B ALTIMORE C ITY P UBLIC S CHOOLS 2013-14 School Leader Effectiveness Evaluation Calculating The Overall Rating Office of Achievement and Accountability.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Mississippi Statewide Teacher Appraisal Rubric (M-STAR)
Advertisements

Educator Evaluation Systems & Effectiveness Labels Venessa Keesler, Ph.D. Office of Evaluation, Strategic Research and Accountability Michigan Department.
Fill in missing numbers or operations
Human Resources Division January 14, The St. Louis Plan is aligned to Standard #8 of the Districts Long Range Plan as well as the Districts Accountability.
Student Growth Objectives for Career and technical education
AYP Changes for 2007 K-20 Videoconference June 11, 2007 Presented by: JoLynn Berge OSPI Federal Policy Coordinator.
Updated Training for DPAS II for Administrators
The Delaware Performance Appraisal System II for Specialists August 2013 Training Module I Introduction to DPAS II Training for Specialists.
Training for Teachers and Specialists
On-the-job Evaluation of Principals Jacquelyn O. Wilson, Ed.D. Delaware SAELP Director Wallace Foundation National Conference October 25-28, 2006.
Career and College Readiness Kentucky Core Academic Standards Characteristics of Highly Effective Teaching and Learning Assessment Literacy MODULE 1.
Assessment Literacy Kentucky Core Academic Standards Characteristics of Highly Effective Teaching and Learning Career and College Readiness MODULE 1.
1 Citrus County 21 st CCLC Progress Report Larry Parman External Evaluator.
Alaska Accountability Adequate Yearly Progress January 2008, Updated.
Alaska Accountability Adequate Yearly Progress February 2007, Updated.
Introducing LEADAlabama June 13, 2012 EDUCATEAlabama/LEADAlabama Section.
1 1  1 =.
Managing the Statutory Requirements for Assessment April 2011.
School Performance Framework Sponsored by The Colorado Department of Education Summer 2010 Version 1.3.
Mid-Year Conversations Teacher Effectiveness Evaluation
Guide to Compass Evaluations and
APS Teacher Evaluation
Performance Appraisal Systems
Discuss the charge of the Michigan Council for Educator Effectiveness (MCEE) Summarize the MCEE Interim Report Provide an Overview of the Pilot.
Springboro Community City School District Todd Petrey, Superintendent Jamie Miles, 8 th Grade Science Teacher SEA Vice-President.
Unclassified Performance Management Process For Unclassified Administrative and Professional (Non-Teaching) Employees Summer 2011.
The SCPS Professional Growth System
Management Plans: A Roadmap to Successful Implementation
In August, the historic CORE district waiver was approved allowing these districts to pursue a new robust and holistic accountability model for schools.
Leading Australian Curriculum: Science Day 4. Australian Curriculum PURPOSE Curriculum leaders develop capacity to lead change and support schools and.
Evaluation Orientation Meeting Teacher Evaluation System
B ALTIMORE C ITY P UBLIC S CHOOLS Teacher Effectiveness Evaluation Calculating The Overall Rating Office of Achievement and Accountability June.
RTI 101 Mia Hyde Tennessee Department of Education Coordinator of Reading Content & Resources.
Santa Rosa County District Schools Evaluation Systems.
Overview of SB 191 Ensuring Quality Instruction through Educator Effectiveness Colorado Department of Education Updated: July 2011.
Welcome! Please sign in and take a seat at one of the front tables 1.
SEED – CT’s System for Educator and Evaluation and Development April 2013 Wethersfield Public Schools CONNECTICUT ADMINISTRATOR EVALUATION Overview of.
Wethersfield Teacher Evaluation and Support Plan
DPAS II Jessica Baker & Cheryl Cresci MED 7701 Dr. Joseph Massare.
Employment Ontario Program Updates EO Leadership Summit – May 13, 2013 Barb Simmons, MTCU.
Before Between After.
Quantitative research key findings January 2013 FX Plus Childcare Survey 2012/13 Summary report.
By the end of this session we will have an understanding of the following:  A new model for teacher evaluation based on current research  The correlation.
The Design and Implementation of Educator Evaluation Systems, Variability of Systems and the Role of a Theory of Action Rhode Island Lisa Foehr Rhode Island.
LOUISIANA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
Teacher Evaluation & APPR THE RUBRICS! A RTTT Conversation With the BTBOCES RTTT Team and local administrators July 20, 2011.
District Leadership Team Stakeholder Involvement in the District Strategic Plan! Session #4 April 12th, 2011.
Florida School Accountability Dr. Karen Schafer Accountability and Testing Adapted from Presentation June, 2014 by Ed Croft Bureau Chief, Accountability.
By the end of this session we will have an understanding of the following:  A model for teacher evaluation based on current research  The FEAPs as a.
SLG Goals, Summative Evaluations, and Assessment Guidance Training LCSD#7 10/10/14.
& dding ubtracting ractions.
Gwinnett Teacher Effectiveness System Training
Budget Projections April 22, What Will Be Covered Tonight? Update on state legislature and public school funding Preliminary.
Sub-heading ADMINISTRATOR EVALUATION AND SUPPORT SYSTEM Curriculum, Instruction and Assessment Leader Proposed Adaptations.
Update on Teacher and Principal Evaluation Implementation of ARS
SMART GOALS APS TEACHER EVALUATION. AGENDA Purpose Balancing Realism and Rigor Progress Based Goals Three Types of Goals Avoiding Averages Goal.
Introduction to Teacher Evaluation August 20, 2014 Elizabeth M. Osga, Ph.D.
Teacher Evaluation New Teacher Orientation August 15, 2013.
Title One Program Evaluation Report to the CCSD Board of Education June 17, 2013 Bill Poock, Title One Coordinator Leslie Titler, Title One Teacher.
Student Growth Measures in Teacher Evaluation
PUSD Teacher Evaluation SY 13/14 Governing Board Presentation May 9, 2013 Dr. Heather Cruz, Deputy Superintendent.
CONTINUING STUDENTS: PROGRESSION AND AWARD
Connecting the Process to: -Current Practice -CEP -CIITS/EDS 1.
Deliberate Practice Technical Assistance Day
B ALTIMORE C ITY P UBLIC S CHOOLS Roster Validation Quick Reference Guide for Teachers Office of Achievement and Accountability April
B ALTIMORE C ITY P UBLIC S CHOOLS Amended Grading Scale December 13,
EVALUATIONS FOR PROFESSIONAL GROWTH Ohio TIF and OTES.
APPR 2.0 (based on CR 3012-d) NSCSD Goals The NSCSD District Goals Can be evidenced in planning, classroom instruction, assessment and teacher’s.
Okeechobee County Instructional Evaluation
Student Growth Measures
Presentation transcript:

B ALTIMORE C ITY P UBLIC S CHOOLS School Leader Effectiveness Evaluation Calculating The Overall Rating Office of Achievement and Accountability June 25,

B ALTIMORE C ITY P UBLIC S CHOOLS Principal Evaluation Update Given the transition in state assessments, recent legislation (i.e. former Senate Bill 676) prohibits the use of state assessments for teacher and principal evaluation until City Schools will not use student growth measures in the principal evaluation that will be used for compensation because all of the measures we planned to use include state assessment data. The resulting evaluation will be based on two professional practice measures (i.e. 70% Leadership Framework and 30% 360 Feedback Survey) and the scoring ranges used to determine the overall rating will be adjusted. The 4-tier rating system will be implemented for the first time since contract ratification in Principals will receive a formative report later this summer that includes the student growth measures. 2

B ALTIMORE C ITY P UBLIC S CHOOLS Principal Evaluation Without Student Growth* (April 2014) 3 Measures of Principal Effectiveness 360 Feedback Survey* (30%) Leadership Framework (70%) *City Schools is using the VAL-ED (Vanderbilt Assessment of Leadership in Education) Survey for the 360 feedback survey measure.

B ALTIMORE C ITY P UBLIC S CHOOLS Determining the Evaluation Rating Step 1: Put all components on the same scale so you can compare apples-to-apples Step 2: Assign weights to each component Step 3: Add all the component scores together Step 4: Determine the rating based on the composite score 4

B ALTIMORE C ITY P UBLIC S CHOOLS Start with the Raw Scores 5 Effectiveness MeasurePrincipal’s Raw Score Explanation Leadership Framework3.1Average of the principal’s ratings on a scale of 1 to Feedback Survey3.7Average of the principal’s ratings on a scale of 1 to 5 using the VAL-ED survey. The average includes the supervisor rating, principal rating and instructional staff rating.

B ALTIMORE C ITY P UBLIC S CHOOLS Step 1: Compare Apples to Apples Evaluation Measure ScoreMultiplierScaled ScoreExplanation Leadership Framework Because of the 1-4 scale of the Leadership Framework and rubric, a multiplier of 25 is used to place the score on a 100-point scale 360 Feedback Survey Because of the 1-5 scale of the VAL-ED survey, a multiplier of 20 is used to place the score on a 100-point scale X 25 = X 20 = 74

B ALTIMORE C ITY P UBLIC S CHOOLS Step 2: Assign Weights 7 Evaluation Measure Scaled Score WeightWeighted ScoreExplanation Leadership Framework %54.25Multiply by.7 because the Leadership Framework is worth 70% of the evaluation score 360 Feedback Survey 7430%22.2Multiply by.3 because the 360 Survey is worth 30% of the evaluation score 77.5 x.7 = x.3= 22.2

B ALTIMORE C ITY P UBLIC S CHOOLS Step 3: Add All Components Together 8 Effectiveness MeasureWeighted Score Leadership Framework Feedback Survey 22.2 = Overall Weighted Score (round to 76)

B ALTIMORE C ITY P UBLIC S CHOOLS Step 4: Determine the Rating 9 Final RatingOverall Score Range* Highly Effective 86 and above Effective 72 – 85 Developing Ineffective 54 and below In this example, the overall weighted score of 76 would place this principal’s rating in the “Effective” range. *Score ranges as agreed to by City Schools and PSASA in June 2014

B ALTIMORE C ITY P UBLIC S CHOOLS Evaluation Outcomes 10 The new evaluation includes 4 overall performance ratings (Highly Effective, Effective, Developing, Ineffective) instead of 3 (Satisfactory, Satisfactory with PIP and Unsatisfactory) Composite evaluation ratings will still be used to determine leadership units. The composite evaluation rating, as well as the ratings on any of the measures, will be used to determine professional development opportunities for principals to target strengths and weaknesses. Performance improvement plans can still be written based on the composite evaluation rating, any single evaluation component, or for any reason. They do not have a direct impact on compensation. New Evaluation RatingLeadership Units Highly Effective Effective Developing Ineffective

B ALTIMORE C ITY P UBLIC S CHOOLS THANK YOU 11 CONTACT US: CONTACT US: