1 Closing the Loop: How to Do It and Why It Matters.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Successful strategies for improving outcomes through quality assessment and evaluation of programs Leadership Conference Winston Salem, NC June
Advertisements

The Commissions Expectations for the Assessment of Student Learning and Institutional Effectiveness Beth Paul Interim Provost and Vice President for Academic.
The PRR: Linking Assessment, Planning & Budgeting PRR Workshop – April 4, 2013 Barbara Samuel Loftus, Ph.D. Misericordia University.
Meeting MSCHE Assessment Expectations
General Education Assessment AAC&U GE and Assessment Conference March 1, 2007.
Human Performance Improvement Process
No Child Left Behind Sub-grant Application Project Planning & Evaluation John Cradler Ruthmary Cradler Educational Support Systems
Enhancing Inquiry through Formative Assessment A monograph by W. Harlen (2003) Summarized by: Mekbib Alemu (PhD student in SMED, AAU) January 25, 2011.
ACCREDITATION Community Day February 1, Significance of Accreditation Accreditation – Accreditation – Allows the students at KC to apply for Federal.
TWS Aid for Supervisors & Mentor Teachers Background on the TWS.
QEP BASICS.
A-G Updates and the New Piece of the Puzzle: Common Core Monica H. Lin, Ph.D. Associate Director of Undergraduate Admissions University of California |
Introduction to Assessment – Support Services Andrea Brown Director of Program Assessment and Institutional Research Dr. Debra Bryant Accreditation Liaison.
GENERAL EDUCATION ASSESSMENT Nathan Lindsay January 22-23,
Understanding MSCHE Expectations for Assessment Linda Suskie, Vice President Middle States Commission on Higher Education 3624 Market Street, Philadelphia.
Institutional Effectiveness (ie) and Assessment
Fall 2013 PDD Accreditation Overview Just Completed a Report and were Reaffirmed… Why Another Report ?!
The Assessment Imperative: A Work in Progress A Focus on Competencies Ricky W. Griffin, Interim Dean Mays Business School Texas A&M University.
Dept. of Computing and Technology (CaT) School of Science and Technology B.S. in Computer Information Systems (CIS) CIP Code: Program Code: 411.
Mary Allen Qatar University September Workshop participants will be able to:  draft/revise learning outcomes  develop/analyze curriculum maps.
Program Review: The Foundation for Institutional Planning and Improvement.
Department Plans for Assessment of Student Learning Teachers Talking February 16, 2011.
Pace University Assessment Plan. Outline I. What is assessment? II. How does it apply to Pace? III. Who’s involved? IV. How will assessment be implemented.
Master Online Teacher Competencies eLearning Conference 2007 Virgil E. Varvel Jr.
The Current Refocusing of General Education. Objectives for the Workshop Proposing and/or Renewing a Course Assessing the general education aspect of.
 The Middle States Commission on Higher Education is a voluntary, non-governmental, membership association that is dedicated to quality assurance and.
Program Assessment Workshop Kathleen Harring. What is Assessment? Assessment is the systematic gathering and analysis of information to inform and improve.
Accrediting Commission for Community and Junior Colleges of the Western Association of Schools and Colleges.
Essential Elements of a Workable Assessment Plan Pat Tinsley McGill, Ph.D. Professor, Strategic Management College of Business Faculty Lead, Assessment.
Applying the Principles of Prior Learning Assessment Debra A. Dagavarian Diane Holtzman Dennis Fotia.
August 3,  Review “Guiding Principles for SLO Assessment” (ASCCC, 2010)  Review Assessment Pulse Roundtable results  Discuss and formulate our.
Implementation and its Correspondence to the Strategic Map ELECTRONIC PORTFOLIOS AND STETSON UNIVERSITY.
Making It Meaningful: Authentic Assessment for Intentional Education David W. Marshall, PhD Joanna M. Oxendine, MEd.
Middle States Accreditation at UB Jason N. Adsit Director, Teaching and Learning Center Michael E. Ryan Director, University Accreditation and Assessment.
Year Seven Self-Evaluation Workshop OR Getting from Here to There Northwest Commission on Colleges and Universities.
Department Mission Statement and Program Learning Outcomes.
Student Learning Outcome Assessment: A Program’s Perspective Ling Hwey Jeng, Director School of Library and Information Studies June 27,
Using Electronic Portfolios to Assess Learning at IUPUI. Trudy Banta, et. al. Indiana University-Purdue University Indianapolis 2007.
Assessment Workshop College of San Mateo February 2006.
Assessment of Student Learning North American Colleges and Teachers of Agriculture Cia Verschelden June 17, 2009.
Student Learning Outcomes at CSUDH. Outcomes assessment can tell us if our students are really learning what we think they should be able to do.
On SLOA (SLO Assessment). (after Munch) Will Lecture die? No…
The Essence of Program Review Brought to you by The Assessment Team! William Serban Karen Henry Paul Garcia Beth Humphreys Kati O’Connor Marlene Chavez-Toivanen.
Developing Learning Assessment Plans and Outcomes Assessments: Challenges and Opportunities in Medical Education Research Robert A. DiTomasso, Ph.D., ABPP.
Periodic Program Review Guiding Programs in Today’s Assessment Climate LaMont Rouse Executive Director of Assessment, Accreditation & Compliance.
11/5/20151 Assessment at California Baptist University Annual Assessment of Student Outcomes (ASO) Program Reviews (every 5 years) Long-range Planning.
Institutional Effectiveness A set of ongoing and systematic actions, processes, steps and practices that include: Planning Assessment of programs and.
E-portfolio at IUPUI Susan Kahn Director, Institutional Effectiveness Indiana University-Purdue University Indianapolis (IUPUI) Sakai Conference Amsterdam.
THE SLO PROCESS #1 create/update SLO’s, rubrics, & assessment methods #2 assess all students in all sections of all courses #3 maintain SLO assessment.
January 26, 2011 Careers Conference, Madison, Wisconsin Robin Nickel, Ph.D. Associate Director, Worldwide Instructional Design System.
Why Community-University Partnerships? Partnerships Enhance quality of life in the region Increase relevance of academic programs Add public purposes to.
Assessing Information Literacy with SAILS Juliet Rumble Reference & Instruction Librarian Auburn University.
The Gold Standard… Faculty are Key.  Annual Assessment based on  Address each SLO  Be specific, measurable, student- focused  Align the new.
Assessment of Student Learning: Phase III OSU-Okmulgee’s Evidence of Student Learning.
Assessment 101: What do you (really) need to know? Melinda Jackson, SJSU Assessment Director October
Program review Experiences from within and without Char Mehrtens UVM Geology Experiences from within and without Char Mehrtens UVM Geology.
Board Assessment Governing Board Online Training Module.
Assessing Student Learning Outcomes Andrew Swan What are Student Learning Outcomes?  Education reform in the 1990s pushed for more sophisticated goals.
 Summative  Formative  Individuals,  Assignments,  Learning activity  Courses,  Programs,  Institutions.  Assessment at a point in time.
Model of an Effective Program Review October 2008 Accrediting Commission for Community and Junior Colleges.
Institutional Student Learning Outcome Assessment Report Fall 2015 Assessment Cycle
Effective Outcomes Assessment
Reframing the Future: Outcomes Assessment
Teaching and Learning Commons West Virginia University
Engaging Institutional Leadership
Assessing Student Learning
Evidence Based Decisions for Information Literacy Programs
What to do with your data?
Student Learning Outcomes at CSUDH
Presentation transcript:

1 Closing the Loop: How to Do It and Why It Matters

2 Presentation Outline What does “closing the loop” really mean? What is the assessment process? How do you “close the loop”? Why should you “close the loop? Where does my program stand?

3 1. Outcomes, questions 2. Means of Assessment and Benchmarks 3. Gathering and Summarizing Evidence 4. Use of Results The Assessment Loop (Closing)

4 Other steps in the assessment process... Planning Mapping goals onto curriculum Adding outcomes to syllabi Offering faculty development Reporting Communicating Adding assessment to Program Review Assessing the assessment

5 Step #1: Learning goals and the hierarchy of specificity Institutional Outcomes (Core Competencies) Program Outcomes Course-level goals

6 Levels of specificity – an example: Business Administration Oral & written communication Ability to write for business Ability to write a business plan

7 Step #2 Means of Assessment and Benchmarks Make your assessment meaningful Don’t make assessment a lot of work for you  Quality Assessment vs. Quantity Assessment Assessment types  Direct vs. Indirect Assessment  Embedded Assessment  Formative vs. Summative Assessment  Authentic Assessment  Triangulation

8 Step #3: Gathering and Summarizing Evidence An inclusive, collegial “community of judgment” Meaning out of data Shared understanding of strengths, weaknesses, needs Decisions, planning for action Communication about planned action Catalyst for change in campus culture

9 Step #4: Use of Results Defining the action Planning for implementation  Who will manage? Contribute?  What expertise, support will it take?  What funding is needed?  How will we get what we need? Implementing

10 Closing the loop: Back to Step #1 Sometimes your results support the status quo What do the findings tell us now? Did our “treatment” improve learning? What else do the findings show? What’s the next step? What have we learned about our assessment process? Infrastructure? What can be improved?

11 Examples of closing the loop… If results suggest the need for change here are some things that might be considered  Pedagogy  Curriculum  Student Support  Faculty Support  Equipment/Supplies/Space  Conduct further assessment  Assessment Process (outcome, means of assessment and/or benchmark) Make sure to document what you have done  SLO Binder, Curricunet, meeting notes, Program Review

12 Why the loop should be closed - Return on the investment in #1, #2 Improvement of learning Stronger programs Fewer silos, more integration More collegiality Happier, more successful students Happier, more satisfied employers More willing donors

13 Why close the loop, cont. Better retention, graduation rates More successful accreditation review Shared campus understanding of mission, learning goals, and what is being done to achieve them Clearer, more substantive communication with the public

14 So where does your program stand? Where are you on the loop in terms of assessing your programs and courses? What are the major impediments that you need to address? How can you address them?  What resources can you draw on?  What strategies can you use?