Review of Annex IV of Reg. 1907/2006 (REACH) Project group DHI Milieu Ltd. Protection Through Knowledge (PTK) Ltd.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
OSHA’s Revised Hazard Communication Standard
Advertisements

2013 Training Requirements for the Revised OSHA Hazard Communication Standard This presentation (“Employers Hazcom Training Requirements”) summarizes the.
Pesticide Education Program Globally Harmonized System (GHS) Change from Material Safety Data Sheet (MSDS) to Safety Data Sheet (SDS)
WCAM GHS Training December Introduction  The federal Hazard Communication Standard says that you have a “Right-To-Know” what hazards you face on.
GHS Globally Harmonized System
CLP (Implementation of GHS in Europe) Lars S. Rasmussen, The Wercs 2009 Global User Group June 2009 The Desmond Hotel, Albany, NY.
Background – Scope and Development of the GHS as an International System Hazard Classification – Physical Hazards – Health Hazards – Environmental Hazards.
Hazard Communication 2013 OSHA 29 CFR
 Chemical manufacturers & importers must classify each chemical produced or imported. They must: Determine the appropriate hazard classes & associated.
DATE  Understand Hazard Communication including revisions to GHS  Label Requirements  Safety Data Sheets.
Hazard Communication Standard Updates O Introduction to Globally Harmonized System (GHS) O Label Elements and Safety Data Sheets (SDS)
Hazard Communication Standard Globally Harmonized System (GHS) of Classification and Labeling of Chemicals Kathleen Park Medical Technology Program Austin.
MIOSHA Update Hazard Communication Training Including GHS Revisions.
Material Safety Data Sheets (MSDS)
OSHA Hazard Communication
NOTOX B.V. REACH (Registration and Evaluation) SOCMA Corporate Excellence Conference 16 May 2008 Savannaha, Georgia.
Législation | ConfidentielPage 1.  Aim of REACh  To give « identity card » and « passport » for all substances  Origin of REACh:  February 2001: presentation.
Value of in vitro assays in your REACH dossier Frédérique van Acker 18 November 2014.
Information requirements for reproductive toxicity under REACH EU-OSHA Workshop Ulrike REUTER Senior Scientific Officer European Chemicals Agency 15. January.
Development of a Worldwide System for Hazard Communication
WHERE BUSINESS AND THE ENVIRONMENT CONVERGE. WHERE BUSINESS AND THE ENVIRONMENT CONVERGE What is the GHS? >A common and coherent approach to defining.
(Organisation for Economic Coopération and Development)
Hazcom 2012 – The Right to Understand What is the GHS? The GHS is an acronym for The Globally Harmonized System of Classification and Labeling of Chemicals.
1 Harmonised classification of substances (Annex VI of the CLP Regulation)- Example of substance classification Semira Hajrlahović Mehić, LL.M.
Ms Sharon Rogers Dr Wendy Pryor Chemical and general safety.
Dropping the M: From MSDS to SDS (Safety Data Sheet)
REVISED HAZARD COMMUNICATION STANDARD INCLUDING GHS REVISIONS
Chemical labeling is changing to help make it easier for us to understand the products we use so we can continue to be safe. The GHS is an international.
SSSG 2007 Global Harmonization System. What is GHS ? GHS is an international system designed to standardize the communication of hazardous substances.
LABELLING Mariana Mihalcea Udrea
GHS CLASSIFICATION ONLINE. Registration: Click on “Register”
The GHS: Overview Presentation George Thomas Thai National GHS Workshop May
CLASSIFICATION AND LABELLING OF DANGEROUS SUBSTANCES FROM CURRENT EU LEGISLATION TO THE GLOBALLY HARMONISED SYSTEM Zagreb, 12 December 2006 Dr. Elisabet.
What does WHMIS mean? W Workplace H Hazardous M Materials I Information S System WHMIS is a Canada wide hazard communication system developed to provide.
OSHA Revised Hazard Communication Standard What you need to know and your responsibility under the new rules.
There is no evaluation associated with this lesson.
GHS Hazard Communication
HMIS® SAMPLE TRAINING PRESENTATION A Compliance Assistance Tool for American Coatings Association Members December 2014.
Benny Hoff TÜV NORD Sweden AB
Know your hazards An overview of chemical hazards and the associated pictograms.
November 2013 California State University, Northridge Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry.
Rutherford County Government. The Occupational Safety and Health Administration's (OSHA) Hazard Communication Standard is designed to protect against.
OSHA HAZCOM 2012 (GHS) Training
Purpose, Scope and Application of the GHS 1. The Globally Harmonized System of Classification and Labeling of Chemicals (GHS) is a rational and comprehensive.
Non-Ferrous Founders’ Society Safety & Health Training Program Hazard Communication/GHS Training Program The Hazard Communication Standard and the Non-Ferrous.
The new chemicals risk matrices. Workshop focus use of new online categorisation tools criteria used to categorise new chemicals under the proposed framework.
Labeling and identification of hazardous substances and preparations Level 2 Leo Sneyders - GPSG Beerse, October Information provided subject to.
The Globally Harmonized System (GHS) for Hazard Classification and Labelling Development of a Worldwide System for Hazard Communication, Not Just the City.
1 More than just a tick (√): What auditors should know about (M)SDSs Claudine Roos Centre for Environmental Management North-West University Potchefstroom.
GHS and RiskAssess - new developments Phillip Crisp and Eva Crisp.
Key elements of the concepts and approaches within the EU in the chemical sector Dr. Marcus Moreno-Horn TAIEX: Workshop, Yerevan 2-3 May 2011 Federal Office.
® ® Striving For Safety Excellence Corporate Environmental, Safety, Risk Management Hazard Communication OSHA Standard Including Globally Harmonized.
GHS Hazard Communication Revised: 01/26/2016. What is GHS? GHS stands for the Globally Harmonized System of Classification and Labeling of Chemicals.
Classification. Hazard Classification The GHS is designed to identify and classify the “hazards” of the substances or mixtures, and to communicate those.
Hazard Communication Standard Updates
WHMIS Awareness Training
Globally Harmonized System (GHS) Employee Required Training By December 1, 2013 Train Employees on the new label elements and the Safety Data Sheet (SDS)
Hazard Communication Update
درس ایمنی در آزمایشگاه مدرس: ماندانا امیری پاییز 94- جلسه سوم.
Législation | Confidentiel
HAZARD COMMUNICATION.
Fertiliser Working Group meeting
Revision of the technical annexes of the BPR
Hazard Communication Update
Material Safety Data Sheets (MSDS)
Chemical Safety MIT EHS Industrial Hygiene Program
DG Environment, Unit D.2 Marine Environment and Water Industry
DG Environment, Unit D.2 Marine Environment and Water Industry
Presentation transcript:

Review of Annex IV of Reg. 1907/2006 (REACH) Project group DHI Milieu Ltd. Protection Through Knowledge (PTK) Ltd.

Content of presentation Introduction (section 1) Criteria for determining minimum risk because of intrinsic properties (section 2) –Physicochemical properties –Toxicological properties –Ecotoxicological properties Information requirements (section 3) Documentation requirements (section 4) Process (section 5) –Submission of proposals (including format) –Evaluation of substances already in Annex IV

Introduction to criteria Basis for inclusion of substances in Annex IV –sufficient information is known about these substances so that they are considered to cause minimum risk because of their intrinsic properties Sufficient information means the information considered necessary to confirm minimum risk Minimum risk because of intrinsic properties means that negligible risk following any known or future use of a substance can be assumed on the basis of the intrinsic properties of the substance Consequence: The proposed criteria do not consider specific uses of the substance and the resulting exposure as all future uses cannot be addressed

Criteria for physicochemical properties 1.The data specified in section 3 on Information requirements must be provided Annexes VII and IX - minus melting/freezing point, density, surface tension, granulometry, stability in organic solvents, identity of degradation products, dissociation constant 2.The substance does not meet the criteria for classification as dangerous in accordance with Dir. 67/548/EEC 3.The substance does not meet criteria for classification under draft Reg. on C & L implementing GHS Broad scope (transport), dangerous and non dangerous

Criteria for physicochemical properties Criterion 3: The substance does not meet any of the criteria for classification in relation to: Explosive Flammable gas/liquid/solid Oxidising gas/liquid/solid Self-reactive/self heating Pyrophoric liquid/solid 1.in contact with water emits flammable gas 2.Organic peroxide 3.Corrosive to metals

Criteria for toxicological properties 1.The data specified in section 3 on Information requirements must be provided Annexes VII, VIII and IX 2.The substance does not meet the criteria for classification as dangerous in accordance with Dir. 67/548/EEC 3.Intrinsic properties of the substance are well below the criteria for classification Absence of significant toxicological effects in relevant toxicological studies

Absence of significant toxicological effects Acute oral/dermal/inhalational toxicity No evident toxicity at 2000mg/kg or 20/5 mg/litre/4h LD 0 > 5000 mg/kg or 50/12.5 mg/litre/4h Irritation Not R66, nor a mild skin irritant (cat 3) nor mildly irritating to eyes under GHS Sensitisation No evidence of sensitisation potential from structural alerts, in animal tests and no human evidence

Absence of significant toxicological effects Repeat dose oral toxicity No evident toxicity at 500mg/kg/d in 90 day study or 1500 mg/kg in 28 day study Similar scaled criteria for dermal and inhalation Carcinogenicity/mutagenicity No evidence of C/M potential based on available data, relevant (Q)SAR models or other structural alerts Reproductive toxicity No evidence at 1000 mg/kg/d orally, scaled for dermal & inhalation No evidence based on relevant (Q)SAR models or other structural alerts

Criteria for ecotoxicological properties 1.The data specified in section 3 on Information requirements must be provided Annexes VII, VIII, IX. Data acc. to Annex X, if available 2.The substance does not meet the criteria for classification as dangerous in accordance with Dir. 67/548/EEC 3.Intrinsic properties of the substance are well below the criteria for classification

Well below the criteria for classification Very low potential for bioaccumulation Log Pow < 2.0 unless BCF < 10 Readily biodegradable Aquatic toxicity Acute, short term EC/LC50 > 1000 mg/L, or Chronic, long term NOEC > 10 mg/L

Information requirements Information for identification of the substance Standard information related to the endpoints in Annexes VII-X (with clarifications) Robust study summaries for one key study per endpoint –Full study reports need not be submitted, but shall be made available upon request General rules for adaptation of the standard testing regime (Annex XI, sections 1 and 2) –Testing does not appear scientifically necessary (use of existing data, (Q)SAR, grouping/read-across) –Testing is not technically possible –Annex XI, section 3, does not apply as it is based on exposure assessment

Documentation requirements Dossier for submissions to be considered for inclusion of an additional substance in Annex IV –Overall conclusion of compliance with the criteria –A conclusion per endpoint based on the information required –The information required and completed format Dossier for submissions to be considered for deletion of a substance in Annex IV –Conclusion that the substance does not meet the criteria –Documentation shall be provided by completion of relevant sections in the format Strict requirements to present complete and clear dossiers Strict rules for evaluation – e.g., if one of the criteria is not met, the submission will be rejected without further consideration of other criteria

Format for submission Substance identification (according to Annex VI section 2) Conclusion on minimum risk – descriptive and numerical Physicochemical properties, summary Toxicological information, summary of each endpoint Ecotoxicological information, summary of each endpoint Identification of substances for which read across or grouping has been applied Overview of information in the submission Annexes containing: Robust study summaries Adaptation according to column 2 of Annexes VII-X Adaptation according to Annex XI Section 1 or 2

Format for submission - Overview of information

Proces Submissions seeking the addition to or deletion of a substance from the existing Annex IV –Shall be submitted by 15 Nov 2007 to the national CA or to either CEFIC, CONCAWE or REACH Alliance –MS and industry associations screen the proposals against the criteria – and forward submissions they find comply with the criteria and information requirements to COM and the contractor (before 30 Nov 2007) –Contractor evaluates the proposals and forwards a summary and conclusion to COM

Proces Approach for evaluation of substances already in Annex IV –Grouping of entries –Data search in GESAMP, HSDB, IUCLID and ECETOX (US-EPA) –Bearing in mind the historical evidence on substances in Annex IV, the burden of proof is directed at evidence of significant toxicological and environmental effects Data gaps can be accepted, if the available data confirm minimum risk (compliance with criteria)

Evaluation of existing entries Grouping of entries –Sugars and syrups –Polymers of sugars –Oils –Fatty acids –Esters of fatty acids –Salts of fatty acids –Glycerides –Amino acids* –Minerals* –Vitamins* * Each substance to be evaluated separately

Results of initial data search in GESAMP, HSDB, IUCLID and ECETOX (US-EPA)

Evaluation of ecotoxicological properties

Ecotoxicological properties - Initial pass/fail evaluation PASS FAIL ???? ? FAIL

Discussion issues General proposed requirements to minimum risk well below the criteria for classification Proposal of a milder evaluation of existing Annex IV entries (available information, use of read-across, (Q)SAR) Time window for submissions