May 22-23, 2006 I hear, and I forget; I see, and I remember; I do, and I understand. - Confucious.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
A Focus on Higher Level Thinking Skills
Advertisements

Bloom’s Taxonomy.
Team 6 Lesson 3 Gary J Brumbelow Matt DeMonbrun Elias Lopez Rita Martin.
Course Design: The Basics Monica A. Devanas, Ph.D. Director, Faculty Development and Assessment Programs Center for Teaching Advancement and Assessment.
DEVELOPING QUESTIONS FOR SCRIPTURE STUDY THAT SUPPORT MAXIMUM LEARNING J AN P ARON, P H D A LL N ATIONS L EADERSHIP I NSTITUTE Bloom’s Taxonomy: Six Levels.
Designing an Educational Program Kathy Stewart, MD David Feldstein, MD PCFDP11/13/10.
Guidelines and Methods for Assessing Student Learning Karen Bauer, Institutional Research & Planning, Undergraduate Studies; Gabriele Bauer, CTE.
Bloom’s Taxonomy
How to Integrate Students with Diverse Learning Needs in a General Education Classroom By: Tammie McElaney.
Intellectual Challenge of Teaching
Communication & Educational Models. Communication n Process of sending and receiving messages n Transmission requires a mutual understanding between communicator.
6 th Grade 2013 INTRODUCTION TO BLOOM’S TAXONOMY.
Introduction to Bloom’s Taxonomy. The Idea Purpose ◦ Organize and classify educational goals ◦ Provide a systematized approach to course design Guided.
Curriculum Development for Information Literacy (IL) Prof. Dr. Buket Akkoyunlu Hacettepe University, Faculty of Education.
Grappling with Grading Assessment & Rubrics
Educational Psychology
Domains of Learning tartomány
Formulating objectives, general and specific
Learning Outcomes at the University of North Alabama Dr. Andrew L. Luna Institutional Research, Planning, and Assessment.
Notebook Freestyle Script Font COOPERATIVE LEARNING UMI CHOTIMAH
Evaluation: A Challenging Component of Teaching Darshana Shah, PhD. PIES
Formative Assessment.
Lesson Planning. Teachers Need Lesson Plans So that they know that they are teaching the curriculum standards required by the county and state So that.
Blooms’ Taxonmy Learning Theories PBL and Hardware.
I hear, and I forget; I see, and I remember; I do, and I understand. - Confucious.
Online Course Development and Constructivist Teaching Strategies Susan M. Zvacek, Ph.D
Project Based Learning
Presentation by : Kesang Tshering
Effective Lesson Planning EnhanceEdu. Agenda  Objectives  Lesson Plan  Purpose  Elements of a good lesson plan  Bloom’s Taxonomy – it’s relevance.
Writing Objectives Including Bloom’s Taxanomy. Three Primary Components of an Objective Condition –What they’re given Behavior –What they do Criteria.
Writing Student-Centered Learning Objectives Please see Reference Document for references used in this presentation.
Bloom’s Taxonomy Ceanlia Vermeulen.
Bloom’s Taxonomy.
Bloom’s Taxonomy. What is it??? Bloom’s Taxonomy is a chart of ideas Named after the creator, Benjamin Bloom A Taxonomy is an arrangement of ideas or.
Blooms Taxonomy Margaret Gessler Werts Department of Language, Reading, and Exceptionalities.
Assessment. Levels of Learning Bloom Argue Anderson and Krathwohl (2001)
BLOOM’S TAXONOMY Mrs. Eagen A, A. Bloom identified six levels within the cognitive domain, from the simple recall or recognition of facts,
Planning Instructional Units. Planning Vital and basic skill for effective teaching Helps you feel organized and prepared Is only a guide: not carved.
IST_Seminar II CHAPTER 12 Instructional Methods. Objectives: Students will: Explain the role of all teachers in the development of critical thinking skills.
Systems Course - Lecture 1 Cognitive Issues and Levels of Learning.
Classroom Strategies That Work. Questions, Cues, and Advance Organizers Helping Students Activate Prior Knowledge.
Formative Assessment. Fink’s Integrated Course Design.
Bloom’s Taxonomy The Concept of “Levels of Thinking”
CDIO: Overview, Standards, and Processes (Part 2) Doris R. Brodeur, November 2005.
The Taxonomy of Educational Objectives Implementation in Teaching and Learning Activities at Faculty of Electrical Engineering UTeM.
Engaging Learners in Small and Large Classes Dr. Vanneise Collins, Kun Huang Quality Enhancement Plan Faculty Workshop Center for Learning & Development.
Workshop 2014 Cam Xuyen, October 14, 2014 Testing/ assessment/ evaluation BLOOM’S TAXONOMY.
Lesson Plan Design & Bloom’s Taxonomy EnhanceEdu.
Active Learning: Rethinking Our Teaching to Promote Deeper Learning
21st Centruy Approaches to Teaching Physics
Learning Assessment Techniques
Developing Learning Materials What are the options?
Assessment.
Technical Writing and Instructional Design: A great confluence!
POWERPOINT PRESENATTION BLOOM’S TAXONOMY Presented by Ms
Bloom’s Taxonomy of Learning
Active Learning: Rethinking Our Teaching to Promote Deeper Learning
Assessment.
85. BLOOM’S TAXONOMY “Bloom’s Taxonomy is a guide to educational learning objectives. It is the primary focus of most traditional education.”
Outcome Based Education
Writing Objectives in Blooms Taxonomy
Group Work Digital Project February 7, 2016
Bloom’s Taxonomy: Six Levels for Understanding
Learning Outcomes: Design Aspects
Changing Instructional Strategies and the Role of the Principal
What you assess makes a statement about what you value
Bloom’s Taxonomy Higher Order Thinking HOT
Our goal is to be thinking at a higher level.
COOPERATIVE LEARNING IN THE CLASSROOM
Presentation transcript:

May 22-23, 2006 I hear, and I forget; I see, and I remember; I do, and I understand. - Confucious

May 22-23, 2006 Active Learning: Motivating Students to Learn Dr. Theresa R. Moore

May 22-23, 2006 Outline of Plenary 1.Review goals of Title 3; 2.Course design; 3.What is active learning & why do it? 4.Learning theorists & learning styles; 5.Active learning and technology (Isaac).

May 22-23, 2006 Outcomes of the workshop Faculty will… Know basic concepts related to a cognitive approach to learning styles; Understand basic premises of active learning; Engage in active learning with their peers; Work individually and with their programs on purposeful alignment of outcomes, assessment methods, and instructional activities; Have a “toolkit” of active learning approaches to apply to courses.

May 22-23, 2006 Section I: Goals of the Title III Project Goal 1: increase the use of outcomes based assessment in courses and programs to measure and improve student learning; Goal 2: increase the use of active learning strategies and technologies to effect learner-centered instruction.

May 22-23, Learning goals 4. Teaching & Learning Activities 3. Feedback & Assessment Section II: Course design 1. Situational factors Active Learning

May 22-23, 2006 Learning Outcome(s) Teaching & Learning Activities Feedback & Assessment Student learning outcome: Students will critically analyze the current educational policies in the United States. Assessment method: exams with critical thinking items embedded Primary instructional method: lecture

May 22-23, 2006 Section III: What is active learning & why do it? Strategies that increase student engagement with material and are aligned with student learning outcomes Theory that derives from two basic assumptions: (1) that learning is by nature an active endeavor and (2) that different people learn in different ways (Meyers and Jones, 1993).

May 22-23, 2006 What is active learning? [it is] when students are engaged in more activities than just listening. They are involved in dialog, debate, writing, and problem solving, as well as higher-order thinking. (Bonwell, C., and Eison, J., 1991)

May 22-23, 2006 Types of activities Small group work Presentations and debates Journaling Role playing Learning Games Field Experiences Case Studies Class Discussions Simulations….more! (Mc Keachie, 1994 and Silberman, 1996)

May 22-23, 2006 “simple tasks” ad hoc exercises; little or no advanced planning; e.g. “think-pair-share” “minute paper” “concept mapping ” “complex tasks” longer duration, carefully planned and structured Active learning types Collaborative learning carefully structured, group formation and student roles important Cooperative learning a form of collaborative learning that has 5 specific criteria to maximize learning

May 22-23, 2006 Cooperative learning: 5 key components 1.Positive interdependence (each individual depends on and is accountable to the others); 2.Individual accountability (each person in the group learns the material); 3. Promotive interaction (group members help one another, share information, clarify); 4.Social skills (emphasis on interpersonal skills); 5.Group processing (assessing how effectively they are working with one another).

May 22-23, 2006 Why do active learning? Sousa, D.A. (2000)

May 22-23, 2006 Why do Active Learning?

May 22-23, 2006 Research summary Longitudinal studies show that cohorts of students instructed using active learning techniques outperformed a comparison group on multiple measures: retention, graduation and pursuit of graduate study (Felder, R., Felder, G, and Dietz, E, 1998)

May 22-23, 2006 Research summary “Scientists and engineers work mostly in groups and less often as isolated investigators. Similarly, students should gain experience sharing responsibility for learning with each other.” Meta-analysis of research studies: greater academic achievement, more favorable attitudes toward learning and, increased persistence in SMET courses and programs.

May 22-23, 2006 Why do active learning? Retention levels are enhanced when active learning methods are used (McKeachie, 1999; Silberman, 1996) Active learning produces:  higher achievement,  more positive relationships among students,  healthier psychological adjustment. (Johnson, D. W., R. T. Johnson, and K. Smith, 1991)

May 22-23, 2006 Section IV: Learning theorists & learning styles Behaviorism (B.F. Skinner) – learning built on conditioning Constructivism (J. Dewey, J. Piaget, L. Vygotsky, others) – learning built on prior knowledge

May 22-23, 2006 John Dewey (1916): 1) individual experience & 2) collaboration w/others are important for learning “School is primarily a social institution. Education is a social process….therefore [it] is a process of living, not preparation for living.”

May 22-23, 2006 Active learning from the Constructivist School Jean Piaget: we come to know the world by building new experiences on old experiences Lev Vygotsky: students learn better by engaging with “more capable others”

May 22-23, 2006 Constructivist principles Knowledge is constructed from experience; Learning results from personal interpretation of knowledge; Learning is an active process; Learning is a collaborative process.

May 22-23, 2006 Benjamin Bloom Viewed education as goal attainment, not competition; Acknowledged individual differences and environment as crucial; Studied high achieving adults - found they excelled because of MENTORSHIP.

May 22-23, 2006 Three Domains of Learning (Bloom,1956) Cognitive: mental skills Affective: growth regarding feelings, emotions Psychomotor: manual, physicality, environment

May 22-23, 2006 Bloom’s Taxonomy of Learning “Higher Order Thinking Skills” Synthesis Comprehension Application Analysis Knowledge Evaluation Alone or with a neighbor: 1) define each skill & 2) align in a hierarchy.

May 22-23, 2006 Bloom’s Taxonomy of Learning Evaluation: compare and discriminate between ideas. Question Cues: assess, decide, grade, test, measure, recommend, convince, select, judge Synthesis: use old ideas to create new ones. Question Cues: combine, integrate, modify, substitute, plan, create, design, invent Analysis: identification of components. Question Cues: analyze, separate, order, explain, connect, classify, arrange, divide, compare, select Application: use of concepts/methods in new situations. Question cues: apply, demonstrate, illustrate, examine, solve Comprehension: understanding of meaning. Question cues: summarize, describe, interpret, predict Knowledge: recall of information. Question cues: define, identify, list, match

May 22-23, 2006 Learning styles Visual, Auditory, Kinesthetic (VAK) Kolb’s learning style inventory (LSI) Meyers Briggs (MBTI)

May 22-23, 2006 VAK learning styles Visual learners have two subchannels visual-linguistic visual-spatial Auditory learners Kinesthetic learners have two subchannels kinesthetic (movement) tactile (touch)

May 22-23, 2006 Section V: Active Learning & Technology

May 22-23, 2006 Bibliography Bloom, B.S. (Ed.) (1956). Taxonomy of educational objectives: The classification of educational goals: Handbook I, cognitive domain. New York ; Toronto: Longmans, Green. Bonwell, C. and Eison, J. (1991). “Active learning: Creating excitement in the classroom.”ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Report No. 1. Bonwell C. and Sutherland, T. (eds.). (1996). Using Active Learning in College Classes: A Range of Options for Faculty. Jossey-Bass Publishers. Dewey, J. (1938). Experience and Education. New York: Collier Books. Felder, R.M., Felder, G.N., Dietz, E.J. (1998). “A Longitudinal Study of Engineering Student Performance and Retention V. Comparisons with Traditionally Taught Students.” Engineering Education, 98(4), Fink, L. D. (2003). Creating significant learning experiences: An integrated approach to designing college courses. Jossey-Bass: San Francisco. Huba, M. E. and Freed, J. E. (2000). Learner-centered assessment on college campuses: Shifting the focus from teaching to learning. Allyn and Bacon. Johnson, D.W., Johnson, R.T., and Smith, K. (1991). Active learning: Cooperation in the college classroom, Edina, MN: Interaction Book Company. Kolb, D. A. (1984). Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development. Prentice Hall.

May 22-23, 2006 Bibliography Mc Keachie, W. J. (1994). Teaching Tips: Strategies, research, and theory for College Teachers. 9th edition. Lexington, Maryland: D.C. Heath. Meyers, C. and Jones, T.B. (1993). Promoting active learning: Strategies for the college classroom. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, Paiget, J. (1970). The Science of Education and the Psychology of the Child. NY: Grossman. Silberman, M. (1996). Active learning: 101 Strategies to teach any subject. Allyn & Bacon. Sousa, D. A. (2000). How the brain learns: A classroom teacher's guide. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press. Stice, J. E. (1987). “Using Kolb’s Learning Cycle to Improve Student Learning.” Engineering Education, 77(5), Vygotsky, L.S. (1971). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes.. (M. Cole, V. John-Steiner, S. Scribner, & E. Souberman, Eds. & Trans.). Cambridge: MA: Harvard University Press.