Copyright Prentice Hall 2004 Abnormal Psychology Fourth Edition Oltmanns and Emery Copyright Prentice Hall 2004

PowerPoint Presentation Montana State University Prepared By Fred W. Whitford Montana State University Copyright Prentice Hall 2004

Mental Health and the Law Chapter 18 Mental Health and the Law This multimedia product and its contents are protected under copyright law. The following are prohibited by law: any public performance or display, including transmission of any image over a network; preparation of any derivative work, including the extraction, in whole or in part, of any images; any rental, lease, or lending of the program. Copyright Prentice Hall 2004

Copyright Prentice Hall 2004 * Overview Case Study: John Hinckley and the Insanity Defense Copyright Prentice Hall 2004

Copyright Prentice Hall 2004 * Overview Expert Witnesses Free Will Versus Determinism Criminal Responsibility Insanity Rights and Responsibilities Szasz Copyright Prentice Hall 2004

Mental Illness and Criminal Responsibility * Mental Illness and Criminal Responsibility Not Guilty by Reason of Insanity Incompetent to Stand Trial Mitigating Factors Copyright Prentice Hall 2004

Mental Illness and Criminal Responsibility * Mental Illness and Criminal Responsibility The Insanity Defense M’Naghten Test Irresistible Impulse and the Product Test Parson v. State Durham v. United States Legislative Actions Copyright Prentice Hall 2004

Mental Illness and Criminal Responsibility * Mental Illness and Criminal Responsibility Guilty But Mentally Ill (GBMI) Burden of Proof Defining “Mental Disease or Defect” Use and Consequences of the Insanity Defense Copyright Prentice Hall 2004

Development in the Insanity Defense * Copyright Prentice Hall 2004

Mental Illness and Criminal Responsibility * Mental Illness and Criminal Responsibility Further Thoughts: The Battered Women Syndrome as a Defense Copyright Prentice Hall 2004

Mental Illness and Criminal Responsibility * Mental Illness and Criminal Responsibility Competence to Stand Trial Competence Dusky v. United States Miranda Warning Sentencing and Mental Health Mitigating Factors Atkins v. Virginia Kansas v. Hendricks Copyright Prentice Hall 2004

Mental Health and Civil Law * Mental Health and Civil Law A Brief History of U.S. Mental Hospitals Moral Treatment Deinstitutionalization Movement Copyright Prentice Hall 2004

Mental Health and Civil Law * Mental Health and Civil Law Libertarianism Versus Paternalism in Treating Mental Patients Civil Commitment Parens Patriae Police Power Copyright Prentice Hall 2004

Mental Health and Civil Law * Mental Health and Civil Law Grounds and Procedures Emergency Commitment Procedures Formal Commitment Procedures Inability to Care for Self Being Dangerous to Self Being Dangerous to Others Kansas v. Hendricks Copyright Prentice Hall 2004

Mental Health and Civil Law * Mental Health and Civil Law Predicting Dangerousness and Suicidal Risk Predicting Dangerousness Clinical Assessment of Dangerousness Base Rates Assessing Suicide Risk Commitment of Minors Parham v. J.R. Copyright Prentice Hall 2004

Mental Health and Violence * Copyright Prentice Hall 2004

Mental Health and Civil Law * Mental Health and Civil Law The Rights of Mental Patients The Right to Treatment Wyatt v. Stickney O’Connor v. Donaldson Copyright Prentice Hall 2004

Mental Health and Civil Law * Mental Health and Civil Law Treatment in the Least Restrictive Alternative Environment Lake v. Cameron Olmstead v. L.C. Copyright Prentice Hall 2004

Mental Health and Civil Law * Mental Health and Civil Law The Right to Refuse Treatment Informed Consent Washington v. Harper Riggins v. Nevada Almost a Revolution Outpatient Commitment Copyright Prentice Hall 2004

Mental Health and Civil Law * Mental Health and Civil Law Research Methods: Base Rate and Predictions Copyright Prentice Hall 2004

Mental Health and Civil Law * Mental Health and Civil Law Deinstitutionalization The Case for Paternalism Copyright Prentice Hall 2004

Mental Health and Family Law * Mental Health and Family Law Children, Parents, and the State Child Custody Disputes Child Custody Expert Witnesses in Custody Determinations Divorce Mediation Copyright Prentice Hall 2004

Mental Health and Family Law * Mental Health and Family Law A Brief Case Study: Jim and Suzanne Copyright Prentice Hall 2004

Mental Health and Family Law * Mental Health and Family Law Child Abuse Physical Child Abuse Child Sexual Abuse Child Neglect Munchausen-by-Proxy Syndrome (MBPS) Termination of Parental Rights Copyright Prentice Hall 2004

Professional Responsibilities and the Law * Professional Responsibilities and the Law Professional Negligence and Malpractice Informed Consent on Alternative Treatments: Osheroff v. Chestnut Lodge Informed Consent Who is the Client? Copyright Prentice Hall 2004

Professional Responsibilities and the Law * Professional Responsibilities and the Law Confidentiality Privileged Communications Tarasoff v. Regents of the University of California Tarasoff and the Duty to Protect Potential Victims Copyright Prentice Hall 2004

Professional Responsibilities and the Law * Professional Responsibilities and the Law Getting Help Copyright Prentice Hall 2004