Just War Theory.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Michael Lacewing Can war be just? Michael Lacewing © Michael Lacewing.
Advertisements

Just War: Along side Pacifism and Realism, Just War theory represents one of the three main moral responses to the issue of war. Just War theory has developed.
Just War Theory.
Justice in Action: Just War Theory
“War Theories” Training Session 2 May 2014
Just War Augustine’s Contributions and Modern Expressions of the Theory.
Chapter 4: Principles.
The International Law of Armed Conflict: An Overview
Lesson Objectives To know about weapons of mass destruction
17th March Just War Aims: To look at the conditions of a just war and to explore the idea that some wars may be justified.
Journal 5: Just War? MLA Format 350 Words or More.
Core Principles Related to Conduct of Hostilities ATHA Specialized Training on International Humanitarian Law May 31, 2010 Stockholm, Sweden.
Internal Armed Conflict and the Law
The Law of Armed Conflict in Practice: Prima-facie Charges & New Defenses The charging of Iraqi insurgents with war crimes and the defense theories that.
20 th Century American History. War: A Definition  Noun  A conflict carried on by force of arms, as between nations or between parties within a nation;
© Michael Lacewing Can war be just? Michael Lacewing
Law of Armed Conflict MIDN 1/C Hagness. Overview HistoryReadingLaws –Ethical conflicts Case study.
Just War Theory Unit #7: The Cold War Essential Question: Was the Cold War a just war?
Ronald F. White, Ph.D. Professor of Philosophy College of Mount St. Joseph.
1. To defend their country e.g WWII 2. To defend religious beliefs, political beliefs, their freedom or way of life 3. To defend an ally or other nation.
“War Theories” Training Session 7 Jan 2014
Today we will learn about Christian Just War theory and how that relates to modern wars.
Chapter 28.  Scriptures and Sacred Tradition has taught us that every human life is sacred from the moment of conception to natural death. No exceptions.
Military Ethics in the New Millennium
MSL 401, Lesson 6a : The Law of Land Warfare The Law of Land Warfare.
The law of war: Humanitarian law THE STORY BEHIND THE STORY.
Situating International Humanitarian Law (IHL) ATHA Specialized Training on International Humanitarian Law May 31, 2010 Stockholm, Sweden.
International Humanitarian Law Geneva Conventions.
Foreign & Defense Policies. Discussion Questions:  Why do you think the Founders intentionally divided responsibility for foreign affairs between president.
Use of violence is any violence against humans justified? what about violence in entertainment, sport, etc.? Wars? just war theory, more below. how can.
Dr. Steve Hays BKHS Leadership and Ethics Spring 2014.
The law of war: Humanitarian law THE STORY BEHIND THE STORY.
Lesson Aim To consider some examples of war To learn about the Just War Theory.
Why is considering ethical issues so important?.  Jus ad bellum – rules before war to justify actions taken  Jus in bello – rules during war to justify.
1. 2
1 - AN OVERVIEW. 2 DEFINITION Rules of Engagement (ROE) are orders issued by competent military authority that define the extent to which military personnel.
Just War When is war the answer?.
Justice in Action: Just War Theory Just War Theory   Jus ad bellum: proposals to justify the use of force in a particular type of situation   Jus.
Justice in Action: Just War Theory PHI 2604 January 25, 2016.
Before formal intro, hand out hit/myth sheet as students get settled and ask them to fill it out. Encourage them to discuss with others and not worry if.
Justice in Action: Just War Theory. Just War Theory Jus ad bellum: proposals to justify the use of force in a particular type of situation Jus in bello:
ALL (E GRADE): Will be able to define what a ‘Just War’ and ‘Holy War’ are and list two criteria for a Just War MOST (C GRADE): Will be able to explain.
Christian Beliefs about Just War,. To be a just war the war must meet certain criteria; 1.LAST RESORT A just war can only be waged as a last resort. All.
International Humanitarian Law Oral Presentation Module Name: UJGT8E-15-M Student No:
Conceptual Overview. Jus ad Bellum (start) Jus in Bello (middle) Jus post Bellum (end)
1 International Humanitarian Law: Indian Perspectives Dr. Tasneem Meenai Associate Professor Nelson Mandela Centre for Peace and Conflict Resolution Jamia.
LAW OF ARMED CONFLICT. HISTORY AND OVERVIEW BACKGROUND n Definition (JCS Pub 1-02): u The part of international law that regulates the conduct of armed.
The Outer Space Treaty Article III
Applying Kant to the issue of.. War
Lecture #6 Just War Theory.
This is Why you can’t just blow stuff up.
List some good reasons for a country to go to war.
Describe the Christian teaching on war (8)
Just War or the Ethics of War
Protection under international humanitarian law
THE JUST WAR THEORY.
The Taking of Human Life
Just War Theory. Just War Theory JWT is not Pacifism Pacifism says that war is always unjust, and therefore always wrong. This is an absolute statement.
Political Violence and Terrorism
LO: Analyse the JWT and explain your own view on war
War and Violence Can war be just?.
Just War.
UNIT FOUR| DEFENSE & SECURITY
JUST WAR.
Justice in Action: Just War Theory
WAR What is it good for? Rae, Chapter 11.
JUST WAR.
Peace and Conflict Quiz
Just War Principles 1. Last Resort
Presentation transcript:

Just War Theory

Just War Theory A doctrine of military ethics When is it right to go to war? How should we act during war? What are our responsibilities after war? Write your ideas for what you think should be included in any Just War criteria. Come up with a list of things that need to be met in order to justify war.

6th Hour Just War Criteria When is it right to go to war? Defense of self and/or people who cannot defend themselves Must be a last resort

6th Hour Just War Criteria How should we act during war? Don’t harm civilians No excessive force

6th Hour Just War Criteria What are our responsibilities after war? All parties involved must pitch in to compensate for damages Create a treaty to avoid future conflict Losers of the war get to participate in construction of the treaty Be mature and don’t gloat Do not leave the losers without a stable government in place Ensure the losers have a say in the history that is written about the war

8th Hour Just War Criteria When is it right to go to war? Defense of self or others being oppressed Must be a last resort

8th Hour Just War Criteria How should we act during war? Don’t target civilians; work to minimize civilian casualties Proceed with caution No nuclear or chemical weapons, or mines Evacuate civilians prior to combat By any means necessary: win! No torture Educate everyone about the conflict and all involved

8th Hour Just War Criteria What are our responsibilities after war? All parties contribute to reconstruction via an international organization like the UN Take care of injured, both physical and mental Cultural exchange program between those formerly at war Help civilians recover, but do not help rebuild infrastructure of former enemy Create a fair treaty Ensure the payback of debts accrued during war

Classic Just War Theory When is it right to go to war? Just reason Must have a good reason, like decreasing suffering; not to punish people or take things Competent authority Only appointed authorities can declare war Probability of success Must be likely to win Last resort All other options must be tried first Proportionality The benefits must outweigh the expected harms

Classic Just War Theory How should we act during war? Distinction War should be directed toward enemy combatants, not toward non-combatants caught in a situation they did not create Proportionality Attacks must not exceed what is necessary for military advantage Military necessity Use as little force as you can to win Fair treatment of prisoners No torture or other mistreatment No evil tactics No rape, plunder, etc.; no using weapons that cannot be controlled

Classic Just War Theory What are our responsibilities after war? Right intention No revenge Both the victors and the defeated must be accountable for war crimes Public declaration and authority Peace agreements must be made by legitimate authority Discrimination Victors must differentiate between political and military leaders, and combatants and civilians Proportionality Any terms of surrender must not be excessive compared to the rights initially violated