Determination of ILS Critical and Sensitive Areas

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
TWO STEP EQUATIONS 1. SOLVE FOR X 2. DO THE ADDITION STEP FIRST
Advertisements

You have been given a mission and a code. Use the code to complete the mission and you will save the world from obliteration…
Wireless LAN RF Principles
Advanced Piloting Cruise Plot.
Chapter 1 The Study of Body Function Image PowerPoint
Copyright © 2011, Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. Chapter 5 Author: Julia Richards and R. Scott Hawley.
1 Copyright © 2010, Elsevier Inc. All rights Reserved Fig 2.1 Chapter 2.
By D. Fisher Geometric Transformations. Reflection, Rotation, or Translation 1.
Unit C: Forest Management
Business Transaction Management Software for Application Coordination 1 Business Processes and Coordination.
1 Ground Based Meteorological Radars Presented By: David Franc NOAAs National Weather Service September 2005.
1 Marinus C. F. Heijl Acting Director Air Navigation Bureau ICAO 30 March 2007 SYMPOSIUM OUTCOMES AND THE WAY FORWARD.
Summary of Convergence Tests for Series and Solved Problems
Jeopardy Q 1 Q 6 Q 11 Q 16 Q 21 Q 2 Q 7 Q 12 Q 17 Q 22 Q 3 Q 8 Q 13
Jeopardy Q 1 Q 6 Q 11 Q 16 Q 21 Q 2 Q 7 Q 12 Q 17 Q 22 Q 3 Q 8 Q 13
Title Subtitle.
My Alphabet Book abcdefghijklm nopqrstuvwxyz.
0 - 0.
2 pt 3 pt 4 pt 5 pt 1 pt 2 pt 3 pt 4 pt 5 pt 1 pt 2 pt 3 pt 4 pt 5 pt 1 pt 2 pt 3 pt 4 pt 5 pt 1 pt 2 pt 3 pt 4 pt 5 pt 1 pt ShapesPatterns Counting Number.
DIVIDING INTEGERS 1. IF THE SIGNS ARE THE SAME THE ANSWER IS POSITIVE 2. IF THE SIGNS ARE DIFFERENT THE ANSWER IS NEGATIVE.
MULTIPLICATION EQUATIONS 1. SOLVE FOR X 3. WHAT EVER YOU DO TO ONE SIDE YOU HAVE TO DO TO THE OTHER 2. DIVIDE BY THE NUMBER IN FRONT OF THE VARIABLE.
SUBTRACTING INTEGERS 1. CHANGE THE SUBTRACTION SIGN TO ADDITION
MULT. INTEGERS 1. IF THE SIGNS ARE THE SAME THE ANSWER IS POSITIVE 2. IF THE SIGNS ARE DIFFERENT THE ANSWER IS NEGATIVE.
Addition Facts
Year 6 mental test 5 second questions
Developing Event Reconstruction for CTA R D Parsons (Univ. of Leeds) J Hinton (Univ. of Leicester)
Around the World AdditionSubtraction MultiplicationDivision AdditionSubtraction MultiplicationDivision.
ZMQS ZMQS
Federal Aviation Administration International Flight Inspection Symposium June 24, 2008 James H. Washington Vice President, Acquisition and Business Services.
Richmond House, Liverpool (1) 26 th January 2004.
BT Wholesale October Creating your own telephone network WHOLESALE CALLS LINE ASSOCIATED.
International Flight Inspection Symposium
ANGLE-of-ATTACK Proprietary Software Systems, Inc.
Identifying the Achilles Heels of Instrument Flight Procedures International Flight Inspection Symposium Oklahoma City, OK USA June 2008 Ivan Ferencz CAA.
International Flight Inspection Symposium
Testing of ILS Receivers in a Multipath Propagation Environment International Flight Inspection Symposium Oklahoma City, OK USA June 2008 Jochen Bredemeyer,
ABC Technology Project
Plane wave reflection and transmission
© Charles van Marrewijk, An Introduction to Geographical Economics Brakman, Garretsen, and Van Marrewijk.
VOORBLAD.
1 Breadth First Search s s Undiscovered Discovered Finished Queue: s Top of queue 2 1 Shortest path from s.
“Start-to-End” Simulations Imaging of Single Molecules at the European XFEL Igor Zagorodnov S2E Meeting DESY 10. February 2014.
1 K  Convexity and The Optimality of the (s, S) Policy.
10:00 Welcome address and introduction (ICAO) 10:15 Presentation of the workshop and its objectives (AWOG chair) 10:30 Objectives of the study conducted.
Squares and Square Root WALK. Solve each problem REVIEW:
Lets play bingo!!. Calculate: MEAN Calculate: MEDIAN
Quadratic Graphs and Completing the Square
Understanding Generalist Practice, 5e, Kirst-Ashman/Hull
Chapter 5 Test Review Sections 5-1 through 5-4.
SIMOCODE-DP Software.
Drop Zone Selection.
GG Consulting, LLC I-SUITE. Source: TEA SHARS Frequently asked questions 2.
RF Fundamentals Lecture 3.
Addition 1’s to 20.
25 seconds left…...
Subtraction: Adding UP
Test B, 100 Subtraction Facts
Presented to: By: Date: Federal Aviation Administration International Aircraft Materials Fire Test Working Group Developing an In-flight Fire Condition.
H to shape fully developed personality to shape fully developed personality for successful application in life for successful.
Week 1.
We will resume in: 25 Minutes.
1 Unit 1 Kinematics Chapter 1 Day
PSSA Preparation.
1 PART 1 ILLUSTRATION OF DOCUMENTS  Brief introduction to the documents contained in the envelope  Detailed clarification of the documents content.
How Cells Obtain Energy from Food
International Flight Inspection Symposium
Conclusions & Recommendations
Conclusions & Recommendations
Presentation transcript:

Determination of ILS Critical and Sensitive Areas International Flight Inspection Symposium Oklahoma City, OK USA June 2008 Determination of ILS Critical and Sensitive Areas Dale Courtney US FAA Air Traffic Organization

Determination of ILS Critical and Sensitive Areas Discussion Points Effects of Multi-Path on ILS Signal-in-Space ILS Critical and Sensitive Areas ICAO Recognition of Critical and Sensitive Areas Mathematical Model Validation Simulation Results Conclusions Questions IFIS 2008, OKC Determination of ILS Critical and Sensitive Areas

Effects of Multi-Path on ILS ILS Localizer and Glide Path Signal Quality is Influenced by Multi-Path Multi-Path Occurs When a Radio Signal Travels by More Than One Path to Arrive At the Receiver The Direct Path is From the Transmitter to the Receiver Additional Paths are Created When the Transmitted Signal Reflects Off Another Object and Then Arrives at the Receiver IFIS 2008, OKC Determination of ILS Critical and Sensitive Areas

Effects of Multi-Path on ILS Multi-Path Can Be Characterized as Either Static or Dynamic Static Multi-Path is Created by Fixed Objects Such as Buildings or Terrain Dynamic Multi-Path is Created by Transient Objects Such as Airplanes or Vehicles The Amount of Degradation on an ILS Signal due to Multi-Path is a Function of Location, Size, and Orientation of the Reflecting Object IFIS 2008, OKC Determination of ILS Critical and Sensitive Areas

Effects of Multi-Path on ILS ILS Signal Degradation Due to Multi-Path is Realized by Structure Roughness and Alignment/Angle Deviation Effects of Multi-Path due to Static Sources Do Not Change Over Time Effects of Multi-Path due to Dynamic Sources Change with Location of the Reflector IFIS 2008, OKC Determination of ILS Critical and Sensitive Areas

ILS Critical and Sensitive Areas Aircraft and Vehicles Operating Near Localizer and Glide Path Facilities Can Cause Distortion to the ILS Signal-in-Space Protection Areas Around the Localizer and Glide Path Facilities Become Necessary to Protect the Integrity of the ILS Signal-in-Space Historically Called ILS Critical and Sensitive Areas IFIS 2008, OKC Determination of ILS Critical and Sensitive Areas

ILS Critical and Sensitive Areas Dimensions and Location of ILS Critical and Sensitive Areas Are Determined by Both Direct Flight Measurement and Mathematical Modeling Movement of Aircraft and Vehicles in the ILS Critical and Sensitive Areas Can be Restricted or Operationally Controlled to Protect ILS Signal Quality During ILS Operations IFIS 2008, OKC Determination of ILS Critical and Sensitive Areas

ICAO Recognition of CSA The International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO) Publishes Critical and Sensitive Area Dimensions and Location in Annex 10 ICAO’s Navigation Systems Panel Recognized Published Critical and Sensitive Areas May Not be Sufficient to Protect ILS Signal Quality Considering Today’s Larger Aircraft IFIS 2008, OKC Determination of ILS Critical and Sensitive Areas

ICAO Recognition of CSA A Group was Commissioned by the Navigation Systems Panel in March 2007 to Consider Updates to ILS Critical and Sensitive Areas The Group Determined Updates to ICAO Critical and Sensitive Areas Considering: Critical Area is a Dimension About the Localizer or Glide Path Such That Aircraft or Vehicles Within the Area Cause Out-of-Tolerance Disturbances to the ILS from the Limit of Coverage to 2 Nautical Miles from Threshold IFIS 2008, OKC Determination of ILS Critical and Sensitive Areas

ICAO Recognition of CSA Sensitive Area is a Dimension About the Localizer or Glide Path Such That Aircraft or Vehicles Within the Area Cause Out-of-Tolerance Disturbances to the ILS from 2 Nautical Miles from Threshold to the Point the ILS Signal is No Longer Used IFIS 2008, OKC Determination of ILS Critical and Sensitive Areas

ICAO Recognition of CSA Critical and Sensitive Area Dimensions are Determined by the Root Sum Square Combination of Static and Dynamic Multi-Path Contribution Static Multi-Path is Considered to Consume 60% of Allowable Tolerance Dynamic Multi-Path is Considered to Consume 80% of Allowable Tolerance IFIS 2008, OKC Determination of ILS Critical and Sensitive Areas

Mathematical Model Validation An Extensive Effort Would be Required to Completely Define ILS Critical and Sensitive Areas Only by Flight Measurement Techniques Mathematical Modeling and Simulation Techniques Lend Themselves to Better Define ILS Critical and Sensitive Areas Simulation Must be Well Validated by Comparison with Ground and Flight Measurement for a Variety of Situations IFIS 2008, OKC Determination of ILS Critical and Sensitive Areas

Mathematical Model Validation Efforts Conducted in Europe and the United States to Validate Simulation Techniques Locations of Interest Were Determined by Simulation Ground and Flight Measurements of an Actual Aircraft in the Determined Position were Collected Results were Compared to Validate Simulation Techniques IFIS 2008, OKC Determination of ILS Critical and Sensitive Areas

Determination of ILS Critical and Sensitive Areas Localizer Validation IFIS 2008, OKC Determination of ILS Critical and Sensitive Areas

Determination of ILS Critical and Sensitive Areas Glide Path Validation IFIS 2008, OKC Determination of ILS Critical and Sensitive Areas

B747 Impact to Small Aperture Localizer IFIS 2008, OKC Determination of ILS Critical and Sensitive Areas

B747 Impact to Large Aperture Localizer IFIS 2008, OKC Determination of ILS Critical and Sensitive Areas

B757 Impact to Medium Aperture Localizer IFIS 2008, OKC Determination of ILS Critical and Sensitive Areas

A380 Impact to Medium Aperture Localizer IFIS 2008, OKC Determination of ILS Critical and Sensitive Areas

Localizer Critical and Sensitive Areas ZS2 ZS1 XC Critical Area Sensitive Area ZC 1500 m XTH YC Y1 Not to scale Dimensions in meters r u n w a y Y2 Y3 XS 300 m Additional Sensitive Area for non-orthogonal, non-parallel to runway orientation Note - Y3 and XTH are determined by a site-specific study. Where no specific study has been undertaken, the default value for XTH is zero. 12 0 m Rear Sensitive Additional rear Sensitive Area for orthogonal to runway orientation IFIS 2008, OKC Determination of ILS Critical and Sensitive Areas

Glide Path Critical and Sensitive Areas Critical Area Not to scale YC [o,p] Glide Path Antenna ZC YS [o,p] XC [o,p] XS [o,p] 45° Sensitive Area Runway Threshold Additional Critical Area for non-parallel aircraft higher than 6 meters ZS Ws Runway Note –The sensitive area extends on the other side of the runway. If vehicle movements or holding are possible in this area, WS is assessed through a specific study. 50m IFIS 2008, OKC Determination of ILS Critical and Sensitive Areas

Determination of ILS Critical and Sensitive Areas Conclusions Critical and Sensitive Area Dimensions are Heavily Influenced by: Aircraft Tail Height and Size Location and Orientation of Reflector Type of Localizer or Glide Path Antenna Validated Mathematical Models Can be Used to More Completely Define Critical and Sensitive Areas as Compared to Flight Measurement IFIS 2008, OKC Determination of ILS Critical and Sensitive Areas

Determination of ILS Critical and Sensitive Areas Conclusions Care Should be Exercised When Using Flight Measurement Techniques Alone to Quantify Effects of an Aircraft or Vehicle on ILS Signal-in-Space Performance as Small Changes in Reflector Location and Orientation Can Result in Varying Levels of Measured Distortion IFIS 2008, OKC Determination of ILS Critical and Sensitive Areas

Determination of ILS Critical and Sensitive Areas QUESTIONS? IFIS 2008, OKC Determination of ILS Critical and Sensitive Areas