Using RMMS to Track the Implementation of Watershed-based Plans

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
S trategic S ubwatershed I dentification P rocess Illinois Department of Natural Resources Conservation 2000 Ecosystems Program.
Advertisements

West Virginia Conservation Agency. Section 319 Non Point Source Program WVCA is the primary entity responsible for the implementation of the: Agriculture.
WATER QUALITY ANALYSIS for ANTIDEGRADATION
Salt Marsh Restoration Site Selection Tool An Example Application: Ranking Potential Salt Marsh Restoration Sites Using Social and Environmental Factors.
1 Watershed Planning: A Key to Integrated Planning FHWA Environmental Conference Ann Campbell Wetlands Division.
RTI International RTI International is a trade name of Research Triangle Institute. Economic Study of Nutrient Credit Trading for the Chesapeake.
What are TMDLs? and What Might They Mean to MS4 Permittees?
Stream Corridors Christine Hall Natural Resources Conservation Service North Jersey RC&D Slides 1-12.
Watershed Approaches and Community Based Planning
Pollutant Trading Discussion 22 July Why Allow Trading? §To make point sources pay §To lure nonpoint sources into doing pollution control so we.
Shingle Creek and West Mississippi Watershed Management Commissions Third Generation Watershed Management Plan.
Cost-Share Funding Opportunities – How the Lower Souris Watershed Committee Can Help You? Karmen Kyle Group Plan Advisor, Lower Souris Watershed Committee.
Water Quality Program WA Department of Ecology. Why do we have to report?  EPA requirement for all 319 grant recipients.  Measure progress on achieving.
Minnesota Watershed Nitrogen Reduction Planning Tool William Lazarus Department of Applied Economics University of Minnesota David Mulla Department of.
Introduction To The Highway Runoff Manual This introduction focus on: An overview of the Highway Runoff Manual. The definition of Minimum Requirements.
Montana’s 2007 Nonpoint Source Management Plan Robert Ray MT Dept Environmental Quality.
ManPlan: A Dynamic Web-based Modeling Program For Managing Nutrient Balance at the Watershed Level.
Web-Based GIS for Hydrological Impact Analysis Bernie Engel, Professor and Head Larry Theller, GIS Specialist Agricultural and Biological Engineering Purdue.
Incorporating the 9-Elements into a WMP Lindsey PhillipsMike Archer Source Water CoordinatorState Lakes Coordinator (402) (402)
National Hydrography Data Use and Applications.
Getting the Big Picture How to Look at Your Watershed Indiana Watershed Planning Guide,
L-THIA Long-Term Hydrologic Impact Assessment Model ….provides relative estimates of change of runoff and non point source pollutants caused due to land.
Watershed Management in MA The Deerfield River Watershed Action Plan Kate Crawford, River Corridor Management, October 10, 2005
1 National Hydrography Dataset Applications Overview Symposium on Terrain Analysis for Water Resources Applications Austin, Texas December 16, 2002.
Watershed Management Decision Support Using Web-Based Hydrological Tools and GIS Bernard A. Engel Jin-Yong Choi Larry Theller Agricultural and Biological.
EPA’S WATERSHED PLANNING APPROACH FOR THE SECTION 319 PROGRAM Dov Weitman Chief, Nonpoint Source Control Branch October.
Fort Bragg Cantonment Area Cape Fear River Basin LIDAR data have been used to create digital contours and topographic maps. 1.A Digital Elevation Model.
Lake Springfield Watershed Nutrient Management Project February 11, 2015.
North Carolina Forest Service North Carolina Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services NC Forestry BMP Effectiveness Monitoring Watershed Study Virginia.
Tom Singleton Associate VP, Director, Integrated Water Resources an Atkins company Linking TMDLs & Environmental Restoration.
Section 319 Grant Program Nonpoint Source Pollution Control
GIS Tools for Watershed Delineation Public Policy Perspectives Teaching Public Policy in the Earth Sciences April 21, 2006 Gary Coutu Department of Geography.
State Approaches to Funding Local Projects A Survey of RFPs The State/EPA NPS Partnership New Orleans, November 27, 2001.
THE COST AND LEVEL OF SERVIC E PRESENTED BY: COURTNEY REICH, AICP ECOLOGICAL PLANNING GROUP Stormwater Management Programs for Local Governments.
Prioritizing Agricultural Lands for Riparian Buffer Placement in the Raritan Basin: A Geographic Information System (GIS) Model Project Partners: North.
Center for Watershed Protection USDA Forest Service, Northeastern Area, State and Private Forestry How to estimate future forest cover in a watershed.
Predicting Sediment and Phosphorus Delivery with a Geographic Information System and a Computer Model M.S. Richardson and A. Roa-Espinosa; Dane County.
Watershed Assessment and Planning. Review Watershed Hydrology Watershed Hydrology Watershed Characteristics and Processes Watershed Characteristics and.
DC Draft Phase II Watershed Implementation Plan Stakeholder Meeting March 1, 2012 Metropolitan Washington Council Of Governments Hamid Karimi Deputy Director.
Taking the Next Step: Implementing the TMDL. What IDEM Provides to Help With Implementation  Compiling all the data in one place  Data-driven recommendations.
Department of Public Works NPDES Low Impact Development and Green Streets Resolutions City Council August 17, 2015.
Amy Walkenbach Illinois EPA 217/
Bassett Creek Water Management Commission Joint Advisory Group Meeting January 23, 2001.
La Moine River Ecosystem Partnership: Organizing for Success Dan Moorehouse & Jeff Boeckler.
Indiana’s Coastal Nonpoint Pollution Control Program Coastal Advisory Board Meeting April 18, 2007.
Straight to the Point – Watershed-based Plans Should: be designed to restore water quality from nonpoint source impairments using sufficiently analyzed.
APPLICATIONS OF WATER QUALITY REGULATIONS Module 22, part c – Applications.
Western Lake Erie Basin Partnership Presented by: Name, Title Your Organization DATE YOU PRESENTED The Meeting you presented at.
Desired Outcomes / Impacts ActionsKnowledge Occurs when there is a behavior change based upon what participants have learned (medium term): Development.
™ Nutrient Management Planning ¨ Will these be mandated in your state?  An emerging national issue is how to account for agricultural non-point source.
Rapid Bioassessment Protocols for low gradient streams) for species richness, composition and pollution tolerance, as well as a composite benthic macroinvertebrate.
BASINS 2.0 and The Trinity River Basin By Jóna Finndís Jónsdóttir.
LTHIA and Online Watershed Delineation - Tale of a DEM consumer Larry Theller,Bernie Engel, and Tong Zhai Purdue University Agricultural and Biological.
Gary Darling - GISP Office of the State CIO Acting Deputy Geographic Information Officer Melody Baldwin Division of Flood Management JOC –FOC GIS Unit.
State of the Streams Loudoun County: 2005 Loudoun Strategic Watershed Management Planning Conference February 23, 2006 Presented by: Darrell Schwalm Loudoun.
Setting Goals for Stream “Health:” The Next Generation of Watershed Plans? The Waterlands Group San Francisco Estuary Institute Aquatic Science Center.
Waterbody Classification Project A project of the Lakes and Watershed Commission, Dane County Department of Planning and Development, and the Dane County.
Introduction to Water Quality Trading National Forum On Water Quality Trading July 22-23, 2003 Chicago, Illinois.
HAMPTON ROADS REGIONAL WATER RESOURCES MANAGEMENT PROGRAM Presentation John M. Carlock, AICP Deputy Executive Director, Physical Planning Hampton Roads.
WATERSHED MANAGEMENT Dov Weitman Chief, Nonpoint Source Control Branch U.S. Environmental Protection Agency May 4, Federal.
CHRIS ZADAK AND RACHEL OLMANSON, METR0-ST. CROIX WATERSHED UNIT WATERSHED RESTORATION AND PROTECTION STRATEGY.
Using RMMS to Track the Implementation of Watershed-based Plans
Using RMMS to Track & Report BMP Implementation
GIS Data Management for SHA’s Bay Restoration Program
4 State LWV’s 60 local LWV’s About 4000 individuals Twin Cites Chicago
Watershed Literacy & Engagement
Straight to the Point – Watershed-based Plans Should:
Section 319 Grant Program – writing a proposal that can be funded
NJ-GeoWeb Interactive Basics Workshop
Nonpoint Source Program
Presentation transcript:

Using RMMS to Track the Implementation of Watershed-based Plans Scott Ristau, Illinois Environmental Protection Agency

Resource Management Mapping Service (RMMS) The Illinois Environmental Protection Agency (Illinois EPA) uses the Resource Management Mapping Service to help track the development and implementation of watershed-based plans in Illinois.

The Resource Management Mapping Service, or RMMS, is maintained by the University of Illinois with support from the Illinois EPA and other state agencies.   The website is located at http://www.rmms.illinois.edu.

RMMS uses a wide range of coordinated natural resource related databases to provide an online, interactive mapping environment designed to help government agencies and others evaluate and manage geographically-based information about Illinois’ natural resources, particularly water resources, so that they can more effectively develop and implement appropriate resource protection and enhancement measures.

So there is a lot that RMMS can do but I’m going to focus primarily on those features that are used to track the implementation of watershed-based plans. However, I also want to point out that many of the data layers in RMMS can also help local stakeholders as they go through the process of developing a watershed-based plan.

Fore example, RMMS contains information on the physical location of lakes and streams assessed and reported in accordance with Section 305(b) of the Federal Clean Water Act.

The 305b assessment data for those lakes and streams can also be viewed in RMMS by using the map identify tool. The codes in the pop-up table are explained in the metadata, which can be viewed by clicking on the name of the data layer.

RMMS can also display the streams and lakes that have been listed in accordance with Section 303(d) of the Clean Water Act (CWA).

And we can look at the 303d list information using the map identify tool

RMMS can also generate HUC12 reports that are designed to describe important characteristics of an individual 12 digit hydrologic unit code (HUC) watershed. The Land Cover report describes the HUC 12 in terms of its size, floodzones, percent imperviousness, land use, governmental units, miles of stream, and lake acres.

The Water Quality report provides the 303d and 305b assessment information for those lakes and steams that are within that 12 digit HUC. It also provides information on the water quality monitoring stations, community water supply wells, and NPDES outfalls that fall within that 12 digit HUC.

The Soils report summarizes information about the soils within that 12 digit HUC in terms of hydrologic soil groups, hydric classification, drainage class, flooding frequency, runoff potential, runoff class, and highly erodible lands.

RMMS also contains data on watershed-based plans that have been developed to control nonpoint source (NPS) pollution. So we can see where we have plans and where we don’t.

Again, using the Map Identify tool you can see some basic information about an individual plan and there is also a link to a copy of the plan.

RMMS allows the user to run reports, such as a report to see what nonpoint source pollution control BMPs were recommended by a specific plan. Watershed Based Plan Data Layer Report Recommended Bmps (Title: Watershed Implementation Plan for the Upper Salt Fork of the Vermilion River) 1990-2018 Generated on Friday, April 05, 2013 Bmp Category Bmp Code Quantity Unit COST Sediment Load Reduction (tons/year) TSS Load Reduction (lbs/year) Phosphorus Load Reduction (lbs/year) Nitrogen Load Reduction (lbs/year) OTHER2 septic system upgrade(34) number buffer zone enhancement / installation(35) 10 acres 3,480 AGRICULTURE Conservation Tillage(329) 140,000 acre 756,000 28,000 2,800 Filter Strip(393) 1,000 228,000 470 50 15,000 Nutrient Management(590) 1,876,000 420,000 HYDROLOGIC Stream Channel Stabilization(584) 34,400 feet Streambank and Shoreline Protection(580) 40,500 Wetland Restoration(657) 100 12,000 Education(1) Monitoring(2)

RMMS also contains information about BMPs that have actually been implemented, such data on individual BMPs implemented with Section 319 funding. Each pink star represents a Section 319 funded BMP.

The BMP information at RMMS is being used in a number of ways The BMP information at RMMS is being used in a number of ways. For example, it’s used to:   document NPS pollution control progress in terms of BMPs and pollutant load reductions at various scales (watershed, county, state); identify potential conflicts or synergies that may exist between proposed BMPs and past BMPs (i.e., will a proposed new streambank stabilization project adversely impact a wetland restoration project previously implemented in the same vicinity); facilitate follow up inspections of past BMPs to identify maintenance needs or other issues; identify future NPS control needs in relationship to past accomplishments; and track the implementation of watershed-based plans.

RMMS allows the user to run reports on BMP implementation, such as a report to list the BMPs implemented within the area covered by a watershed plan .

By having this information in RMMS users can compare the units (acres, feet, number) & load reductions of BMPs actually implemented under Section 319 and other programs to the BMP recommendations contained in the watershed plan to see what kind progress is being made in terms of implementing the plan.

For example, by combining the two RMMS tables we generated before we can see what was recommended versus what has been achieved in this planning area. Watershed Implementation Plan for the Upper Salt Fork of the Vermilion River Recommended Load Reductions Bmp Code Quantity Recommended Quantity Implemented Quantity Remaining Unit Sediment Load Reduction (tons/year) Phosphorus Load Reduction (lbs/year) Nitrogen Load Reduction (lbs/year) septic system upgrade(34)   number buffer zone enhancement / installation(35) 10 acres Conservation Tillage(329) 140,000 4,485.80 135,514 acre 28,000 2,800 Filter Strip(393) 1,000 26.90 973 470 50 15,000 Nutrient Management(590) 3,844.77 136,155 420,000 Stream Channel Stabilization(584) 34,400 feet Streambank and Shoreline Protection(580) 40,500 450 40,050 Wetland Restoration(657) 100 12,000 Education(1) Monitoring(2) Total Load Reductions Recommended 28,470 2,850 447,000 Implemented Load reductions 45,116.0 39,320 77,531 Remaining Need -16,646.0 -36,470.0 369,469.0

But we have to keep in mind that the BMP data layers currently available in RMMS don’t tell the whole story. For example, RMMS doesn’t have data on BMPs that are being implemented privately or under certain other government programs, such as those administered by NRCS.

The 319 BMP reports in RMMS also help us populate several fields in GRTS. For example, say we had a project that installed BMPs in multiple 12-digit HUCs. We can run a BMP report in RMMS for that specific project, download the report to Excel, and sort the results by HUC12.

This data can then be used to define the Drainage Areas in GRTS as well as the Pollutant Load Reduction fields and BMP fields in GRTS for those specific drainage areas.

Thank You Scott Ristau, Illinois Environmental Protection Agency Scott.Ristau@illinois.gov