Utilizing an Industrial Advisory Board in the Accreditation Process Dr. Raymond Greenlaw Department of Computer Science Armstrong Atlantic State University.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Successful strategies for improving outcomes through quality assessment and evaluation of programs Leadership Conference Winston Salem, NC June
Advertisements

IMPLEMENTING EABS MODERNIZATION Patrick J. Sweeney School Administration Consultant Educational Approval Board November 15, 2007.
Promotion and Tenure Workshop for MUSM Faculty A Faculty Development Opportunity Mercer University School of Medicine 2012.
Bernie Engel, Professor and Head Agricultural and Biological Engineering 1 March 25, 2014.
Cedarville University Accreditation Self-Study Plan Presented by Dr. Thomas Mach.
Accreditation in Applied Science Computing, Engineering, and Technology Dr. Raymond Greenlaw Department of Computer Science Armstrong Atlantic State University.
An Overview of Some Issues Relating To the Accreditation Process Dr. Raymond Greenlaw Department of Computer Science Armstrong Atlantic State University.
So what can I expect when I serve on a NEASC/CPSS Visiting Committee? A Primer for New Visiting Committee Members.
Individual Education Program. IEP Process2 IDEA has Five Major Components  1.Evaluation and Identification  2. IEP and Related Services  3.Placement.
Using the New CAS Standards to Assess Your Transfer Student Programs and Services Janet Marling, Executive Director National Institute for the Study of.
Ron Smelser Professor and Associate Dean Dean’s Office.
Service to the University, Discipline and Community Academic Promotions Briefing Session Chair, Academic Board Peter McCallum.
PRESENTED BY: Michael T. Flannery, M.D., F.A.C.P. Professor of Medicine GME Internal Review Director.
Gateway Engineering Education Coalition Engineering Accreditation and ABET EC2000 Part II OSU Outcomes Assessment for ABET EC200.
© Copyright CSAB 2013 Future Directions for the Computing Accreditation Criteria Report from CAC and CSAB Joint Criteria Committee Gayle Yaverbaum Barbara.
Promotion & Tenure Workshop The Dossier. What the Committee Looks for: I nnovation I nitiative I mpact.
1 Why is the Core important? To set high expectations – for all students – for educators To attend to the learning needs of students To break through the.
Orientation for Academic Program Reviews
Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology ABET 1Advisory committee of
October Priority 8 Review Team 8: Planning Subcommittee M. DesVignes, D. Kinney, J. Moore, M. Siegel, R. Tillberg Collect and use data systematically.
First Choice Graduate Programs Initiating a First Choice Program Consultation and Review.
Computer Science Department Program Improvement Plan December 3, 2004.
Computer Science Accreditation/Assessment Issues Bolek Mikolajczak UMass Dartmouth, CIS Department Chair IT Forum, Framingham, MA January 10, 2006.
Mohammad Alshayeb 19 May Agenda Update on Computer Science Program Assessment/Accreditation Work Update on Software Engineering Program Assessment/Accreditation.
Industry Advisory Board Department of Computer Science.
Board Recruitment. Why recruit? Effective conservation districts have outstanding and qualified board members. A diverse district board will be better.
Orientation for Academic Program Reviews
 The Middle States Commission on Higher Education is a voluntary, non-governmental, membership association that is dedicated to quality assurance and.
CAA’s IBHE Program Review Presentation April 22, 2011.
CHEN Program Assessment Advisory Board Meeting June 3 rd, 2012.
King Fahd University of Petroleum and Minerals
Accrediting Commission for Community and Junior Colleges of the Western Association of Schools and Colleges.
1. 2 Why is the Core important? To set high expectations –for all students –for educators To attend to the learning needs of students To break through.
Assessment & Evaluation Committee A New Road Ahead Presentation Dr. Keith M. McCoy, Vice President Professor Jennifer Jakob, English Associate Director.
 K-12 Principal Internship and Competency Summary Aaron Freed K-12 Principal Licensure Candidate Bethel University.
Who are we? And what is it that we do? LCC--Business Department Advisory Committee.
Membership Promotion (MP) RETENTION. Continuously track members Create retention programs Focus on days past due first Know your members and recognize.
Basic Workshop For Reviewers NQAAC Recognize the developmental engagements Ensure that they operate smoothly and effectively” Ensure that all team members.
Introduction & Step 1 Presenter: Updated 6/21/2013.
HECSE Quality Indicators for Leadership Preparation.
 Introduction Introduction  Contents of the report Contents of the report  Assessment : Objectives OutcomesObjectivesOutcomes  The data :
Leadership Training Conference Dallas, Texas March 3-6, 2011.
1. Housekeeping Items June 8 th and 9 th put on calendar for 2 nd round of Iowa Core ***Shenandoah participants*** Module 6 training on March 24 th will.
EE & CSE Program Educational Objectives Review EECS Industrial Advisory Board Meeting May 1 st, 2009 by G. Serpen, PhD Sources ABET website: abet.org Gloria.
Building and Recognizing Quality School Systems DISTRICT ACCREDITATION © 2010 AdvancED.
Preparing for the renewal and tenure processes Bernard Robaire Department of Pharmacology and Therapeutics MAUT Tenure Workshop April 24, 2015 – Faculty.
THE NUTS AND BOLTS OF ADVISORY COMMITTEES Development of Work-Based Learning Programs Unit 6-- Developing and Maintaining Community and Business Partnerships.
Practicing Meaningful Learning Outcomes Assessment at UGA Department of Crop and Soil Sciences August 10, 2015 Dr. Leslie Gordon Associate Director for.
ABET 2000 Preparation: the Final Stretch Carnegie Institute of Technology Department Heads Retreat July 29, 1999.
Columbia University School of Engineering and Applied Science Review and Planning Process Fall 1998.
Telecommunications Engineering The University of Texas at Dallas The Erik Jonsson School of Engineering and Computer Science Jonsson School Industrial.
Tenure Promotion Jason Cong Professor and Past Chair Computer Science Department University of California, Los Angeles.
Promotions on the Clinician Educator Track Larry L. Swift, Ph.D. Vice Chair for Faculty Affairs Department of Pathology, Microbiology & Immunology.
What Your Program Needs to Know about Learning Outcomes Assessment at UGA.
Presented by Carol Love Board Leadership Seminar December 8, 2015.
Guidelines and Process. AIAA TCM Membership Selection Guidelines (page 1 of 2) A formal education in both the technical (engineering and/or science) and.
Faculty career development through establishing institutionalized mechanisms to address the needs of pre- tenure and post-promotion faculty in the IDEAL.
Hitting The Mark With Your Resume Presented by Experiential Learning and Career Management (ELCM)
Funded by a grant from the National Science Foundation. Any opinions, findings, conclusions or recommendations expressed are those of the authors and do.
EMPOWERMENT THROUGH EDUCATION Business Retention and Expansion Task Force Workshop Joe Lucente Assistant Professor and Extension Educator OSU Extension.
Forming Boards of Specified Jurisdiction Mary Kay Tschanz, Principal St. James School, Highwood September 17, 2008 Archdiocesan Development Council.
Human Aspects of Organizing Reading: pp. 173 – 183.
So what can I expect when I serve on a NEASC/CPSS Visiting Team?
Promotion to Full Professor: Regulations and Procedures
The Federal programs department September 26, 2017
Department of Computer Science The University of Texas at Dallas
Internship Bill of Rights
To achieve improvement through: Self assessment Benchmarking
Promotion to Full Professor: Regulations and Procedures
Presentation transcript:

Utilizing an Industrial Advisory Board in the Accreditation Process Dr. Raymond Greenlaw Department of Computer Science Armstrong Atlantic State University

Raymond Greenlaw Utilizing an Industrial Advisory Board in the Accreditation Process2 Outline Introduction Initial Planning Membership Issues Use of Board in Assessing PEOs Pitfalls and Challenges Perspectives and Roles Within University Conclusion

Raymond Greenlaw Utilizing an Industrial Advisory Board in the Accreditation Process3 Outline Introduction Initial Planning Membership Issues Use of Board in Assessing PEOs Pitfalls and Challenges Perspectives and Roles Within University Conclusion

Raymond Greenlaw Utilizing an Industrial Advisory Board in the Accreditation Process4 Introduction Industrial advisory board also known as… –Advisory board –Board –External advisory board –Affiliates board –Community advisory board

Raymond Greenlaw Utilizing an Industrial Advisory Board in the Accreditation Process5 Introduction Creation driven by deans Fund raising Political influence Student internship programs Placement of graduates

Raymond Greenlaw Utilizing an Industrial Advisory Board in the Accreditation Process6 Introduction Departmental level Useful feedback to program Assessment goals set for advisory board Great effort required to set up and use industrial advisory board effectively

Raymond Greenlaw Utilizing an Industrial Advisory Board in the Accreditation Process7 Outline Introduction Initial Planning Membership Issues Use of Board in Assessing PEOs Pitfalls and Challenges Perspectives and Roles Within University Conclusion

Raymond Greenlaw Utilizing an Industrial Advisory Board in the Accreditation Process8 Initial Planning Form internal advisory board committee Chair understands assessment process –ABET’s terminology relating to assessments – program educational objectives (PEOs) –ABET’s expectations regarding assessment of PEOs Decide function Meet regularly and document work Educate new faculty members

Raymond Greenlaw Utilizing an Industrial Advisory Board in the Accreditation Process9 Initial Planning Questions for the committee to consider: –What type of feedback is the committee expecting from advisory board? –How can such feedback be obtained? –How can this information be documented and used in the assessment of PEOs? –What level of commitment is needed by members? –What time commitment? –How can the committee obtain buy in from department?

Raymond Greenlaw Utilizing an Industrial Advisory Board in the Accreditation Process10 Outline Introduction Initial Planning Membership Issues Use of Board in Assessing PEOs Pitfalls and Challenges Perspectives and Roles Within University Conclusion

Raymond Greenlaw Utilizing an Industrial Advisory Board in the Accreditation Process11 Membership Issues Introduction Rotation Agenda Meetings Turnout Follow Through

Raymond Greenlaw Utilizing an Industrial Advisory Board in the Accreditation Process12 Membership: Introduction Challenges of non-urban settings Desired size vs. practical size General rule: 25 to 30 members Half will show up for events/meetings

Raymond Greenlaw Utilizing an Industrial Advisory Board in the Accreditation Process13 Membership: Introduction Who should be considered? –Reliable –Interested in the program –Willing to serve and with time –Capable of making contributions to assessment process –Candidates: Alumni Business people Local retirees Colleagues at neighboring institutions

Raymond Greenlaw Utilizing an Industrial Advisory Board in the Accreditation Process14 Membership: Introduction Where do you meet potential members? –Through deans and department heads –Former students –Technical talks in community –Fund raising events –Technocrat meetings –Through current members –Web sites for local technical companies

Raymond Greenlaw Utilizing an Industrial Advisory Board in the Accreditation Process15 Membership: Introduction How should potential members be approached and asked to serve, and for how long? –Informal conversation –Formal invitation letter Responsibilities List of current members URL of current board’s Web site Recent departmental news

Raymond Greenlaw Utilizing an Industrial Advisory Board in the Accreditation Process16 Membership: Rotation Maintain diversity, balance, continuity Three-year rotation Thirty members –Goal: 5 first-years, 10 second-years, 15 third- years Invite select third-years to serve more One-third turnover rate (recommended)

Raymond Greenlaw Utilizing an Industrial Advisory Board in the Accreditation Process17 Membership: Agenda Announce meeting times in advance Send agenda and reminder one month in advance s and hard copies Follow-up phone calls

Raymond Greenlaw Utilizing an Industrial Advisory Board in the Accreditation Process18 Membership: Meetings Schedule regular annual meetings Meet twice/year (recommended) –Probably see each member at least once Document discussions Present salient points to department Analyze and evaluate information gathered Document and assess actions resulting from evaluations

Raymond Greenlaw Utilizing an Industrial Advisory Board in the Accreditation Process19 Membership: Turnout Maintain attendance logs Follow-up with members –Thank you letters –Summary of items accomplished –Next meeting date

Raymond Greenlaw Utilizing an Industrial Advisory Board in the Accreditation Process20 Membership: Follow Through Periodic correspondence Departmental newsletters Talk announcements Homecoming announcements

Raymond Greenlaw Utilizing an Industrial Advisory Board in the Accreditation Process21 Outline Introduction Initial Planning Membership Issues Use of Board in Assessing PEOs Pitfalls and Challenges Perspectives and Roles Within University Conclusion

Raymond Greenlaw Utilizing an Industrial Advisory Board in the Accreditation Process22 Program Educational Objectives ABET’s definition: Program Educational Objectives (PEOs): Broad statements that describe the career and professional accomplishments that the program is preparing graduates to achieve.

Raymond Greenlaw Utilizing an Industrial Advisory Board in the Accreditation Process23 Program Educational Objectives Program outcomes: Narrower statements that describe what students are expected to know and be able to do by the time of graduation. These relate to skills, knowledge, and behaviors that students acquire in the matriculation through the program.

Raymond Greenlaw Utilizing an Industrial Advisory Board in the Accreditation Process24 Program Educational Objectives PEOs must be measurable Scenario - computing PEOs: (1)Graduates shall work in the computing industry in managerial roles. (2)Graduates shall receive advanced degrees and teach computing at the high-school level.

Raymond Greenlaw Utilizing an Industrial Advisory Board in the Accreditation Process25 PEO Scenario Board selection –Professors from local universities where students go for graduate work –Principals from local high schools –Managers or executives from local computing companies Tools –Board member surveys –Alumni surveys

Raymond Greenlaw Utilizing an Industrial Advisory Board in the Accreditation Process26 PEO Scenario Sample Survey:

Raymond Greenlaw Utilizing an Industrial Advisory Board in the Accreditation Process27 Outline Introduction Initial Planning Membership Issues Use of Board in Assessing PEOs Pitfalls and Challenges Perspectives and Roles Within University Conclusion

Raymond Greenlaw Utilizing an Industrial Advisory Board in the Accreditation Process28 Pitfalls and Challenges Problem: –Self-motivated board member dictating policy or changes to curriculum Solution: –Well-written invitation letters –Initial two-year terms (optional renewal)

Raymond Greenlaw Utilizing an Industrial Advisory Board in the Accreditation Process29 Pitfalls and Challenges Key Challenges –Maintaining high-energy level of all –Achieving high attendance and good participation –Obtaining useful feedback –Maintaining continuity –Educating the board –Keeping the board engaged –Having the board work as a team

Raymond Greenlaw Utilizing an Industrial Advisory Board in the Accreditation Process30 Pitfalls and Challenges Common struggles –Maintaining a full complement of members –Scheduling and holding regular meetings –Sending out good agendas in advance –Developing appropriate surveys and rubrics for obtaining feedback –Documenting, assessing, and evaluating meeting results –Following through with implementing recommendations –Regularly communicating with members –Reporting back to department

Raymond Greenlaw Utilizing an Industrial Advisory Board in the Accreditation Process31 Pitfalls and Challenges Considerations –Owning vs. dictating policy –Provide student resumes –Invite board members to speak on campus –List members and affiliates on Web site Essentials –Strong leadership on committee –Faculty involvement

Raymond Greenlaw Utilizing an Industrial Advisory Board in the Accreditation Process32 Outline Introduction Initial Planning Membership Issues Use of Board in Assessing PEOs Pitfalls and Challenges Perspectives and Roles Within University Conclusion

Raymond Greenlaw Utilizing an Industrial Advisory Board in the Accreditation Process33 Perspectives and Roles Within University Students Faculty Department heads Deans Members Chair must set expectations and define roles

Raymond Greenlaw Utilizing an Industrial Advisory Board in the Accreditation Process34 Outline Introduction Initial Planning Membership Issues Use of Board in Assessing PEOs Pitfalls and Challenges Perspectives and Roles Within University Conclusion

Raymond Greenlaw Utilizing an Industrial Advisory Board in the Accreditation Process35 Conclusion Maintaining a strong and productive advisory board, and utilizing that board in the accreditation process for the assessment of program educational objectives requires steady work.