AB 109 Public Safety Realignment December 5, 2013.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
July CPOC Meeting. Key Changes to AB 109 AB 109 is modified by AB 117 Realignment is now operative on October 1, 2011 (budget also establishes the community.
Advertisements

REPORTING VIOLATIONS OF PROBATION
Walter A. McNeil, Secretary Florida Department of Corrections Criminal and Civil Justice Policy Council February 3, 2009.
Walter A. McNeil, Secretary Florida Department of Corrections Public Safety and Domestic Security Policy Committee Policy Committee October 6, 2009.
1 Florida Department of Corrections Presentations to the Senate Committee on Criminal and Civil Justice Appropriations December 13, 2007.
Community-Based Reentry Programs Using Electronic Technology
Criminal Justice Process: Sentencing & Corrections
Department of Corrections Virginia Criminal Sentencing Commission “Prison Bound Offenders” Appropriations Act Item 387 D September 8, 2008.
What is the term that defines the men and women we supervise? Parolee Probationer Offender Supervised Releasee Restored Citizen Returning Citizen Client.
Issues Faced by Juveniles Leaving Custody: Breaking Down the Barriers University of Oregon April 6, 2007 Pat Arthur, National Center for Youth Law.
REGIONAL REENTRY CONFERENCE JULY , 2013 PARENTING SENTENCING ALTERNATIVE SUBSTITUTE SENATE BILL 6639.
1 CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS AND REHABILITATION 2012 National Association of Sentencing Commissions Terri McDonald, Undersecretary, Operations.
Measuring 109 In Fresno County
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS AND REHABILITATION ASSEMBLY BILL 109 AND HOW IT IMPACTS COUNTIES.
Conducting Research in Challenging Times: California Parolee Reentry Court Evaluation Association of Criminal Justice Research, California March
Criminal Justice Process: Sentencing and Corrections 1. Sentencing Options 2. Purposes of Punishment 3. Parole 4. Capital Punishment 5. Corrections.
Fresno County month data provided to Chief Probation Officers of California (CPOC) & ORE future work Owen Research & Evaluation October 26, 2012.
Public Safety Realignment Local custody for non-violent, non- serious, non-sex offenders Changes to State Parole Local Post-release Supervision Local.
Offender Re-Entry: One Jail’s Perspective Montgomery County Department of Correction and Rehabilitation Wendy Miller-Cochran, LCSW-C Re-Entry Unit Social.
HOPE Probation H awai`i’s O pportunity P robation with E nforcement July 2008 Judge Steven S. Alm First Circuit Court, Honolulu, Hawai`i
THE IMPACT OF AB 109 ON LAPD. Overview AB 109 impact on the LAPD Statistical information AB 109 impact on LAPD jail facilities Securing the safety of.
Presented By: Chief Edward Medrano Gardena Police Department.
Community Supervision and Alternative Sanctions Comparisons Barb Tombs July 16, 2007 Presentation to the CT Sentencing Task Force Subcommittees.
SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY PUBLIC SAFETY REALIGNMENT PLAN 1 st Quarter Update October 1, 2011 – December 31,
Second Chances: Housing and Services for Re-entering Prisoners National Alliance to End Homelessness Annual Conference Nikki Delgado Program Manager Corporation.
September 20, 2011 Criminal Justice Realignment OCTOBER 1, 2011.
1 Division of Adult Parole Operations MARGARITA PEREZ Deputy Director Enhancing Public Safety through the Successful Reintegration of Offenders.
In the Community. Community Corrections Continues after incarceration And it deals with split sentences.
 Parole officers interact with recently-released prisoners and their families in order to help them become productive members of society.  They develop.
When Does Criminal Justice Realignment Take Effect? 1 Eligible felonies sentenced to county jail: applies to any person sentenced on or after October 1,
Probation and Parole Chapter 12.
Carlos Morales Behavioral Health & Recovery Services of San Mateo County Marissa King Human Services Agency of San Mateo County.
Public Safety Realignment Act of 2011 (AB109) Impacts on San Francisco County Wendy S. Still Chief Adult Probation Officer Association for Criminal Justice.
SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY 2011 PUBLIC SAFETY REALIGNMENT PLAN AUGUST 30, 2011.
11 Beyond the Bench 2013 “Juvenile Justice Reform– where are we now?” CALIFORNIA JUVENILE JUSTICE TRENDS UPDATE December 2, 2013 – Anaheim, CA Presented.
Making Communities Safer Population Management/Control Strategies ASCA All Directors Training Session 2 December 3, 2010 CHRISTOPHER B. EPPS COMMISSIONER.
Criminal Justice Reform in California Challenges and Opportunities Mia Bird Northern California Grantmakers Annual Conference – From Ideas to Action May.
Probation and Parole in the United States Your presenter:
Pretrial, Probation and Parole
Probation, Parole, and Community Corrections
TREATMENT COURTS Inns of Court Presentation By John Markson & Elliott Levine October 17, 2012.
ANALYSIS OF LOUISIANA PRISON SYSTEM 1 Main Office: 720 Kearney St. Denver, CO Ph Wendy Naro-Ware October2012.
REALIGNMENT RESEARCH UPDATE January 24, Realignment Research Group Charter  Define a Data Governance Processes  Make recommendations for a county-wide.
Welcome to unit What’s New? Announcements Questions - Concerns.
Evidence-Based Reentry Practices in a Jail Setting
North Carolina TASC NC TASC Bridging Systems for Effective Offender Care Management.
Click Here to Add Text This could be a call out area. Bullet Points to emphasize Association for Criminal Justice Research (California) 76th Semi-Annual.
SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY PUBLIC SAFETY REALIGNMENT 1. 6-Month Preliminary Evaluation Report Post Release Community Supervision Offenders ▫From October 2011.
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS AND REHABILITATION ASSEMBLY BILL 109 AND HOW IT IMPACTS COUNTIES.
AJ 50 – Introduction to Administration of Justice Chapter 10 – Probation, Parole, and Community Corrections.
2 3 Texas has one of the largest Probation Populations in the United States (Bureau of Justice Statistics, 2007) 4 Selected StatesProbation Population.
OFFENDER REENTRY: A PUBLIC SAFETY STRATEGY Court Support Services Division.
Public Safety and Offender Rehabilitation Services Act of 2007 (AB 900) Implementation and Impact on County Mental Health Robin Dezember Chief Deputy Secretary.
Realignment: The Role of the BSCC and the Composition of Local Detention Facilities Patricia Mazzilli, Executive Director Board of State and Community.
Realignment: A One-year Examination of Offenders Released from State Prison in the First Six Months of Public Safety Realignment Association for Criminal.
Connecticut Department of Correction Division of Parole and Community Services Special Management Unit Parole Manager Frank Mirto October 14, 2015.
Yavapai County Jail Planning Services Presentation to: Yavapai County Board of Supervisors January 6, 2016.
Kaplan University Online CJ101 Unit 8 Introduction to the Criminal Justice System.
State Sentencing Policy Roundup Carl Reynolds Director, Office of Court Administration, Austin Texas.
Presentation by: Hon. Stephen V. Manley Superior Court of California County of Santa Clara A Statewide Training for Local Mental Health Boards and Commissions.
Public Safety Realignment Act 2011 P UBLIC S AFETY R EALIGNMENT A SSEMBLY B ILLS : AB 109, AB 117, AB1 17 County of San Bernardino, Department of Behavioral.
© 2015 Cengage Learning Chapter 12 Probation, Parole and Intermediate Sanctions Chapter 12 Probation, Parole and Intermediate Sanctions © 2015 Cengage.
The Changing Landscape in Community Corrections and Supervision of High Risk Offenders San Francisco Juvenile Probation Department Board of Supervisors,
Corrections Also known as community-based corrections Community corrections: Refers to a wide range of sentences that depend on correctional resources.
BCJ 3150: Probation and Parole
An Examination of AB109 Recidivism In San Joaquin County In Year 4
Summit County Probation Services
10 Probation, Parole, and Community Corrections.
History (Continued) In May, 2011, Federal Court required that the prison population of California be decreased from 180% of prison capacity to no more.
10 Probation, Parole, and Community Corrections.
Presentation transcript:

AB 109 Public Safety Realignment December 5, 2013

Outline Federal Three Judge Panel -- Prison Reduction Plan AB 109, Public Safety Realignment Act of 2011 Los Angeles County’s Management of Post Released Supervised Persons 2 Los Angeles County Probation Department

Federal Three Judge Panel - Prison Reduction Plan The prison population ballooned to twice the size of what it was designed to house. A Federal three-judge panel ruled that the level of mental health care and medical services provided were unconstitutional in violation of the eighth amendment (cruel and unusual punishment) The State of California was ordered to reduce the prison population to 137.5% of design capacity – roughly 110,000 inmates – by December 31, This order led to numerous prison reduction efforts throughout the years, to include AB Los Angeles County Probation Department

AB 109 – Public Safety Realignment Act of 2011 ● Effective October 1, 2011 ● AB 109 is NOT an “early release program” of State inmates, nor did it result in the “transfer” of inmates or parolees from State to local jurisdiction pre-realignment. ● Five (5) significant changes:  Redefined criteria with respect to who serves their time in the county jail as opposed to State prison.  State inmates whose current conviction is serious or violent, Mentally Disordered Offenders, High Risk Sex Offenders, and Lifers are released to the supervision of State Parole, WHILE the remainder are released to the supervision of the counties, i.e., N-3s or Post Release Supervised Persons (PSPs).  Under Penal Code 1170(h), allows judges to impose a split sentence.  Transferred the state parole revocation process to the courts.  Mandates that parole violators serve their revocation time under local jurisdiction. 4 Los Angeles County Probation Department

Post-Release Supervised Person (PSP) Under the jurisdiction of the Los Angeles County Probation Department Prison inmates whose last sentence was of a non- serious, non-violent, non-sexual nature, irrespective of prior criminal history. Three-year PSP Supervision Condition. Mandatory termination from supervision after a 12- month period without a custodial sanction. Approximately 60% are assessed at high to very high risk. 5 Los Angeles County Probation Department

PSP Case Management & Community Supervision ● Pre-release planning ● Risk/needs assessment ● Case plan tailored to the specific needs of the PSP ● Where appropriate, referrals are made to the appropriate rehabilitative service(s): 6 Los Angeles County Probation Department Mental Health Substance Abuse Medical Services Housing Employment Services Etc.

PSP Case Management & Community Supervision ● Ongoing Collaboration with County Partners, to include Community/Faith Based Organizations and PSP’s Family ● Unannounced Home Visits ● Unannounced Narcotic Testing ● Unannounced Compliance Checks ● Office Visits ● Enforcement of Conditions of Supervision ● Follow-up on Referrals for Services ● Modification of Case Management Plans ● Motivational Interviewing ● Cognitive Behavioral Treatment 7 Los Angeles County Probation Department

GENDER SPECIFIC FOCUS ● Community/Faith Based Organization Advisory Committee ● Community Transition Unit ● In Reach Re-Entry Services ● Sober Living with Child and Transitional Living with Child ● Educational Courses (parenting, pregnancy) ● Gender Specific Employment Services ● Gender Specific Substance Abuse Treatment 8 Los Angeles County Probation Department

What if a PSP does not comply with their Conditions of Supervision? ● Graduated Sanctions ● Flash Incarceration (up to ten days in County Jail) ● Revocation up to 180-days in County Jail - with automatic half-time. 9 Los Angeles County Probation Department PSP Case Management & Community Supervision

PSP Population October 2011 through November 30, Los Angeles County Probation Department Population Total Cases Accepted19,439 Total Cases Closed8,348 Outstanding Warrants 1 1,768 Deported 2 1,004 Active Cases8,319 1 Does not include Warrants issued for deported PSPs. Snapshot at month end. 2 PRCS case accepted; PSP deported

Cases Accepted vs. Cases Closed October 2011 through November 30, Los Angeles County Probation Department

Arrests for Misdemeanor/Felonies 12 Los Angeles County Probation Department 19,439 total PRCS cases accepted as of November 30, 2013; of which 7,263 (37%) have at least one arrest for misdemeanor and/or felony (excludes flash incarceration).

13 Los Angeles County Probation Department Flash Incarcerations - Cumulative