Michael Lacewing enquiries@alevelphilosophy.co.uk The Idea of God Michael Lacewing enquiries@alevelphilosophy.co.uk © Michael Lacewing.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The Ontological Argument
Advertisements

© Michael Lacewing James and Freud on Religious Experience Michael Lacewing
God A Priori Arguments. Classical Theism Classical conception of God: God is Classical conception of God: God is Omnipotent Omnipotent Omnipresent Omnipresent.
Free will and God’s omniscience
Omniscience and immutability Michael Lacewing
Is Religion Reasonable? Are religious beliefs (about the universe’s relation to the supernatural) reasonable? Faith seeking understanding: ontological,
Philosophy and the proof of God's existence
The argument from design: God
Plantinga’s ontological argument
Two puzzles about omnipotence
The Ontological Argument. Anselm’s Argument So the fool has to agree that the concept of something than which nothing greater can be thought exists in.
The ontological argument
The Euthyphro dilemma.
The logical problem of evil
Descartes’ trademark argument Michael Lacewing
The Ontological Argument
The Ontological Argument
© Michael Lacewing Omnipotence and other puzzles Michael Lacewing co.uk.
Malcolm’s ontological argument Michael Lacewing
Phil 1000 Bradley Monton Class 2 The Cosmological Argument.
Phil 1000 Two weeks on God, with Professor Bradley Monton.
Is Religion Reasonable? Faith Seeking Understanding The ontological argument The cosmological argument The teleological argument (from design)
Is Belief in God Reasonable? Faith Seeking Understanding A posteriori arguments (based on experience): The teleological argument (from design) The cosmological.
Divine attributes Michael Lacewing
© Michael Lacewing The attributes of God Michael Lacewing
God as Eternal and Omnipotent Mr. DeZilva Philosophy of Religion Year 13.
© Michael Lacewing The origin of ‘God’ Michael Lacewing
Divine Attributes Miscellaneous Proofs of the existence of God
Introduction to Philosophy Lecture 5 The Ontological Argument By David Kelsey.
Lecture 7: The Existence of God Major Arguments for God’s Existence Based upon Natural Theology.
Ontological Argument. Teleological argument depends upon evidence about the nature of the world and the organisms and objects in it. Cosmological argument.
Introduction to Philosophy Lecture 5 The Ontological Argument By David Kelsey.
A Mickey Mouse Guide to the Ontological Argument
The Ontological Argument
Omnipotence and other puzzles Michael Lacewing co.uk Michael Lacewing co.uk.
Anselm’s Ontological Argument STARTER TASK: ‘Fools say in their hearts, “There is no God”’ Psalm 14:1 Copy this statement down. What do you think it is.
Meditations: 3 & 4.
Chapter 1: Religion Proving God: The Ontological Argument Introducing Philosophy, 10th edition Robert C. Solomon, Kathleen Higgins, and Clancy Martin.
The Ontological Argument
Chapter 1: The cosmological argument AQA Religious Studies: Philosophy of Religion AS Level © Nelson Thornes Ltd 2008 Revision.
The Nature of God Nancy Parsons. Attributes- Nature of God Candidates should be able to demonstrate knowledge and understanding of: 1.God as eternal,
The Mickey Mouse Guide to the Ontological Argument
James and Freud on Religious Experience
Cosmological arguments from contingency
THE ONTOLOGICAL ARGUMENT 1
OA: Faith and Reason What difference does the argument make
Omnipotence and other puzzles
ASPECTS OF GOD OMNIPOTENCE.
The paradox of the stone
The Ontological Argument
The ontological argument
A Mickey Mouse Guide to the Ontological Argument
Kant’s criticisms of the Ontological Argument
O.A. so far.. Anselm – from faith, the fool, 2 part argument
Descartes’ ontological argument
Other versions of the ontological argument
Descartes’ trademark argument
Michael Lacewing The attributes of God Michael Lacewing © Michael Lacewing.
The Ontological Argument: St. Anselm’s First Argument
Kant’s objection to ontological arguments
THE ONTOLOGICAL ARGUMENT
THE ONTOLOGICAL ARGUMENT.
THE ONTOLOGICAL ARGUMENT.
THE COSMOLOGICAL ARGUMENT.
Clarify and explain the key ideas. A’priori Deductive
Clarify and explain the key ideas. A’priori Deductive
IN SUPPORT OF THE ONTOLOGICAL ARGUMENT
Explore the weaknesses of the ontological argument. (8 marks)
Clarify the key ideas Logic Definition Premises Outline opinion Flawed
Presentation transcript:

Michael Lacewing enquiries@alevelphilosophy.co.uk The Idea of God Michael Lacewing enquiries@alevelphilosophy.co.uk © Michael Lacewing

The idea of God What is the idea of God? Does it make sense? Can we prove the existence of God just from the idea of God? What is the origin of the idea of God? Is it God? If so, how did we get it from God - is it innate or discovered in experience? Or did we invent it? Why?

What is the idea of God? Augustine: to think of God is to ‘attempt to conceive something than which nothing more excellent or sublime exists’ or could exist God as personal: intellect and will Perfect intellect: omniscience Perfect will: omnipotence, perfect goodness Transcendence: beyond creation, self-sufficient, non-spatial, without beginning or end Everlasting - throughout time Eternal - outside time Immanence: closely related to creation, e.g. omnipresent

Puzzles about omnipotence Omnipotence: ‘all-powerful’: Is logic a limitation on God’s power? God can’t change logic, not because of a lack of power, but because any description of a logically impossible state of affairs or power is not a description at all ‘The power to do whatever it is possible for a perfect being (or the greatest possible being) to do’

The stone paradox Can God create a stone so heavy that he can’t lift it? If yes, he can’t lift it; if no, he can’t create it ‘The power to create a stone an omnipotent being can’t lift’ is logically incoherent, so it’s not a possible power. Or: the stone is, by definition, impossible to lift. If God lacks the power to lift a stone it is logically impossible to lift, there is still no power God lacks.

Other puzzles Can God know the future? Can God do evil? In what sense is God ‘good’? Is everything that God wills good by definition? Or is there an independent standard of good that God adheres to? Can God be transcendent and personal?

Anselm’s argument By definition, God is a being greater than which cannot be conceived. I can conceive of such a being. It is greater to exist than not to exist. Therefore, God must exist.

Anselm on islands and God Gaunilo: I can conceive of the the perfect island, greater than which cannot be conceived. And so such an island must exist, because it would be less great if it didn’t. Anselm: An island wouldn’t cease to be what it is – an island – if it wasn’t perfect. Islands aren’t perfect by definition or ‘essentially’. God wouldn’t be God if there was some being even greater than God. Being the greatest conceivable being is an essential property of God. God’s existence is therefore necessary, while even a perfect island exists only contingently.

Kant’s objection Kant: existence is not a ‘perfection’, because it is not a predicate at all. To say ‘x exists’ is not to describe x at all or explain what x is. Existence is not part of the concept of anything. To say ‘x exists’ is to say that some real object corresponds to the concept of x.

The origin of ‘God’ Descartes: Innate and God-given Experience The idea of God, infinite perfection, can’t be derived from experience Hume: it can be, negatively - not-finite, not-imperfect Experience Religious experience Experience more generally ‘Human construction and projection’ Legitimate: Inference to the best explanation Illegitimate: Origin in emotional or social need

Invention as explanation Many concepts are invented in order to explain experience, even concepts of things we cannot directly experience e.g. electron, ecosystem If we invented the concepts because explanations using them are true, the concepts refer to something that exists Are explanations invoking God true? What did we use the first explanations invoking God for? ‘God of the gaps’: the concept of God filled gaps in our understanding of the world But what about cosmological argument, religious experience, miracles?

Invention and psychology: Freud The origins of religion in human history: a response to our vulnerability in the face of forces of nature The origins of religion in the individual mind: a development from our childhood vulnerability and our relationship with our father, whom we both fear and love “Thus [man’s] longing for a father is a motive identical with his need for protection against the consequences of his human weakness.”

Invention and psychology Religion is an ‘illusion’, i.e. caused by the fulfilment of a wish (we want it – life, the universe – to be this way). This doesn’t show that God doesn’t exist - only that the origin of the idea of God is emotional But this emotional need could realistic: if we are made by God, our deepest longing could be relationship with God; Freud misidentifies the nature of the need The idea that God will ‘make everything alright’ is not the childish fantasy Freud thinks it is

Invention and sociology Durkheim: At the level of society, religious belief promotes cooperation, mutual respect, solidarity, a sense of identity, and the basis for a collective morality and for authority in the society. these features help the group to survive and flourish. Explaining the origins of religious practices and beliefs is not yet to explain the origins of GOD, because even if human societies work better with religious belief, this is not to say that the concept or belief in God must be part of that religious belief Nietzsche: the idea of God is a projection of our values, an illusory external confirmation