1 CDM Study October 19, 2011 Stan But Manager, Economics & Load Forecasting.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Evaluation at NRCan: Information for Program Managers Strategic Evaluation Division Science & Policy Integration July 2012.
Advertisements

Impact Assessment in the policy cycle at the European Commission
1 Accessibility Forum Projects Bill Hetzner Jim Kindrick.
Smart Grid: an Ontario Perspective Brian Hewson, Senior Manager Regulatory Policy Hamilton May 8, 2013.
Scaling up the global initiative on the implementation of the SNA and supporting statistics Meeting on Scaling up the coordination and resources for the.
Parallel Flow Visualization/Mitigation Proposal
1 OAS Financial Management Challenges and Program- Budget Implications 1 SECRETARIAT FOR ADMINISTRATION AND FINANCE October 2008.
Health and Work Environment 15 March 2012 Ageing Populations and New Opportunities for Businesses in Europe and Japan Miki Kohara Osaka University
- GDP 2011 versus 2010 – increase by 5.5%
Using computer simulations to assess energy and carbon reductions in building CDM projects Joe Huang March 14, 2011.
UNFCCC secretariat, programme Fleur Newman, Programme Officer Breakout session 4.2 Procedure on significant deficiencies CMP & EB Mandates and 2012 Process.
HIGH LEVEL SAFETY CONFERENCE Montreal 29 March 2010
Copyright © 2012 California Department of Education, Child Development Division with WestEd Center for Child & Family Studies, Desired Results T&TA Project.
Experience you can trust. Practical Approaches to Benefit- Cost Challenges in Energy Efficiency Programs Kansas Corporation Commission Mitchell Rosenberg,
Mn/DOT & ACEC/MN Collaboration 1. Mn/DOT Commissioner and Executive Staff ACEC Transportation Executive Leadership Team ACEC - Mn/DOT Collaboration Team.
1 Child Care Resource and Referral (CCR&R): FY 13 Contract Renewal Proposal Summary Presentation January 2012.
1 Managing for efficiency (MfE) in IFAD: Progress under IFAD8 and proposals for IFAD October 2011 Ninth Replenishment of IFAD’s Resources.
PROJECT MANAGEMENT OFFICE JOURNEY FROM 2010 TO PRESENT 2012.
The Department of Energy Enterprise Risk Management Model
Presentation of the proposed Annex 19 – Safety Management
1 Title I Program Evaluation Title I Technical Assistance & Networking Session May 23, 2011.
A Roadmap to Successful Implementation Management Plans.
Green Building Ordinance Transportation and Environment Committee
IHPA and the National Efficient Price (NEP) Independent Hospital Pricing Authority.
New Paradigms for Measuring Savings
Item #16 California Measure SB375: Linking Greenhouse Gas Emissions Reductions to Metropolitan Transportation Planning Presentation to the National Capital.
SAI Performance Measurement Framework
Roadmap for Sourcing Decision Review Board (DRB)
1 Priority-Based Budgeting Performance Measurement: What’s New for FY 2008 A techie & manager training of performance measures changes for FY 2008 A techie.
Strategic Financial Management 9 February 2012
Welcome to the Virtual Historian Getting started with the VH 2.0 Go to virtualhistorian.ca Select language of usevirtualhistorian.ca 2 Note: For.
1 Evaluation Plan for Geotargeted Efficiency Programs November 19, 2008.
Capability Creativity Maturity 14 September 2011 Sofia, Bulgaria Bulgarian Association of Software Companies (BASSCOM) Bulgarian IT Industry Barometer.
ERGEG Advice Comitology Guidelines on Fundamental Electricity Data Transparency Florence Forum 13 December 2010 Bente Danielsen.
NANC Report Numbering Oversight Working Group (NOWG) March 9, 2011 Tri-Chairs: Laura Dalton, Verizon Communications Natalie McNamer, T-Mobile USA Gwen.
Highlights From the Survey on the Use of Funds Under Title II, Part A
Revision of WIPO Standard ST.14 Committee on WIPO Standards, third session Geneva 15 – 19 April 2013 Anna Graschenkova Standards Section.
Introduction Build and impact metric data provided by the SGIG recipients convey the type and extent of technology deployment, as well as its effect on.
Economic Criteria for Transmission Planning in the ERCOT Region Public Utility Law Seminar DeAnn Walker August 3, 2012.
By Saurabh Sardesai October 2014.
Economic Impact of Poor Power Quality on Industry Nepal Adopted from The Internet for Educational Purpose Sudaryatno Sudirham October 2003.
Farmers Rural Electric Cooperative Corporation 2006 Load Forecast Prepared by: East Kentucky Power Cooperative, Inc. Forecasting and Market Analysis Department.
Coincident Peak Load Forecasting Methodology Prepared for June 3, 2010 Meeting with Division of Public Utilities.
Regional Technical Forum End-use Load Shape Business Case Project Project Initiation Meeting Portland, OR March 5, 2012.
Integration of Variable Generation Task Force Preliminary Conclusions and Actions.
Reliable Power Reliable Markets Reliable People Performance Targets for the Customer Interconnection Process January, 2008.
Electricity Distributors Conservation and Demand Management RP
1 Road Weather Management Performance Metrics Development: An Update Chris Cluett, Leon Osborne, Arthur Handman, Jeff Jenq ITS America 2007 Annual Meeting.
2013 Cost of Service Orientation Session Conservation and Demand Management – Review of Updated CDM Guidelines (EB ) July 9, 2012 Viive Sawler.
Network Customer Meeting Access Metric Update November 16, 2006.
Residential Sector Market Studies Planning Tool Output of Market Studies Needs Assessment ( study) July 29, 2014 webinar Opinion Dynamics, for California.
Grayson Rural Electric Cooperative Corporation 2006 Load Forecast Prepared by: East Kentucky Power Cooperative, Inc. Forecasting and Market Analysis Department.
Modernization and Reengineering of the Census of Governments Presented at the State Data Center Annual Training Conference Lisa Blumerman Governments Division.
Washington’s Water Use Efficiency Rule May Require Increased Coordination for Many Utilities Dan Sander, P.E. Senior Engineer.
Oregon Population Forecast Program Rulemaking Advisory Committee (RAC) Population Research Center (PRC)
1 UFE Workshop Sponsored by COPS October 19, 2004.
Blue Grass Energy Cooperative Corporation 2006 Load Forecast Prepared by: East Kentucky Power Cooperative, Inc. Forecasting and Market Analysis Department.
Licking Valley Rural Electric Cooperative Corporation 2006 Load Forecast Prepared by : East Kentucky Power Cooperative, Inc. Forecasting and Market Analysis.
Sixth Power Plan A Public Utility Point of View Bill Gaines, Director, Tacoma Public Utilities Craig Smith, Assistant General Manager, Snohomish PUD Northwest.
Demand Forecast Deviations Working Group Presented to: Stakeholder Advisory Committee Presented by: Pat Doran January 24, 2007.
Exterior LED Area Lights
Hybrid Forecast for Resource Adequacy Analysis with recommendations Massoud Jourabchi April
DRAFT – FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY © 2013 New York Independent System Operator, Inc. All Rights Reserved. EIPC Roll-Up Powerflow Model Zach Smith Director,
Formation of a Market Analysis Subcommittee Charlie Grist and Jennifer Light RTF Policy Advisory Committee February 19, 2016.
LNBA Subgroup: Avoided Transmission Value
/ California Energy Demand (CED) 2011 Revised Electricity and Natural Gas Forecast February 3, 2012 Chris.
CDM Study Stan But October 19, 2011
CDM Study Stan But October 19, 2011
Resource Adequacy Demand Forecast Coincidence Adjustments
DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEES AB 1600 UPDATE
Presentation transcript:

1 CDM Study October 19, 2011 Stan But Manager, Economics & Load Forecasting

2 Agenda OEB Directive Stakeholder Recommendations CDM Study Objectives Study Findings Preliminary CDM Impacts for Summary

3 OEB Directive In its Decision with Reasons for EB , the Board noted the following: – there does not appear to be a broadly accepted methodology in place to identify reasonably anticipated effects of any CDM program on the throughput of the respective distribution or transmission systems. –For the purposes of establishing credible load forecasts, much more acuity than is currently available is needed. The Board accepted Hydro Ones CDM estimates used in the load forecast, but directed Hydro One to work with the OPA in devising a robust, effective and accurate means of measuring the expected impacts of CDM programs.

4 Stakeholder Recommendations Hydro One held two stakeholder consultations in February and March 2011 Below is a summary of recommendations from the above sessions: –An in-house study prepared by Hydro One staff instead of an external study by consultant –A review of CDM categories and methodologies to incorporate the CDM impacts into the load forecast used by utilities in other jurisdictions –CDM categories should be comprehensive and can be tracked –Hydro One should work closely with the OPA to better define and measure CDM impacts for use in its load forecast –CDM impacts should be presented by customer class

5 CDM Study Objectives Objective 1: Develop a robust methodology to forecast CDM impacts using comprehensive and well-defined categories Objective 2: Develop a methodology to incorporate the CDM impacts into Hydro Ones load forecast

6 Study Findings Literature Review Utilities reviewed: –British Columbia, New York and California as recommended by stakeholders –Other major utilities in North America with CDM experience Tools used: web-search and personal communication

7 Study Findings Load Forecast Survey A web-based survey was sent to about 100 utilities/organizations in North America and 41 responses were received The literature review and the survey provided a list of well-defined and comprehensive CDM categories: Programs initiated by the utility Program initiated by other organizations Building codes and appliance efficiency standards Rate structures Increased conservation effect

8 Study Findings Load Forecast Survey (Contd…) Three methods are commonly used to incorporate CDM impacts in the load forecast: Method 1: Forecast using actual load (without any CDM adjustment) Method 2: Forecast CDM impacts as an explanatory variable on the right hand side of the econometric equation Method 3: Add back historical CDM impacts to the actual load and then forecast forward

9 Study Findings Review of load forecast methodologies for incorporating CDM in the load forecast Hydro One undertook a review of the three methods to evaluate the advantages and challenges associated with each method The review results suggested that: –Method 3 is the most robust, technically sound and efficient and it produces reliable and accurate load forecasts –Method 3 addresses the OEB directive to apply a methodology that is less primitive and that provides more acuity Hydro One has adopted Method 3

10 Study Findings Alignment with the OPA

11 Study Findings Alignment with the OPA (Contd…) –Hydro One worked closely with the OPA to better understand the savings assumptions used in their current conservation forecast Step 1 Obtain detailed savings assumptions for each CDM category Step 2 Determine Hydro One specific annual CDM savings by sector Step 3 Derive monthly CDM savings using Hydro One specific load shapes Step 4 Derive CDM savings by rate class

12 Preliminary CDM Impacts for

13 Summary –The literature review provided a list of well-defined and comprehensive categories –The survey results helped Hydro One better understand the methodologies used by utilities to incorporate CDM impacts into the load forecast –The comparative review of methodologies helped identify an effective and efficient method to incorporate CDM in the load forecast –Hydro One worked closely with the OPA to derive CDM forecast specific to Hydro One –Hydro One believes that the CDM study incorporates all recommendations from stakeholders and meets the Boards Directive

14 Thank You