Introduction to Live Animal Evaluation Kenneth Geuns Michigan State University Dept. of Animal Science.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Animal Selection and Evaluation
Advertisements

Principles of Livestock/Poultry Evaluation and Showmanship
Stockman’s Practice Info
Beef Grading Dr. Gretchen Hilton Assistant Professor Meat Judging Team Coach.
Live Animal Evaluation Beef Nick Nelson Blue Mt. Community College ANS 231 Originated by Kenneth Geuns Michigan State University Revised 2009.
BEEF CARCASS YIELD AND QUALITY GRADING
Meat Identification Quiz
Welcome to the Wonderful World of Meat!
Beef Grading J. Brad Morgan Oklahoma State University.
 Muscle  = PRODUCT  Fat  Want a moderately lean product!  Volume/capacity  Feed Efficiency  Production Capabilities (sows - longevity in crate)
Beef Judging ANS4615. Beef Judging Key to beef judging requires accurate grading skills Successful evaluation of quality and yield grading is essential.
Lamb Carcass Grading.
Ag Science Meat Product Quality.
Marketing Systems For Livestock and Poultry
Marketing Livestock. One purpose of Quality Counts Reveal impact of 76,000 market projects.
Principles of Livestock/Poultry Evaluation and Showmanship.
Principles of Marketing and Evaluating Beef Cattle
+ Market Swine & Grades of Swine Megan Kay. + Objectives Identify swine classes. Define swine grades. List characteristics of ideal swine.
 While Quality grade deals with a prediction of the eating quality of the meat, Yield grade is a measurement of the amount of edible meat that the carcass.
Live Animal Evaluation Swine Nick Nelson Blue Mt. Community College ANS 231 Originated by Kenneth Geuns Michigan State University Revised 2009.
Meat Goat Carcass Merit Dr. Dwight Loveday University of Tennessee-Knoxville Department of Food Science & Technology.
Live Cattle Evaluation. What are we trying to determine? u Quality grade u Yield grade u Dressing percentage.
Evaluating Fat and Muscle in Livestock Developed by: Celina Johnson University of Florida.
Live Animal Evaluation Sheep Nick Nelson Blue Mt. Community College ANS 231 Originated by Kenneth Geuns Michigan State University Revised 2009.
Quality and Yield Grading Beef Quality Grading  Used to predict the palatability (taste) of the meat.  Determined by the age and marbling (intramuscular.
Animal Selection and Evaluation Livestock Evaluation.
Beef Carcass Evaluation AS101
U.S. Quality Grades Sex Class Maturity Marbling Firmness.
Live Beef Evaluation & Pricing. History 1916 Standards for U.S. grades developed 1924 Market classes and grades of dressed beef developed 1927 Voluntary.
F30 Beef Cattle Evaluation Some of the pictures and text contained in this material have copyright restrictions limiting their use. Use of this information.
Beef Evaluation: What you must estimate Actual 12th rib fat –nearest.01 inch REA –nearest.1 square inch –live weight, move decimal ( ) Yield.
Objective: Define cutability, degree of lean, marbling, and quality features used to market beef and swine.
Beef Quality Grading, Yield Grading and Pricing. Slaughter By-Products ($/cwt) $66/cwt$109/cwt Fab/Processing Credit Items: Fat $8.50/cwt Bone $5/cwt.
Grading Slaughter Cattle. Quality Grades: Prime (highest) Choice (most desirable today) Select (good) Standard Determined by the amount of fat.
Beef Grading and Evaluation
Livestock Evaluation “MUST” Haves
Introduction to Breeding Livestock Judging and Evaluation
Youth Livestock Specialist
Principles of Livestock/Poultry Evaluation and Showmanship.
Understand quality features of beef, pork and poultry Objective 4.02.
Yield and Quality of Animal Products Dr. Benjy Mikel Introduction to Animal and Food Sciences Agent In-Service.
Class of Beef Ribs Class of Beef Ribs - Results.
AnSc 1101 Meat Grading. Outline Retail yield Inspection vs. grading Carcass Anatomy Quality Grading Yield Grading.
QUALITY GRADING LIVESTOCK Quality Standards for Beef, Pork and Poultry  The United States Department of Agriculture sets forth quality features.
Introduction into Meat Science
Market Beef Evaluation
Live Animal Evaluation Sheep
Principles of Livestock/Poultry Evaluation and Showmanship.
Livestock Evaluation And Selection
By: Jennie Simpson, Dr. Frank Flanders, and Christina Akins
Beef Carcass Yield Grading CDE Practice Based on the 2003 Georgia State Meats CDE By: Jennie Simpson, Dr. Frank Flanders, and Tiffany Prather Georgia Agricultural.
UNDERSTANDING QUALITY FEATURES OF BEEF, PORK, AND POULTRY Objective: 4.02.
Principles of Livestock/Poultry Evaluation and Showmanship
Quality Standards for Beef, Pork, & Poultry
Beef Judging ANS4615.
For: ADVS 1110 Introduction to Animal Science
Live Animal Evaluation Beef
Beef Carcass Yield Grading CDE Tutorial
BEEF CARCASS YIELD AND QUALITY GRADING
Live Animal Evaluation Swine
Market Beef Evaluation
People Ethical Treatment Animals People Eating Tasty Animals.
2017 Iowa 4-H/FFA Meat Contest
Animal Selection and Evaluation
Market Lamb Evaluation
Developed by: Celina Johnson University of Florida
Quality and Yield Grading
Enterprise: Animal Science
Evaluating Fat and Muscle in Livestock
Meats Identify the differences between beef, pork, and lamb cuts;
Presentation transcript:

Introduction to Live Animal Evaluation Kenneth Geuns Michigan State University Dept. of Animal Science

Introduction to Market Beef Evaluation

Market Beef Evaluation: Fat Indicators Tailhead & Pins Last Ribs Brisket Fore flank Rear flank & Cod

Steer A

Steer B

Steer A Steer B

Market Beef Evaluation: Muscle Indicators Loin Quarter/ Rump Forearm Stifle

Live Cattle Evaluation u Weight u Dressing Percent u 12th rib fat u Ribeye area u KPH u Quality Grade u Yield Grade

Weight u Live or Carcass u Live Weight range u 900 lb to 1500 lb u Avg: 1200 lb u Carcass Weight range u 550 lb to 950 lb u 750 lb

Dressing Percent u Proportion of live weight that ends up as carcass u Example: 1250 lb steer with a 775 lb carcass has a dressing percent of 62% u Range: % u Avg: 62%

Factors Affecting Dressing % u Gut Fill u Gut fill = Body Weight = Dressing % u Hide weight and/or mud u Hide wt = Dressing % u Muscle u Muscle = Dressing % u Fat u Fat = Dressing % u Dairy influence

12th Rib Fat Thickness u Highly correlated to retail yield u Predictor of total carcass fatness u Range:.15 in. to.80 in. u Avg:.40 u.25 in. considered minimum

Ribeye Area u Highly correlated with lean yield u Predictor of total carcass muscle u Dependant of carcass weight u Range: sq. in. u Avg: 12.5 sq. in. for 1150 lb steer u Rule of thumb: 1.1 sq. in. for 100 lb live wt

Kidney, Pelvic and Heart Fat u Internal fat as a percentage of carcass weight u Continental cattle will tend to have less than British cattle u Range: % u Avg: 2.5%

Quality Grade u Assigned according to amount of marbling and bone maturity u Most influential component of pricing u Range: Standard to Prime u Avg: Low Choice

Factors Affecting Marbling u Genetics u Age of cattle u Time on feed u Energy content of diet u Fat cover u Continental/ Brahman influence

Yield Grade u Calculated to predict yield of boneless, closely trimmed, retail cuts from the round, loin, rib and chuck u Based on 4 estimations u 12th rib fat u Hot carcass weight (HCW) u Rib eye area (REA) u Kidney, pelvic, heart fat (KPH)

Yield Grade u Range: 1 through 5 u 1 = Lean and/or Muscular; High cutability u 5 = Fat and/or Light Muscled; Low cutability u Avg: 3.0

Introduction to Market Lamb Evaluation

Lamb Evaluation: Fat Indicators Shoulder Breast Forerib Flank

Lamb Evaluation: Fat Indicators Base of leg/ Twist Dock Spine Loin Edge

Lamb Evaluation: Muscle Indicators Forearm Leg Stifle

Lamb Evaluation: Muscle Indicators Rack Loin Leg

Reading Top Shape

Live Lamb Evaluation u Weight u Dressing percent u 12th rib fat u Ribeye area u Yield grade u Quality grade

Weight u Live weight u Range: lb u Avg: 125 lb u Carcass weight u Weight of dressed carcass with kidney and pelvic fat removed

Dressing Percent u Percentage of live weight that ends up as carcass u Range: % u Avg: u 53% for shorn lambs u 50% for unshorn lambs

Factors Affecting Dressing Percent of Lamb u Pelt weight u Unshorn lambs will dress 1-5% lower than shorn u Fill u Muscling u Fat cover

Fat Thickness u Taken at the 12th rib u Normally adjusted up to a.1 inch due to body wall fat u Used in YG equation u Range: in. u Avg:.25 in. u Minimum requirement:.15 in.

Ribeye Area u Measured at 12th rib u Indicator of total muscle in carcass but not used in YG equation u Range: sq. in. u Avg: 2.5 sq. in.

Yield Grade u Predicts the yield of boneless, closely trimmed retail cuts from the leg, loin, rib, and shoulder u Only includes adjusted 12th rib fat thickness u YG = (10 * Adj. fat thickness)

Quality Grade u Predictor of eating quality based on three factors: u Maturity u Lean Quality u Texture u Firmness u Marbling u Conformation

Lamb Quality Grades u Range: Good to Prime u Avg: Choice u Majority of market lambs will grade Choice

Lamb Quality Grade u Superior conformation can compensate for inferior lean quality and vice versa u Good lean quality with Choice conformation = Choice u Prime lean quality with Choice conformation = Prime u To qualify for Ch or Pr, lamb carcass must have at least.10 in. fat covering

Primal Identification

Introduction to Market Swine Evaluation

Swine Evaluation: Fat Indicators Shoulder Loin Edge Ham/ Loin Junction Junction Flank ElbowPocket Jowl Seam of Ham Ham

Swine Evaluation: Muscle Indicators ForearmHam Loin Stifle

Weight u Live Weight u Range: 210 lb lb u Average: 250 to 260 lb u Carcass Weight u Weight of dressed carcass (hot or chilled) u Chilled 1.5% less than hot u Range: lb u Avg: 180 lb

Dressing Percent u Proportion of body weight that ends up as carcass u Example: 255 lb live weight hog with 186 lb carcass = 73% dress u Some variation in dressing % across plants due to slaughter procedures and time of carcass weight measurement (hot or chilled) u Range: % u Avg: 72%

Factors Affecting Dressing Percent u Gut Fill u Gut fill = Body Weight = Dressing % u Muscle u Muscle = Dressing % u Fat u Fat = Dressing %

Carcass Length u Measurment taken from the First Rib to the Aitch Bone u Not in calculations u Range: in. u Avg: 31 in.

10th Rib Fat u Used in % Muscle Formula u Range: in. u Avg.:.90 in

Last Rib Fat u Used in USDA Grade calculation u Range: in. u Avg:.80 in.

Loineye Area u Estimated at the 10th rib u Range: sq. in. u Avg: 5.5

Reading Top Shape

BF =.90 inches

Reading Top Shape BF = 1.5 inches

Reading Top Shape BF =.20

The End!