The framework decision on mutual recognition of custodial sentences Estella Baker

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Life sentence in Finland and other Nordic Countries

Advertisements

European Judicial Network The EJN website:

THE POSITIVES AND NEGATIVES OF CITIZENSHIP Estella Baker

INTERNATIONAL HUMAN RIGHTS MECHANISMS

on Transfer of Sentenced Persons

Children in Prison From Convention to National Legislation: Legal Implementation of International Standards Bragi Guðbrandsson Government Agency for Child.

THE CERTIFYING AUTHORITY

CHILD-FRIENDLY JUSTICE GUIDELINES. Getting there (1) Gaps between law and practice CRC and ECHR Resolution No. 2 on Child-Friendly Justice (25-26 Oct.

EUROPEAN INITIATIVES IN THE FIELD OF MUTUAL LEGAL ASSISTANCE IN CRIMINAL MATTERS AND MUTUAL RECOGNITION NEW LEGAL MECHANISM FOR CREATING AN AREA OF FREEDOM,

Poland Basel Protocol on Liability and Compensation Financial Limits And Insurance Questionnaire 2 Ratification Krystyna Panek - Gondek Chief Inspectorate.

Basel Convention Secretariat United Nations Environmental Programme ___________________________________ Roles and Responsibilities under the Protocol Laura.

European Investigation Order Background and Context Steve Peers April 7, 2014.

The Probation Service and Irish Prison Service Introduction JUST/ /JPEN/AG/2943 Release and Resettlement of High Risk Prisoners Florence December.

Article 54 CISA and the ECJ/CGEU case law

XVII CDAP Meeting with Judges and Prosecutors on Overcrowding in Prison Rome Mauro Palma Vice- Chair European Council for Penological Co-operation Council.

1 Latvia and Implementation of framework decision No.947 on transfer of community sanctions Imants Jurevičius State Probation Service of Latvia Head of.

Framework Decisions 909 and 947 A Policy Perspective DUTT Conference Amsterdam, Netherlands 25 January 2013.

Serving Time in a Foreign Land 22 March 2012 Anand Doobay Consultant, Peters & Peters 15 Fetter Lane, London, EC4A 1BW Tel: + 44 (0) Fax: +

Slide 1/31 © copyright Standard training programme in judicial cooperation in criminal matters within the European Union Version: 3.0 Last updated:

Purpose MLA and extradition (and other forms of international judicial cooperation) with 3rd countries is part of the external policy of the Union Purpose.

Slide 1/32 © copyright Standard training programme in judicial cooperation in criminal matters within the European Union Version: 3.0 Last updated:

The Law of the Lisbon Treaty. Our emerging European Criminal Process ? Professor Dermot P.J. Walsh School of Law University of Limerick.

In cooperation with the Chapter 9 The use of non-custodial measures in the administration of justice Facilitator’s Guide.

Slide 1/15 © copyright Standard training programme in judicial cooperation in criminal matters within the European Union Version: 3.0 Last updated:

Irish Penal Reform Trust Reforming the Early Release System in Ireland.

A narrow pathway between fences Seminar on free movement of same sex families in Europe European Parliament, 3 May 2011 Pál Szirányi – Permanent representation.

1 Substantive criminal law and mutual recognition Hans G. NILSSON, Jur Dr h.c. Head of Division Criminal justice Council of the European Union.

Privacy and security: Is Europe going banana? Jean-Marc Van Gyseghem Head of Unit « Liberties in the information society » CRID – University.

EU: Bilateral Agreements of Member States. Formerly concluded international agreements of Member States with third countries Article 351 TFEU The rights.

The fight against human trafficking Presentation by Janine Schütze.

6 December 2010 Judicial cooperation in the EU From mutual legal assistance to mutual recognition Adrienne Boerwinkel Senior Legal Adviser Dutch Ministry.

Course: European Criminal Law SS 2009 Hubert Hinterhofer.

1 Federal Ministry of Justice Sharing Experiences of the German EU Presidency.

REINTEGRATION and AFTERCARE First exchange visit Milano, June and 1 July 2014 Insercoop, Sccl (Barcellona) 1.

European Commission Justice March 2012 Cooperazione Giudiziaria UE Corporate Liability for committing corruption Kiev, 8 February 2013 Workshop on the.

M O D U L O IV M O D U L E IV. THE PRINCIPLE OF MUTUAL RECOGNITION AND ITS IMPLEMENTATION.

1 Mutual Recognition of Driving Disqualifications Liam Dolan Department of Transport.

Council Framework Decision 2008/947/JHA Cooperation between Romania, Ireland and Italy to support the implementation of the Council Framework Decision.

GRAHAM WILKINSON National Offender Management Service TRANSFER OF SENTENCED PERSON COUNCIL FRAMEWORK DECISION 909: A UK PERSPECTIVE.

MODULE II: THE INSTRUMENTS OF JUDICIAL COOPERATION IN CRIMINAL MATTERS IN THE CONTEXT OF THE COUNCIL OF EUROPE.- TOPIC 4 THE 1959 CONVENTION ON MUTUAL.

Provisions Related to Facilitation Maria Socorro Z. Manguiat Compliance Programme March 2006.

Executing Environmental Judgments in Criminal Proceedings.

The acquis Council Framework Decision of 19 July 2002 on combating trafficking in human beings (2002/629/JHA). Council Directive 2004/81/EC of 24 April.

European Arrest Warrant – Actual Challenges

Universiteitstraat 4, B-9000 Gent, België - T +32 (0) , F +32 (0) Neil Paterson & Marije Knapen.

Maria Dimitrova Government Agent Ministry of Justice Bulgaria.

Prof. Dr. Gert Vermeulen t f Practitioners’ expectations regarding mutual recognition Mutual.

CRIMINAL LAW OF THE EUROPEAN UNION 1 April 2015 THE LISBON TREATY AND CRIMINAL LAW Dr. sc. Zoran Burić Department of Criminal Procedural Law University.

OTHER COUNCIL OF EUROPE CONVENTIONS INTRODUCTION.

Experience of Slovenia in implementation of European Arrest Warrant

Reform of the European Arrest Warrant Libby McVeigh.

Universiteitstraat 4, B-9000 Gent, België - T +32 (0) , F +32 (0) Neil Paterson – EU Implementation.

One cannot legislate kindness? The development of European legal instruments governing non-custodial sanctions Dirk van Zyl Smit and Sonja Snacken.

Legislative implementation of EU Criminal Law in Sweden Seminar EU Criminal Law Spring 2013 Department of Law UPPSALA UNIVERSITY Mari-Ann.

1 European Evidence Warrant Mutual recognition and judicial cooperation in criminal matters in the EU Jarlath Spellman Irish National Member Eurojust.

UK and EU Criminal & Policing Law: What Effect of Brexit?

Lost in Translations – An Examination of the Legal & Practical Problems Associated with the Implementation (or Non-Implementation) of Directive 2010/64/EU.

TAIEX SEMINAR JUDICIAL COOPERATION IN CRIMINAL MATTERS: TWENTY YEARS OF SHARING EU EXPERTISE 3 June, 2016 Dr. Anna Fiodorova Working group II EaP session.

Article 54 CISA: Are UK courts bound? Estella Baker Professor of European Criminal Law & Justice © Estella Baker.

The Criminal Justice Implications of a Brexit Professor John Spencer May

Procedural Safeguards in Criminal Proceedings in the European Union in Practice Estella Baker Professor of European Criminal Law & Justice

Dr. Željko Karas Police College, Zagreb (Croatia)

Mutual Recognition & Custodial Sentences Or Measures Involving Deprivation Of Liberty 3 June 2010 Over next 20 minutes or so…share the preliminary conclusions.

Mutual Recognition & Custodial Sentences Or Measures Involving Deprivation Of Liberty 1 October 2010 Over next 20 minutes or so…share the preliminary conclusions.

Chapter 9. The use of non-custodial measures

Daniel BERNARD Federal Prosecutor of Belgium CICERO FOUNDATION SEMINAR

The Rule of Law & Mutual Recognition Can the EU live up to its own expectations? Nele Audenaert 05/09/2018.

European Arrest Warrant

NATIONAL STRATEGY FOR SOCIAL REINTEGRATION

Presentation transcript:

The framework decision on mutual recognition of custodial sentences Estella Baker

Contents Background Framework decision on custodial sentences Contentious issues © Estella Baker

Background Mutual recognition programme, 2001 Punishment package FWD 2005/214/JHA on financial penalties FWD 2006/783/JHA on confiscation orders FWD 2008/909/JHA on custodial sentences FWD 2008/947/JHA on probation & alternative sanctions Council of Europe Convention on the Transfer of Sentenced Persons, 1983 & Additional Protocol of 1997 © Estella Baker

The Framework Decision Scheme © Estella Baker

Who does it cover? Natural persons only! Sentenced to custody/deprivation of liberty Determinate or indeterminate Through criminal proceedings © Estella Baker

The purpose… to establish the rules under which a Member State, with a view to facilitating the social rehabilitation of the sentenced person, is to recognise a judgment and enforce the sentence. Article 3(1) See also Articles 4(2), 4(4) © Estella Baker

How does the scheme work? Sentence imposed in issuing state [IS] Judgment & certificate sent to executing state [ES] Decision regarding recognition & enforcement by ES Sentenced person transferred (if necessary) Sentence enforced according to law of ES © Estella Baker

Criteria for transfer Sentenced person in IS or ES S/he has consented, if required Identification of ES: Member State of nationality where sentenced person lives or to which will be deported post-sentence Or any other consenting MS ES satisfied enforcement would serve purpose of facilitating social rehabilitation © Estella Baker

When is consent not needed? Where proposed transfer is to Member State of nationality where sentenced person lives or to which s/he will be deported post-sentence Or to Member State to which s/he has fled or returned in view of criminal proceedings in IS But has opportunity to state opinion, which must be transmitted to ES, in all cases where present in IS © Estella Baker

When can the ES decline enforcement? Would not serve purpose of facilitating social rehabilitation & successful reintegration (Article 4(4)) The list in Article 9: note paras (d), (h), (j), (k) © Estella Baker

Accountability to the IS The specialty rule (Article 18) Amnesty, pardon, review of judgment (Article 19) Early & conditional release (Article 17) Impossibility, partial enforcement, adaptation, escape (Article 21) © Estella Baker

Implementation & its consequences Implementation deadline: Dec Consequences with respect to existing instruments Transitional arrangements (what happened on Dec 5?!) © Estella Baker

Domestic implementation Repatriation of Prisoners Act 1984 (as amended) CJEU access The Transitional Protocol © Estella Baker

Contentious issues Mutual recognition issues Consent Citizenship & integration Directive 2004/38, Article 28 Case C-145/09 Tsakouridis Case C-348/09 PI (AGs Opinion of 6 March, 2012) See also Case C-66/08 Kozlowski (EAW) Prison conditions & fundamental rights © Estella Baker

Thank you for listening! © Estella Baker