Evaluating the Alignment and Quality of the Assessed Curriculum Virginia Department of Education Office of School Improvement 2013-2014.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Parts of a Lesson Plan Any format that works for you and your JTEs is ok… BUT! Here are some ideas that might help you set up your LP format. The ALTs.
Advertisements

Writing constructed response items
Assessment types and activities
Common Formative Assessment Initiative In 2008, Colorado Legislature passed Senate Bill titled Colorado Achievement Plan for Kids (CAP4K) Expand.
Michigan Assessment Consortium Common Assessment Development Series Putting Together The Test Blueprint.
Understanding the ELA/Literacy Evidence Tables. The tables contain the Reading, Writing and Vocabulary Major claims and the evidences to be measured on.
Assessment & Evaluation adapted from a presentation by Som Mony
Teacher Evaluation New Teacher Orientation August 15, 2013.
Evaluating Student Achievement
John Clegg. Contents What is CLIL? CLIL objectives What to assess in CLIL Fairness issue Ways of addressing fairness reduce the language demands of the.
The ABCs of Assessment Improving Student Learning Through New Approaches to Classroom Assessment.
Aligning Unit Tests and Backwards Instruction Planning Virginia Department of Education Office of School Improvement
Designing Scoring Rubrics. What is a Rubric? Guidelines by which a product is judged Guidelines by which a product is judged Explain the standards for.
Writing High Quality Assessment Items Using a Variety of Formats Scott Strother & Duane Benson 11/14/14.
Building an Accurate SBPR RECORD KEEPING ASSESSMENT AND INSTRUCTION GRADE LEVEL STANDARDS SBPR 1.
ASSESSMENT IN EDUCATION ASSESSMENT IN EDUCATION. Copyright Keith Morrison, 2004 TESTS Purposes of the test Type of test Objectives of the test Content.
Uses of Language Tests.
Norm-referenced assessment Criterion-referenced assessment Domain-referenced assessment Diagnostic assessment Formative assessment Summative assessment.
Grade 12 Subject Specific Ministry Training Sessions
ACE TESOL Diploma Program – London Language Institute OBJECTIVES You will understand: 1. The difference between a course, curriculum, and syllabus. 2.
Evaluating the Alignment and Quality of the Taught Curriculum Virginia Department of Education Office of School Improvement
 DIAGNOSTIC: provides instructors with information about student's prior knowledge and misconceptions before beginning a learning activity.  FORMATIVE:
Essay Assessment Tasks
Assessment Cadre #3: “Assess How? Designing Assessments to Do What You Want”
From Learning Goals to Assessment Plans University of Wisconsin Parkside January 20, 2012 Susan Hatfield Winona State University
TEXAS TECH UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES CENTER SCHOOL OF PHARMACY KRYSTAL K. HAASE, PHARM.D., FCCP, BCPS ASSOCIATE PROFESSOR BEYOND MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTIONS.
The Planning and Assessment Cycle
Bank of Performance Assessment Tasks in English
David Steer Department of Geosciences The University of Akron Learning objectives and assessments Oct 2013.
Authentic Assessment Principles & Methods
Student Work Example(3 rd grader) – Yakelin Burnau.
August 2007FFP Testing and Evaluation Techniques Chapter 7 Florida State Fire College Ocala, Florida.
Four Basic Principles to Follow: Test what was taught. Test what was taught. Test in a way that reflects way in which it was taught. Test in a way that.
CASL: Target -Method Match Statesville Middle School January 13, 2009.
Timber Trace Elementary School October 4, Introduction Module # 1 Structure of the Handbook Design Questions and Modules Sample Activity Box How.
Let’s Talk Assessment Rhonda Haus University of Regina 2013.
Teaching Today: An Introduction to Education 8th edition
David Steer Department of Geosciences The University of Akron Learning objectives and assessments May 2013.
Assessments Matching Assessments to Standards. Agenda ● Welcome ● What do you think of assessment? ● Overview of all types of evidence ● Performance Tasks.
Curriculum Report Card Implementation Presentations
Classroom Evaluation & Grading Chapter 15. Intelligence and Achievement Intelligence and achievement are not the same Intelligence and achievement are.
After lunch - Mix it up! Arrange your tables so that everyone else seated at your table represents another district. 1.
ASSESSING STUDENT ACHIEVEMENT Using Multiple Measures Prepared by Dean Gilbert, Science Consultant Los Angeles County Office of Education.
Richard Beinecke, Professor and Chair Suffolk University Institute for Public Service.
Target -Method Match Selecting The Right Assessment.
Common Formative Assessments for Science Monica Burgio Daigler, Erie 1 BOCES.
4-Day Agenda and Expectations Day 2 Building Formative Assessments linked to deconstructed content and skills Building Formative Assessments linked to.
Lecture by: Chris Ross Chapter 7: Teacher-Designed Strategies.
Assessment and Testing
Teacher in Residence  Sign in and take any graded homework from your folders.  Turn in your TWS – Teaching Context and Unit Overview  Please.
Assessment. Workshop Outline Testing and assessment Why assess? Types of tests Types of assessment Some assessment task types Backwash Qualities of a.
Process and Content Standards in Mathematics: Thoughts and Reflections V 2 CTM - Valley of Virginia Council of Teachers of Mathematics November 13, 2012.
Grand Island K-8 SCIENCE Common Formative Assessments for Science Monica Burgio Daigler, Erie 1 BOCES.
Georgia will lead the nation in improving student achievement. 1 Georgia Performance Standards Day 3: Assessment FOR Learning.
Summary of Assessments By the Big Island Team: (Sherry, Alan, John, Bess) CCSS SBAC PARCC AP CCSSO.
Review: Alternative Assessments Alternative/Authentic assessment Real-life setting Performance based Techniques: Observation Individual or Group Projects.
Presented to GETSI by Ellen Iverson, SERC, Carleton College Developed as InTeGrate talk by David Steer Department of Geosciences The University of Akron.
Stuart Birnbaum Department of Geological Sciences The University of Texas at San Antonio Learning objectives and assessments June 15, 2015.
Evaluation, Testing and Assessment June 9, Curriculum Evaluation Necessary to determine – How the program works – How successfully it works – Whether.
 Teaching: Chapter 14. Assessments provide feedback about students’ learning as it is occurring and evaluates students’ learning after instruction has.
Defining & Aligning Local Curriculum. What is Curriculum? Individually consider your personal definition of the term curriculum What words do you think.
Chapter 6 Assessing Science Learning Updated Spring 2012 – D. Fulton.
Depew Science 5-8 Data Rollout. Reviewing Current Assessment Data Initial reactions Where do you believe your students were MOST successful when compared.
Formative and Summative Assessment
Chapter 14 Assembling, Administering, and Appraising classroom tests and assessments.
Exploring Assessment Options NC Teaching Standard 4
Curriculum Coordinator: D. Para Date of Presentation: Jan. 20, 2017
Developing Quality Assessments
Testing Schedule.
Presentation transcript:

Evaluating the Alignment and Quality of the Assessed Curriculum Virginia Department of Education Office of School Improvement

AgendaAgenda 1.What are the basic components of an Assessed Curriculum? 2.How do we measure the quality of the basic components of our Assessed Curriculum? 1.What are the basic components of an Assessed Curriculum? 2.How do we measure the quality of the basic components of our Assessed Curriculum?

Question 1 What are the basic components of an Assessed Curriculum?

Basic Components for Local Assessment Alignment & Content Coverage Consistency and Fairness Alignment & Content Coverage Consistency and Fairness

Reading the Tool TermWhat it Means No Implementation None or few of the elements are present for Functional Implementation; this component is ineffective Limited Implementation Some or most elements of Functional Implementation are present; this component is partially effective Functional Implementation All the elements needed for effectiveness are present Full Implementation All the elements for Functional Implementation are present AND at least one other element is in place for this component to be highly effective.

The Many Purposes of Assessments Find out what students already know and can do. Help students improve their learning by using data to inform to instruction. Let students, and their families, know how much they have learned within a prescribed period of time. Find out what students already know and can do. Help students improve their learning by using data to inform to instruction. Let students, and their families, know how much they have learned within a prescribed period of time. Cooper, 2007

Major Types of Assessments Diagnostic Assessment Formative Assessment Summative Assessment Diagnostic Assessment Formative Assessment Summative Assessment

Formative Assessment: Assessment FOR Learning “Assessment for learning encompasses both diagnostic (initial) and formative assessment; it is assessment that occurs during the instructional process and is primarily intended to help students improve their learning.” Cooper, 2007

Formative Assessment Any activity you do that helps you assess where your students currently are with their learning and understanding is “for” learning.

Examples of Formative Assessment Informal Entrance/Exit Slips Question & Answer Thumbs up/Thumbs down Formal Quizzes Classwork Journals Informal Entrance/Exit Slips Question & Answer Thumbs up/Thumbs down Formal Quizzes Classwork Journals

Summative Assessment: Assessment OF Learning Any activity you do that provides feedback on what the students have learned in a chapter, unit, quarter, and/or semester is “of” learning.

Examples of Summative Assessment Formal Unit Tests Performance Tasks Formal Unit Tests Performance Tasks

Determining the Type of Assessment Depends on how we use the results Even summative assessments (like unit tests) can be used formatively Depends on how we use the results Even summative assessments (like unit tests) can be used formatively

Alignment, Content Coverage, Consistency, and Fairness

Alignment and Content Coverage  Is it measuring what we want it to measure?  Is it “on target?”

Consistency & Fairness Is it fairly and consistently measuring what we want it to measure?

Alignment & Content Coverage

AlignmentAlignment Is the assessment aligned to the major purposes and learning objectives of the Written and Taught Curricula? For example: Does the assessment on U.S. History to 1865 adequately address what a student should know and be able to do with information about U.S. History to 1865? Is the assessment aligned to the major purposes and learning objectives of the Written and Taught Curricula? For example: Does the assessment on U.S. History to 1865 adequately address what a student should know and be able to do with information about U.S. History to 1865?

Content Coverage Whether the assessment contains a rich enough sample of the chosen learning objectives For example: Are there enough questions on generating and testing hypotheses to evaluate students’ abilities to generate and test hypotheses? Whether the assessment contains a rich enough sample of the chosen learning objectives For example: Are there enough questions on generating and testing hypotheses to evaluate students’ abilities to generate and test hypotheses?

Example: Unpacking a Standard For each learning objective, underline the content, circle the word(s) that provide(s) information regarding cognitive level, and finally, classify the word(s) into one of Bloom’s six cognitive levels. 4.10The student will a)identify representations of lines that illustrate intersection, parallelism, and perpendicularity. Identify practical situations that illustrate parallel, intersecting, and perpendicular lines.

Example: Unpacking a Standard For each learning objective, underline the content, circle the word(s) that provide(s) information regarding cognitive level, and finally, classify the word(s) into one of Bloom’s six cognitive levels. 4.10The student will a)identify representations of lines that illustrate intersection, parallelism, and perpendicularity. Identify practical situations that illustrate parallel, intersecting, and perpendicular lines. Remember Apply

Do these items cover the standard sufficiently?

Better Content Coverage: Add an Item

Using Standards to Determine Item Type

Item Type: Selected Response Objective—right or wrong answers Examples  Multiple choice  True/false  Matching Objective—right or wrong answers Examples  Multiple choice  True/false  Matching

Item Type: Constructed Response Written or oral React to and use information Generally graded with a rubric Examples  Fill-in-the-Blank  Short Answer  Essay Written or oral React to and use information Generally graded with a rubric Examples  Fill-in-the-Blank  Short Answer  Essay

Item Type: Performance Task Apply knowledge Usually “real life” situations Generally graded with a rubric Examples:  Role-play (debates, skits)  Model/Simulation  Performance/Product  Labs Apply knowledge Usually “real life” situations Generally graded with a rubric Examples:  Role-play (debates, skits)  Model/Simulation  Performance/Product  Labs

Table of Specifications Standard RememberUnderstandApplyAnalyzeEvaluateCreate item Type and Item Number A.1: Demonstrate understanding of the inter-relationships among fundamental concepts in the physical, life, and Earth systems science. X A.2: Use outcome of investigations to build and refine questions, models, and explanations XX

Basic Component: Consistency & Fairness

Consistent and Fair Assessments Have we considered and tried to avoid:  Culturally biased language and expressions  Developmentally inappropriate reading level  Mechanical or grammatical mistakes in assessment items  Insufficient or unclear directions  Poor layout, causing uncertainty or mistakes in reading the assessment  Insufficient number of assessment items  Subjective scoring Have we considered and tried to avoid:  Culturally biased language and expressions  Developmentally inappropriate reading level  Mechanical or grammatical mistakes in assessment items  Insufficient or unclear directions  Poor layout, causing uncertainty or mistakes in reading the assessment  Insufficient number of assessment items  Subjective scoring Gareis & Grant (2008)

Increasing Fairness: Hints for Overall Test Construction 1.Make sure one item does not give away the answer to another item (cluing). 2.Provide clear directions to each portion of the test. 3.Do not split items across pages. 4.Make sure the test is neat and error-free. 5.Provide clear and adequate response spaces. 6.Provide point values for older students. 1.Make sure one item does not give away the answer to another item (cluing). 2.Provide clear directions to each portion of the test. 3.Do not split items across pages. 4.Make sure the test is neat and error-free. 5.Provide clear and adequate response spaces. 6.Provide point values for older students. Gareis & Grant (2008)

Question 2 How do we measure the quality of the basic components of our Assessed Curriculum?

How do these pieces fit together? Review a local assessment using the Assessment Tool.