What do you know about the Rigor/Relevance framework?

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Rigor/Relevance: Integrated Instruction & Student Engagement Liholiho Group Data Coaches & STEM RTs.
Advertisements

The 3 R’s IGOR ELEVENCE ELATIONSHIPS.
The Rigor and Relevance Framework: A lesson
School Board Workshop January 11, 2006 Rigorous and Relevant Questions/Assignments? Alison Adler and Rosemarie Backhus The Department of Safe Schools Secondary.
In Your Walkthroughs… Do You See Rigorous and Relevant Questions/Assignments? High School Learning Team Meeting October 26, 2005.
Rigor/Relevance/Relationships Working in Quadrant D.
Title I School Improvement Where have we been? Where are we going? Presented by Jan Stanley, State Title I Director April 2009.
Session 4 Rigor and Relevance Problem-Based Learning
How to engage students through Rigor, Relevance & Relationships
Understanding Depth 0f knowledge
Why this Research? 1.High School graduates are facing increased need for high degree of literacy, including the capacity to comprehend texts, but comprehension.
RIGOR AND RELEVANCE.
An Overview of Webb’s Depth of Knowledge
Securing Academic Rigor for Secondary Students RELEVANCE, RIGOR & EUREKA! NAGC, November 2007 Dr. Cecelia Boswell ©Dr. Cecelia Boswell, ACES, Austin Creek.
Rigor, Relevance, Relationships, & Results
1 Implementing the standards cannot simply mean informing teachers about what the designers of the standards intended or providing them with videos of.
Intellectual Challenge of Teaching
LoTi / H.E.A.T. Lori Whitman LTC2E, Director KIDS / SSOS Consultant
Rationale for CI 2300 Teaching and Learning in the Digital Age.
1 1*. 2 After studying and practicing with the Rigor & Relevance Framework tools, teachers will be able to write lesson plans and develop learning experiences.
Where the Rubber Hits the Road – Next Generation Assessments Susan Gendron, Senior Fellow International Center for Leadership in Education October 3, 2011.
RIGOR, RELEVANCE, RELATIONSHIPS, & RESULTS Presented By: Kim Powell and Kim Dye November 10 th, 2012.
Introduction to digiCOACH Empowering Instructional Leaders Common Core Edition.
Teaching for Rigor and Relevance Why, What, How? Dr. Kelly Gillespie SWPRSC.
1. Read a description of a science experiment and list the necessary materials to perform the experiment. 2. Locate and read a current article on stem.
What Our Students Need Most The 7 Fundamental Conditions of Learning.
Robin Sabo, Clear Creek ISD. What is rigor? Or is rigor more that that But what about in education? Harder Challenging Focused on higher thinking levels.
Project-Based Learning Training What is the problem with current education methods?
Did you know… “ We are currently preparing students for jobs that don’t yet exist using technologies that haven’t yet been invented in order to solve problems.
MR. RAJA HASAN KHAN THE CITY SCHOOL GULSHAN BOYS CAMPUS SENIOR SECTION : BUSINESS STUDIES ACTION PLAN For Oct.2011 Intel® Getting Starting Course.
“In years to come, your students may forget what you taught them
To Examine Curriculum, Instruction, and Assessment.
Teaching Today: An Introduction to Education 8th edition
Dillon School District Two Revised Bloom’s Taxonomy.
Who is Benjamin Bloom? Bloom developed the “Taxonomy of Cognitive Objectives.” In the 1950’s, the taxonomy was developed by Benjamin Bloom, a professor.
Developing Assessments for and of Deeper Learning [Day 2b-afternoon session] Santa Clara County Office of Education June 25, 2014 Karin K. Hess, Ed.D.
MR. RAJA HASAN KHAN THE CITY SCHOOL GULSHAN BOYS CAMPUS SENIOR SECTION : BUSINESS STUDIES ACTION PLAN For Sep.2011 Intel® Getting Starting Course.
Project Based Learning Learning Through Discovery.
Engaging Students through Rigorous and Relevant Instruction.
Multimedia/Hypermedia + Distance Education Benefits for Teachers and Students ETEC 602 Assignment #3 Carol Mehlhaff Nova Southeastern University.
Coaching Rigor in the Classroom: Text Complexity and Close Reading Diane Hubona March 15, 2013.
RIGOR & RELEVANCE NEW TEACHER MEETING SEPTEMBER 21, 2009 NEW TEACHER MEETING SEPTEMBER 21, 2009.
Common Core State Standards An overview for Professional Development Leads March 8, 2010 Mary Russell, Region 3 Joyce Gardner, Region 8.
Rigor and Relevance Training Alison Owens Agenda Introductions Introductions How do you learn best activity How do you learn best activity Review of.
International Center for Leadership in Education Common Core Rigor and Relevance.
Welcome to Rigor + Relevance+Web.20 =Results or Can you see your way to Quadrant D? BJ Bagwell, Ph.D Susan Milligan.
Considering the 21 st Century Learner Joe Ferrara Director of Science, FWISD.
Nurturing Active, Deep, and Engaging Learning for Students of Color Tony Lamair Burks II, Ed.D. Superintendent-in-Residence National Center for Urban School.
Grade 7 & 8 Mathematics Reporter : Richard M. Oco Ph. D. Ed.Mgt-Student.
Bloom’s Taxonomy The Concept of “Levels of Thinking”
Teaching for Rigor and Relevance Why, What, How? Dr. Kelly Gillespie SWPRSC.
Building in the Three R’s An Introduction to Rigor, Relevance, and Relationship Edited from a PLS presentation for Lenoir County Public Schools Presented.
Is Your Lesson Rigorous and Relevant?  Exploring the Rigor and Relevant Framework  Exploring Questioning.
Project Based Learning at Island View School Originally presented at the School District 8 Principals’ Meeting, January 19, 2011 by John Sheehan, Erin.
Building Effective Content Literacy Tasks. The Cycle of Assessment Teach: Does the instruction and the tasks align to the identified learning target(s)?
T EACHING WITH R IGOR AND R ELEVANCE Northside Elementary June 2013.
Building a System-Wide Focus On Student Achievement Joe Shannon September 30, 2011.
Teaching and Learning Cycle and Differentiated Instruction A Perfect Fit Rigor Relevance Quality Learning Environment Differentiation.
Day Two Agenda  The Big Picture  CIR – Phase 2  CIR – Phase 3  Preparing for Coaching Visit  Wrap Up and Next Steps.
Bloom’s Taxonomy (different types of questioning)
Rigor / Relevance Framework
Rigor/Relevance For All Students Common CORE January, 2013
“Unpacking” our modules-building modules that meet LDC criteria
SEMS STEAM 2016.
Rigor and Relevance: A Must for 21st Century Learners
Rigor/Relevance Framework
EXPLICIT DIRECT INSTRUCTION
Skills for Learning, Life and Work
Assessment and Higher-Order Thinking
Synthesis Evaluation Analysis Application Comprehension Knowledge
Presentation transcript:

What do you know about the Rigor/Relevance framework? Edited from a PLS presentation for Middle School in Vinton, Iowa

Why Rigor & Relevance? Many Iowa schools have adopted this model as a tool to improve instruction because it . . . Engages all teachers in school-wide efforts, Focuses on instruction, Provides a common vocabulary with which to discuss teaching and learning.

Rigor 6. Evaluation 5. Synthesis 4. Analysis 3. Application New Bloom’s Taxonomy 6. Evaluation 5. Synthesis 4. Analysis 3. Application 2. Comprehension 1. Knowledge/ Awareness Creating Evaluating Analyzing Applying Understanding Remembering

When is a Task Rigorous? Students… think deeply about a problem analyze new situations interpret and synthesize knowledge bring ideas together in a new or creative way develop and justify their own criteria for evaluation are intellectually challenged

Relevance Knowledge is less connected to realistic situations and has less apparent value beyond school Knowledge is clearly connected to realistic situations and has value beyond school Knowledge in one discipline Apply in one discipline Apply across disciplines Apply to real-world predictable situations Apply to real-world unpredictable situations

When is a Task Relevant? Value beyond school Addresses an actual problem of contemporary significance Builds on students’ real-life experiences Has students communicate knowledge beyond the classroom Students recognize the connection between classroom knowledge and situations outside the classroom

C D A B Adaptation High Rigor – Low Relevance High Rigor – High Relevance Adaptation A Low Rigor – Low Relevance B Low Rigor – High Relevance

Quadrant A Represents simple recall & basic understanding of knowledge for its own sake. Students gather and store bits of knowledge and information. Students are primarily expected to remember or understand this acquired knowledge. Low Rigor – Low Relevance C D A B 8

Quadrant B Students use acquired knowledge to complete tasks with a connection outside school. Activities or tasks involve lifelike situations. Does not require higher order thinking. Low Rigor – High Relevance C D A B 9

Quadrant C Students are thinking deeply about a problem in the discipline. Represents more complex thinking but has less clear value outside of school. Students extend and refine their acquired knowledge to be able to use that knowledge automatically and routinely to analyze, solve problems and create unique solutions. High Rigor – Low Relevance C D A B 10

Quadrant D Students are thinking deeply and there is a connection to lifelike situations. Even when confronted with unknowns, students are able to use extensive knowledge and skills to create solutions and take action that further develops their skills & knowledge. High Rigor – High Relevance C D A B 11

Student-Teacher Engagement In the Rigor/Relevance Framework there are different degrees of student engagement. In the following slide there is a description of student engagement. Decide in which quadrant it would fit best.

Students are thinking deeply about teacher-directed questions Students are thinking deeply about teacher-directed questions. Which quadrant? C D A B A B C D 13

Teacher is doing the working and the thinking. Which quadrant? B A B C D 14

Students are working on teacher-directed, real-life problems Students are working on teacher-directed, real-life problems. Which quadrant? C D A B A B C D 15

Students are working and thinking. Teacher is working & thinking. Rigor & Relevance: Student – Teacher Engagement C Students are working and thinking. D Teacher is working & thinking. A B R I GOR RELEVANCE