Second Quarter 2002 August 1, 2002 Note to Internet viewers: Please use NOTES PAGES view to access all notes and text.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
2002 Results 17 March © 2003 Management Consulting Group PLC All rights reserved 2002 Final Results.ppt 2 Agenda Introduction 2002 highlights Profit.
Advertisements

Brazil: Sustainable Growth, income distribution and social inclusion Miami Minister Paulo Bernardo April 6th, 2008.
April 27, 2009, Atlas Copco Group Q1 Results April 27, 2009.
JET AIRWAYS (I) LTD Presentation on Financial Results Q
Third Quarter 2002 October 25, 2002 Note to Internet viewers: Please use “NOTES PAGES” view to access all notes and text.
July 17, 2009, Atlas Copco Group Q2 Results July 17, 2009.
August Results first half year 2010 Amsterdam, August 2010.
SYST 660 Airline Operating Costs and Airline Productivity
Homework 4 (Airline Cost Analysis-United) Saba Neyshabouri.
1 FY 11 Airport Budget Recommendations. 2 Aviation Department Mission Statement To provide a safe and secure air transportation system that is economically.
Overview of the Domestic Airline Industry James Morrison.
AIRLINE CHALLENGES CURRENT STRATEGIES AIRLINE CHALLENGES CURRENT STRATEGIES A personal perspective by Pierre J. Jeanniot Opening session.
1 FAA Aviation Forecasts Fiscal Years Presented at the 30 th Annual FAA Aviation Forecast Conference By Robert L. Bowles Manager, Statistics.
World Wine Trade in 2014 April 17, 2015 Rafael del Rey Spanish Observatory of Wine Markets.
Time for a Turnaround: Facing Fiscal Reality in New York State Citizens Budget Commission.
Airline Productivity and Cost Analysis Evan Demick
JetBlue Cost and Productivity Analysis Greg Koch HW for OR 750.
Continental Airlines: The Competitive Arena
Delta Air Lines Cost and Productivity Analysis Ujaval Patel.
Alaskan Airlines SYST660 Airline Operating Costs and Airline Productivity Lorenzo Flores.
United Airlines Cost and Productivity Analysis Nahid Boustani Spring 2013.
Presented to Scotia Capital at the Canadian Transportation Conference Toronto - May 9, 2002.
Airline Operating Costs & Airline Productivity - US Airways - Seungwon Noh (Apr )
1 Financial results of JSC “Aeroflot” as of 2003 In accordance with IAS Deputy General Director for finance and planning Mikhail I.Poluboyarinov.
Homework: Airline Operating Costs and Airline Productivity April 9,2012 Maryam Zavareh.
American Airline Cost and Productivity Analysis Samira Monshi
IAS Financial results Efficiency increase in 2002.
Fourth Quarter & Full Year 2007 Results Presentation January 30, 2008.
INTERIM RESULTS » 2 AGENDA Overview & Operating Environment Performance – Long Haul Airline – Short Haul Airline Domestic Tasman & Pacific Islands.
Presented to Raymond James Ltd. at the 2002 Institutional Conference Vancouver, June 3-4, 2002.
Air Transport Association May 21,2002 NET INCOME U.S. Scheduled Airlines
Midwest Express Holdings, Inc. Robert W. Baird Growth Stock Conference May 10, 2002.
First Quarter 2008 Results Presentation April 30, 2008.
April 27, Atlas Copco Group Q1 Results April 27, 2005.
Fourth Quarter 2002 Preliminary & Unaudited February 6, 2003 Note to Internet viewers: Please use “NOTES PAGES” view to access all notes and text.
First Quarter 2002 May 2, 2002 Note to Internet viewers: Please use “NOTES PAGES” view to access all notes and text.
Midwest Express Holdings, Inc. Raymond James Growth Airline Conference January 30, 2003.
Heracles Group Analysts’ Day - 12 th April  Highlights 2005  Financial & Market Overview  Financial Performance Agenda.
Homework: Airline Operating Costs and Airline Productivity Rui Neiva, April 9, 2012 Definitions: RPM: revenue passenger miles; ∑ i = 1 to All Flights (Number.
2003 Q3 Results Conference Call August 19, 4:00 PM (ET)
Profitability Analysis of Components of Operating Income
13 February 2008 Company confidential Results 4Q07 and FY07 Martin De Prycker, CEO 13 February 2008.
Lecture 28. Chapter 17 Understanding the Principles of Accounting.
By: Nan Shellabarger Date: February 28, 2006 Federal Aviation Administration FAA Forecast.
0 DASA 2006 and 4Q06 Earnings. 1 Disclaimer This document contains “forward-looking statements”. Forward-looking statements may be identified by words.
Where Innovation Is Tradition AirTran Airways Productivity and Cost Analysis Michael J. McCormick Air Transportation System Engineering April.
Group Finance Q presentation 1 Kongsberg Automotive 1Q 2006 Olav Volldal (CEO)
22 October 2008 Slide 1 Results 3Q08 Results 3Q08 Martin De Prycker, CEO 22 October 2008.
H1 RESULTS 2007 Jón Karl Ólafsson, CEO Agenda 01 Highlights 02 Financial results 03 Outlook 04 New organizational chart 05 Q & A.
Improved Performance (millions) Q2Q2 Change Oper. Revenue$2,552 $2,564 $ (12) Oper. Expense2,4902,636 (146) Oper. Income (Loss) 62 (72) 134.
HOTEL LIFE CYCLE. Hotel Lifecycle YearsOccupancy & Income 0 – 2Introduction to market 2 – 4Occupancy rises slowly 4 – 5Gradual increases in income 5 –
1 Moscow August 1, Financial Results (IAS) 2001.
Airline Operating Costs and Airline Productivity: Frontier Airlines Danielle Hettmann SYST461 Homework Assignment.
Giulio Mazzalupi Atlas Copco Group - Q4 Results Stockholm, February 12, 2001.
First Quarter 2013 Earnings Conference Call April 18, 2013.
AKTIV KAPITAL ASA Q Presented by CEO Rolf Stub Oslo,
Midwest Express Holdings, Inc. Robert W. Baird Growth Stock Conference May 14, 2003.
July 16, Atlas Copco Group Q2 Results July 16, 2004.
This presentation may include forward-looking comments regarding the Company’s business outlook and anticipated financial and operating results. These.
NET INCOME U.S. Scheduled Airlines $ Billions
A Relatively Smooth Ride
FY 2016 Annual Financial Report Operating Statement Highlights
Q2 Results Stockholm, July 19, 2001
DOA Facilities Management Airline Industry Growth Trends
Newfoundland and Labrador’s Foodservice Industry
H1/Q Financial Results.
A Record Number of Passengers Generated Fewer Profits
Atlas Copco Group Q2 Results July 17, 2009.
Solid State System (3S) 2014 Second Quarter Investor Conference
Economic Outlook EconoSummit 2019 William Strauss Las Vegas, NV
Presentation transcript:

Second Quarter 2002 August 1, 2002 Note to Internet viewers: Please use NOTES PAGES view to access all notes and text.

Agenda - 2nd Quarter Highlights Economic Environment Operating Statistics Competitive Environment Revenue Highlights Income Highlights

2nd Quarter Results Air Canada records only profit among major international carriers in North America Operating results improve by $134 million Operations generate $81 million in cash Traffic resumes growth over 2001 Increased productivity and lower unit costs underlie higher profitability Aircraft flying hours reduced by 8% while available seat miles remain unchanged

2nd Quarter Results System load factor up 1.8 PP in quarter Manpower level down 3,338 or 8.7% from 2nd quarter 2001 Employee productivity up 10% Fuel price per litre down 18% Net unit cost down 6.9% Quarter end cash of $0.9 billion

Q2 Stats At a Glance Mainline Operations

Loss Before FX & Tax Improves $159 Million

Q2 Net Interest Exp. Improves

Traffic Growth Pushes Load Factor Up Mainline Operating Statistics

Capacity Reductions Still In Place In Q2 U.S. Market (Y-O-Y Changes in Mainline Capacity) % Change in ASMs

Atlantic & Pacific Markets Drive Traffic Growth (Y-O-Y Changes in Mainline Traffic) % Change in RPMs

Strong Domestic & Atlantic Yields - While Improving, U.S. Remains Weak (Y-O-Y Changes in Mainline Passenger Yield) % Change in Yield

Very Strong Atlantic & Pacific RASM Performance (Y-O-Y Changes in Mainline Revenue per ASM) % Change in RASM

Q2 Revenue growth powered by Canada & Atlantic/Pacific (Y-O-Y Changes in Mainline Passenger Revenue) % Change in Revenue

Increased Yield Lifts Domestic RASM Q201 J&A01 Q401 Q102 Q202 Capacity - Canada (Y-O-Y Changes in Capacity) % Change in ASMs Yield - Canada (Y-O-Y Changes in Passenger Yield) RASM - Canada (Y-O-Y Changes in Revenue per ASM) Load Factor- Canada (Y-O-Y Changes in Load Factor) % Change in RASM PP Change in Load Factor % Change in Yield Q201 J&A01 Q401 Q102 Q202

US RASM Down Primarily On Weak Pricing Q201 J&A01 Q401 Q102 Q202 Capacity - Transborder (Y-O-Y Changes in Capacity) % Change in ASMs Yield - Transborder (Y-O-Y Changes in Passenger Yield) RASM - Transborder (Y-O-Y Changes in Revenue per ASM) Load Factor- Transborder (Y-O-Y Changes in Load Factor) % Change in RASM PP Change in Load Factor % Change in Yield Q201 J&A01 Q401 Q102 Q202

Other Intl RASM Up On Higher Load Factor Q201 J&A01 Q401 Q102 Q202 Capacity - Other Intl (Y-O-Y Changes in Capacity) % Change in ASMs Yield - Other Intl (Y-O-Y Changes in Passenger Yield) RASM - Other Intl (Y-O-Y Changes in Revenue per ASM) Load Factor- Other Intl (Y-O-Y Changes in Load Factor) % Change in RASM PP Change in Load Factor % Change in Yield Q201 J&A01 Q401 Q102 Q202

System RASM Unchanged As Higher Load Factor Offsets Soft Yield Q201 J&A01 Q401 Q102 Q202 Capacity - Total (Y-O-Y Changes in Capacity) % Change in ASMs Yield - Total (Y-O-Y Changes in Passenger Yield) RASM - Total (Y-O-Y Changes in Revenue per ASM) Load Factor- Total (Y-O-Y Changes in Load Factor) % Change in RASM PP Change in Load Factor % Change in Yield Q201 J&A01 Q401 Q102 Q202

Declining Unit Cost Drives Increased Profits Q201 J&A01 Q401 Q102 Q202 Canada RASM % Change Y-O-Y Other Intl RASM Total System USA RASM % Change Y-O-Y Q201 J&A01 Q401 Q102 Q202

Air Canada Continues to Record The Best Traffic Results Of Any Major N.A. Carrier (Y-O-Y Traffic Change) % Change in RPMs

Salaries & Wages: Manpower level down sharply; benefits cost up (Air Canada - Mainline)

Average Salary Up 4.9%, Employee Levels Down 8.7% (Y-O-Y Change - Total Salaries * & Employees*) *Mainline % Change Y-O-Y

Fuel: Price still sharply down (Air Canada - Mainline)

Mainline Cost Per Litre Down 18% While Productivity Up 5.9% (Fuel Productivity* & Unit Cost*) *Mainline % Change Y-O-Y

All Expense Categories Down except Aircraft Rent, User Fees and Mtce. *Mainline % Change Y-O-Y Q2 2002/2001 RPMs ASMs COMM. FOOD & BAR A/C MTCE USER FEES A/C RENT OTHER DEP.

Q2 Net Unit Cost Down 6.9% (Cost Per ASM*) *Mainline, adjusted for non-ASM revenue % Change Y-O-Y

Fuel a Major Component Of Net CASM* Improvement Of 6.9% *Mainline LabourFuel Unit cost decrease net of non-ASM revenue Other Effect of non-ASM revenue

Air Canada Has Lowest Net Unit Cost Of N.A. Majors *Adjusted for non-ASM producing activity. (Unit Cost* per ASM* - Q202 & Q201) U.S. cents

Balance Sheet - Liquidity is Good (Air Canada - Consolidated) NM - not meaningful