PART 75 SPAN & RANGE Manuel J Oliva Clean Air Markets Division

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Chemistry: Matter and Change
Advertisements

Measurements and Their Uncertainty 3.1
LABORATORY ACTIVITIES FOR REGENTS CHEMISTRY. Many laboratory activities require measurements. Science uses the S.I. (Metric System) of measurements.
Depreciation Accounting Depreciation Accounting Accounting Standard 6 Presented by : CA. Rajeev Bansal ACA, D.I.S.A.(ICA) B. Com. M/s Rajeev Lakshmi Bansal.
Formulas.
Exam 2 Practice Problems
NETTING Rick Goertz, P.E. Air Permits Division Texas Commission on Environmental Quality Environmental Trade Fair 2013 NETTING.
Presentation Heading Air Source Heat Pumps Jordan Jeewood
Lecture 4 PY 427 Statistics 1 Fall 2006 Kin Ching Kong, Ph.D
Quality Assurance Program
1 Bid Evaluation - Goods Objective Secure goods/services at most economical cost Price only one factor Other optional factors Time of delivery/completion.
EPA Methods 3A, 6C, 7E, 10 & 20 Corrections to May 15, 2006 Final Rule That Updated the Methods That Updated the Methods Foston Curtis US EPA.
New Source Review (NSR) Program Basics
BOILER EFFICIENCY Heat Input is Pulverised Coal
ECMPS Reporting Requirements under the MATS Rule
2013 Emissions Inventory Workshop EXAMPLE CALCULATIONS.
Thermal Mass Flow Meters Market and applications.
Factor of Evaporation: lbs/hr steam produced per BHp.
SECTION 11 LEVEL B SUIT OUT. SECTION 12 AIR MONITORING.
Common Monitoring and Reporting Errors Louis Nichols Clean Air Markets US EPA March 2007.
Capacity Planning.
Capacity and Constraint Management
SOLARIS 3-GAS METER Complete operation of Solaris multi-gas meter can be found on the LAFD Ethernet.
Steffes Engineered Flare System
Sensor Operating Theory
Richard (Rick) Goertz, P. E
2014 Emissions Inventory Workshop How to Calculate Your Emissions CO VOC E = A × EF PM NOx 2000 lb/ton.
Florida Department of Environmental Protection David Read Cement Subproject Manager Bureau of Air Regulation Cement Mercury Subproject.
Created by Susan Neal $100 Fractions Addition Fractions Subtraction Fractions Multiplication Fractions Division General $200 $300 $400 $500 $100 $200.
General Monitoring Requirements and Options
Harmonization of Part 60 and Part 75 CEM Requirements Robert Vollaro
Harmonization of Parts 60 and 75
The Compensation Plan Part 1: Ad Packs. Members Buy $10 Ad Packs - Each $10 Ad Pack earns $0.20 daily ($0.10 Sat/Sun) - Ad Packs expires when $15 is earned.
EPA Proposed Mandatory Greenhouse Gas Reporting Rule.
EPA Proposed Mandatory Greenhouse Gas Reporting Rule.
Thank you and welcome Linear Programming (LP) Modeling Application in manufacturing And marketing By M. Dadfar, PhD.
Proportions and Percents Unit rates & Proportions Unit Rate Scale Drawing and Probability Fractions Percents.
Hosted by Lynn Dickson Choice1Choice 2Choice 3Choice
EnvironmentEnvironnementCanada Nusa Dua, Bali, Indonesia September 5 – 7, Part 4: LFG Utilization.
THIS IS Graphing Square roots Completing the Square # of roots Quadratic Formula Solve by Graphing.
Reece Parker and Justin Cherry, P.E. Air Permits Division Texas Commission on Environmental Quality Advanced Air Permitting Seminar 2014.
Environmental Science
Preventing and Resolving Reporting Errors Using Monitor Data Checking Software (MDC) Louis Nichols Clean Air Markets Division.
Ronald L. Baker Robert Peters Edul Chikhliwala EcoChem Analytics
2. Describing the flow of air inside a duct.
CEMTEK CEMS Users Group Meeting and Forum September 24-25, 2009 Santa Ana, California RKI Specific DAHS Training and RECLAIM Updates Presented by Norm Iseri, RKI Engineering.
Discharge Monitoring Reports (DMRs)
Kimberton, PA | Columbus, GA | Strategic Air Planning: Where Do We Grow From Here? Colin McCall |
Impact Area 1-hour standards. SILs used to determine when a proposed source’s ambient impacts warrant a comprehensive (cumulative) source impact analysis.
Planned Revisions to 40 CFR Parts 72 and 75 Matthew G. Boze U.S. EPA Clean Air Markets Division.
Large Steam& Gas Turbines P M V Subbarao Professor Mechanical Engineering Department Backbones of Modern Nations ……
Clean Air Markets Program Data
Implementation of US Cap and Trade Programs
| Philadelphia | Atlanta | Houston | Washington DC Boiler MACT Compliance Plans: Failure to Develop Plans Is Planning to Fail Susie Bowden|
1 Saxony-Anhalt EU Twinning RO 04/IB/EN/09 State Environmental Protection Agency Wolfgang GarcheWorkshop European Standards Requirements of.
Control Chart Methodology for Evaluating CEMS Data
1 Dec. 11, 1997 LEADS Quality Control Systems Robert Brewer (512) Monitoring Operations Division Network QA Manager.
Hardware Analyser vs Software Analyser
Virtual Analyser What is it Have you ever faced an analyser failure that requires a plant shut down to repair & wished that there.
Compliance Assurance Monitoring (CAM) November 24, 2009.
Measurements Measurements and errors : - Here, the goal is to have some understanding of the operation and behavior of electrical test instruments. Also,
Lancom 4 In Power and Boilers Derek Stuart. Lancom 4 In Power and Boilers Derek Stuart Combustion Theory In order to maximize the heat capture (efficiency)
Solver Feature Excel’s KY San Jose State University Engineering 10.
Solver Feature Excel’s KY San Jose State University Engineering 10.
Complying with Periodic Emissions Monitoring Requirements
Control Chart Methodology for Evaluating CEMS Data
Calibration Calibration of the analyzer establishes the relationship between actual pollutant concentration input and the analyzer response. Should be.
Control System Instrumentation
Training Module Presented by Steve Wright
Total Solution for Flue Gas Analyzer Series
Presentation transcript:

PART 75 SPAN & RANGE Manuel J Oliva Clean Air Markets Division Sam, Sarah suggested this would be a good presentation for the Division. Manuel J Oliva Clean Air Markets Division U.S. Environmental Protection Agency

Instrument Span & Range Question: Aren’t Span and Range the Same? Answer: Under Part 75 Span and Range can be equal in value, but are not the same. However, the range value must always be  the span value. PART 75

Span & Range Defined Range: Instrument Full-Scale “What the instrument is set up to measure” Span: Highest concentration or flow rate that a monitor component is required to be capable of measuring. (§72.2) “What the rules require to be measured, Quality assured portion of the range” “Rules of the Game” - Appendix A, §2 Affected Parameters: SO2, NOX, CO2, O2 and Flow Rate 1. Kenon was gracious enough to provide initial allocation data.

Example of Span & Range Case 1: Span = Range Case 2: Span < Range 0 ppm 500 ppm Span Case 2: Span < Range 400 ppm 0 ppm 500 ppm

Range Settings Select a range so majority of readings obtained during typical unit operation are kept within 20 to 80 percent of instrument full scale range (to extent practicable) Importance: Avoid signal to noise problems at low end of range, and inaccuracies or exceedance at high end of range. Accuracy of measured values is objective Exceptions: (SO2) low sulfur fuel, (SO2/NOX) emission controls and two span values, (SO2/NOX) dual span unit Range Signal Noise Level Not Necessarily Linear at Extremes 1. Cement kilns in NY provided with 8,085 tons.

Span Settings Span Settings: Dependant on pollutant Importance: Concentrations of calibration gases used for daily QA and linearity checks, as well as daily control limits for gas and flow monitors are expressed as % span “Simple” rule of thumb, range and span values can be equal

Setting the Span - SO2 Monitors Define MPC Maximum Potential Concentration (MPC) is based on analysis of highest sulfur fuel burned (max % sulfur and min GCV, or max % sulfur/GCV ratio) or historical CEMS data Define MEC if Appropriate Maximum Expected Concentration (MEC) is based on expected % SO2 removal, fuel analysis or historical CEMS data MEC is appropriate for units with SO2 controls or both high-sulfur and low-sulfur fuels, including blends

Setting the Span - SO2 Monitors (Continued) High Span* = MPC × 1.00 to MPC × 1.25 Rounded to nearest 100 ppm (or 10 ppm if SO2  500 ppm) Full Scale Range  Span Value Low Span = 1.00 × MEC to 1.25 × MEC (If Required) Rounded to nearest 10 ppm (or 100 ppm as appropriate) Low Span Required if MEC < 20% of High Range (Controls or low sulfur fuels) Use the Low Span when SO2 readings are expected to be below 20% of High Full-Scale Range * If unit has SO2 control it can forgo high span and report a “default high range value” of 200% of MPC during hours when low range is exceeded. Full scale of low range cannot exceed five times MEC.

Setting the Span - NOX Monitors Define MPC Maximum Potential Concentration (MPC) is based on the fuel (or blend) that gives highest uncontrolled NOX emissions. Options include: fuel based defaults, boiler type defaults, NOX emission test results, historical CEMS data or manufacturer data Define MEC if Appropriate Maximum Expected Concentration (MEC) is based on expected NOX removal efficiency, NOX concentration testing, historical CEMS data, or permit limit Determine a separate MEC for each fuel (or blend)

Setting the Span - NOX Monitors (Continued) High Span* = MPC × 1.00 to MPC × 1.25 Rounded to nearest 100 ppm (or 10 ppm if NOX  500 ppm) Full Scale Range  Span Value Low Span = 1.00 × MEC to 1.25 × MEC (If Required) Rounded to nearest 10 ppm (or 100 ppm as appropriate) Low Span Required if MEC < 20% of High Range (If more than one MEC, use MEC closest to 20% of High Range) Use the Low Span when NOX readings are expected to be below 20% of High Full-Scale Range * If unit has Add-On NOX control it can forgo high span and report a “default high range value” of 200% of MPC during hours when low range is exceeded. Full scale of low range cannot exceed five times MEC.

Setting the Span - CO2 & O2 Monitors Define MPC for CO2 CO2 Maximum Potential Concentration (MPC) is 14% CO2 (boilers) or 6% CO2 (turbines) default values, or determine based on historical CEMS data MPC is used only for substitute data purposes Define Minimum Potential Concentration for O2 O2 Minimum Potential Concentration is determine based on historical CEMS data Minimum Potential Concentration is used only for substitute data purposes for units using flow monitors and O2 diluent monitors to determine Heat Input Bullet 1 - Allocations are initially set to “cap” emissions to a certain level (I.e. 20% reduction in emissions). Sources will generally reduce emissions under cap by controls or operational changes. It is expected therefore that sources would be sellers in a mature program. Bullet 2 - 3% reduction required not counting sources with zero emissions. 27% reduction assuming sources with zero emissions emitted at their allowance levels. 5% surplus with cement kilns and not subtracting out zero emissions sources.

Setting the Span - CO2 & O2 Monitors (Continued) O2 Span Between 15% and 25% O2 Below 15% O2 allowed with technical justification CO2 Span Between 14% and 20% CO2 (for boilers) Between 6% and 14% CO2 (for turbines)

Setting the Span - Flow Monitors Define MPV Maximum Potential Velocity (MPV) is based on equations in Appendix A (F-factors, heat input, diluent concentration and moisture concentration), or Highest values from traverse testing (Ref. Method 2) Define MPF Maximum Potential Flow Rate (MPF) is equal to MPV × stack area Used only for substitute data purposes

Setting the Span - Flow Monitors (Continued) Calibration Span = MPV* × 1.00 to MPV* × 1.25 Rounded up to at least two significant figures Flow Rate Span = 1.00 × MPF to 1.25 × MPF Expressed in the units used for Part 75 reporting (scfh) Rounded to nearest 1000 scfh * MPV must be converted to the units of daily calibration (e.g. kscfm, inches of H20, etc.)

Adjustments to Span and Range Perform at least annual evaluation of the span and range settings (Appendix A, §2.1.2.5) DAHS

Summary Process Diagram RANGE  ?? SPAN VALUE 0 20 40 60 80 100 Single Span (or High Span) Based on maximum potential concentration or flow rate 20% to 80% of Full Scale Range (Majority of Data) Low Span (if Required) Based on maximum expected concentration

Optimal Range