Society for Risk Analysis Workshop 3: Application of Web-based Risk Assessment Information System (RAIS) Leslie Galloway, University of Tennessee/Oak Ridge.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Environmental Tobacco Smoke
Advertisements

1 Consumer Exposure Assessment at the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency: A ccomplishments and Opportunities for Global Collaboration Thomas Brennan.
Spanish Royal Decree for the statement of polluted soils Real Decreto 9/2005 (B.O.E nº15, 18 of January, 2005) JRC Meeting, 3-4 February, 2005 The criteria.
Vapor Study Informational Meeting General Mills/Henkel Corp. Superfund Site Van Cleve Recreation Center November 12, 2013 Minnesota Department of Health.
Revisiting the Formula CTL Workgroup Contaminated Media Forum 1.
RECAP Addressing Exposure to Multiple Constituents that Elicit Noncarcinogenic Effects on the Same Target Organ/System.
COMPARISONS OF SUB-SLAB SOIL GAS MEASUREMENTS TO MODELED EMISSIONS FROM SUBSURFACE CONTAMINATION by John A. Menatti and Robin V. Davis Utah Department.
Further Site Investigation Sutton Walls Former Landfill
Trichloroethylene (TCE) Toxicity Values Update Waste Site Cleanup Advisory Committee Meeting March 27, 2014 C. Mark Smith Ph.D., M.S. Deputy Director Office.
Risk Assessment.
Environmental Risk Assessment for “Facet Enterprises”, New York, USA Presentation by Marie, Seun, and Deb.
1 Risk assessment: overview and principles –Risk principles –Steps in risk assessment –Risk calculation –Toxicology.
Environmental Indexes by Amit Joshi. Purpose Assess the potential risks posed by releases from industrial sources Conduct preliminary impact assessment.
National Inventory of Potential Sources of Soil Contamination in Cyprus Part 2 Risk-Based Approach to Assessment of Cypriot Contaminated Sites Eleonora.
ESTIMATION OF LIFETIME CANCER RISK AMONG RESIDENTIAL ADULTS AND CHILDREN NEAR OKHLA LANDFILL, NEW DELHI VIA INGESTION (ORAL ROUTE) DUE TO ARSENIC AND BENZENE.
Environmental exposures  Cancer risks:  Tobacco smoke  Radon in homes  Arsenic.
Toxic New Source Review Lance Ericksen Engineering Division Manager MBUAPCD.
RISK ANALYSIS,EVALUATION AND CHARACTERIZATION OF THE DIXIE OIL PROCESSORS INC., FRIENDSWOOD,TEXAS CVEN 610/PHEO 650 APRIL 22,2004 BY OKE NWANESHIUDU ABHIRAM.
I Like This !!!!!!!!!!!!. Kennecott Copper Mine (North Zone) April 20, 2004 By: Ben Chadwick, Shweta Mehta, Purvi Patel.
Vapor Intrusion Guidance Proposed Updates
29 th International conference SEGH, 8-12 July Toulouse, FRANCE 2013 Health risk estimate for groundwater and soil contamination in the.
Common Issues for Exposure Scenarios without GNS VAP CP Summer Coffee July 14 th, 2015 Mike Allen Ohio EPA CO- Supervisor
SOUTHWEST DIVISION Evaluation of Ambient Metals in the San Francisco, California Area Presentation for the NDIA Conference G. Patrick Brooks, R.G. NAVFAC,
This presentation will probably involve audience discussion, which will create action items. Use PowerPoint to keep track of these action items during.
Risk Analysis of Contaminated Sites: Human Health and Ecological Risk Assessment F. Quercia, ANPA Workshop ICS/UNIDO - Fundacion Mamonal Environmental.
Overview of US EPA’s Vapor Intrusion Guidance VAP CP Summer Coffee July 14 th, 2015 Carrie Rasik Ohio EPA CO- Risk Assessor
Screening Level Ecological and Human Health Risk Assessment Poplar Point, Washington, DC.
Proposed Identification of Environmental Tobacco Smoke as a Toxic Air Contaminant Public Workshop Cal/EPA Headquarters Building Sierra Hearing Room Sacramento,
Tom Purucker Robert Stewart Fred Dolislager Human Health and Ecological Risk Assessment with Spatial Analysis and Decision Assistance (SADA) Freeware.
Philip Bedient, Ph.D. Rice University
Application of a Human Health Risk Assessment Software to Support Revitalisation Decisions at Post-industrial Sites E.Wcislo, J.Dlugosz, M.Korcz Institute.
 EPA’s soil sampling objectives  Technical approach  Technical assistance to DTSC/DOE  Next Steps and Schedule.
1 School Siting Environmental Health and Safety Considerations J. Brad Peebles Ph.D.,C.E.P
Introduction to Atlantic RBCA Version 3 Webinar May 4, 2013.
Gradient CORPORATION Vapor Intrusion Attenuation Factors (AFs) – Measured vs. EPA Defaults A Case Study Presented by Manu Sharma and Jennifer DeAscentis.
BASELINE RISK ASSESSMENT OVERVIEW Dawn A. Ioven Senior Toxicologist U.S. EPA – Region III 4 April 2012.
(IAQ). What is Risk Assessment? Risk assessment: provides information on the health risk Characterizes the potential adverse health effects of human exposures.
Western Region Pesticide Meeting Air Monitoring Studies for Agriculture-Urban Interfaces Carl A. Brown, Ph.D. Idaho Department of Environmental Quality.
Michael J. Sullivan, Ph.D., CIH, REA
Approaches for Evaluating the Relevance of Multiroute Exposures in Establishing Guideline Values for Drinking Water Contaminants Kannan Krishnan, Université.
LDEQ RECAP Miscellaneous Topics. Exposure Assessment n Site-specific under MO-3 only n Construction worker scenario n Greatly reduced ET, EF, and/or ED.
COMMITMENT & INTEGRITY DRIVE RESULTS Risk Based Corrective Action Using site-specific risk assessment to achieve Regulatory Closure.
Brownfields Health Risks & Remediation Diogo Cadima Topic ‘A’ Term Project CET 413.
Examples of Health Risk Assessment Applications for Contaminated Sites in the Upper Silesia, Poland Eleonora Wcislo Institute for Ecology of Industrial.
Production of Nitric Acid Environmental Impact Assessment Erik TolonenNick Poulin Environmental Engineering Environmental Planning and Decision Making.
Workshop U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Rockville, Maryland Pacific Northwest National Laboratory November 15-17, 2005 GENII Version 2.0 Overview and.
Contaminated Soil Monitoring Pornsri Suthanaruk, Ph.D Pollution Control Department (PCD) Ministry of Natural Resources and Environment Thailand Workshop.
1 RBCA Tool Kit Exercise. 2 Groundwater protection : Tier 1 compliance point Point of compliance=Point of exposure (on site) compliance point (receptor)
Human Health Risk Assessment and Chemical Safety
Trichloroethylene (TCE) Update Waste Site Cleanup Advisory Committee Meeting January 24, 2013.
Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry Division of Health Assessment and Consultation Meeting Agenda Monday, September 27, :30 pmMeet and.
RISK ASSESSMENT. Major Issues to be considered in designing the Study 1.- Emission Inventory What is the relative significance of the various sources.
Potential Addition of Vapor Intrusion to the Hazard Ranking System U.S. EPA Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response February 24, 2011 Listening Session.
September 18, 1998 State of Illinois Rules and Regulations Tiered Approach to Corrective Action (TACO) Presented by The Great Plains/Rocky Mountain Technical.
Partitioning and Bioavailability Assessment for Sediments from South Wilmington Wetlands Huan Xia and Upal Ghosh Department of Chemical, Biochemical,
Who’s Risk Is It? Risk-Based Decision-Making in Indian Country Ms. Marilyn Null Deputy for Community-Based Programs U.S. Air Force.
Air Pollution Research Group Analysis of 1999 TRI Data to Identify High Environmental Risk Areas of Ohio by Amit Joshi.
RISK DUE TO AIR POLLUTANTS
Part 1b Part 1b NATURE OF THE ENVIRONMENT AND POPULATIONS; BASIC CONCEPTS OF EXPOSURE, DOSE AND RISK.
Environmental Risk Assessment and Risk Management Kevin L. Long ENVIRON International Corporation Academy Park High School May 12, 2010.
Key Concepts on Health Risk Assessment of Chemical Mixtures.
Risk CHARACTERIZATION
DOSE-RESPONSE ASSESSMENT
Proposed Plan for No Further Action
Anniston PCB Site Review of Risk Assessments for OU-1/OU-2
Jay Peters Gina M. Plantz Richard J. Rago
Environmental sampling and monitoring
Radon Vapor Intrusion Screening Level Calculator
Click to start.
FQPA: “It’s a Good Thing” (for Kids)
Presentation transcript:

Society for Risk Analysis Workshop 3: Application of Web-based Risk Assessment Information System (RAIS) Leslie Galloway, University of Tennessee/Oak Ridge National Laboratory Debra Stewart, University of Tennessee/Oak Ridge National Laboratory Katie Tucker, Ingenium/Oak Ridge National Laboratory RAIS The Risk Assessment Information System Copyright © 2009 The University of Tennessee All Rights Reserved

Instructors

Copyright © 2009 The University of Tennessee All Rights Reserved Schedule RAIS Overview/Navigation Homepage Tutorials User’s List Risk Guidance What’s New Document Search Glossary Support Navigation – Tools and EPA Tools Data Assessment ARARs – Federal and State Chemical Data Profiles Ecological Benchmarks Background Values PRGs – Chemical and Radiological Practice Session #1 Toxicity Assessment Toxicity Profiles Toxicity Values – Chemical and Radiological Toxicity Metadata Radionuclide Decay Chain Practice Session #2 Risk Characterization Risk Models Chemical Risk Calculator Practice Session #3

Copyright © 2009 The University of Tennessee All Rights Reserved

Copyright © 2009 The University of Tennessee All Rights Reserved Tutorials

Copyright © 2009 The University of Tennessee All Rights Reserved User List

Copyright © 2009 The University of Tennessee All Rights Reserved Risk Guidance

Copyright © 2009 The University of Tennessee All Rights Reserved What’s New

Copyright © 2009 The University of Tennessee All Rights Reserved Document Search

Copyright © 2009 The University of Tennessee All Rights Reserved Document Search

Copyright © 2009 The University of Tennessee All Rights Reserved Glossary

Copyright © 2009 The University of Tennessee All Rights Reserved Support

Copyright © 2009 The University of Tennessee All Rights Reserved Navigation - Tools

Copyright © 2009 The University of Tennessee All Rights Reserved Navigation – EPA Tools

Copyright © 2009 The University of Tennessee All Rights Reserved Data Assessment - ARARs

Copyright © 2009 The University of Tennessee All Rights Reserved Data Assessment – Federal ARARs

Copyright © 2009 The University of Tennessee All Rights Reserved Data Assessment – Federal ARARs

Copyright © 2009 The University of Tennessee All Rights Reserved Data Assessment – CA ARARs

Copyright © 2009 The University of Tennessee All Rights Reserved Data Assessment – CA ARARs

Copyright © 2009 The University of Tennessee All Rights Reserved Chemical Data Profiles

Copyright © 2009 The University of Tennessee All Rights Reserved Chemical Data Profiles

Copyright © 2009 The University of Tennessee All Rights Reserved Chemical Data Profiles

Copyright © 2009 The University of Tennessee All Rights Reserved Chemical Data Profiles

Copyright © 2009 The University of Tennessee All Rights Reserved Chemical Data Profiles

Copyright © 2009 The University of Tennessee All Rights Reserved Chemical Data Profiles

Copyright © 2009 The University of Tennessee All Rights Reserved Chemical Data Profiles

Copyright © 2009 The University of Tennessee All Rights Reserved Chemical Data Profiles

Copyright © 2009 The University of Tennessee All Rights Reserved Ecological Benchmarks

Copyright © 2009 The University of Tennessee All Rights Reserved Ecological Benchmarks

Copyright © 2009 The University of Tennessee All Rights Reserved Ecological Benchmarks

Copyright © 2009 The University of Tennessee All Rights Reserved Ecological Benchmarks

Copyright © 2009 The University of Tennessee All Rights Reserved Background Values

Copyright © 2009 The University of Tennessee All Rights Reserved Background Values

Copyright © 2009 The University of Tennessee All Rights Reserved Background Values

Copyright © 2009 The University of Tennessee All Rights Reserved Preliminary Remediation Goals (PRGs)

Copyright © 2009 The University of Tennessee All Rights Reserved Chemical PRGs

Copyright © 2009 The University of Tennessee All Rights Reserved Chemical PRGs

Copyright © 2009 The University of Tennessee All Rights Reserved Chemical PRGs

Copyright © 2009 The University of Tennessee All Rights Reserved Chemical PRGs

Copyright © 2009 The University of Tennessee All Rights Reserved Chemical PRGs

Copyright © 2009 The University of Tennessee All Rights Reserved Radiological PRGs

Copyright © 2009 The University of Tennessee All Rights Reserved Radiological PRGs

Copyright © 2009 The University of Tennessee All Rights Reserved Radiological PRGs

Copyright © 2009 The University of Tennessee All Rights Reserved Radiological PRGs

Copyright © 2009 The University of Tennessee All Rights Reserved Radiological PRGs

Copyright © 2009 The University of Tennessee All Rights Reserved Radiological PRGs

Copyright © 2009 The University of Tennessee All Rights Reserved Data Assessment Practice Your San Francisco 0.5 acre residential site in alluvial soil and groundwater has the following contaminants: – Benzene in soil at 50 mg/kg – Arsenic in soil at 5 mg/kg – Toluene in groundwater at 5 ug/L Screen against PRGs, Primary MCLs, and generic background to determine the COPCs.

Copyright © 2009 The University of Tennessee All Rights Reserved Data Assessment Practice Results When getting ARAR make sure you use California for Primary Drinking Water MCL. When calculating soil PRG select San Francisco for PEF and VF. All others are default. When getting soil background make sure to get mean for proper soil type.

Copyright © 2009 The University of Tennessee All Rights Reserved Toxicity Profiles

Copyright © 2009 The University of Tennessee All Rights Reserved Toxicity Profiles

Copyright © 2009 The University of Tennessee All Rights Reserved Toxicity Values

Copyright © 2009 The University of Tennessee All Rights Reserved Chemical Toxicity Values

Copyright © 2009 The University of Tennessee All Rights Reserved Radiological Toxicity Values

Copyright © 2009 The University of Tennessee All Rights Reserved Chemical Toxicity Metadata

Copyright © 2009 The University of Tennessee All Rights Reserved Chemical Toxicity Metadata

Copyright © 2009 The University of Tennessee All Rights Reserved Radionuclide Decay Chain

Copyright © 2009 The University of Tennessee All Rights Reserved Radionuclide Decay Chain

Copyright © 2009 The University of Tennessee All Rights Reserved Radionuclide Decay Chain

Copyright © 2009 The University of Tennessee All Rights Reserved Toxicity Assessment Practice Aldrin, Ametryn, Dieldrin, ethylbenzene, vinyl chloride are your COPCs. – What is the common RfD target organ for these chemicals? ________________ – What would you need to be concerned about if all COPC concentrations were less than PRG? _______________________________________________________ – What’s the only known human carcinogen? ___________________ – What is the primary use of vinyl chloride? _____________________ – What contaminant is found in cigarette smoke? _________________ – Which COPC has the most toxic oral slope factor?_________________ inhalation unit risk? ____________ RfD___________, RfC_________?

Copyright © 2009 The University of Tennessee All Rights Reserved Toxicity Assessment Practice Results Aldrin, Ametryn, Dieldrin, ethylbenzene, vinyl chloride are your COPCs. – What is the common RfD target organ for these chemicals? Liver – What would you need to be concerned about if all were less than PRG? The additive effect of multiple chemicals on one organ may pose a risk even if all of the COPCs are below target hazard quotient. – What’s the only known human carcinogen? Vinyl chloride – What is the primary use of vinyl chloride? To make PVC – What contaminant is found in cigarette smoke? Ethylbenzene – Which COPC has the most toxic oral slope factor? Aldrin, inhalation unit risk? Aldrin, RfD? Aldrin, RfC? Vinyl chloride.

Copyright © 2009 The University of Tennessee All Rights Reserved Risk Models

Copyright © 2009 The University of Tennessee All Rights Reserved Chemical Risk Calculator

Copyright © 2009 The University of Tennessee All Rights Reserved Chemical Risk Calculator

Copyright © 2009 The University of Tennessee All Rights Reserved Chemical Risk Calculator

Copyright © 2009 The University of Tennessee All Rights Reserved Chemical Risk Calculator

Copyright © 2009 The University of Tennessee All Rights Reserved Chemical Risk Calculator

Copyright © 2009 The University of Tennessee All Rights Reserved Chemical Risk Calculator

Copyright © 2009 The University of Tennessee All Rights Reserved Chemical Risk Calculator

Copyright © 2009 The University of Tennessee All Rights Reserved Chemical Risk Calculator

Copyright © 2009 The University of Tennessee All Rights Reserved Chemical Risk Calculator

Copyright © 2009 The University of Tennessee All Rights Reserved Chemical Risk Calculator

Copyright © 2009 The University of Tennessee All Rights Reserved Chemical Risk Calculator

Copyright © 2009 The University of Tennessee All Rights Reserved Chemical Risk Calculator

Copyright © 2009 The University of Tennessee All Rights Reserved Risk Characterization Practice You developed the following CSM for your 50 acre site in San Francisco. Your site is an adult prison where average served sentence is 30 years and guards average employment is 10 years. The prison was built in a former chemical processing facility. Perform the risk assessment for each potential landuse for the following soil and air data. Hint: no children are present; adjust ED; prisoners don’t get 2 weeks of vacation.

Copyright © 2009 The University of Tennessee All Rights Reserved Risk Characterization for Inmates

Copyright © 2009 The University of Tennessee All Rights Reserved Risk Characterization for Guards

Copyright © 2009 The University of Tennessee All Rights Reserved Risk Characterization Analysis What receptor is likely to exhibit systemic effects from exposure to ambient air, the guards or inmates? _________________ Is soil exposure to guards and inmates likely to result in harmful systemic effects? _______ What chemical is driving cancer risk for guards and inmates exposed to air? _________ What chemical is driving cancer risk for guards and inmates exposed to soil? ____________ What could be done for the guards to lower cancer risk to 1E-05? _____________________

Copyright © 2009 The University of Tennessee All Rights Reserved Risk Characterization Results for Inmates For the inmate, I used resident landuse and only entered exposure parameters for adult (16-30yrs). I put zeros in for all other age cohorts. ED was 30 yrs, EF was 365 d/yr, ET was 24 hrs. Change Climatic Zone to San Fran for VF and ED. Change As to 50 acres.

Copyright © 2009 The University of Tennessee All Rights Reserved Risk Characterization Results for Guards For the inmate, I used resident landuse and only entered exposure parameters for adult (16-30yrs). I put zeros in for all other age cohorts. ED was 30 yrs, EF was 365 d/yr, ET was 24 hrs. Change Climatic Zone to San Fran for VF and ED. Change As to 50 acres.

Copyright © 2009 The University of Tennessee All Rights Reserved Risk Characterization Analysis Results What receptor is likely to exhibit systemic effects from exposure to ambient air, the guards or inmates? inmates Is soil exposure to guards and inmates likely to result in harmful systemic effects? No What chemical is driving cancer risk for guards and inmates exposed to air? Benzidine What chemical is driving cancer risk for guards and inmates exposed to soil? Chloroform What could be done for the guards to lower cancer risk to 1E-05? Lower ED, lower EF, wear respirators, etc.