSSI 2012 J. Hewett.
Jonathan Nistor Purdue University 1.  A symmetry relating elementary particles together in pairs whose respective spins differ by half a unit  superpartners.
STAU CLIC Ilkay Turk Cakir Turkish Atomic Energy Authority with co-authors O. Cakir, J. Ellis, Z. Kirca with the contributions from A. De Roeck,
The study of q q production at LHC in the l l channel and sensitivity to other models Michihisa Takeuchi ~~ LL ± ± (hep-ph/ ) Kyoto Univ. (YITP),
Phenomenology of NMSSM in TeV scale mirage mediation
1-lepton + Multijets Analysis bRPV interpretation
Classically conformal B-L extended Standard Model
Fine Tuning In Supersymmetric Models
Measuring Fine Tuning Peter Athron In collaboration with David Miller.
The MESSM The Minimal Exceptional Supersymmetric Standard Model
Supersymmetry, naturalness and environmental selection
非最小超对称唯象研究: 工作汇报 杨 金 民 中科院 理论物理所 南开大学.
The Mysteries of Particle Physics and how we are trying to solve them
Shuo Yang Associated production of the Higgs boson and
Prospect after discoveries of Higgs/SUSY
Presentation transcript:

Peter Athron David Miller In collaboration with Fine Tuning

 Expect New Physics at Planck Energy (Mass) Hierarchy Problem  Higgs mass sensitive to this scale  Supersymmetry (SUSY) removes quadratic dependence Enormous Fine tuning! SUSY?  Standard Model (SM) of particle physics  Eliminates fine tuning  Beautiful description of Electromagnetic, Weak and Strong forces  Neglects gravitation, very weak at low energies (large distances)

Little Hierarchy Problem  Constrained Minimal Supersymmetric Standard Model (CMSSM)  Z boson mass predicted from CMSSM parameters Fine tuning? Only low mass SUSY avoids fine tuning SM masses sensitive to SUSY masses

R. Barbieri & G.F. Giudice, (1988) Define Tuning is fine tuned % change in from 1% change in Observable Parameter Traditional Measure

Limitations of the Traditional Measure  Considers each parameter separately  Fine tuning is about cancellations between parameters.  A good fine tuning measure considers all parameters together.  Considers only one observable  Theories may contain tunings in several observables Global Sensitivity G. W. Anderson & D.J Castano (1995) Consider: All points are tuned?All points are special, atypical scenarios?  True tuning must be quantified with a normalised measure No unnatural cancellation!

parameter space volume restricted by, Parameter space point, Unnormalised Tuning: New Measure `` Compare dimensionless variations in ALL parameters With dimensionless variations in ALL observables

parameter space volume restricted by, Parameter space point, Unnormalised Tuning: New Measure Tuning: mean value `` Compare dimensionless variations in ALL parameters With dimensionless variations in ALL observables Remove Global Sensitivity

Probability of random point lying in : Probability of a point lying in a “typical” volume: New Measure Define: We measure the relative improbability! volume with physical scenarios qualitatively “similar” to point P

Standard Model Obtain over whole parameter range:

Large numbers of observables and parameters Numerical Approach  Choose a point P in the parameter space.  Take random fluctuations about this point.  Count how many points are in and  Apply tuning measure Fine Tuning in the CMSSM

Tuning

Tuning in

“Natural” Point 1

“Natural” Point 2

If we normalise with NP1If we normalise with NP2 Tunings for the points shown in plots are:

 Fine Tuning in the SM  SUSY  CMSSM appears fine tuned in  Little Hierarchy Problem  New measure considers how:  all observables restrict  space formed by all parameters  in comparison to “typical” (global sensitivity)  CMSSM may not be fine tuned Conclusions

Tuning in

Tuning

m 1/2 (GeV)

For our study of tuning in the CMSSM we chose a grid of points: Plots showing tuning variation in m 1/2 were obtained by taking the average tuning for each m 1/2 over all m 0. Plots showing tuning variation in m 0 were obtained by taking the average tuning for each m 0 over all m 1/2. Technical Aside To reduce statistical errors:

For example... MSUGRA benchmark point SPS1a: ALL

Supersymmetry  The only possible extension to space-time  Unifies gauge couplings  Provides Dark Matter candidates  Leptogenesis in the early universe  Elegant solution to the Hierarchy Problem!  Essential ingredient for M-Theory

Beyond the Standard Model Physics  Technicolor  Large Extra Dimensions  Little Higgs  Twin Higgs  Supersymmetry

Superymmetry Models with extended Higgs sectors  NMSSM  nMSSM  ESSM Supersymmetry Plus  Little Higgs  Twin Higgs Alternative solutions to the Hierarchy Problem  Technicolor  Large Extra Dimensions  Little Higgs  Twin Higgs Need a reliable, quantitative measure of fine tuning to judge the success of these approaches. Solutions?

Global Sensitivity Consider: responds sensitively to All values of appear equally tuned! throughout the whole parameter space (globally) All are atypical? True tuning must be quantified with a normalised measure G. W. Anderson & D.J Castano (1995) Only relative sensitivity between different points indicates atypical values of