How Faculty Like to Learn And What Should Be Done About It Carl Berger Jeff Bohrer Cheryl Diermyer Copyright by the authors, 2006. This work is the intellectual.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 Effective Feedback to the Instructor from Online Homework Michigan State University Mark Urban-Lurain Gerd Kortemeyer.
Advertisements

Culture Change: What IT Takes to Create a Quality Customer Service Environment Presented By: Anne Agee, Executive Director, Division of Instructional and.
What Students Say About Emerging Practices and Learning Technology Anthony Potoczniak - Rice University Sarah E. Smith - North Carolina State University.
Technology Across the Curriculum Programs Keys to Success Beth Secrist, TAC Coordinator Copyright Beth Secrist, This work is the intellectual property.
Implementing an Electronic Annual Reporting System for Evaluating Faculty Performance T. P.Mack, P. Robinson, R.C. Woods, J. Mitchell, and T. McAnge. College.
Campus Video Services Alliance: A Strategic Partnership and Its Effects Copyright Jim Duncan and Molly Langstaff This work is the intellectual property.
What Does the Net Generation Expect From Us? SAC August 8, 2005 SAC August 8, 2005 Copyright © 2005, Joel L. Hartman. This work is the intellectual property.
© Scordias & Morris, 2005 Virtual Classroom Visits: Using Video Conferencing Technology to Enhance Teacher Education Dr. Margaret Scordias Pamela B. Morris,
Copyright Policy Copyright Cathy O’Bryan This work is the intellectual property of the author. Permission is granted for this material to be shared.
A Web-based Bibliography Management Initiative: Collaborating for Classroom and Library Technology Integration Brian Nielsen, Academic Technologies Denise.
Andrea Eastman-Mullins Information & Technology Coordinator University of North Carolina, Office of the President Teaching and Learning with Technology.
TESL Ontario Conference October 28 & 29, Project Team Project Lead - Carolyn Cohen Research Lead - Antonella Valeo Research Consultants - Sheila.
Innovation and Outcomes: Voices of Experience Purdue University Calumet Midwest Educause Conference Monday, March 13, 2006 Heather L. Zamojski: Course.
Faculty Workshops Series
The Road to Distance Learning May Be Closer Than You Think….. Copyright Polley Ann McClure This work is the intellectual property of the author.
The Milliennial Instructor The Milliennial Student... and now... The Milliennial Instructor? Carl Berger Copyright by the author, This work is the.
"Cyberspace Education: Challenges and Opportunities" Presented by: Bob Diveley Manager of Administrative Systems Columbus State University Copyright Bob.
INSTITUTE FOR DISTANCE AND DISTRIBUTED LEARNING Three Approaches to Distance Learning Support Services EDUCAUSE 2002 Copyright Bridget Moore and Mark Raby,
Copyright Statement © Jason Rhode and Carol Scheidenhelm This work is the intellectual property of the authors. Permission is granted for this material.
Foundations of Excellence: Support Services for Online Learning Midwest Regional Conference, 2005 Chicago, Illinois Presenters: Diane Dates Casey Jan Engle.
Chatham College Community and Computers Pervasive Computing at a Liberal Arts College Charlotte E. Lott, Ph. D. Lynda Barner West, Ed. D. Copyright Charlotte.
Summer Online Courses A Distance Learning Alternative for Traditional Campuses North East Regional Computing Program Annual Conference (NERCOMP) Boston.
Interactive Learning: Teaching Geographic Information Systems (GIS) with WebCT By: Andrew Clark University of Arizona Department of Geography and Regional.
National Research Agenda to Support Transformation National Learning Infrastructure Initiative Focus Session June, 2003 Copyright Jillian Kinzie, 2003.
NLII Mapping the Learning Space New Orleans, LA Colleen Carmean NLII Fellow Information Technology Director, ASU West Editor, MERLOT Faculty Development.
Unraveling Web Development PRESENTERS: Bob Nakles and Paras Kaul, George Mason University.
Student Technological Mastery: It's Not Just the Hardware Wm. H. Huffman, Ph.D. Ann H. Huffman, Ph.D.
Mellon Fellowship for Undergraduate Research: Ideas, Innovations & Impacts Elizabeth Dupuis, University of California,
Embedded Librarian Program: Librarians and Faculty Partnering to Serve Online Students NERCOMP Annual Conference Innovation and Reliability: Finding the.
Faculty and Student Expectations for Students’ Information Technology and Information Literacy Knowledge & Skills: One Institution’s Assessment Linfield.
Copyright notice  Copyright Victoria Mantor and Wangui Njuguna This work is the intellectual property of the author. Permission is granted for this.
Learning technology center Preparing Faculty and Students for Hybrid Courses Copyright Alan Aycock, Carla Garnham & Robert Kaleta, This work is the.
Washington and Lee University Lexington, Virginia EDUCAUSE 2002 "Juggling Opportunities in Collaborative Environments" October 1 ‑ 4, Atlanta, Georgia.
UNC’s Digital Library Project: Current Initiatives, Future Plans Megan Winget Academic Technology Specialist Office of Arts & Sciences Information Services.
Sharing Information and Controlling Content: Continuing Challenges for Higher Education Susanna Frederick Fischer Assistant Professor Columbus School of.
Preparing for and Teaching Hybrid Courses Midwest EDUCAUSE March 25, 2003 Mary Sudzina, Ph.D. University of Dayton Robert Kaleta, Ph.D. & Carla Garnham.
Catalyst Portfolio Tool Copyright Tom Lewis, This work is the intellectual property.
Copyright Jack Chambers, This work is the intellectual property of the author. Permission is granted for this material to be shared for non- commercial,
Making Big Classes Small: Penn State’s Blended Learning Initiative Renata Engel John T. Harwood January 30, 2006 Copyright Penn State, This work.
HumaniTech®: Educause, Seattle October 24, 2007 Bridging Divides, Building Collaborations
NERCOMP 2002, College for Lifelong Learning What Students, Faculty and the College are Learning about Teaching and Learning Online Managing the 24x7 Classroom.
Campus Technology 08 Shootout! Bracing for the Next-Gen Student Wave: Myth or Mandate? Next-Gen Students “Speak Up” – Are we listening? Julie Evans Project.
December 2001 Meeting Advanced and Specialized Educational Technology Project Development Needs of Faculty Presenters: Ruth NewberryStephen Hardesty Educational.
Twitter: 1.
The Millennial Instructor The Net-generation Student... OK, but the Net-Gen Instructor??? Carl Berger Copyright by the author, This work is the intellectual.
Curricular Collaboration with Technology Report on a three-year inter-institutional program Scott E. Siddall Scott E. Siddall Denison University Granville,
Not Just Making Waves: Making a Difference with Intensive Multi-Campus Workshops Alex Wirth-Cauchon Associate Director, Midwest Instructional Technology.
George Mason University Assessing Technology Support: Using Portfolios to Set Goals and Measure Progress Anne Agee, Star Muir, Walt Sevon Information Technology.
NLII05 Annual Meeting Professional Development of Faculty and Instructional Technology Staff through Communities of Practice University of Memphis: Technology.
Copyright [Dr. Michael Hoadley, Chat Chatterji, and John Henderson ] [2004]. This work is the intellectual property of the authors. Permission is granted.
Student Learning when Teaching with Technology: Aligning Objectives, Methods, and Assessments Copyright Information Copyright Karen St.Clair & Stan North.
Student Learning when Teaching with Technology: Aligning Objectives, Methods, and Assessments Copyright.
Integration is Critical for Success Curriculum Course Delivery Ongoing Support Instructor & Learner.
EDUCAUSE 2003 Copyright Toshiyuki Urata 2003 This work is the intellectual property of the author. Permission is granted for this material to be shared.
CATS in the Classroom Spring 2007 Faculty Workshops Series Dr Aziza Ellozy Center for Learning and Teaching Copyright Notice.
OCWC Conference 2010 OCW Creation in HE Institutions Joseph Hardin University of Michigan.
Chief Information Officer Effectiveness in Higher Education Wayne Brown, Ph.D. Copyright Wayne Brown This work is the intellectual property of the.
© Scottsdale Community College Leveraging the Power of E-Learning Taking your course to a higher level Presented by Sidne Tate Director, Instructional.
1 Carl Berger NlII Spring Focus: Survey results Copyright Carl Berger This work is the intellectual property of the author. Permission is granted.
How many of you use Blackboard?
Southeast Missouri State University
Malia Crouse Regis University January 22, 2009
Using Champions to Make Change Happen
Educause Learning Initiatives (ELI) January 20-22, 2009
SESSION FIVE: TIPS FOR IMPLEMENTATION AND EVALUATION
Ed Barboni, Senior Advisor, Council of Independent Colleges
Project for OnLine Instructional Support (POLIS)
myIS.neu.edu – presentation screen shots accompany:
© Mike Reese This work is the intellectual property of the author
An App A Day Copyright Tina Oestreich and Brian Yuhnke This work is the intellectual property of the author. Permission is granted for this material.
Presentation transcript:

How Faculty Like to Learn And What Should Be Done About It Carl Berger Jeff Bohrer Cheryl Diermyer Copyright by the authors, This work is the intellectual property of the authors. Permission is granted for this material to be shared for non-commercial, educational purposes, provided that this copyright statement appears on the reproduced materials and notice is given that the copying is by permission of the authors. To disseminate otherwise or to republish requires written permission from the author.

Faculty Voices (Video) How Faculty Like to Learn Maria Nagel Nutritional Science Stephen Hilyard Art Chris Wiese Biochemistry

What do we know today? Many surveys of faculty exist When taken as a whole, they paint a picture of best practices Caution: some specific findings might not apply to YOU

What do we know today? People helping people is most highly desired Workshops are still desired Faculty are willing to learn on their own Faculty least prefer books, manuals, and anything with a cost Strong preference for with links

Adult Learning Principles: Motivated to Learn Adult Learning Principles –Relevant material –Applicable to real work –Practice and Feedback –Some Control –Follow up support North Central Regional Educational Laboratory

“Adult learners respond better when new material is presented through a variety of instructional methods, appealing to their different learning preferences.” The Ultimate Educator Christine Edmunds, Kip Lowe, Morna Murray, Anne Seymour

Informing, yet Perplexing Significant group of faculty don't seem to respond to 'Adult learning principles' Convenience stronger then need to know Colleague more important than expertise 'In my office' more important than hotline

Informing, yet Perplexing The curse of successful traditional teaching Time, effort, relevance to teaching... critical Reward, recognition, count toward... crucial Awareness of not reaching student may be tipping point... or may be totally irrelevant

Possible Explanations Variety of learning styles Culture of local department or field of study Variety of “faculty types”?

A funny thing happened on the way… 2005 and 2006 gave same survey to faculty and students Role and affiliation Interesting group, faculty with student roles and students with faculty roles How did we find out? What do we call them?

How we discovered Section on demographics (Association and Role) Freshman, Sophomore, Junior, Senior, Graduate Student, Post-graduate Student, Tutor, Teaching Assistant, Research Assistant, Adjunct, Lecturer, Instructor, Professor, Researcher, Librarian, Clinical, Assistant, Associate, Full Part-time, Full-time, Visiting, Post-doc, Adjunct, Student, Faculty, Researcher, Librarian

Unusual combinations Students who teach Faculty involved in formal learning Focus on teaching and learning Would this group look different? Probably an older student group? Probably a younger faculty group? Just echo faculty but more skill? Just echo students?

What distinguishes the Millennial Instructor? Age? Expertise? Use/need for support? Patience? WINWINI

Age In-between From % from % from Millennial Instructors not limited to youth only!

Not in-between More expertise on all categories Significantly differ on Education and Personal Like faculty on Research Millennial Instructors have strong perception of expertise Expertise?

Barriers in Using Technology for Teaching and Learning

Characteristics Expertise but in three areas Barriers to using technology in teaching and learning Preference when to learn Preference on how to learn

How do we guide such folk? Get out of their way? Recognize and reward? Maybe I should just retire?

Overview Existing surveys can tell a great deal (but not everything) Collect and share data about your faculty Contribute to this discussion

Recent actions at Wisconsin Central IT is working more closely with departmental IT units Tailored Workshops Departmental IT point persons You Want to do What With Your CMS? e-Pedagogy Sessions Level 1, 2, 3 support/consultations

Recent actions at Michigan Continue to survey faculty and students at the same time (split later) Move of support from U-wide to local departments and schools Move to "What they need When they need it and Where they are."

Future Investigation

Questions?

Contact Carl Jeff Cheryl