Improving Student Academic Achievement and Closing Achievement Gaps Bringing Improvement to Scale at All Grade Levels.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Understanding Student Learning Objectives (S.L.O.s)
Advertisements

[Imagine School at North Port] Oral Exit Report Quality Assurance Review Team School Accreditation.
WASC Visiting Committee Report 3/28/2007. Areas of Strength Organization The Co Principals and the School Leadership Team provide direction and support.
Classroom Factors PISA/PIRLS Task Force International Reading Association January 2005.
1 When DAP Meets GAP Promoting Peaceful Coexistence between Developmentally Appropriate Practice & the Need to Address the Achievement Gap International.
CURRICULUM/ ACADEMIC GOALS STAFF SELECTION/ CAPACITY BUILDING PROGRAMS/PRACTICES/ ARRANGEMENTS MONITORING RECOGNITION/ INTERVENTION © National Center for.
© National Center for Educational Accountability National Center for Educational Accountability San Jose, California March 30, 2004 Jean Rutherford, Ed.D.,

Fostering A Positive School Culture Through Collaborative Administrative Practices A Framework for Excellence: The Role of Administration.
Career and College Readiness Kentucky Core Academic Standards Characteristics of Highly Effective Teaching and Learning Assessment Literacy MODULE 1.
Assessment Literacy Kentucky Core Academic Standards Characteristics of Highly Effective Teaching and Learning Career and College Readiness MODULE 1.
World’s Largest Educational Community
The Readiness Centers Initiative Early Education and Care Board Meeting Tuesday, May 11, 2010.
Instructional Decision Making
1 R-2 Report: Success in algebra by the end of ninth grade A presentation to the Board of Education by Brad Stam, Chief Academic Officer Instructional.
Building Leadership Team October Agenda Big Picture Formative Overview PLC Overview SMART Goal and Action Plan Plan.
Pre Planning: Identification of Need 1. Develop/Review Student Learning Expectations 2. Examine alignment of learning expectations with assessments 3.
Common Core at CPS Scope and Sequence Implementation Plan
o Nearly all 50 states have adopted the Common Core State Standards and Essential Standards. o State-led and developed Common Core Standards for K-12.
SEED – CT’s System for Educator and Evaluation and Development April 2013 Wethersfield Public Schools CONNECTICUT ADMINISTRATOR EVALUATION Overview of.
Framework Feedback: What We Are Already Doing. Theme 1: CURRICULUM FRAMEWORK FOR 21ST CENTURY 1. Common Pacing Guides with embedded 21 st Century skills.
Implementation of the PA Core Standards. Effective Communication Guiding Principle 1 Design and establish systems of effective communication among stakeholders.
The Rubric Reality Cobb Keys Classroom Teacher Evaluation System.
CCSSM Implementation Plan: Improving Math Teaching at Scale Karen Prigodich, District Math Specialist Centennial School District, Portland North West Math.
Building Effective Leadership Teams: A Practitioner’s Look
The Need To Improve STEM Learning Successful K-12 STEM is essential for scientific discovery, economic growth and functioning democracy Too.
1 Phase III: Planning Action Developing Improvement Plans.
TOSS-BFK Administrators’ Evaluation Crosswalk to School-wide Changes
Provisions for Training and Professional Development 1 Florida Digital Instructional Materials Work Group November 13, 2012.
Annual UMES Summer Institute “Making the Adjustment” Student Learning Objectives :
1 Literacy PERKS Standard 1: Aligned Curriculum. 2 PERKS Essential Elements Academic Performance 1. Aligned Curriculum 2. Multiple Assessments 3. Instruction.
Heather Zavadsky, Ph.D. Bringing School Reform to Scale: Moving From Islands of Greatness to Successful Systems.
Forward Moving Districts Information Summarized by Iowa Support Team as they Study Identified Buildings and Districts Actions in those Buildings and Districts.
High Quality High Schools Education Commission of the States 2006 National Forum on Education Policy Dr. Jimmy Neitzel National Center.
Teacher: Decide what to teach Decide what to assign Decide how to assess Decide how to grade In the end, convey how the kids did compared.
Ensuring Quality and Effective Staff Professional Development to Increase Learning for ALL Students.
Principal Evaluation in Massachusetts: Where we are now National Summit on Educator Effectiveness Principal Evaluation Breakout Session #2 Claudia Bach,
Administrator’s Academy July 2015 Instruction & Accountability Division.
1. 2 Why is the Core important? To set high expectations –for all students –for educators To attend to the learning needs of students To break through.
Instructional Leadership Pennsylvania Reading First Eastern Regional Reading First Technical Assistance Center Florida State University and The Florida.
CIV 1 Lincoln County Administrators Total Instructional Alignment.
Supporting Principals Using Data to Inform Instructional Leaders March 8, 2010 San Antonio, Texas Center to Close the Achievement Gap.
Ohio HSTW/MMGW: The Positive Impact!. What is High Schools That Work?  An initiative of the Southern Regional Education Board (SREB)  The nation’s largest.
Leadership: Connecting Vision With Action Presented by: Jan Stanley Spring 2010 Title I Directors’ Meeting.
Communication System Coherent Instructional Program Academic Behavior Support System Strategic FocusBuilding Capacity.
Standards-Based Education Curriculum Alignment Project Elementary Principals’ Meeting October 21, 2010.
APS Common Core State Standards: Turning Dreams into Reality for All Kids! Linda Sink, APS Chief Academic Officer January 19, 2012 MC 2 Leadership Conference.
The Challenge We must realize that the system is the cause of weak execution due to lack of clarity, commitment, collaboration and accountability resulting.
FEBRUARY KNOWLEDGE BUILDING  Time for Learning – design schedules and practices that ensure engagement in meaningful learning  Focused Instruction.
CommendationsRecommendations Curriculum The Lakeside Middle School teachers demonstrate a strong desire and commitment to plan collaboratively and develop.
Intro to TPEP. A new evaluation system should be a model for professional growth, supporting collaboration between teachers and principals in pursuit.
Expeditionary Learning Queens Middle School Meeting May 29,2013 Presenters: Maryanne Campagna & Antoinette DiPietro 1.
WASC/CDE Visiting Committee Final Presentation ___________________ Dublin High School ___________________ March 9-11, 2009.
GARDEN CITY DISTRICT LEADERSHIP November 6, 2012.
Improving Schools Through Data & Best Practices 5 Simple Strategies.
1. Administrators will gain a deeper understanding of the connection between arts, engagement, student success, and college and career readiness. 2. Administrators.
TLCP Workshop Thurs. Oct. 25, 2007 Given by: Judit Sastre.
ANNOOR ISLAMIC SCHOOL AdvancEd Survey PURPOSE AND DIRECTION.
Learning-Centered Leadership Joseph Murphy Peabody College, Vanderbilt University.
The Leadership Challenge in Graduating Students with Disabilities Guiding Questions Joy Eichelberger, Ed.D. Pennsylvania Training and Technical Assistance.
Dr. Derrica Davis Prospective Principal Candidate: Fairington Elementary School.
ACS WASC/CDE Visiting Committee Final Presentation South East High School March 11, 2015.
Principal Student Achievement Meeting PLC Visioning and Beyond.
Kentucky Core Academic Standards Pike County Schools.
Meeting the LEAPS Act May 5, PEI: Building Rigorous and Robust PreK-3 Family Engagement 1.
Working With Parents as Partners To Improve Student Achievement Taylor County Schools August 2013.
ACS WASC/CDE Visiting Committee Final Presentation Panorama High School March
Outcomes By the end of our sessions, participants will have…  an understanding of how VAL-ED is used as a data point in developing professional development.
 A MODEL SCHOOL. The children are the of North Aiken supported by reflective and responsive teachers and staff, devoted parents, a supportive district.
Paul L. Dunbar Elementary Strategic Plan (Jackson Cluster)
Presentation transcript:

Improving Student Academic Achievement and Closing Achievement Gaps Bringing Improvement to Scale at All Grade Levels

“Getting the job done” for our public schools means setting high expectations to get all students to a minimum of grade level proficiency. This will ensure they are ready for college and/or ready for the workforce.

The key starting point in improving California’s public schools is data. Since our kids can’t wait years and because by its own admission, the CDE is years and tens of millions of dollars away from building a data system… CBEE has partnered with Just for the Kids-CA

Just for the Kids-California  Built and paid for by the CA Business community at no cost to government or schools  Publicly available data from more than 9,300 schools  Complete student level records from 3,500 volunteer schools  40% of all student level data in the state  Largest academic performance database in the nation

Now for the first time we have data to use as a tool to improve our schools. And this is how we use the data to find out what is happening in our schools.

… we can make comparisons among look-a-like schools

… from there we can find higher performing, comparable schools

… we can measure improvement over time by each grade and subject

… we can measure strands of the CST and benchmark against higher performers

… we can measure achievement gap reduction over time

…we can see who is outperforming expectations Stagg Street Elementary

… we can benchmark across the district by school, grade and subject

…we can measure “college readiness” for high schools through CSU Early Assessment Program results

…and backward map performance on the CST for those who are proficient on the EAP

Data must be used to find and implement best practices. We find schools that look just like yours and then connect you to them to learn from their proven strategies…

a “Best Practices Network” and collection of research and examples of practices based upon “what works” a way to find local and state high performing schools with the goal of visiting and learning from them an accountability system as a useable tool for school improvement Inform Improve Inspire through…

Disseminating Results JFTK Best Practice Study Process Source: National Center for Educational Accountability and Just for the Kids

Core Beliefs about Teaching and Learning Organizational Knowledge Resource Allocation Local Influences, Relationships, Communication Define and Unpack Specific Academic Objectives by Grade and Subject Provide Strong Instructional Leaders, HQ Teachers, and Aligned PD Provide Scientifically Based, Evidence-Based Instructional Programs Develop Student Assessment and Data Monitoring Systems: Monitor School Performance Recognize, Intervene, or Adjust Based on School Performance Focus School Plan on Explicit Improvement of Performance on Academic Objectives Select, Develop, and Allocate Staff Based on Student Learning Ensure the Use of Scientifically Based, Evidence-Based Programs, Practices, and Arrangements in every Classroom Monitor Teacher Performance and Student Learning Recognize, Intervene, or Adjust Based on Teacher and Student Performance Ensure Teaching Content is based on Specified Academic Objectives Collaborate in Grade/Subject Level Teams focused on Student Work Use Scientifically Based, Evidence-Based Programs, Practices, and Arrangements Monitor Student Learning Recognize, Intervene, or Adjust Based on Student Performance

Focus School Plan On Explicit Improvement of Performance on Academic Objectives Assure Teaching Content is based on Specified Academic Objectives Define and Unpack Specific Academic Objectives by Grade and Subject Theme: Curriculum and Academic Goals JFTK Best Practice Framework

Performance Level Low High Middle “Haven’t we already done this?” “We use the state standards. They are clear. We trust our teachers enough not to have to spell them out any more specifically.” “There is ALWAYS work to be done to further understand and interpret the standards— especially in terms of the rigor and student work expectations for each standard.” Theme: Curriculum and Academic Goals JFTK Best Practice Framework

K Grade Level Teacher Impact 100% 50% 33.6% 25% 20% 16.6% 14.3% 12.5% 11% 10% 9% 8% 7.7% Teacher Accountability 7.7% 15.4% 23.1% 30.8% 38.5% 46.2% 53.9% 61.6% 69.3% 77% 84.7% 92.4%100% 46.2%23.1%30.7% School Impact 100% District Impact Theme: Curriculum and Academic Goals JFTK Best Practice Framework

Select, Develop, and Allocate Staff based on Student Learning Provide Strong Instructional Leaders, Highly Qualified Teachers, and Aligned Professional Development Collaborate in Grade/Subject Level Teams focused on Student Work Theme: Staff Selection, Leadership, and Capacity Building JFTK Best Practice Framework

Rich and Deep Staff Selection Systems  Specific programs to develop quality teacher and principal candidates  Heavy emphasis on internal development of future leaders  Extensive partnerships with colleges and universities to encourage students to pursue teaching careers  Identification of staff who are “right” for school Theme: Staff Selection, Leadership, and Capacity Building JFTK Best Practice Framework

Aligned Professional Development  Data-driven  Content-and process-oriented  Job-embedded/Individualized  Classroom-based/Collaborative  Continuous and ongoing improvement strategies  Heavily aligned to standards and to chosen instructional resources Theme: Staff Selection, Leadership, and Capacity Building JFTK Best Practice Framework

Assure the Use of Scientifically Based, Evidence-Based Programs, Practices, and Arrangements in every Classroom Provide Scientifically Based, Evidence- Based Instructional Programs Use Scientifically Based, Evidence- Based Programs, Practices, and Arrangements Theme: Instructional Programs, Practices, and Arrangements JFTK Best Practice Framework

Mixture of Prescription and Autonomy Tight and Loose Governance  Instructional Time  Grouping Models  Instructional Planning Time/Collaboration  Basic Instructional Programs  Instructional Strategies  Use of Data for Decision-Making  Specific and Measurable Improvement Goals Theme: Instructional Programs, Practices, and Arrangements JFTK Best Practice Framework

Monitor Teacher Performance and Student Learning Develop Student Assessment and Data Monitoring Systems: Monitor Student Performance Monitor Student Learning Theme: Monitoring-Compilation, Analysis, and Use of Data JFTK Best Practice Framework

Strong Instructional Leaders Highly-Qualified Teachers Aligned Professional Development Evidence-Based Tools and Resources …and then assuring that we have provided the necessary staff, tools, and resources for them to learn it, we must ask: After determining WHAT it is that all children are expected to learn by grade and subject, “How will we know if they have learned it?” Theme: Monitoring-Compilation, Analysis, and Use of Data JFTK Best Practice Framework

State: Assessment District: Benchmark Assessments School: Unit Tests Teacher: Daily Monitoring State: Assessment Teacher: Daily Monitoring Theme: Monitoring-Compilation, Analysis, and Use of Data JFTK Best Practice Framework

Recognize, Intervene, or Adjust Based on Teacher and Student Performance Recognize, Intervene, or Adjust Based on School Performance Recognize, Intervene, or Adjust Based on Student Performance Theme: Recognition, Intervention, and Adjustment JFTK Best Practice Framework

Strong Instructional Leaders Highly-Qualified Teachers Aligned Professional Development Evidence-Based Tools and Resources “What are we going to do if a student does not learn what we said he or she would learn in any particular grade or subject?” The most important question of all… Theme: Recognition, Intervention, and Adjustment JFTK Best Practice Framework

 Time to Learn  Resources and Support to Learn If learning the stated objectives is NOT going to vary among students, then what must vary? The Intervention Theme: Recognition, Intervention, and Adjustment JFTK Best Practice Framework

We can now find and recognize schools in every corner of the state that are getting the job done. Critical Elements for the Cycle of Improvement

Recognizes public schools that are consistently raising achievement and closing achievement gaps CBEE/JFTK-CA Honor Roll Provides these schools a voice to share their Best Practice so others can replicate what works

What if the practices in California’s schools should remain the same as they are today and the rate of improvement in our schools should not improve?

The answer is…

But, what if the rest of the schools in the state adopted the Honor Roll best practices? And, what would happen if all schools in the state experienced the same rate of improvement as the Honor Roll Schools?

The answer is…

Our work now is to recognize those getting the job done and give them a voice to explain their best practices for others to copy.

And where are these STAR schools?

What Can We Do?  Locate and connect to Star schools in your area  Form “Teaching Hospital” partnerships with high performers  Place student teachers in STAR schools  Use data and best practices to dispel myths and provide solutions

Improving Student Academic Achievement and Closing Achievement Gaps Bringing Improvement to Scale at All Grade Levels