Summary Document Promise Neighborhoods Note: These slides are intended as guidance only. Please refer to the official Notice in the Federal Register.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
National Representative 2012 – 2013 Using PTAs National Standards for Family School Engagement.
Advertisements

New Jerseys Promise Communities Pilot All Children All Communities Success.

WV High Quality Standards for Schools
Copyright © 2010 American Institutes for Research All rights reserved. Washington 21st Century Community Learning Centers Program Evaluation February 2011.
Maryland Higher Education Commission BRAC Higher Education Investment Fund Technical Assistance Meeting June 21, 2010.
The Readiness Centers Initiative Early Education and Care Board Meeting Tuesday, May 11, 2010.
Core Pre-K Standards Review & Comment
Eight Week Intervention Program for Preschool Children Prior to Kindergarten Entry Board of Early Education and Care December 8, 2009.
1 Alignment of Inclusive Pre-School Learning Environments and Quality Rating Improvement System 391 Grant Funding Board Presentation April 10, 2012.
Leicestershires Vision for short break transformation Leicestershire is committed to the transformation and expansion of short break services for disabled.
Opening Doors: Federal Strategic Plan to Prevent and End Homelessness
A Roadmap to Successful Implementation Management Plans.
Alabama State Board of Education
P-16 Council Overall Goals Regional change agents for “Closing the Gaps” Engaging community stakeholders Parents K-12 teachers K-12 administrators College.
Quality Enhancements in After- School and Out-of-School Time (ASOST-Q) Competitive Grant (FC 530) Grant Information Webinars May 23 rd and 30 th, 2014.
Anticipated Grant Opportunities to Support Additional Time for Learning Grant Information Webinar March 14, :00 AM – 11:00 AM 2:00 PM – 3:00 PM.
MIDWEST EQUITY ASSISTANCE CENTER 2011 ANNUAL EQUITY UPDATE OCTOBER 5-6 KANSAS CITY MARRIOTT, DOWNTOWN.
Individualized Learning Plans A Study to Identify and Promote Promising Practices.
Computing Leadership Summit STEM Education Steve Robinson U.S. Department of Education White House Domestic Policy Council February 22, 2010.
High-Quality Supplemental Educational Services And After-School Partnerships Demonstration Program (CFDA Number: ) CLOSING DATE: August 12, 2008.
Linking Actions for Unmet Needs in Children’s Health
2011 OSEP Leadership Mega Conference Collaboration to Achieve Success from Cradle to Career 2.0 Federal Initiatives Update Investing in Innovation (i3)
COLLEGE SPARK WASHINGTON 2012 Community Grants Program LOI Webinar 9/27/2011 9:30 AM 9/28/2011 2:00 PM.
Departments of Education and Public Welfare Office of Child Development and Early Learning Executive Budget
Using Strengthening Families to Meet the Goals of Race to the Top Early Learning Challenge.
COLLEGE SPARK WASHINGTON 2012 Community Grants Program Application Webinar 12/22/201110:00 AM 1/4/20122:00 PM.
LOCAL LEVEL ALIGNMENT UNDER WIOA Office of Career, Technical, and Adult Education for NTI Conference November 12, 2014.
Funding Opportunities at the Institute of Education Sciences Elizabeth R. Albro, Ph.D. Associate Commissioner Teaching and Learning Division National Center.
1 EEC Board Policy and Research Committee October 2, 2013 State Advisory Council (SAC) Sustainability for Early Childhood Systems Building.
Building a Strong Foundation Through and Effective Board and Sound Practices.
Summary Document July 2011 P ROMISE N EIGHBORHOODS 2011 Competition Note: These slides are intended as guidance only. Please refer to the official Notice.
United Way of Greater Toledo - Framework for Education Priority community issue: Education – Prepare children to enter and graduate from school.
The Early Reading First Program CFDA # A and B Center for Faith-Based and Community Initiatives
Summary Document March 2010 Investing in Innovation (i3) Fund Note: These slides are intended as guidance only. Please refer to the official notice of.
Creating a New Vision for Kentucky’s Youth Kentucky Youth Policy Assessment How can we Improve Services for Kentucky’s Youth? September 2005.
Presented by:Wendy L. Ault, Executive Director Tarren Bragdon, Consultant Connect Aspirations to a Plan Bidders’
Southern Area 2015 Program Webinar Series Eneid A. Francis, Area Director Cori B. Cooper, Chairperson, Program Committee.
DRAFT – Not for Circulation Investing in Innovation (i3) 2012 Development Competition Summary Document February 2012 Note: These slides are intended as.
Overview Slides March 13, 2012 Q&A Webinar i3 Development Pre-Application Note: These slides are intended as guidance only. Please refer to the official.
Funding Opportunities at the Institute of Education Sciences Elizabeth R. Albro, Ph.D. Associate Commissioner Teaching and Learning Division National Center.
Overview of the SPDG Competition Jennifer Doolittle, Ph.D. 1.
Keystones to Opportunity Pennsylvania’s Vision for Sustainable Growth in Reading Achievement Curriculum Directors’ Meeting February 23, 2012.
All Youth Ready at 21. Connecticut Youth Futures Policy Team  Participates in: Youth Policy Institute of the National Conference of State Legislatures,
PANAMA-BUENA VISTA UNION SCHOOL DISTRICT
Quad Cities Promise Neighborhood. Promise Neighborhood Grant Program o Based on the Harlem Children’s Zone project o Neighborhood revitalization o Coordinating.
Presenters: Martin J. Blank, Martin J. Blank, President, Institute for Educational Leadership; Director, Coalition for Community Schools S. Kwesi Rollins.
Promise Neighborhoods Update Presentation July 21, 2011.
DIPLOMAS NOW SUMMER INSTITUTE JULY 7-9, 2011 BOSTON, MA Welcome to Day 2!
National Consortium On Deaf-Blindness Families Technical Assistance Information Services and Dissemination Personnel Training State Projects.
Infant Mortality Reduction Initiative Collaborative Grants Pre-Application Webinar July 20, 2015.
Planning the Plan May 28, 2010 grantify Hartford’s Promise.
State and Regional Approaches to Improving Access to Services for Children and Youths with Epilepsy Technical Assistance Conference Call Sadie Silcott,
PRESENTING: Bill East, Executive Director, NASDSE Steve Wooderson, CEO, CSAVR May 5, 2015 Capacity Building Institute – Impact of Workforce Innovation.
Transforming Michigan’s Adult Learning Infrastructure.
NOTES FROM INFORMATIONAL BRIEFINGS FOR POTENTIAL REGIONAL CENTER AND CONTENT CENTER APPLICANTS JUNE 19,20 & 22, 2012 Comprehensive Centers Program.
1 Access to the World and Its Languages LRC Technical Assistance Workshop (Part 1) Access to the World and Its Languages I N T E R.
Strengthening Communities Awarded to support the development and implementation of collaborate and innovative community projects that address economic.
1 Cross-Cutting Issues 5310-JARC-New Freedom U.S. Department of Transportation Federal Transit Administration SAFETEAU-LU Curriculum August 7, 2007.
PERKINS IV AND THE WORKFORCE INNOVATION AND OPPORTUNITY ACT (WIOA): INTERSECTIONS AND OPPORTUNITIES.
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA) Bureau of Health Workforce (BHW) Division of Medicine.
CAREER PATHWAYS THE NEW WAY OF DOING BUSINESS. Agenda for our Discussion Today we’ll discuss: Career Pathways Systems and Programs Where we’ve been and.
Preparing for the Title III Part F STEM Competition Alliance of Hispanic Serving Institutions Educators Grantsmanship Institute March 20, 2016.
Program Information for Applicants School Leadership Program U.S. Department of Education 2005.
HRSA Early Childhood Comprehensive Systems (ECCS) Impact 2016 Funding Opportunity Announcement (FOA) Barbara Hamilton, Project Officer Division.
Welcome to Workforce 3 One U.S. Department of Labor Employment and Training Administration Webinar Date: April 30, 2014 Presented by: U.S. Departments.
Informational Webinar Troy Grant Assistant Executive Director for P-16 Initiatives Tennessee Higher Education Commission.
Race to the Top—Early Learning Challenge Letters of Support Webinar
Investing in Innovation (i3) Fund
Welcome and Introductions
Presentation transcript:

Summary Document Promise Neighborhoods Note: These slides are intended as guidance only. Please refer to the official Notice in the Federal Register.

2 Vision All children growing up in Promise Neighborhoods have access to effective schools and strong systems of family and community support that will prepare them to attain an excellent education and successfully transition to college and career Note: These slides are intended as guidance only. Please refer to the official notice inviting applications, requirements, definitions, and selection criteria in the Federal Register.

Promise Neighborhoods (PN) Background High Need Medium Need Low Need 3 Families/children segmented by need Aligned City/Regional Infrastructure and Leadership High-Performing Schools and Academic Programs Effective Community Services PN students meet outcomes, prepared for college and career Distressed communities are transformed Strong Family Supports Note: These slides are intended as guidance only. Please refer to the official notice inviting applications, requirements, definitions, and selection criteria in the Federal Register.

4 RESOURCE LEVERAGING, INTEGRATION, AND TARGETING Private funding (individual, corporate, philanthropic) New Promise Neighborhoods funding, support (ED) Other public funds, programs (ED, HUD, HHS, Justice, Labor, USDA, State, local, etc) Build continuum of solutions from cradle through college to career Integrate other community supports: housing, health, etc. Early Learning K-12 College/ Career PN Background (cont.) Improve outcomes shared by leaders and members of community Increase capacity of organizations focused on achieving results and building a college-going culture in neighborhoods Integrate programs and break down agency silos Support efforts to sustain and scale up proven, effective solutions Learn about the impact of Promise Neighborhoods and about relationship between particular strategies and student outcomes Note: These slides are intended as guidance only. Please refer to the official notice inviting applications, requirements, definitions, and selection criteria in the Federal Register.

PN Program Summary 5 Purpose Funding Applicants Significantly improve outcomes of children in our most distressed communities by: 1)Supporting efforts to improve outcomes that are communicated and analyzed by leaders and members of community; 2)Identifying and increasing capacity of eligible entities focused on results from cradle through college to career; 3)Building a continuum of academic programs and family and community supports with effective school(s) at the center; 4)Integrating programs and breaking down silos between agencies; 5)Working with local governments to sustain and scale up solutions; and 6)Learning about overall impact of Promise Neighborhoods and relationship between particular strategies and student outcomes Fiscal Year 2010: $10M for up to 20 one-year planning grants Eligible applicants: Are nonprofits (which may include faith-based organizations) and institutions of higher education that are representative of neighborhood Must manage or partner with at least one school in the neighborhood. Also encouraged to partner with LEA, Federal, State, and local leaders, and other providers of family and community supports Note: These slides are intended as guidance only. Please refer to the official notice inviting applications, requirements, definitions, and selection criteria in the Federal Register.

Program Sequence Planning application Planning applicants submit proposal for how they will plan to create a Promise Neighborhood April, 2010 – June, 2010 Planning year Planning grantees develop plan to deliver continuum of solutions to challenges in neighborhood September, September, 2011 $10MM for up to 20 grants Implementation application Implementation applicants submit plans to deliver a continuum of solutions and describe how they have completed planning activities Spring/ Summer 2011 Implementation phase Implementation grantees implement plans to deliver solutions for children in Promise Neighborhood Begin September, 2011 Requested $200MM for up to 10 grants 6 Note: These slides are intended as guidance only. Please refer to the official notice inviting applications, requirements, definitions, and selection criteria in the Federal Register.

PN Target Results/Indicators 7 Grade Students Proficient in Core Subjects Indicator: #/% of students at or above grade level according to 3 rd -8 th grade and high school assessments High School Graduation Indicator: Graduation rate in neighborhood high school College/Career Success Indicator: #/% of students with post secondary degrees or other credentials w/o need for remediation Age Academic Programs Grantees must collect data for the five academic indicators (program and project) stated above. BirthK Family and Community Supports Students Are Healthy Indicator: #/% of children who participate in 60 minutes of physical activity daily and eat five or more servings of fruits and vegetables daily Students Feel Safe Indicator: #/% of students who feel safe at school and traveling to and from school as measured by a school climate survey Students Live in Stable Communities Indicator: Student mobility rate (as defined in notice inviting applications) Family/Community Support Learning Indicator: #/% of students with a caring adult at home, school, and community; or #/% of families that attend parent-teacher conferences Students w/ 21 st Century Learning Tools Indicator: #/% students with school and home access to broadband and connected computing device Grantees must collect data for the five community support program indicators stated above. Grantees may also select their own project indicator in each category to fit the needs of their communities or use the indicators prescribed by ED. Successful MS to HS Transition Indicator: Attendance rate of students in sixth, seventh, eighth and ninth grades Children Ready for Kindergarten Indicators: #/% of young children who demonstrate age-appropriate functioning; have a medical home; and participate in early learning programs Note: These slides are intended as guidance only. Please refer to the official notice inviting applications, requirements, definitions, and selection criteria in the Federal Register.

8 Absolute Priority 1 – Describe Proposal to Plan 1.Neighborhood and level of distress 2.How to build a continuum of solutions 3.Organizational capacity to plan and implement 4.How to sustain and scale up what works 5.Commitment and alignment with key partners 6.How to track available sources of Federal, State, and local funds 7.How to identify requirements that impede the project goals 8.How to use data to manage program 9.Work with national evaluator to learn about impact 10.Indicators for needs assessment Absolute Priority 1 – Describe Proposal to Plan 1.Neighborhood and level of distress 2.How to build a continuum of solutions 3.Organizational capacity to plan and implement 4.How to sustain and scale up what works 5.Commitment and alignment with key partners 6.How to track available sources of Federal, State, and local funds 7.How to identify requirements that impede the project goals 8.How to use data to manage program 9.Work with national evaluator to learn about impact 10.Indicators for needs assessment PN Planning Notice Priorities Absolute Priority 2 – Rural Communities 1.Address all the requirements in Absolute Priority 1. 2.Serve only one or more rural communities. Absolute Priority 2 – Rural Communities 1.Address all the requirements in Absolute Priority 1. 2.Serve only one or more rural communities. All applicants must meet one of the absolute priorities Absolute Priority 3 – Tribal Communities 1.Address all the requirements in Absolute Priority 1. 2.Serve at least one Indian tribe. Absolute Priority 3 – Tribal Communities 1.Address all the requirements in Absolute Priority 1. 2.Serve at least one Indian tribe. Note: These slides are intended as guidance only. Please refer to the official notice inviting applications, requirements, definitions, and selection criteria in the Federal Register. Applicants may address the invitational priority. We are interested in applicants that address the invitational priority by including practices, strategies, or programs in one of the following four areas, but do not give preference over other applications. 1.Unique Learning Needs of Students with Disabilities and Students with Limited English Proficiency 2.Internet Connectivity 3.Civic Engagement 4.Arts and Humanities 1.Unique Learning Needs of Students with Disabilities and Students with Limited English Proficiency 2.Internet Connectivity 3.Civic Engagement 4.Arts and Humanities

9 Eligibility Requirements MUST MUST, TO RECEIVE A GRANT Eligible Entity: For Absolute Priority 3 (Tribal Communities), an eligible applicant is an eligible entity that partners with an Indian Tribe, or an Indian Tribe that meets the definition of an eligible entity. Eligible Entity: For Absolute Priority 3 (Tribal Communities), an eligible applicant is an eligible entity that partners with an Indian Tribe, or an Indian Tribe that meets the definition of an eligible entity. Nonprofit, which may include faith-based organizations Institution of Higher Education or TO RECEIVE A GRANT, MUST Focus on a neighborhood in which there are multiple signs of distress based on indicators of need and other relevant indicators Operate a school; or partner with at least one school in the neighborhood in coordination with the schools local educational agency Currently provide at least one of the solutions from the applicants proposed continuum of solutions in neighborhood to be served Be representative of the geographic area proposed to be served (including board members who are from the neighborhood, are low-income, and/or are public officials) Focus on a neighborhood in which there are multiple signs of distress based on indicators of need and other relevant indicators Operate a school; or partner with at least one school in the neighborhood in coordination with the schools local educational agency Currently provide at least one of the solutions from the applicants proposed continuum of solutions in neighborhood to be served Be representative of the geographic area proposed to be served (including board members who are from the neighborhood, are low-income, and/or are public officials) Note: These slides are intended as guidance only. Please refer to the official notice inviting applications, requirements, definitions, and selection criteria in the Federal Register.

10 PN Selection Criteria Need for the Project (10 pts): Severity of problem; description of neighborhood; gaps in existing services and infrastructure Need for the Project (10 pts): Severity of problem; description of neighborhood; gaps in existing services and infrastructure Quality of Project Design (20 pts): How to plan for continuum; focus on school improvement; strategies for data, coordination Quality of Project Design (20 pts): How to plan for continuum; focus on school improvement; strategies for data, coordination Quality of Project Services (15 pts): Proposed solutions have evidence; use of needs assessment; services will lead to improvements Quality of Project Services (15 pts): Proposed solutions have evidence; use of needs assessment; services will lead to improvements Quality of Project Personnel (25 pts): Qualifications, training, experience, and lessons learned of applicant and project director Quality of Project Personnel (25 pts): Qualifications, training, experience, and lessons learned of applicant and project director Quality of the Management Plan (20 pts): Achieve objectives on time and within budget; alignment of partners; inclusion of diversity of perspectives; sustainability and scalability Quality of the Management Plan (20 pts): Achieve objectives on time and within budget; alignment of partners; inclusion of diversity of perspectives; sustainability and scalability Peer Review A panel of peer reviewers will judge applications by allocating points in each of the categories based on how well an application proposes to address the criteria. Peer Review A panel of peer reviewers will judge applications by allocating points in each of the categories based on how well an application proposes to address the criteria. Significance (10 pts): Long-term systems change/improvement; build local capacity to improve/expand services; use of new strategies; potential for application in a variety of settings Significance (10 pts): Long-term systems change/improvement; build local capacity to improve/expand services; use of new strategies; potential for application in a variety of settings Note: These slides are intended as guidance only. Please refer to the official notice inviting applications, requirements, definitions, and selection criteria in the Federal Register.

11 Important PN Dates Notice Published in Federal Register:TBA Technical Assistance: Informational Conference Call:Monday, May 3 (1:00 PM – 2:00 PM EST) Pre-Application Webinars:Wednesday, May 5 (1:00 PM – 5:00 PM EST) Monday, May 10 (12:00 PM – 4:00 PM EST) Other Events:TBA Applications: Intent to Apply Due:May 21, 2010 Applications Due:June 25, 2010 Applications Reviewed:Summer 2010 All Grant Awards Announced: September 2010 Note: These slides are intended as guidance only. Please refer to the official notice inviting applications, requirements, definitions, and selection criteria in the Federal Register.

12 Other Important Resources Promise Neighborhoods Website: Notice Inviting Applications, Requirements, Definitions, and Selection Criteria Application Package (includes the Notice Inviting Applications) Application Checklist Applicant Eligibility Checklist Frequently Asked Questions Promise Neighborhoods Summary Document (PowerPoint) Promise Neighborhoods At-A-Glance (quick reference) Call for Peer Reviewers: Further questions may be sent to Answers to the most frequently asked questions will be posted on our Note: These slides are intended as guidance only. Please refer to the official notice inviting applications, requirements, definitions, and selection criteria in the Federal Register.