P07105: Project METEOR - Steel Rocket January 19, 2007 1 Project METEOR Design and Optimization of a Small Scale Rocket for Pico- Satellite Launching Team.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
What Will The Ideal Hydrogen ICE Look Like?
Advertisements

SEMINAR ON APPLICATIONS OF NOS IN AUTOMOBILES
1 Copyright © 2010, Elsevier Inc. All rights Reserved Fig 2.1 Chapter 2.
OXYGEN-ALTERNATE FUEL TORCH EASY SET UP June 4, 2011 Chad Koens District Manager
Business Transaction Management Software for Application Coordination 1 Business Processes and Coordination.
AUTOMOTIVE COOLING SYSTEMS
FUEL SUPPLY SYSTEM.
Jeopardy Q 1 Q 6 Q 11 Q 16 Q 21 Q 2 Q 7 Q 12 Q 17 Q 22 Q 3 Q 8 Q 13
Jeopardy Q 1 Q 6 Q 11 Q 16 Q 21 Q 2 Q 7 Q 12 Q 17 Q 22 Q 3 Q 8 Q 13
Pneumatic Principles.
0 - 0.
DIVIDING INTEGERS 1. IF THE SIGNS ARE THE SAME THE ANSWER IS POSITIVE 2. IF THE SIGNS ARE DIFFERENT THE ANSWER IS NEGATIVE.
Addition Facts
Adding value through knowledge © NNC Limited September 2002International PHOENICS User Conference 1 A PHOENICS model of the hotbox region of an advanced.
ZMQS ZMQS
Lecture 02: Work and Energy
BT Wholesale October Creating your own telephone network WHOLESALE CALLS LINE ASSOCIATED.
ABC Technology Project
Squares and Square Root WALK. Solve each problem REVIEW:
Sets Sets © 2005 Richard A. Medeiros next Patterns.
DIFFERNETIAL PRESSURE FLOWMETERS
Addition 1’s to 20.
25 seconds left…...
Presented to: By: Date: Federal Aviation Administration International Aircraft Materials Fire Test Working Group Developing an In-flight Fire Condition.
Week 1.
We will resume in: 25 Minutes.
TASK: Skill Development A proportional relationship is a set of equivalent ratios. Equivalent ratios have equal values using different numbers. Creating.
THE CHEMICAL CONCEPT INVENTORY
Internal Combustion Engine Group The effect of compression ratio on exhaust emissions from a PCCI Diesel engine ECOS July 2006 Laguitton, Crua,
Engine Geometry BC L TC l VC s a q B
Team Members: Raul Lugo, Kyle Bowerman Mentor: Matthew Summers
Analysis of Rocket Propulsion
36th Annual Frontiers in Education Conference
Rocket Engines Liquid Propellant –Mono propellant Catalysts –Bi-propellant Solid Propellant –Grain Patterns Hybrid Nuclear Electric Performance Energy.
Presenter: Peter Renslow Advisors: James K. Villarreal and Steven Shark.
Hybrid Propulsion System Basics
Introduction to Propulsion
Uncontrolled copy not subject to amendment Rocketry Revision 1.00.
Principles of Propulsion and its Application in Space Launchers Prof. Dr.-Ing. Uwe Apel Hochschule Bremen REVA Seminar1.
Rocket Nomenclature EGR 4347 Analysis and Design of Propulsion Systems.
Class 4: Fundamentals of Rocket Propulsion
Project M.E.T.E.O.R. P07109: Flying Rocket Team Andrew Scarlata, Geoff Cassell, Zack Mott, Garett Pickett, Brian Whitbeck, Luke Cadin, David Hall.
HTPB Fuel Grain Flow Rate, Sizing, and Thrust. Regression Rate Governs Size The faster the solid propellant is burned, the “fatter” the rocket must be.
1 Propulsion Overview MAE155A Dr. Nacouzi. 2 Agenda Introduction to Propulsion Propulsion Systems: Liquids, Solids, other Basic Propulsion Performance.
P07109: Project M.E.T.E.O.R. Flying Rocket Team Andrew ScarlataProject Leader/ Mechanical Engineer Geoff CassellLead Engineer/ Mechanical Engineer David.
Hybrid Rocket Combustion Process & Nozzle John Chambers.
Student: C1C Tim Brown Advisor: Maj. Lydon Fast Burning Hybrid Fuels.
Rocket Engine Physics and Design
36th Annual Frontiers in Education Conference
EXTROVERTSpace Propulsion 02 1 Thrust, Rocket Equation, Specific Impulse, Mass Ratio.
 Expand upon knowledge base developed from Panther 1 solid rocket launch (6/28/06)  Enhance relationship and training opportunities between Florida.
Thermal Model of MEMS Thruster Apurva Varia Propulsion Branch Code 597.
HYBRID ROCKET PROPULSION SYSTEMS BY: MCDOG SNIZZY ALLEN A.K.A SHAWN.
Analytical and Empirical Characterization of Hybrid Rocket Swirl Injection Presenters: Matt H. Summers Advisor: James K. Villarreal.
Effects of Swirl Injector Design on Hybrid Rocket Fuel Regression Rate
Solid Rocket Motors A solid rocket motor is a system that uses solid propellants to produce thrust Advantages High thrust Simple Storability High density.
6/13/20161 P ROJECT METEOR H YBRID R OCKET M OTOR Ken Court Chad Eberhart Patrick Haus Chris Natoli Nohl Schluntz S ENIOR D ESIGN P ROJECT R EVIEW Friday.
THE TSIOLKOVSKY ROCKET EQUATION
Oxidizer Tank and Delivery Team
Rocket Engines Liquid Propellant Solid Propellant Hybrid Nuclear
Development and Principles of Rocketry
ESFT : Propulsion Team Solid Propellant Propulsion
PROJECT METEOR OXIDIZER SYSTEM AND STRUCTURE
John Beasley 3/20/2008 Propulsion Group Contact: Black Boxes and Code Flowchart AAE 450 Spring 2008.
DESIGN OF THE ARIES IV TRIBRID LIQUID PROPELLANT ROCKET ENGINE
PROJECT METEOR HYBRID ROCKET MOTOR
Project METEOR Hybrid Rocket Motor Team Members: Marc Balaban
Project METEOR Hybrid Rocket Motor Team Members: Marc Balaban
Presentation transcript:

P07105: Project METEOR - Steel Rocket January 19, Project METEOR Design and Optimization of a Small Scale Rocket for Pico- Satellite Launching Team Members: Ray Mulato Joe D’Amato Joel Baillargeon Kent Etienne Guion Lucas Ryan Kuhns

P07105: Project METEOR - Steel Rocket January 19, Project Overview Projected Flight Pattern

P07105: Project METEOR - Steel Rocket January 19, Hybrid Rocket Classified as utilizing a liquid oxidizer and solid propellant to achieve thrust –Current Oxidizer: Nitrous Oxide (NOX) –Current Propellant: Hydroxyl Terminated Poly-Butadiene (HTPB) –Possible Propellant: Poly-Methyl Methacrylate (PMMA ) Project Overview

P07105: Project METEOR - Steel Rocket January 19, Injector Plate Garolite Pre & Post Combustion Chambers 2-D Nozzle Hydroxyl-Terminated Polybutadiene (HTPB) Fuel Grain Chamber Wall Snap Ring Current Test Chamber Setup

P07105: Project METEOR - Steel Rocket January 19, Theoretical Isp for HTPB & NOX  320 s Properties –Efficiency of propulsion system –Ratio of thrust to weight –Change in momentum per unit mass of propellant –Affected by combustion temp, chamber pressure, exit pressure, and mass flow rate Project Deliverable – Specific Impulse

P07105: Project METEOR - Steel Rocket January 19, Optimization of: –Nozzle Geometry –Fuel Grain Material Geometry –Oxidizer Flow Rate –Ignition System Data Acquisition –Temperature –Pressure –Thrust Specific Impulse of 220 s Project Objectives

P07105: Project METEOR - Steel Rocket January 19, From Guidance Team for controlled flight to 90 km: m fuel = 10kg; m dot = 0.2kg/s; t burn = 50 s; T = 445 N (100 lb) Specification Number Design Specification Unit of Measure Marginal Value Ideal Value 1Specific Impulsesec Oxidizer/Fuel Ratio-58 3ThrustN Burn Timesec5060 5Overall Mass Flow Ratekg/s Mass of Fuel Grainkg Mass of Oxidizerkg88.75 Project Specifications

P07105: Project METEOR - Steel Rocket January 19, Testing Purpose Testing took place December 9 th & 10 th, 2006 Vary Nozzle Geometry to see the effects on thrust Conceivably measure mass flow rate of system –Weigh nitrous oxide tank and fuel grains prior and after each test –Come up with approximate O/F ratios Introduce Team to current design

P07105: Project METEOR - Steel Rocket January 19, Results

P07105: Project METEOR - Steel Rocket January 19, Testing 11 Degree Half Angle

P07105: Project METEOR - Steel Rocket January 19, Testing 11 Degree Half Angle

P07105: Project METEOR - Steel Rocket January 19, September 16th, 2006 Test

P07105: Project METEOR - Steel Rocket January 19, First Testing – December 2006 Observations –Overall system setup –Ignition system can be inconsistent in terms of time –Oxidizer tank temperature varied considerably from test to test –Teflon tape in feed system was tedious and led to increased time between tests –Brass fittings can be cross-threaded and/or broken easily –Noticeable inaccuracies in current mass flow rate measurement –Power supply was convoluted –8 Degree Half Angle Nozzle design gave the best thrust results –Nitrogen tank regulator was damaged, consistently leaks, had to develop a work around for it Conclusions –Began to reduce time between tests –Steady voltage and current supply is needed to minimize ignition time –A method of controlling internal tank temperature is needed to remove guesswork –Stainless steel can be used in place of brass and teflon combination –Stainless steel fittings in oxidizer feed system should be used –Means of gathering reliable mass flow is crucial – Coriolis flow meter or volumetric flow meter in combination with other values –A generator might be a better means of running the operation –Difficult to draw definite conclusion from this, as multiple variables play a role in thrust –Need to order a more robust regulator

P07105: Project METEOR - Steel Rocket January 19, Feed System Equipment Goals of adding additional feed system equipment: –Acquire a reliable value for mass flowrate in order to calculate a number of parameters Regression rate Test Chamber Pressure Oxidizer-Fuel Ratio Oxidizer Mass Velocity –Feedback Pressure Regulator Constant supply pressure leads to overall experimental control Capability to vary supply pressure –Optimization of nozzle for a supply pressure –Gas Tank Heating Blanket Allows for a controlled internal tank temperature –Temperature control leads to internal pressure control

P07105: Project METEOR - Steel Rocket January 19, Longer, wider chamber for longer burn and increased thrust Injector plate – redesign hole pattern and sizing in order to increase burn efficiency and completeness Use of Polymethyl Methylacrylate (PMMA) as a solid fuel in place of HTPB – possibly higher thrust Redesign of Pre and Post combustion chambers to minimize viscous losses inside the chamber Redesign of nozzle to take advantage of expansion of hot gas inside the diverging section of the nozzle rather than behind it Redesign of fuel grain to optimize regression rate and thrust (increase surface area exposed to flame) Possible Test Chamber Improvements

P07105: Project METEOR - Steel Rocket January 19, Current Feed System

P07105: Project METEOR - Steel Rocket January 19, Control of Oxidizer (N2O) Pressure via tank as well as before injector – installation of a feedback regulator Use of Stainless Steel in place of Brass in Nitrous Oxide feed system due to N2O effect on brass components (shorter life, corrosion of surfaces) Use of a tank “stand” to hold oxidizer tank inverted as well as to measure weights (for the current round of testing) Possible Feed System Improvements

P07105: Project METEOR - Steel Rocket January 19, Highlighted areas show where changes are being made Proposed Changes to Feed System

P07105: Project METEOR - Steel Rocket January 19, Feed System Equipment Test Chamber Pressure Transducer Tee Fitting Mass Flowrate Meter Backflow Pressure Regulator Inline Flow Filter

P07105: Project METEOR - Steel Rocket January 19, Design of Experiments Factorial Method vs. One Variable at a Time –Factorial method able to achieve comparable results with fewer tests –Factorial method able to correlate relationships between factors being tested Factor A Factor B LowHigh Factor A Factor B LowHigh O.V.A.T. Factorial

P07105: Project METEOR - Steel Rocket January 19, Design of Experiments NOX Pressure (Pre-Inj.) Length of Fuel Grain Post-Combustion Chamber Nozzle Injector Plate Fuel Grain Additive Fuel Grain Geometery 3 levels (∆ of 50 psi.) 2 levels (11” – 18”) 4 levels (1.5” - 3.0”; ∆ 0.5”) 2 levels 2 levels (4 holes/ 9 holes) 2 levels (Alum. Pwdr/ Non-Alum. Pwdr) 3 levels (Star, Circle, Cross) Independent Test Variables Levels

P07105: Project METEOR - Steel Rocket January 19, Design of Experiments Reasons for choosing these variables: –Short lead time for testing –See how pressure, and (L/D) ratio of the fuel grain effects thrust –No prior knowledge of injector plate design –Combustion chamber wasn’t chosen due to the additional changes to the system needed to accommodate that test. NOX Pressure (Pre-Inj.) Length of Fuel Grain Injector Plate Variables In Next Test 3 levels (∆ of 50 psi.) 2 levels (11” – 18”) 2 levels (4 holes/ 9 holes) Levels

P07105: Project METEOR - Steel Rocket January 19, Senior Design I Project Plan