The best environmental choice in seafood Disclaimer If any interpretive issues arise in relation to the issues covered in these presentations, the text of the English MSC Scheme Documents will prevail in all instances. The MSC is not responsible for any issues arising to any parties as a result of consulting these presentations. If you are unsure of any details on any of the subjects covered, please consult the relevant MSC scheme documents or contact the MSC at MSC Executive October2011

The best environmental choice in seafood Chain of Custody surveillance audits September 2011

The best environmental choice in seafood

Learning Objectives To know how to comply with scheme requirements To be able to easily explain to your clients what they need to do Understand the procedure for determining surveillance frequency

The best environmental choice in seafood Agenda Scheme Requirements What happens at a surveillance audit? What your client needs to know Surveillance frequency Exercise Photo: Tony Rotondas

The best environmental choice in seafood Surveillance Scheme requirements Section 17.8 Table B4: Risk Analysis to determine appropriate Levels of On-going Surveillance

The best environmental choice in seafood Surveillance 17.8 Surveillance: 1.Scoring table 2.Reduced level can happen at any time between 10 and 18 months 3.Remote reduced for very low risk companies

The best environmental choice in seafood Table introduced because: – Previous verification was in some cases disproportionally heavy in relation to associated risk – Accounts for seasonal operations – Flexibility to arrange/organise audits – All companies are scored using the same criteria Surveillance

The best environmental choice in seafood Surveillance During a surveillance audit, the CAB: Checks continued conformity to the CoC Standard, and Checks use of MSC ecolabel Records the list of products actually handled since the last audit to update the MSC database.

The best environmental choice in seafood Surveillance Planned but also irregularly timed – : CB shall have a documented system in place for irregularly timed short-notice audits

The best environmental choice in seafood What the client needs to know 1.Audit Frequency ranges from every 18 months to every 6 months 2.If Major nonconformity is raised, the level of frequency is enhanced 3.Show or explain the risk table Photo: Blue Lotus

The best environmental choice in seafood Surveillance Type & Frequency 1. Enhanced: Onsite once each 6 months 2. Standard: Onsite once each 12 months 3. Reduced: Onsite between months from the date of certification 4. Remote reduced: Desk audit between months from the date of certification

The best environmental choice in seafood Surveillance A desktop audit shall involve the same activities as onsite audits. (17.8.2)

The best environmental choice in seafood Surveillance 17.8 CR : Table B4: Risk factors are not exhaustive Table B5: Overlapping categories for some scores

The best environmental choice in seafood Table B4: Factors and scoring to determine surveillance frequency

The best environmental choice in seafood Table B5 The ranges in Table B5 intentionally overlap. Where this occurs (i.e a score of 30 – 35 or 50 – 55) CAB’s shall make the decision on which surveillance type to use, and shall record their reasons for decision

The best environmental choice in seafood

Summary Table B5: Overlapping categories for some scores Surveillance audits take place between 6 and 18 months A desktop audit involves the same activities as onsite audits. Planned but also irregularly timed

The best environmental choice in seafood Please send comments, queries, suggestions to: Thank you