The CHE’s Accreditation Criteria QA Forum: Professional bodies February 2012.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Setting internal Quality Assurance systems
Advertisements

QA Forum - Private Providers Programme Design March 2012.
Update on HEQF Implementation 21 February HEQF ALIGNMENT: IMPLEMENTATION AND OPERATIONAL PLAN ALL HIGHER EDUCATI ON PROGRA MMES AND QUALIFIC ATIONS.
EAC HIGHER EDUCATION POLICY
The CeQuInt Assessment Frameworks Axel Aerden & Maria E. Weber.
The SEDA Teacher Accreditation Scheme James Wisdom Visiting Professor in Educational Development, Middlesex University
Special Meeting on ICT Education in Tertiary Institutions Towards a Regional Perspective on Quality and Academic Standards in ICT Education and Training.
Second Cycle of Quality Assurance: 2012−2017 Private Providers QA Forum Wits School of Education Dr Mark Hay Executive Director: Quality Assurance 1 September.
HEQC Accreditation Process & Role of Professional Bodies (PB) CHE & Professional Bodies Forum 12 September 2012.
ACADEMIC INFRASTRUCTURE Framework for Higher Education Qualifications Subject Benchmark Statements Programme Specifications Code of Practice (for the assurance.
Management of the quality assurance system at the University of East London Ruth Carter Head of Quality Assurance and Enhancement EUROPOS SĄJUNGA Europos.
Standards and Guidelines for Quality Assurance in the European
COUNCIL ON HIGHER EDUCATION QA Forum: PHEIs Data on PHEIs 6 March 2012 Tamara Bezuidenhout.
ACCREDITATION OF HIGHER EDUCATION INSTITUTIONS,THEIR PROGRAMMES AND COURSES 1.
 The Middle States Commission on Higher Education is a voluntary, non-governmental, membership association that is dedicated to quality assurance and.
Common recommendations and next steps for improving local delivery of climate finance Bangkok, October 31, 2012.
Professional Bodies Quality Assurance Forum 26 February 2013.
UNIVERSIDAD CARLOS III DE MADRID CENTRO DE AMPLIACIÓN DE ESTUDIOS CRITERIA AND GUIDELINES FOR THE ACCREDITATION OF MASTER’S DEGREES IN SPAIN 1.
1 JOMO KENYATTA UNIVERSITY OF AGRICULTURE AND TECHNOLOGY P.O BOX , NAIROBI - KENYA PROGRAMME DEVELOPMENT BY Prof. David M.Mulati and J. M.
Developments in Programme Accreditation QA Forum with Professional Bodies August 2011.
Being a Senco!. What is the core purpose of being a Senco?
NCFHE Guidelines on Internal Quality Assurance
ACADEMIC PERFORMANCE AUDIT
MALAYSIAN QUALIFICATIONS AGENCY
Prof. György BAZSA, former president Hungarian Accreditation Committee (HAC) CUBRIK Workshop IV Beograd, 13 March, 2012 European Standards and Guidelines.
Development and Evaluation of Joint Study Programmes Almantas Šerpatauskas Center for Quality Assessment in Higher Education.
Re-accreditation Workshop Private Higher Education Institutions 6 August 2008.
GUIDELINES ON CRITERIA AND STANDARDS FOR PROGRAM ACCREDITATION (AREA 1, 2, 3 AND 8)
1 PARTNERING WITH LIBRARIANS FOR IMPROVED QUALITY OF HIGHER EDUCATION PREM NAIDOO HIGHER EDUCATION QUALITY COMMITTEE (HEQC)
AN OVERVIEW MALAYSIAN QUALIFICATIONS AGENCY. MALAYSIAN QUALIFICATIONS AGENCY (1/11/07 ) MALAYSIAN QUALIFICATIONS AGENCY (1/11/07 ) pzv/09/09/08 2 Malaysian.
© Engineering Council (UK) 2002 Regulation and Accreditation in the UK Jim Birch Head of International Recognition.
The European standards and guidelines for quality assurance Séamus Puirséil, Vice – President, ENQA.
Foundation Degrees Foundation Degree Forward Lichfield Centre The Friary Lichfield Staffs WS13 6QG — Tel: Fax: —
20 th Anniversary Professor LEE Keng-mun, William Executive Director HONG KONG COUNCIL FOR ACCREDITATION OF ACADEMIC AND VOCATIONAL QUALIFICATIONS (HKCAAVQ)
Possible changes to the Accreditation Process Quality Assurance Forum August 2011.
Council on Higher Education: Three-year Business Plan and MTEF Budget Presentation to the Portfolio Committee on Higher Education and Training.
Shaping Society APMR Briefing Zulkefli Bin Mansor Pusat Pembangunan dan Pengembangan Program Akademik Bahagian Hal Ehwal Akademik.
Dolina Dowling December 2010 Presentations 2, 3 1
Council on Higher Education: Annual Report Presentation to the Portfolio Committee on Higher Education and Training 10 October 2013.
WHO Global Standards. 5 Key Areas for Global Standards Program graduates Program graduates Program development and revision Program development and revision.
ACADEMIC PERFORMANCE AUDIT ON AREA 1, 2 AND 3 Prepared By: Nor Aizar Abu Bakar Quality Academic Assurance Department.
Management in relation to learning processes Proposal Sources: ANECA, CHEA, DETC.
CHE Business Plan Mission The mission of the CHE is to contribute to the development of a higher education system that is characterised by.
MALAYSIAN QUALIFICATIONS AGENCY
Council on Higher Education: Three-year Business Plan and MTEF Budget Presentation to the Portfolio Committee on Higher Education and Training.
SESSION 4 EVALUATING FOR FULL ACCREDITATION USING COPPA EVALUATION INSTRUMENT 1.
Council on Higher Education: Three-year Business Plan and MTEF Budget Presentation to the Portfolio Committee on Higher Education and Training.
MONITORING: Part of INSQA’s Quality Assurance Process 1. PURPOSE The purpose of a monitoring visit is to perform a formative evaluation of the process.
TAFE NSW Teacher Advisory and Assessment Scheme Policy Training Advisor Assessor – ( Institute Representative and Discipline Expert) Organising Manager.
Expanding quality distance provision in an integrated post- schooling system Kethamonie Naidoo NADEOSA Conference - 24 June 2014 University of Pretoria.
Dr. Salwa El-Magoli Chairperson of the National Quality Assurance and Accreditation Committee. Former Dean of the Faculty of Agricultural, Cairo university.
AIUA STRATEGI PLAN GUIDELINES : Quality Assurance Prepared by Kolej Universiti Islam Sultan Azlan Shah (KUISAS), Perak, Malaysia.
30/10/2006 University Leaders Meeting 1 Student Assessment: A Mandatory Requirement For Accreditation Dr. Salwa El-Magoli Chair-Person National Quality.
PORTFOLIO COMMITTEE MEETING PRESENTATION ON THE APP AND BUDGET ALLOCATION FOR THE YEAR 2016/ th APRIL 2016.
QA in HEIs: ZIMCHE’s Perspectives Workshop on trends in HE for BUSE Administrators 8-9 April 2016 Evelyn Garwe, Deputy CEO.
8th International Conference on Quality Assurance in Higher Education in Africa Windhoek, Namibia (19 – 23 September 2016) Practicum on African Quality.
Higher Education Quality Committee
DEVELOPMENT OF STUDY PROGRAMS IN UNIVERSITY OF PRISHTINA/KOSOVO
Program Quality Assurance Process Validation
Faculty of Science Review Staff Orientation Workshop
Promoting an Internal Quality Culture in Mozambican Universities
Promoting Teacher Education Quality Through Standards
DRAFT Standards for the Accreditation of e-Learning Programs
Quality and Standards An introduction.
Report back: Group 3 Deliverables Area 2: Programme Management
Programme Review Dhaya Naidoo Director: Quality Promotion
CHE ACCREDITATION OF NURSING PROGRAMMES
THE INSPECTION SYSTEM AND THE SCHOOL EXTERNAL EVALUATION
Internal and External Quality Assurance Systems for Cycle 3 (Doctoral) programmes "PROMOTING INTERNATIONALIZATION OF RESEARCH THROUGH ESTABLISHMENT AND.
TLQAA STANDARDS & TOOLS
Presentation transcript:

The CHE’s Accreditation Criteria QA Forum: Professional bodies February 2012

Accreditation processes New programmes across HE sector, re- accreditation of programmes in private sector. New sites of delivery, change of mode. Volume: depends; usually about 400 processes per year. Provider-offerings, not generics

On-line system for applications and processing Principle of peer evaluation Multiple checks and balances: –Checklisting –Evaluation –Recommendations –Accreditation Committee scrutiny –HEQC

Evaluators: nominated by sector, database of 1500 subject specialists, training Accreditation Committee – 20 experts, 5- 6X per year, 2 days at a time – can consider up to 100 programmes/processes in one meeting. Recommends outcomes to next committee – HEQC. Or defers, or requests site visit

Site visits When a committee requests it, in fulfilment of conditions set, where there are complaints, where evaluators suggest it as in re-accreditation process. In new framework will be mandatory for new institutions.

Outcomes Provisionally Accredited – then to DHET and SAQA for registration. Provisional Accreditation with conditions – conditions monitored. 3 types. Not accredited. Representation in 21 days, re-evaluated, goes through process.

2. Documents, criteria Applications are made on system, Upload all relevant documents e.g. modules, budgets, policies Form follows criteria used. 19 criteria: new programmes use 1-9. Each has minimum standards (about 10).

Criteria 1. Programme design 2. Admissions 3.and 4. Staffing 5. Teaching and learning strategy 6. Student assessment 7. Infrastructure and library resources 8. Administrative services 9. Postgraduate policies, procedures etc.

Criterion 1 Programme design – The programme is consonant with the institution’s mission, forms part of institutional planning and resource allocation, meets national requirements, the needs of students and other stakeholders, and is intellectually credible. It is designed coherently and articulates well with other relevant programmes, where possible.

Criterion 2 Student recruitment, admission and selection: Recruitment documentation informs students of the programme accurately and sufficiently and admission adheres to current legislation. Admission and selection of students are commensurate with the programme’s academic requirements, within a framework of widened access and equity…

Criterion 3 Staffing: Academic staff responsible for the programme are suitably qualified and have sufficient relevant experience and teaching competence, and their assessment competence and research profile are adequate for the nature and level of the programme… opportunities for staff development. i. one level higher, recognised HE institutions

Criterion 4 Staffing: The academic and support staff complement is of sufficient size and seniority for the nature and field of the programme and the size of the student body… the ratio of full-time to part-time staff is appropriate… Iv. Exposure to diversity of ideas, styles and approaches.

Criterion 5 Teaching and learning strategy: the institution gives recognition to the importance of promoting student learning. The T &L strategy is appropriate for the institutional type, mode(s) of delivery, and student composition, contains mechanisms to ensure the appropriateness of teaching and learning methods…

Criterion 6 Assessment: the different modes of the programme have appropriate policies and procedures for internal assessment; internal and external moderation, monitoring of student progress; explicitness validity and reliability of assessment ….

Criterion 7 Infrastructure and library resources: suitable and sufficient venues, IT infrastructure and library resources… iii complement the curriculum, self-study.

Criterion 8 Programme administrative services: Iii integrity of certification

Challenges Provider programme – professional body expectations -Evaluator knowledge of professional body reqts Generics? Registration? WIL HEQF – not quite settled yet… Implementation – 8050 total, 4000 As, 1550 Bs, 2500 Cs.

Criterion 9 Postgraduate programmes have appropriate policies, procedures and regulations for the admission and selection of students, the selection and appointment of supervisors, and the definition of the roles and responsibilities of supervisors and students. 10 – an academic is programme coordinator…