Project Prioritization Framework Principles

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Transportation Funding Alternatives and Outreach
Advertisements

Metrolinx is an agency of the Government of Ontario Planning, Design and Engineering (PDE) Workplan February 20, 2009.
Scaling up the global initiative on the implementation of the SNA and supporting statistics Meeting on Scaling up the coordination and resources for the.
ENTITIES FOR A UN SYSTEM EVALUATION FRAMEWORK 17th MEETING OF SENIOR FELLOWSHIP OFFICERS OF THE UNITED NATIONS SYSTEM AND HOST COUNTRY AGENCIES BY DAVIDE.
County of Fairfax, Virginia Department of Transportation Transportation Funding Alternatives and Outreach Board Transportation Committee June 12, 2012.
Product Stewardship Recommendations Report Solid Waste Management Coordinating Board January 28, 2009.
WECC/TEPPC Response to DOE Funding Opportunity Status Update June 29, 2009 Bradley Nickell Renewable Integration and Planning Director.
The Implementation Structure DG AGRI, October 2005
TEN-T Info Day for AP and MAP Calls 2012 EVALUATION PROCESS AND AWARD CRITERIA Anna Livieratou-Toll TEN-T Executive Agency Senior Policy & Programme Coordinator.
Joint presentation by respective units in DGs AGRI, EMPL and REGIO IPA Components III, IV and V: Conditions for successful preparation and absorption of.
1 Establishing Performance Indicators in Support of The Illinois Commitment Presented to the Illinois Board of Higher Education December 11, 2001.
Project Appraisal Module 5 Session 6.
Overview for Parents and Guardians Fall 2010
Integrated Approach to Area Master Planning in Jubail Industrial City
1. 2 August Recommendation 9.1 of the Strategic Information Technology Advisory Committee (SITAC) report initiated the effort to create an Administrative.
1 Service Providers Capacity Assessment Framework Presentation to the Service Delivery Advisory Group August 28, 2008.
Future Airspace Strategy (FAS) Heathrow Airport Consultative Committee 31 st March 2010 Phil Roberts Assistant Director of Airspace Policy 1 1.
2013 BUDGET General Fund Revenues$84,870,998 Expenditures Divisional 69,635,424 Non-Divisional 5,695,509 Transfers 9,540,065 84,870,998 $ Nil * Capital$14,788,522.
CEET Conference 2011 Funding VET for Social Inclusion Competitive tendering and contestable funding in VET: approaches to supporting access and equity.
Chamber – December 2010 Presented by Carla Ippolito Manager, Special Projects Rapid Transit December 6, 2010 Hamilton’s Rapid Transit Initiative.
Chesapeake Bay Program Goal Development, Governance, and Alignment Carin Bisland, GIT6 Vice Chair.
Chesapeake Bay Program Goal Development, Governance, and Alignment Carin Bisland, GIT6 Vice Chair.
DISTILLATE Appraisal Workshop 21 May 07 Michael Padgett, Regional Transport Advisor, Yorkshire & Humber Assembly.
Presentation By: Chris Wade, P Eng. Finally … a best practice for selecting an engineering firm.
MTF Rail Development Forum
ACT CANADA 2014: Using Business Cases To Get Great Projects Financed and Delivered December 1, 2014| Michael Sutherland.
Transit Capital & Operating Priorities Municipal Capital Project Priorities Municipal Policy Document Related Planning Activities 2 VIA 2040 Plan COSA.
Problems and Solutions Moving Forward Transportation Forum May 12, 2012 John Howe, Vice President Investment Strategy and Project Evaluation.
FasTracks Moving Forward: Regional Transportation Plan (RTP) Amendment Staff Recommendation Phillip A. Washington and Team August 7, 2012.
1 Metrolinx delivers The Big Move Regional Transportation Plan: Transforming Transportation in the Greater Toronto and Hamilton Area November 5, 2012 Bruce.
Transportation leadership you can trust. presented to NCHRP Project Panel presented by Cambridge Systematics, Inc. with PB Consult Inc. Texas Transportation.
Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA): Overview
Transportation/Land-Use Connections Program Program Evaluation Proposal for FY 2009 Program September 5, 2008 Darren Smith, Sarah Crawford Transportation.
U.S Department of Transportation Federal Highway Administration Federal Transit Administration MAP-21 Moving Ahead with Progress in the 21 st Century Linking.
October Prop K Strategic Plan & 5-Year Prioritization Programs Presentation to the Citizens Advisory Committee October 24, 2007.
State Smart Transportation Initiative October 9, 2014 Matthew Garrett Oregon DOT Director Erik Havig Oregon DOT Planning Section Manager.
AT Benefit Cost Analysis Model Highway Design, Project Management and Training Section Technical Standards Branch Presented by Bill Kenny, Director: Design,
MnDOT-ACEC Annual Conference March 5,  Capital planning and programming at MnDOT  Major considerations  A more transparent and collaborative.
Citizens Advisory Committee Quarterly Update Bill Van Meter, Assistant General Manager, Planning September 19, 2012.
AGENDA OPEN HOUSE 6:00 – 8:00 PM  Review materials  Ask questions  Provide feedback on purpose, needs, and alternatives  Sign up for list  Fill.
Rapid Transit for Toronto February 8, Metrolinx “5 in 10 Plan” - October 2010 Light Rail Transit Projects New Rapid Transit for Etobicoke North.
OPEN HOUSE #4 JUNE AGENDA OPEN HOUSE 6:00 PM  Review materials  Ask questions  Provide feedback  Sign up for list  Fill out comment.
Statewide Strategies for Coordinating Regional Transportation and Land Use Planning Katie Benouar, Senior Transportation Planner Office of Regional and.
North Etobicoke LIP Summit Woodbine Convention Centre June 28 th, 2011.
Presentation to Membership. A Recap of Our Process February 2009: Decision to renew strategic plan March 2009: Engagement of Berlin, Eaton.
DOWNTOWN MOVES TRANSFORMING OTTAWA’S STREETS
1 Ontario’s 2012 Transit-Supportive Guidelines ACT Canada - Sustainable Mobility Summit Hamilton, Ontario, November 7, 2012 Ministry of Transportation.
The Kern Regional Transportation Plan A Vision and Guidebook for Kern County in 2025.
1 Perspectives on Collaboration Presentation to Travel Demand Modelling in the GTHA Organizational Structure and Regional Collaboration Systems Analysis.
Office of Major Project Development (OMPD) Overview November 2015.
Planning Commission Study Session: Preferred Plan July 23, 2015.
A Strategic Agenda for Pinellas County’s Future Growth Whit Blanton, FAICP Pinellas Planning Council & Pinellas Metropolitan Planning Organization August.
AGRO PARKS “The Policy Cycle” Alex Page Baku November 2014.
SYSTEM MANAGEMENT PERFORMANCE MEASURES, RANKING AND PRIORITIZATION CORRIDOR MANAGEMENT PLANS INCORPORATION INTO STIP & TIP STRATEGY IMPLEMENTATION MONITOR.
Counties Transit Improvement Board: Program of Projects & Transit Investment Framework Workshop 3 Board Workshop October 16, 2013.
9 th International HIA Conference A framework for public health officials to integrate HIA considerations in municipal project undertakings for the City.
Regional Economic Strategy (RES) Leading the Way and Action Plan Gillian Roll, One NorthEast NERIP Measuring the Economy Seminar 20 th November 2006.
July/August 2014 How the ONRC links with… Lynley Hutton.
Ministry of Transportation Update on Provincial Initiatives
Stage 2 Light Rail Transit Program “In the ground ready”
CBP Biennial Strategy Review System
NGTA Halton Planning and Public Works Committee
Loddon Campaspe Integrated Transport Strategy
Draft OECD Best Practices for Performance Budgeting
Loddon Campaspe Integrated Transport Strategy
CBP Biennial Strategy Review System ~Meetings Detail~ DRAFT August 29, /6/2018 DRAFT.
STP Shared Local Fund: Project Evaluation Criteria
Strategic Environmental Assessment (SEA)
Ontario Presentation to the NEB Modernization Expert Panel
DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEES AB 1600 UPDATE
Presentation transcript:

Project Prioritization Framework Principles February 20, 2009

Background November 28, 2008, Metrolinx Board approved the Regional Transportation Plan (RTP) and Investment Strategy RTP identified Top 15 Priority Projects for early implementation leveraging Province’s $11.5 B MoveOntario 2020 commitment Board also directed staff to complete project-level Benefits Case Analysis (BCA) work for all Top 15 Priority Projects, beyond those with pre-existing, legacy commitments

BCA/Prioritization Work Plan Pearson Airport-Union Rail Link Spadina Subway Extension Mississauga Transitway Peel Queen Street RT Summer 2009 Hamilton King-Main RT Halton-Peel Dundas RT Peel Hurontario RT Durham Highway 2 RT GO Transit Rail: Bowmanville extension and other service improvements November 2008 Spring 2009 February 2009 Scarborough RT Eglinton Crosstown Finch West LRT Yonge North Subway Extension GO Lakeshore Electrification Construction start in 2009 October 2008 York VIVA Sheppard East LRT Proposed Workplan Strategy BCA Completion Project Prioritization Framework to support 2010/11 and beyond Metrolinx Capital Plan recommendations (Summer 2009) Pre-Metrolinx implementation priorities Previously announced and funded by other sources Continuing progress towards construction start

Prioritization Rationale Ensure fair, transparent, defensible basis for decisions on the optimal multi-year staging of Top 15 Priority Projects Provide comparative, evidenced-based evaluation and ranking of priority projects on a region-wide basis for the first time in the GTHA Prioritization decisions will support development of the 2010-11 and 5-Year Metrolinx Capital Plan “Made-in-GTHA” approach informed by best practices in other leading jurisdictions

Proposed Prioritization Timelines Three-step approach recommended for development of Prioritization Framework: Allows sufficient time to complete: Outstanding BCAs and Consultations with municipal, transit agency, provincial and other stakeholders on prioritization parameters February 2009 Board approval of Prioritization Framework guiding principles Spring 2009 Board review of potential prioritization scenarios, weighting and criteria following completion of additional BCA reports Summer 2009 Final Project Prioritization recommendations, supported by completion of all remaining BCAs, presented for Board approval

Proposed Guiding Principles Staff recommend five principles be adopted to guide development of Prioritization Framework: Process should be clear, logical and transparent Decisions should be evidence-based and data-driven Consistent, region-wide application of prioritization criteria Build on project-level BCA results and broader RTP goals and objectives Provide advice and support to decision-makers, but not prescribe decisions based on rigid, quantitative rankings Flexibility to accommodate Board-directed strategic policy preferences and weightings

Prioritization Criteria – Considerations BCA and RTP measures provide data that could form the basis of the Prioritization Framework BCA process provides comparative, standardized assessment of the “triple bottom line” costs and benefits of project alternatives, consistent with the goals and objectives of the Big Move BCA assessments undertaken in close collaboration with municipal and transit agency staff through project technical teams Metrolinx staff are reviewing BCA outputs to ensure comparability between projects for the purposes of the Prioritization Framework Costs, benefits and other impacts can be scaled to allow comparisons between projects of differing orders-of magnitude (e.g., benefits per dollar invested/per kilometre/per new rider) Additional criteria beyond BCA and RTP measures can be incorporated, if appropriate Review required to avoid double-counting project costs and benefits

Potential Evaluation Criteria Staff recommend that criteria broadly consistent with the following categories form the basis of the Prioritization Framework: Transportation User/Customer Benefits Financial Impacts Environmental Impacts Economic Development Impacts Social and Community Impacts Other Impacts (e.g., potential network implications) Staff will review BCA and RTP measures, as well as potential additional criteria, and report back with recommended criteria in Spring 2008, following consultations with municipal, transit agency, provincial and other stakeholders

Staff Recommendations Receive Report ISP 09-002 “Project Prioritization Framework Principles”; Five principles to guide the development of the Project Prioritization Framework: Clear, logical and transparent; Evidence-based and data-driven; Consistent, region-wide application across the Top 15 Priority Projects; Builds on The Big Move and project-level Benefits Case Analysis Accommodates strategic policy preferences and weightings as may be directed by the Board

Staff Recommendations Prioritization criteria broadly consistent with: Transportation customer and user benefits; Financial impacts; Environmental impacts; Economic development impacts; Social and community impacts; and Other impacts as appropriate. Metrolinx staff consult with municipal, transit agency, provincial and other stakeholders and partners in the ongoing development of a viable Project Prioritization Framework; and Metrolinx staff report back to the Board: In May 2009 with the next iteration of the Prioritization Framework, including project prioritization ranking scenarios based on BCA and RTP data inputs; and In July 2009 with a final report and recommendations for prioritizing the balance of the RTP Top 15 Priority Projects, and to support the development of the Metrolinx 2010/11 Capital Plan and update to the rolling Five-Year Capital Plan.