FAC Items in Process (Action Items) 1) Version Description Document (VDD) for DM2 V 2.01 o Opened: April 2010 o Process step: Incorporated into next version.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
FAC Items in Process (Action Items) 1) Version Description Document (VDD) for DM2 V 2.01 o Opened: April 2010 o Process step: Incorporated into next version.
Advertisements

Mounting Installations SITRANS P for Differential Pressure
Questionnaire on Water Consumption in Sweden P1 From what source do you consume water from most frequently ? P2 Is your home connected to the public system.
Questionnaire on Water Consumption in Sweden P1 From what source do you consume water from most frequently ? P2 Is your home connected to the public system.
NANPA Oversight Working Group Status Report to the NANC March 20, 2001 Chair Pat Caldwell.
Fiscal Law Project Planning Session Results December 18, 2002.
Bulk Electric System Definition Task Force Update Joint Standing Committee Meeting October 21, 2010 Brian Theaker, BESDTF Chair.
Work plan – Evaluation - General Aspects - NEFIS – mid-term, WP2 and WP3 Meeting, Vienna March 2004 University of Hamburg, Aljoscha Requardt WP 5:
U.S. Route 30 Environmental Impact Statement & Phase I Design Report Community Advisory Group Meeting Thursday May 8, 2008.
P1 RJM 16/10/02EG1C2 Engineering Maths: Matrix Algebra Tutorial 1 A mass (weight 20N) is suspended by two wires as shown in the figure: relevant distances.
Title Presented by: For: Date:. Summary The summary is intended to provide the audience with a quick overview and basic understanding of the essential.
European Observatory on Infringements of Intellectual Property Rights Vincent O’Reilly 22 April 2013.
Table of contents 1 Manual of Operational Procedures (MOP) 2
Biometrics Kayla Burke.
A. S. Morse Yale University University of Minnesota June 4, 2014 TexPoint fonts used in EMF. Read the TexPoint manual before you delete this box.: A A.
Technical Assessment Review / Decision Briefing Template
BASIN PLAN AMENDMENTS ADOPTION HEARING Item 2 Water Board Meeting of April 9, 2014 Chuck Curtis and Robert Larsen Lahontan Water Board.
New Cost Estimate Template Issued: December 11, 2014 Effective: January 5, 2015.
Section 305 Technical Subcommittee Boston, MA: June 14, 2014.
Instructional Materials Process and Progress Update Chief Academic Officer Quarterly Meeting November 13, 2012.
© 2003 Open Mobile Alliance Ltd. All Rights Reserved. Used with the permission of the Open Mobile Alliance Ltd. under the terms as stated in this document.
Keeyask Generation Project Environmental Assessment Process Tracey Braun, M. Sc. Director, Environmental Approvals Branch Conservation and Water Stewardship.
1 Accredited Standards Committee C63 ® - EMC Subcommittee 5 – Immunity Report to Main C63 Committee Stephen R Whitesell Chair, SC5 May 7, 2015.
C r2. 2 Conference call summaries Major open issues  Open issues in Traffic models  Other open issues addressed by contributions  Other.
Water Supply Planning Initiative State Water Commission November 22, 2004.
Getting Involved in the Research Data Alliance Stefanie Kethers
IEEE /r3 Submission September 2008 John Notor, Cadence Design Systems, Inc.Slide 1 IEEE IMT-Advanced Review Process Date:
Proposed Co-convened WG1/2 Objectives, Schedule, and Activities Group Name: TP#1 Source: Omar Elloumi (Alcatel-Lucent), Laurent Laporte (Sprint) Meeting.
WG-2 - ARC TP #16 Status Report Group Name: oneM2M TP #16 Source: WG2 Chair (Nicolas Damour – Meeting Date: Agenda.
© Mahindra Satyam 2009 Configuration Management QMS Training.
1 IEEE Technology Selection Process Presentation of Contribution C Dan Gal Berlin, September 14, 2004.
Cesg-1 CSS Area Report -- Super BOF Background From A. Hooke to CESG: (CSS AD emphasis ) Date: Fri 02 Oct 2009 To: CESG cc: CMC Subject: Proposed.
12 August 2010 DoDAF Development Team
CLIC-ILC WG Oxford, Jan 10 Slide 1 CLIC – ILC General Issues WG, Update BackgroundChargeStatusPlans.
Standards Review Subcommittee Update August 17, 2010.
File: /ram/wgchairs.sxi Date: 7 January, 2016 Slide 1 Process and Tools (PROTO) Team General Area Meeting IETF59, Seoul, Korea -- March 2004
API 17N Subsea Production System Reliability, Integrity, and Technical Risk Management Don Wells Hess Corporation.
November SECURITY WORKING GROUP REPORT November 2004.
1 MPLS Architectural Considerations for a Transport Profile ITU-T - IETF Joint Working Team Dave Ward, Malcolm Betts, ed. April 16, 2008.
[Exercise Name] After Action Conference. [Date] [Exercise Name] Agenda I.Introductions & Opening Remarks II.Exercise Summary III.Items Identified IV.AAR.
Work Related to Senate Bill 2202 (effective January 1, 2001)
A Member of StarDyne Technologies Revised on April 7, 2013 Task Manager QUICK REFERENCE FOR AUTHORIZERS.
The Standards Hiatus by Lawrie Schonfelder & Miles Ellis Why wasn’t the standard sequence F66, F77, F88 What caused the the extra 3 years?
Security WG: Report of the Fall 2003 Meeting October 28, 2003 Howard Weiss, NASA/JPL/SPARTA.
IEEE /r5 Submission November 2008 John Notor, Cadence Design Systems, Inc.Slide 1 IEEE IMT-Advanced Review Process Date:
WP6 – Monitoring and Evaluation 17th November 2014 Rome.
COMET Working Group Progress Report 11/13/03
process and procedures for assessments
(5.1)Development of IMS to fit the organization (step wise)
CBP Biennial Strategy Review System
DoDAF Version 2.03 Update 05 Jan 2012 DoDAF Team 1 1.
Global Grid Forum GridForge
Guilford Standards for Promotion and Tenure
Grid Code What is the Standard Modification Process? Panel
NCWG Terms of Reference NCWG April 2016, IHB, Monaco
Overview of the FEPAC Accreditation Process
Administrative Instructions – Short Version (Option 2)
NATIONAL CREDENTIALING FORUM FEBRUARY 20, 2004
CBP Biennial Strategy Review System
Item 6: Improving assessment of GES Draft conclusions and Way forward
Harmonisation Activity Progress report
Next Steps Advisory group debrief call Circulate meeting summary
Key Data on education: process for statistical indicators
POLICY, CONTRACTING, SYSTEMS ENGINEERING, and EDUCATION SUBCOMMITTEE SUMMARY PSMC Meeting April 20 – 23, 2010 LMI, McLean, VA.
CUSC Amendment Panel Recommendation
Strategic Coordination Group 2007 Reporting Guidance on Monitoring
(Project) SIGN OFF PROCESS MONTH DAY, YEAR
Web-based Imaging Management Service WIMS Working Group
Presentation transcript:

FAC Items in Process (Action Items) 1) Version Description Document (VDD) for DM2 V 2.01 o Opened: April 2010 o Process step: Incorporated into next version o Item Status: Version 2.02 final as of 30 September 2010 Decision Brief to FAC leading to ASRG signature o POC: Dave McDaniel 2) Configuration Management Plan for DM 2 o Opened: April 2010 o Process step: Get FAC approval for forwarding to ASRG o Item Status: Comments have been incorporated Decision Brief to FAC leading to ASRG signature o POC: Dave McDaniel 1

DoDAF-DM2 v2.02 VDD Comments Summary No action New DoDAF- DM2 actions

Next Steps Make corrections to VDD Request ASRG approval of 2.02

CM Plan Comments Summary Similar to VDD

Next Steps Revise CM Plan 1.IAW agreed comments 2.To be consistent with ASRG CONOPS: –ASRG/FAC is the CM body for DoDAF and DM2 –Work group in an advisory role 3.Detail how FAC WG reps participate in WG recommendations –During WG meetings –Revisiting WG recommendations –Formulating alternate recommendations –Advising FAC reps to redirect or non-concur with WG recommendations Present at January FAC

DoDAF-DM2 WG Status Most of November WGs (three meetings) spent on revising the DoDAF model names and one- liners –Background: DoDAF models are specified in 5 ways: Name One-liner Short description Long description Mapping to DM2 data elements, aka monster matrix –Currently these are: Internally Inconsistent Overlapping Use undefined terms Do not follow a standard naming and description convention –As first step, the DoDAF-DM2 WG has been working on quick fixes to the Name and one- liners Many members believe some of the SvcVs are redundant and are recommending deletion of several. The next step, detailed analysis and cleanup of the Short and Long descriptions will involve significant effort and time –The WG recommends some quick fixes to the names and one-liners for 2.03 and will present these at the January FAC

DoDAF-DM2 WG CSAR Request FAC and FAC technical reps review CSAR for: –Technical agreement with WG recommendations for 2.03 made to date (see next slide) –Agreement with WG course of action and prioritization for AI/CRs in progress for 2.03 (see next 9 slides) –Any other AI/CRs that should be prioritized for 2.03 but that arent

2.03 WG Recommended Solutions

2.03 WG Recommended In- Progress AIs (p1 of 9)

2.03 WG Recommended In- Progress AIs (p2 of 9)

2.03 WG Recommended In- Progress AIs (p3 of 9)

2.03 WG Recommended In- Progress AIs (p4 of 9)

2.03 WG Recommended In- Progress AIs (p5 of 9)

2.03 WG Recommended In- Progress AIs (p6 of 9)

2.03 WG Recommended In- Progress AIs (p7 of 9)

2.03 WG Recommended In- Progress AIs (p8 of 9)

2.03 WG Recommended In- Progress AIs (p9 of 9)