Drift models and polar field for cosmic rays propagation Stefano Della Torre 11th ICATPP, Como 5-9 october 2009.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 Climate Change some astrophysical perspectives.
Advertisements

Douglas Biesecker NOAA/Space Environment Center Chair of Solar Cycle 24 Prediction Panel.
(Space Climate School, Saariselka, March, 2009)
The Solar Polar Field Reversal Observed By SOHO/MDI Yang Liu, J. Todd Hoeksema, X-P Zhao – Stanford University
The Solar Wind and Heliosphere
Uncovering the Global Slow Solar Wind Liang Zhao and Thomas H. Zurbuchen Department of Atmospheric, Oceanic and Space Sciences, University of Michigan.
S. Della Torre 1,2, P. Bobik 5, G. Boella 1,3, M.J. Boschini 1,4, C. Consolandi 1, M. Gervasi 1,3, D. Grandi 1, K. Kudela 5, F. Noventa 1,3, S. Pensotti.
JUSTIN C KASPER SMITHSONIAN ASTROPHYSICAL OBSERVATORY He/H variation in the solar wind over the solar cycle NESSC (CfA) 27 October 2008.
A Whole-Heliosphere View of the Solar Wind Hale Lecture American Astronomical Society 5/24/2010 Marcia Neugebauer University of Arizona.
Study of Galactic Cosmic Rays at high cut- off rigidity during solar cycle 23 Partha Chowdhury 1 and B.N. Dwivedi 2 1 Department of Physics, University.
A New Look at the Heliosphere and Solar Modulation
Galactic and Anomalous Cosmic Rays in the Heliosheath József Kόta University of Arizona Tucson, AZ , USA Thanks to : J.R. Jokipii, J. Giacalone.
Las Cruces CRS April 21-22, 2011 F.B. McDonald 1, A.C. Cummings 2, E.C. Stone 2, B.C. Heikkila 3, N. Lal 3, W.R. Webber 4 1 Institute for Physical Science.
Bastille Day 2000 Solar Energetic Particles Event: Ulysses observations at high heliographic latitudes M. Zhang Florida Institute of Technology.
HMI – Synoptic Data Sets HMI Team Meeting Jan. 26, 2005 Stanford, CA.
1 Synoptic Maps of Magnetic Field from MDI Magnetograms: polar field interpolation. Y. Liu, J. T. Hoeksema, X. P. Zhao, R. M. Larson – Stanford University.
Absence of a Long Lasting Southward Displacement of the HCS Near the Minimum Preceding Solar Cycle 24 X. P. Zhao, J. T. Hoeksema and P. H. Scherrer Stanford.
Thomas Zurbuchen University of Michigan The Structure and Sources of the Solar Wind during the Solar Cycle.
1 Heliospheric Magnetic Field Leif Svalgaard Stanford University, CA
The Sun and the Heliosphere: some basic concepts…
Katya Georgieva Boian Kirov Simeon Asenovski
Solar Modulation: A Theoretical Perspective Modeling of cosmic ray charge-sign dependence in the heliosphere Marius Potgieter Unit for Space Physics North-West.
Recurrent Cosmic Ray Variations in József Kόta & J.R. Jokipii University of Arizona, LPL Tucson, AZ , USA 23 rd ECRS, Moscow, Russia,
Cynthia López-Portela and Xochitl Blanco-Cano Instituto de Geofísica, UNAM A brief introduction: Magnetic Clouds’ characteristics The study: Event types.
The Solar Wind.
Introduction to Space Weather Jie Zhang CSI 662 / PHYS 660 Spring, 2012 Copyright © The Heliosphere: The Solar Wind March 01, 2012.
Ed Stone Symposium February 11, 2006 Voyager Observations of Galactic and Anomalous Cosmic Rays in the Heliosheath F.B. M c Donald 1, W.R. Webber 2, E.C.
02-06 Dec 2013CHPC-Cape town1 A study of the global heliospheric modulation of galactic Carbon M. D. Ngobeni, M. S. Potgieter Centre for Space Research,
Recent ‘Unprecedented’ Weak Solar Wind: A solar glitch or a harbinger for the next Maunder minimum? Conveners: Joan Feynman* and Janet Luhmann When: Wednesday.
Why Solar Electron Beams Stop Producing Type III Radio Emission Hamish Reid, Eduard Kontar SUPA School of Physics and Astronomy University of Glasgow,
THE EARTH’S MAGNETIC FIELD Note; The geographical north pole acts like the south pole of a magnet.
P. Bobik, G. Boella, M. J. Boschini, M. Gervasi, D. Grandi, K. Kudela, S. Pensotti, P.G. Rancoita 2D Stochastic Monte Carlo to evaluate the modulation.
27-Day Variations Of The Galactic Cosmic Ray Intensity And Anisotropy In Different Solar Magnetic Cycles ( ) M.V. Alania, A. Gil, K. Iskra, R.
Periodicities in the Solar Wind Tenative CSI 763 Research Project Christina Henderson.
ASEN5335- Aerospace Environments -- The Solar Wind 1 THE INTERPLANETARY MEDIUM AND IMF Consequently, the "spiral" pattern formed by particles spewing.
Modeling the Sun’s global magnetic field Karel Schrijver SHINE 2006 "[The] most important attitude is to find which forgotten physical processes are responsible.
The Evolution of the Heliospheric Current Sheet and its Effects on Cosmic Ray Modulation József Kóta and J.R. Jokipii The University of Arizona Tucson,
Melissa, Connie, Melissa, Jieyi, Ambereen, Dorothy King Edward VI High school for Girls.
39 th COSPAR Scientific Assembly Mysore, INDIA July 14-22, 2012 F.B. McDonald 1, W.R. Webber 2, E.C. Stone 3, A.C. Cummings 3, B.C. Heikkila 4, N. Lal.
Centenary Symposium 2012 University of Denver June 26-28, 2012 F.B. McDonald 1, W.R. Webber 2, E.C. Stone 3, A.C. Cummings 3, B.C. Heikkila 4, N. Lal 4.
Daejeon, UN/ESA/NASA/JAXA Workshop, Sept 2009 On the Connection of Cosmic Ray Long- Term Variation with Sunspot Numbers: Convection-Diffusion and.
Primary Cosmic Ray Spectra in the Planet Atmospheres Marusja Buchvarova 1, Peter Velinov 2 (1) Space Research Institute – Bulgarian Academy of Sciences,
Three dimensional tensor of cosmic rays for various interplanetary magnetic field structure Michael V. Alania Siedlce University, Poland.
Cosmic Rays at 1 AU Over the Deep Solar Minimum of Cycle 23/24 Cosmic Ray Transport in the Helioshealth: The View from Voyager AGU Fall Meeting San Francisco,
16-20 Oct 2005SSPVSE Conference1 Galactic Cosmic Ray Composition, Spectra, and Time Variations Mark E. Wiedenbeck Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California.
The ICME’s magnetic field and the role on the galactic cosmic ray modulation for the solar cycle 23 Evangelos Paouris and Helen Mavromichalaki National.
Introduction to Space Weather Jie Zhang CSI 662 / PHYS 660 Fall, 2009 Copyright © The Heliosphere: Solar Wind Oct. 08, 2009.
By: Paul Lim and Brittany Griner.  Reliable, radiation resistance, and spin stabilized  Approximately 370kg (814 pounds)  Box-like main structure 1.65.
Solar Wind Helium Abundance and the Minimum Speed of the Solar Wind
Measurements of the Orientation of the Heliospheric Magnetic Field Neil Murphy Jet Propulsion Laboratory.
Cosmic Ray Positron Fraction Observations during the A- Magnetic Solar Minimum John Clem and Paul Evenson* * Presenter AESOP Departing Esrange, Sweden.
GCRs & ACRs Intensities during the last Solar Minimum: Similarities and Differences J. Kόta & J.R. Jokipii University of Arizona, LPL 32 nd ICRC Beijing,
Breakout Session F: Anomalous and Galactic Cosmic Rays Rick Leske and Maher Dayeh 5 presentations…and lots of discussion.
The heliospheric magnetic flux density through several solar cycles Géza Erdős (1) and André Balogh (2) (1) MTA Wigner FK RMI, Budapest, Hungary (2) Imperial.
1 Voyager Observations of Anomalous Cosmic Rays A. C. Cummings and E. C. Stone, Caltech F. B. McDonald, University of Maryland B. Heikkila and N. Lal,
Drift Effects if the 22-year Solar Cycle of Cosmic Ray Modulation
July 17, 2017 ICRC2017 Charge-sign dependence in the solar modulation during the solar cycle 23 Shoko Miyake (NIT, Ibaraki Col., Japan.) Shohei Yanagita.
Y. C.-M. Liu, M. Opher, O. Cohen P.C.Liewer and T.I.Gombosi
Solar modulation of cosmic ray positrons in a quiet heliosphere
35th International Cosmic Ray Conference
CHARGE SIGN DEPENDENCE OF LONG TERM COSMIC RAY MODULATION
Solar Modulation Davide Grandi AMS Group-INFN Milano-Bicocca.
Solar cycle variation of the heliospheric magnetic field
Galactic Cosmic Ray Propagation in the 3D Heliosphere
MDI Global Field & Solar Wind
M. D Ngobeni*,1, M. S. Potgieter1
ESS 261 Topics in magnetospheric physics Space weather forecast models ____ the prediction of solar wind speed April 23, 2008.
On the relative role of drift and convection-diffusion effects in the long-term CR variations on the basis of NM and satellite data Lev Dorman (1, 2) Israel.
Mariette Hitge, Adri Burger
Presentation transcript:

Drift models and polar field for cosmic rays propagation Stefano Della Torre 11th ICATPP, Como 5-9 october 2009

Outline Cosmic Rays propagation in different period/polarity Drift Models Solar Wind Heliosphere Conclusions

Modulation A>0 A<0 Tilt Angle from Wilcox Obs. Shikaze et al. 2007

Boella et. Al Modulation There is a strong dependence of the modulation from the polarity of the field Variation between two consecutive minimum (it change the Field polarity) Rate of flux in two consecutive period with similar solar activity Boella et. Al. 2001

The Cosmic Rays propagation inside the heliosphere is described by the Parker equation U Cosmic Rays number density per unit interval of kinetic energy Cosmic Rays propagation Diffusion Small Scale Magnetic Field irregoularity Convection Presence of the solar wind moving out from the Sun Energetic Loss Due to adiabatic expansion of the solar wind Drift Large Scale structure of magnetic field (e.g. gradients)

Along the equatorial region, where the magnetic field invert his polarity, we have Neutral Sheet Drift Neutral Sheet Sheet with |B|=0 -> charge dependent -> Magnetic polarity dependent Magnetic Drift Drift This Effect is greater during solar minimum periods, when the Heliosferic Magnetic Field (HMF) have a regular topology, and vanishing during Solar Maxima due to chaotic behavior of the field line Potgieter et al. 1985

Neutral Sheet Coronal Magnetic Field lines at Solar minimum Activity The combination with the Solar Rotation cause a tilt of the Neutral Sheet; causing the so called “ballerina skirt” effect around the Eclittica Plane The amplitute of this oscillation is called Tilt Angle (  ) And it depends of Solar activity: e.g. minimum activity ->   10°, maximum activity ->  >75°

Neutral Sheet Drift Potgieter & Moraal (1985) Burger & Potgieter (1989) Wavy Neutral Sheet - Hattingh & Burger (1995) Ordinary Drift NS drift Transition Function that emulate the effect of a wavy neutral sheet 2D Approximation erer N S

during solar Minimum AMS-01 (1998) CAPRICE (1994) Tilt Angle (  ) < 30°

Solar Wind High Solar Activity Low Solar Activity Ulysses measurement

Agreement with data

Modified Heliospheric Magnetic Field A We use a Simple Parker’s Field With a Polar modification as in Jokipii & Kòta 1989

Polar Cosmic Rays access reduced Agreement with data

A solar Magnetic perturbation generated TODAY on the Sun, will get the Heliopause in Dynamic view of HMF month We divide the heliosphere in 14 region, with previous solar condition each AMS-01 view of heliosphere A Cosmic Particle in average will remain  1 month into heliosphere

Agreement with data

In all simulation presented we use PM model 30° A>0 A<0 BESS High Solar Activity AMS-01 Low Solar Activity IMAX Middle solar activity CAPRICE Low Solar Activity Experimental Data Nymmik  Empirical Model.  One parameter model: smoothed sunspot number in the months previous the oservations data.  For All Nuclei  Actually the ISO standard for space qualification.

Increase of precision compared with Nymmik model Our Average variance = 5% Nymmik Average variance = 16%

Conclusions We develop a 2D - MonteCarlo Stochastic program that reproduces Cosmic rays data in different solar periods using a dynamic view of HMF. We use a modified Magnetic field that reduces the drift contribute in polar regions. We find that during solar minimum both PM and WNS model reproduce data with confidence; increasing solar activity only PM model does that. The Solar wind latitudinal dependency is relevant in order to reproduce data

Thanks for Yours Attention

The Cosmic Rays propagation inside the heliosphere is described by the Parker equation U Cosmic Rays number density per unit interval of kinetic energy Diffusive term Advective term (drift + Convection) Stochastic Approach The 2D - Parker equation is equivalent to a set of Stochastic Differential Equation

Proton created at 100 AU following the Local Interstellar Spectrum random walk propagation inside the heliosphere until they reach the lower energy admitted or they are scattered outside the heliosphere The passage trough the region of interest (e.g. 1 AU) is registered Stochastic Approach