The Extended Essay
How does it fit in?
Definition In-depth study of a focused topic Topic of own choice Within a single Diploma Programme subject Guidance of supervisor Maximum 4000 words
Demands Topic that requires the gathering and analysis of information from a number of sources Genuine intellectual challenge Independent research + critical thinking Formal, structured presentation
Focus Process of academic research Level of analysis Quality of argument Coherence of communication Standards of formal presentation (referencing, bibliography, abstract)
Time Management Recommended: 40 hrs in total Work done outside regular class work Consultation session(s) with supervisor Internal deadlines
Guidance Supervisor subject teacher Librarian study center, research library EE Guide (first examinations 2009) Internet EE sites
Assessment Externally assessed Grade from A (excellent) to E (elementary) Grade boundary scale 0-36 Generic assessment criteria (A-K) Combined with TOK: max. 3 bonus points ”Viva Voce”-interview with supervisor (10-15 min)
Assessment Criteria: generic, subject group specific interpretations A: research question (achievement levels: 0,1,2) B: introduction (0,1,2) C: investigation (0,1,2,3,4) D: knowledge and understanding of the topic studied (0,1,2,3,4) E: reasoned argument (0,1,2,3,4) F: application of analytical and evaluative skills (0,1,2,3,4) G: use of language (0,1,2,3,4) H: conclusion (0,1,2) I: formal presentation (0,1,2,3,4) J: abstract (0,1,2) K: holistic judgement (0,1,2,3,4)
Papers needed EE Guide (start 2009) : generic part, subject groups part Checklist of criterion I (”formal presentation”) Contract with signatures from your supervisor Deadlines paper Calendar you keep during the process- time management
Academic honesty Clear indication of sources used NO plagiarism, collusion, duplication ”malpractice” !! ”Viva Voce”-interview with supervisor (10-15 min) When detected disqualification from Diploma
Definition of Malpractise PLAGIARISM = the representation of ideas or work of another person as the candidate’s own COLLUSION = supporting malpractise by another candidate, as in allowing one’s work to be copied or submitted for assessment by another DUPLICATION of work = presentation of the same work for different assessment components and/or diploma requirements Any other behaviour which gains an unfair advantage for a candidate or which affects the results of another candidate