09/19/031 Susan Albertine The College of New Jersey Gloria John Baltimore Ruth Mitchell Education Trust Ron Henry Georgia State University Quality in Undergraduate.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Overview of Case Management Susan Chapman, PhD, RN N 226 Guest Lecturer February 12, 2003.
Advertisements

The Content Side of the ACPS Professional Learning Plan (PLP)
Joint ATS-WASC Accreditation Reviews Jerry McCarthy, ATS Teri Cannon, WASC.
1-1 Chapter 1: Introduction to the Resource Guide Preschool English Learners: Principles and Practices to Promote Language, Literacy, and Learning ©2012.
Working Document. Not to be distributed without CDE permission. Preschool English Learners Training Manual – Chapter 1 6 Preschool English Learners: Principles.
Copyright © 2012 California Department of Education, Child Development Division with WestEd Center for Child & Family Studies, Desired Results T&TA Project.
1 Common Core State Standards What they are! & How they came to be! Implications for New Jersey New Jersey State Board of Education May 4, 2011 Dorothy.
Core Pre-K Standards Review & Comment
August 8, 2013 Texas Education Agency | Office of Assessment and Accountability Division of Performance Reporting Shannon Housson, Director Overview of.
Stage One: Registrant Mentor, (N.M.C., 2006).
Managing the Statutory Requirements for Assessment April 2011.
Managing the Statutory Requirements for Assessment April 2011.
Guide to Compass Evaluations and
APS Teacher Evaluation
Management Plans: A Roadmap to Successful Implementation
A Roadmap to Successful Implementation Management Plans.
Effectively applying ISO9001:2000 clauses 6 and 7.
1 Division of Aging and Adult Services (DAAS) Knowledge Management and Transfer Project 7/30/12.
Linking assignments with course and program goals Lehman College Assessment Council and Lehman Teaching and Learning Commons November 28, :30 -
Student Learning Outcomes and Assessment An Overview of Purpose, Structures and Systems Approved by Curriculum Committee Approved by Academic.
Session 2: Introduction to the Quality Criteria. Session Overview Your facilitator, ___________________. [Add details of facilitators background, including.
Educational Transformations Enabled by Technology Robert Tinker The Concord Consortium
GENERAL EDUCATION ASSESSMENT Nathan Lindsay January 22-23,
Sponsored by CEPA Foundation – Cultural & Educational Programs Abroad CEPA Foundation Webinar #1 on Curriculum Integration Integrating Education Abroad.
Student Learning Outcomes (SLOs) Module #3: Program vs Course SLOs Office of Academic Planning & Accountability Institutional Effectiveness Moderator:
New Employee Orientation: Performance Management
02/21/031 Susan Albertine The College of New Jersey Gloria John Baltimore Ron Henry Georgia State University Quality in Undergraduate Education QUE.
Core Curriculum for Clinical Coaching Intro - VNIP Model
Core Curriculum for Clinical Coaching Intro - VNIP Model
Assessment Literacy: Formative Instructional Practices
2011 PI Conference Overview Assessment/Evaluation 2. Collaboration 3. Dissemination 4. Faculty Development 5. Key Challenges 6. Materials Development.
GEORGIA PERF0RMANCE MANAGEMENT FOR EMPLOYEES 2008
What is LEAP? Roundtable Discussions October 19 & 20.
1 © 2006 Curriculum K-12 Directorate, NSW Department of Education and Training English K-6 Syllabus Using the syllabus for consistency of assessment.
Student Growth Measures in Teacher Evaluation Module 3: Using Data to Inform Growth Targets and Submitting Your SLO 1.
1 Phase III: Planning Action Developing Improvement Plans.
Department of Mathematical Sciences August 15, /20 Math 1319 “Mathematics in the Modern World”
Learning Outcomes, Authentic Assessments and Rubrics Erin Hagar
1 Literacy PERKS Standard 1: Aligned Curriculum. 2 PERKS Essential Elements Academic Performance 1. Aligned Curriculum 2. Multiple Assessments 3. Instruction.
1 Personal Development and Performance Review Professional Development.
Educator Evaluation: A Protocol for Developing S.M.A.R.T. Goal Statements.
Connecting the Process to: -Current Practice -CEP -CIITS/EDS 1.
DATA TRACKING AND EVALUATION 1. Goal of the STEP program: To increase the number of STEM graduates within the five-year period of the grant. You have.
06/14/041 Ronald J. Henry Georgia State University Byron Brown Valdosta State University Jackie Thornberry Georgia Perimeter College Dee Abrahamse California.
Working with Rubrics: Using the Oral Communication, Writing, and Critical Thinking Rubrics VALUE Rubrics Ashley Finley, Ph.D Senior Director of Assessment.
Determining the Validity and Reliability of Key Assessments and Other Questions Regarding Key Assessments.
Measuring Student Learning March 10, 2015 Cathy Sanders Director of Assessment.
09/20/021 Susan Albertine The College of New Jersey Nevin Brown Education Trust Ron Henry Georgia State University Quality in Undergraduate Education QUE.
Academy for Student-Centered Learning – Workshop Two Melia Fritch, Shawna Jordan, & Shannon Washburn October 28, 2013 CREATING STUDENT-CENTERED LEARNING.
Performance Descriptors Consultation October 2014 Summary.
Assessment Leader Training General Education Student Learning Assessment GEO Training Series: 2 of 5 Spring 2012 February 13, 2012.
2015 Institute on High-Impact Practices and Student Success June 9-13, 2015 University of Wisconsin-Madison Team Leader Webinar.
Using Electronic Portfolios to Assess Learning at IUPUI. Trudy Banta, et. al. Indiana University-Purdue University Indianapolis 2007.
Approaches to Assessment Workshop for College of the Redwoods Fred Trapp August 18, 2008.
March 26-28, 2013 SINGAPORE CDIO Asian Regional Meeting and Workshop on Engineering Education and Policies for Regional Leaders Programme Evaluation (CDIO.
Welcome to Curriculum Mapping… The attendee will understand the purpose of curriculum mapping, with a focus on the alignment of instruction with desired.
Assessing Your Assessments: The Authentic Assessment Challenge Dr. Diane King Director, Curriculum Development School of Computer & Engineering Technologies.
NCATE for Dummies AKA: Everything You Wanted to Know About NCATE, But Didn’t Want to Ask.
A Basic Guide to Academic Assessment Presented by Darby Kaikkonen Director of Institutional Research.
Assessment Design. Four Professional Learning Modules 1.Unpacking the AC achievement standards 2.Validity and reliability of assessments 3. Confirming.
Using edTPA Data for Program Design and Curriculum Mapping Mary Ariail, Georgia State University Kristy Brown, Shorter University Judith Emerson, Georgia.
Continuous Improvement. Focus of the Review: Continuous Improvement The unit will engage in continuous improvement between on-site visits. Submit annual.
Gifted and Talented Academy Year 2 Curriculum and Instruction Session 3
QCC General Education Assessment Task Force March 21 and 22, 2016 Faculty Forum on General Education Outcomes.
ACS WASC/CDE Visiting Committee Final Presentation Panorama High School March
Information Literacy Standards for Freshmen Seminars
CEA Case Study Marianne Farrugia.
Advanced Program Learning Assessment
We VALUE HIPs Utilizing VALUE Rubrics and HIP QA Tools in Course Revitalization Presented by Melynda Conner, TBR OSS HIP Specialist 2019.
Assessment Literacy: Test Purpose and Use
Presentation transcript:

09/19/031 Susan Albertine The College of New Jersey Gloria John Baltimore Ruth Mitchell Education Trust Ron Henry Georgia State University Quality in Undergraduate Education QUE

09/19/032 Roles Communication specialist – Gloria John Project director – Susan Albertine Standards process experts – Education Trust –Ruth Mitchell –Patte Barth Funders –Pew Charitable Trusts – Michelle Seidl –ExxonMobil Foundation – Ed Ahnert Project evaluators - PSA

09/19/033 Roles Critical friends – disciplinary consultants –Ginny Anderson – biology – AIBS –Spencer Benson – biology – U.Maryland –Jay Labov – biology – NRC –Lendol Calder – history – Augustana College –Mills Kelly – history – George Mason –Paul Bodmer – English – NCTE –Susan Ganter – mathematics - Clemson –Bernie Madison – mathematics – MAA

09/19/034 Conceptual Framework of QUE Stage 1: Development of each learning outcome associated with a major: What should students know, understand, and be able to do? Learning outcomes for level 14 Learning outcomes for level 16 Disciplinary contributions to General Education learning outcomes or cross cutting literacies.

09/19/035 Conceptual Framework of QUE Stage 2: Development of evidence that a student has attained desirable proficiencies in a course: Aligning assignment with learning outcome Developing scoring guides or rubrics Constructing performance standards for a learning outcome Scoring student work

09/19/036 Conceptual Framework of QUE Stage 3: Development of evidence that a student has attained desirable proficiencies in a curriculum: Developing aligned assessments so that a student can demonstrate growth through courses towards proficiency in the total curriculum.

09/19/037 Conceptual Framework of QUE Stage 3a: Curriculum Mapping Analyzing curriculum to determine learning outcomes for sequences of courses, using gap analysis or Super-matrix.

09/19/038 Super-matrix or gap analysis Course 1Course 2Course 3Course 4Course 5Total Outcome Outcome Outcome

09/19/039 Super-matrix or gap analysis  Major (4): Outcome is fully introduced, developed and reinforced throughout the course. Students demonstrate an “application knowledge” or “understanding.”  Intermediate (3): Outcome is introduced and further developed and reinforced in course. Students demonstrate a “working knowledge” of the outcome.  Moderate (2): Outcome is introduced and further developed and reinforced in course. Students demonstrate a “minimal working knowledge” of the outcome.  Minor (1): Outcome is introduced in course. Students have a “talking knowledge” or “awareness” of the outcome.  Not at all (0)

09/19/0310 Super-matrix or gap analysis  For the matrix of courses within program, comparing program outcomes:  Does the course add significantly to the learning of the program outcome?  Does the course add significantly to the assessment of the program outcome?

09/19/0311 Conceptual Framework of QUE Stage 3b: Learning outcome mapping - assessment Using the super-matrix, trace assessment of learning outcome through the curriculum How do we capture student developmental progress as s/he proceeds randomly through a series of courses that make up a curriculum?

09/19/0312 Why we are here - Objectives  Participants demonstrate functioning knowledge of performance assessments – able to set criteria, select evidence, and make judgment about extent to which evidence is met  Participants learn about curriculum mapping and are able to apply the super-matrix to their own curriculum

09/19/0313 Agenda Plenary Session: Saturday 8:30 – 10:15 AM Grant Wiggins Assessment and Accountability: –How to design assessment activities that will reveal how students are learning more

09/19/0314 Agenda Disciplinary Groups: Saturday 10:30 am - noon; 1:00-2:30 pm; 2:45-4:15 pm; Sunday 8:30- 10:00 am; and 10:15-11:45 am  How are we accomplishing valid and reliable assessments?  How do you know they work?  Designing rubrics; Using Understanding by Design  How do various courses provide a student opportunity to develop a particular learning outcome?

09/19/0315 QUE Deliverables Department and campus draft learning outcomes, performance descriptions, collections of student work, and assessments of student learning

09/19/0316 QUE Objectives Development and use of standards for lower division to facilitate the transition to upper division within 4-year institutions and for transfer from 2-year to 4-year institutions Development and use of standards for graduation from college Levels 14 and 16 represent performance-bound learning [not the time it takes to get there] Learner-centered learning, not time-specific or place-specific learning

09/19/0317 Next meeting Each cluster provides evidence of alignment of courses and curriculum for the disciplines in which they are involved, using the super-matrix. Apply to own curriculum – bring information to meeting in March As an activity, each discipline group could find one outcome they could all agree upon. Then they could "track" that outcome through the curriculum and talk about how that outcome might be assessed through a common graded assignment in say four or five key required courses (or course clusters) that all the students might take.

09/19/0318 QUE web site QUE Web site is at private section –user name standards –password standards