New Trends and New Providers in Higher Education Council of Europe Conference on Public Responsibility for Higher Education and Research 23-24 September.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
REVERSING THE TREND : LOCAL TLIS AS PROVIDERS OF CROSS- BORDER EDUCATION? Curtis Floyd Director - Registration, Accreditation and Quality Enhancement (Ag.)
Advertisements

1 Bologna Shaping the Agenda Bologna today and tomorrow Lesley Wilson Secretary-General, European University Association.
Lifelong learning: Taking Bologna to the labour market Lars Lynge Nielsen President of EURASHE Leuven Ministerial Conference 28 April 2009.
Developing and Supporting the Curriculum Staff and the Curriculum: Challenges and Changes James Moir University of Abertay Dundee.
Towards 2010 – Common Themes and Approaches across Higher Education and Vocational Education and Training in Europe - New and emerging models in vocational.
The role of Technology and Innovation Parks in Europe European Economic and Social Committee – Exploratory Opinion.
Building Internal Quality Assurance System Andy Gibbs Beirut 2013.
EAC HIGHER EDUCATION POLICY
State of Play and Main Challenges Related to Armenian National Qualifications Framework (ANQF) Armen Ashotyan Minister of Education and Science Strasbourg,
An update on the wonderful world of quality assurance! Fiona Crozier
Quality, Profit, and the Public Good Tensions in Cross-Border Delivery of Higher Education Kevin Kinser Department of Educational Administration and Policy.
Quality and the Bologna Process Andrée Sursock Deputy Secretary General European University Association (EUA) EPC Annual Congress, March 2005, Brighton.
Challenges for newly developed agencies Badr Aboul-Ela (Director – CAA) Nadia Badrawi (President of ANQAHE) Ian Cumbus (Commissioner – CAA)
Quality Assurance – The International Challenge(s) UK NARIC Annual Conference 2 November 2009.
Forum on Qualifications Frameworks Background Report Strasbourg, October 2007 Stephen Adam University of Westminster Council of Europe.
QUALIFICATIONS FRAMEWORKS: Challenging technical questions!
European Higher Education in a Globalised World EUA Convention Graz, May 2003 Frans van Vught University of Twente.
BOLOGNA PROCESS and the COUNCIL OF EUROPE CONTRIBUTION RUDN, Moscow, 12 December December 2007 Katia Dolgova-Dreyer, Council of Europe.
COIMBRA GROUP ANNUAL CONFERENCE Anita Lehikoinen.
Royal Ministry of Education and Research UNESCO/OECD WORK ON GUIDELINES FOR QUALITY PROVISION Jan S. Levy, Norwegian Ministry of Education.
External Quality Assurance in the European Higher Education Area: Challenges and Trends Rolf Heusser, Switzerland TechnoTN Forum, Brussels, 4 May 2007.
Changing the focus of International Credential Evaluation Assessment of non-traditional qualifications Jindra Divis “Bologna” Seminar, Lisboa 2002.
Forum on Qualifications Frameworks DRAFT Report by General Rapporteur Strasbourg, October 2007 Gerard Madill Universities Scotland Council of Europe.
Competences, Learning Outcomes and Convergence Stephen Adam, University of Westminster and
Universities UK How will the Bologna Process and EU initiatives affect higher education worldwide? Diana Warwick 1.
The Bologna Process and the European Higher Education Area Ensuring Worldwide Competitiveness of Master’s and PhD Programmes at European Universities of.
GOVERNMENT OF ROMANIA MINISTRY OF PUBLIC FINANCE MANAGING AUTHORITY FOR COMMUNITY SUPPORT FRAMEWORK Evaluation Central Unit Development of the Evaluation.
International cooperation in recognition and quality assurance What can be learned from higher education ? By Michaela Martin.
“the perfect storm”... the implications ahead for global higher education.
11 Workshop on Establishment of a Continental Accreditation Agency for Higher Education in Africa 10 – 11 April 2013, Addis Ababa Rationale for Establishing.
Credential evaluation – criteria and procedure Workshop: Boosting quality: International Credential Evaluation and Higher Education Quality Assessment.
International symposium higher education “CURRENT TRENDS IN HIGHER EDUCATION DEVELOPMENT: QUALITY OF EDUCATION AND GLOBAL CONTEXT” May 2013 Transnational.
Higher Education and Research Council of Europe September 2006.
Recognition: the national centre and the ENIC Network Seminar on the recognition of qualifications Baku, 22 April 2005 Gunnar Vaht Head of the Estonian.
Development and Cooperation The Roots of Democracy and Sustainable Development: Europe's Engagement with Civil Society in External Relations.
ACE Opening Session 2002 News from the Recognition Field Lesley Wilson Secretary General European University Association (EUA)
The national system of qualifications and interests of the stakeholders in the development of higher education Rimma Seidakhmetova Bologna Process and.
RIGA ‘BOLOGNA’ CONFERENCE IMPROVING THE RECOGNITION SYSTEM OF DEGREES AND STUDY CREDIT POINTS IN THE EUROPEAN HIGHER EDUCATION AREA December The.
WHAT MAKES A SUCCESSFUL QUALITY ASSURANCE AGENCY? CEENQA WORKSHOP FRIDAY, 23 MAY 2014 Hotel Sirius-Pristina.
1 EQF – Referencing criteria Criteria and procedures in 10 points to ensure that the information made public - is validated by the competent authorities,
Beyond structures: implementation of national qualifications frameworks (general principles) Stephen Adam.
Bologna self-certification Implications and challenges.
1 Joint EAIE/NAFSA Symposium Amsterdam, March 2007 John E Reilly, Director UK Socrates-Erasmus Council.
STEPHEN ADAM SEEC CONFERENCE: CREDIT CHANGES AND CHALLENGES LONDON, 10 TH DECEMBER 2010 CURRENT ISSUES ASSOCIATED WITH THE THE TWO.
THE BOLOGNA PROCESS AND RECOGNITION OF QUALIFICATIONS Recognition as a key part of higher education policy in Europe.
QUALITY, ICTs AND « LICENCE-MASTER- DOCTORATE »(LMD) REFORMS Juma SHABANI Abuja, September 22nd, 2015.
Royal Ministry of Education and Research UNESCO/OECD WORK ON GUIDELINES FOR QUALITY PROVISION Jan S. Levy, Norwegian Ministry of Education.
Royal Ministry of Education and Research UNESCO/OECD WORK ON GUIDELINES FOR QUALITY PROVISION Jan S. Levy, Norwegian Ministry of Education.
Svava Bjarnason Observatory on Borderless Higher Education ‘Borderless’ Higher Education - Competition or Collaboration?
“The 2005 ‘Researchers in Europe’ Initiative”. Σανόπουλος Δημήτριος Εθνικό Κέντρο Έρευνας και Τεχνολογικής Ανάπτυξης (ΕΚΕΤΑ) Θεσσαλονίκη Μάρτιος
1 EAN CONFERENCE June 30 – July 2, 2008, Berlin. 2 „Challenges for Europe: European Higher Education in a Global Setting“ Barbara Weitgruber Austrian.
Systemic Reform and Cross border education in APEC economies Presented to the 2nd APEC Symposium on Education Reform Xi’an, China, January 15-17, 2008.
FINANCING HIGHER EDUCATION: THE PUBLIC RESPONSIBILITY Yerevan, September 8 – 9, 2011 Sjur Bergan, Council of Europe.
Implementing the LLL Charter Michael H örig EUA Programme Manager Nicosia, Cyprus 22 November 2010.
Tempus project UM JEP “QUASYS” University of Zagreb Prof. Helena Jasna Mencer, Ph. D. Coordinator “Development of Quality Assurance System in.
Towards a European Qualifications Framework Relevance beyond Europe? Moscow 18 April 2006 Jens Bjornavold European centre for development of vocational.
Andy Gibbs Yerevan 2009 Winter School “Promoting European Dimension in Higher Education”
Recognition 2010: the recognition agenda for the EHEA Bologna seminar Riga, 3-4 December 2004 Gunnar Vaht President of the ENIC Network
Current issues in internationalization of higher education in Finland Conference in Seinäjoki Dr. Carita Blomqvist Head of Unit Recognition and.
Director of Research and Strategy Association of Commonwealth Universities and Director Observatory on Borderless Higher Education Developments in Borderless.
Internationalisation is Requisite for the Innovative Development of Applied Technology-Oriented Education Ciarán O’Leary Dublin Institute of Technology.
New Trends and New Providers in Higher Education
The Bologna Process and Tuning Project: Educational Structures in Europe Dag Wiese Schartum.
Why Qualifications Frameworks
International Information Seminar Seminar, Minsk October 2016, Minsk State Linguistics University MODULE BASED EDUCATION. ASSESSMENT OF LEARNING.
Gunnar Vaht Head of the Estonian ENIC/NARI Baku, 2017
NATIONAL ACTION PLANS FOR RECOGNITION
THE BOLOGNA PROCESS AND RECOGNITION OF QUALIFICATIONS
2nd regional meeting of Ministers of Education on the implementation of the European Higher Education Area Palais de l’Europe, room 10, Council of Europe,
National Correspondents for Qualifications Frameworks (QF-EHEA)
Presentation transcript:

New Trends and New Providers in Higher Education Council of Europe Conference on Public Responsibility for Higher Education and Research September 2004, Strasbourg Stephen Adam, University of Westminster

FOCUS: CHALLENGES OF TRANSNATIONAL EDUCATION (borderless education) FOR PUBLIC RESPONSIBILITY LOCAL NATIONAL INTERNATIONAL TRANSNATIONAL EDUCATION - Education unconfined by national borders, which often bypasses state authority and challenges preconceived notions about the provision and regulations of learning.

1) LOCAL : trends impacting on Higher Education Institutions Changing national environment: Financial pressures, increasing competition (TNE), diversification of students Increasing institutional autonomy: Role, nature, organisation, administration, autonomy, good governance Organisation and expression of the curricula: Learning outcomes, credits, student-centred learning. distance learning Internet + new technologies: Cheating/plagiarism, new assessment methods and controls NEW TRENDS & NEW PROVIDERS IMPACT AT THE LOCAL LEVEL + RAISE IMPORTANT QUESTIONS ABOUT THE RESPONSIBILITIES OF ALL STAKEHOLDERS IN HIGHER EDUCATION - CASCADE EFFECT!

2) NATIONAL : trends impacting on ministries, competent authorities and agencies responsible for higher education ‘New style’ qualifications frameworks: Elaboration of comparable and compatible qualifications (Berlin Communiqué) Use of levels, level/qualifications indicators, learning outcomes, benchmarks, etc. Development of the over-arching European Framework of Qualifications How public responsibility relates to national and the emerging over-arching European Framework of Qualifications Borderless education: Advent of corporate, for-profit, not-for-profit, franchise and branch campuses TNE produces complex effects on different sectors and cycles Positive and negative impacts + schizophrenic reaction (import/export) Impacts on national education systems + domestic quality assurance HOW SHOULD PUBLIC AUTHORITIES TREAT THESE DEVELOPMENTS?

3) INTERNATIONAL : trends impacting on international organisations and institutions Expanding global education market: Increasing transnational education + more (domestic + overseas) competition Raises huge recognition issues + problems of mixed jurisdiction GATS: Questions public-private distinctions + educational subsidies Is education a ‘public good’ when supply is limited? Codes of practice: International codes of good practice improve transnational education (COE/UNESCO) European Higher Education Area: The nature of the completed EHEA (2010) will have profound effects WHAT SORT OF EDUCATIONAL ENVIRONMENT WILL THE EHEA PROMOTE (emphasis on quality, competition, educational values) + HOW WILL IT IMPACT ON TRANSNATIONAL EDUCATION AND PUBLIC RESPONSIBILITY?

CONCLUSIONS: 1.We need to re-examine our narrow notion of public responsibility. 2.Whole academic community needs to take a more proactive role – shaping the newly emerging 21 st- century educational world. 3.We require a more effective response to borderless education.

QUESTIONS/CHALLENGES: 1.How does transnational/borderless education impact on the public responsibility for higher education? Who is responsible - the importer and/or the exporter country? 2.How should public responsibility for transnational education relate to new national qualifications frameworks and the emerging overarching European framework of qualifications? How does the creation of the European Higher Education Area impact on the public responsibility for transnational education? 3.Are there any effective ways (nationally and internationally) to regulate transnational education – what might these be? Can public responsibility for transnational education be better discharged if the transnational providers are given the opportunity for official recognition? 4.What implications does GATS have for the public responsibility for higher education provision? 5.What role can international codes of practice play in the promotion of good practice associated with the provision of transnational education? How can these be made more effective?

RECOMMENDATIONS: Promote a debate between national and international stakeholders to develop a coordinated policy on the implications of transnational education (imported and exported) for the European Higher Education Area.

National education systems can no longer act as if they are isolated desert islands!