EPA’S DRAFT GUIDELINES TO STATES FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF STATE 111(d) PLANS MIDWESTERN POWER SECTOR COLLABORATIVE JUNE 17, 2014 FRANZ LITZ PROGRAM CONSULTANT.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Carbon Dioxide Emissions Costs and Electricity Resource Planning New Mexico Public Regulation Commission Case No UT March 28, 2007 Presented.
Advertisements

DG Energy and Transport, European Commission Fabrizio Barbaso 17/04/2008 EU RENEWABLE ENERGY PROPOSALS ARF Energy Security Seminar EUROPEAN COMMISSION.
1 Proposed Rulemaking to Implement Provisions of the Federal Clean Air Interstate Rule Environmental Quality Board Meeting Harrisburg, PA February 20,
Change picture on Slide Master CO2 Performance Standards New & Existing Coal Plants SSEB Annual Meeting October 15, 2013 PRESENTED BY Angela J. Levin Troutman.
KEEA Conference October 2013 Carbon Pollution Standards for Power Plants under Section 111 of the CAA: How Energy Efficiency Can Help States Comply 1 Jackson.
1 It's All in the Numbers: Options for State and Regional Compliance Tracking for EPA's Clean Power Plan Lars Kvale - Managing Director APX Environmental.
EPA’s draft guidelines to states for the development of state 111(d) PLANS NORTH DAKOTA ALLIANCE FOR RENEWABLE ENERGY OCTOBER 22, 2014 Franz Litz PROGRAM.
EPA’s Clean Power Plan Proposed Rules for Reducing GHG Emissions from Power Plants Presentation to ACPAC June 16,
Prospective new EPA rules on existing source greenhouse gas emissions National Lieutenant Governors Association Oklahoma City, OK July 19, 2013 Eugene.
1 AEP Perspectives on Development and Commercialization of CCS Technology for Natural Gas Power Generation Matt Usher, P.E. Director – New Technology Development.
EDDIE TERRILL AIR QUALITY DIVISION DEPT. OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY AUGUST 21, 2014 EPA’s 111(d) Clean Power Plan Rule: A DEQ Perspective.
EPA Clean Power Plan. Emission Targets StateInterim Goal Final Goal 2030 AECI 2013 Net Rate Interim Reduction Final Reduction Missouri 1,6211,5441, %21.3%
NARUC 2015 Winter Meeting February 16, 2015 Combined Heat and Power and the Clean Power Plan Bruce Hedman Institute for Industrial Productivity.
Modeling a Clean Energy Standard Karen Palmer Senior Fellow Resources for the Future USAEE/IAEE Annual Conference Washington, DC October.
Clean and Affordable Energy Future in Northwest U.S. Nancy Hirsh NW Energy Coalition October 1, 2014.
Update on EPA Activities MOPC July 15-16, Current Known Impacts –Retirements –De-ratings –Outage Impact Studies Proposed Clean Power Plan 2 Topics.
Recent EPA Regulation Development Presented by Bill Luthans to the 56 th Meeting of the Joint Advisory Committee Meeting for the Improvement of Air Quality.
EPA Rulemakings to Set GHG Emission Standards for Power Plants National Hydropower Association Webinar Kyle Danish February 14, 2014.
Air Protection Branch 1. 2 Air Quality Activities Support the Mission of the Air Protection Branch Monitor and Report Air Quality Data Analysis and Planning.
EPA Regulations On Electric Utility Generating Units (EGU)
Clean Air Act Section 111(d) Indiana Energy Association September 11, 2014 Thomas W. Easterly, P.E., BCEE Commissioner IN Department of Environmental Management.
EPA’s Clean Power Plan Rule:
EPA Basics on Clean Air Act Sec. 111(d) Reducing Carbon Emissions from Existing Power Plants NW Energy Coalition May 2, 2014.
CHEAPER AND CLEANER: Using the Clean Air Act to Sharply Reduce Carbon Pollution from Existing Power Plants, Delivering Health, Environmental and Economic.
Advanced Fossil Energy Projects Loan Guarantee Solicitation November 2013.
1 Regulatory Concepts Related to the Control of NOx and SOx From Fossil- fired Electric Generating Units Air Quality Technical Advisory Committee Meeting.
Clean Power Plan EPA’s Clean Power Plan An overview of EPA’s proposed rules and the implications for the future Presented by: David Crews SVP - Power Supply.
Energy Efficiency in the Clean Power Plan Opportunities for Virginia Mary Shoemaker Research Assistant Spring 2015 VAEEC Meeting May 11, 2015.
Can CCS Help Protect the Climate?. Key Points Climate Protection requires a budget limit on cumulative GHG emissions. Efficiency, Renewable Electric,
CLEAN ENERGY TO PROMOTE CLEAN AIR & IMPROVE ELECTRICITY PRICE STABILITY Alden Hathaway, ERT Debra Jacobson, GWU Law School April 6, 2006.
OPTIONS FOR STATES IMPLEMENTING CARBON STANDARDS FOR POWER PLANTS ARKANSAS STAKEHOLDER MEETING MAY 28, 2014 FRANZ LITZ PROGRAM CONSULTANT.
Electric Utility Greenhouse Gas Emissions Reduction Second Rule Development Workshop December 5, 2007 Department of Environmental Protection Division of.
EPA’s Final Clean Power Plan: Overview Steve Burr AQD, SIP Section September 1, 2015.
EPA’s Proposed Clean Power Plan U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.
Clean Power Plan - Final Rule Overview Mark Leath, PE Prepared for - Missouri Air Conservation Commission September 24, 2015.
Clean Air Act Section 111(d) Indiana State Bar Association Utility Law Section September 4, 2014 Thomas W. Easterly, P.E., BCEE Commissioner IN Department.
Developing a Framework for Offset Use in RGGI Opportunities and Risks Dale Bryk, NRDC and Brian Jones, MJB&A – Northeast Regional GHG Coalition RGGI Stakeholder.
EPA’s Proposed Federal Clean Power Plan Steve Burr AQD, SIP Section October 6, 2015.
EPA’s Clean Power Plan: Compliance Options and Engagement Opportunities Vicki Arroyo, Executive Director Gabe Pacyniak, Mitigation Program Manager Lissa.
EPA’s Proposed Clean Power Plan House Committee on Natural Resources and Environment February 12, 2015 Tegan B. Treadaway Assistant Secretary Office of.
California Energy Commission IEPR Lead Commissioner Workshop University of California, Irvine August 17,
Indiana Energy Conference EPA Clean Power Plan—111(d) November 13, 2014 Thomas W. Easterly, P.E., BCEE, Commissioner IN Department of Environmental Management.
CLEAN POWER PLAN PROPOSAL Reducing Carbon Pollution From Existing Power Plants Kerry Drake,Associate Director Air Division, US EPA, Region 9 California.
Use of Renewable Energy and Energy Efficiency to Reduce Regional Haze in the West Air Innovations Conference Chicago, Illinois August 10-12, 2004 Rick.
June 26, Background of Federal GHG Regulation Supreme Court determines greenhouse gases (GHGs) are “air pollutants” under the Clean Air Act U.S.
Clean Air Interstate Rule (CAIR) CAIR Model Cap and Trade Rules: Unique Elements and Flexibilities Office of Air and Radiation March 2005.
California Public Utilities Commission CPUC Climate Change Activities Paul Clanon Executive Director August 28, 2007 Presentation to the Senate Energy,
Overview of EPA’s Final Clean Air Act Section 111(d) Emissions Guidelines for Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Existing Electric Generating Units Overview.
Clean Power Plan: Overview of Proposed Federal Plan and Model Rules Clean Power Plan: Overview of Proposed Federal Plan and Model Rules Air Quality Committee.
Clean Power Plan – Now What? OCTOBER 16, 2015 FALL PR-MR & MARKETING MEETING.
Clean Power Plan TENNESSEE MINING CONFERENCE AGENDA November 3, 2015 John Myers Director, Environmental Policy and Regulatory Affairs.
Clean Power Plan Compliance Pathways
EPA’s Greenhouse Gas Rules NOVEMBER 6, Overview Greater stringency overall: 32 percent vs. 30 percent reductions by 2030; setting the stage post-2030.
©2010 Foley & Lardner LLP EPRC 5 EPI’s 5 th Annual Energy Policy Research Conference Will The Clean Power Plan Make It Through The Courts? September 11,
FINAL CLEAN POWER PLAN Before the Virginia Energy Efficiency Council Virginia Department of Environmental Quality November 12, 2015.
Impacts of Environmental Regulations in the ERCOT Region Dana Lazarus Planning Analyst, ERCOT January 26, 2016.
Clean Air Act Section 111 WESTAR Meeting Presented by Lisa Conner U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Office of Air and Radiation November 6, 2013.
Proposed Carbon Pollution Standard For New Power Plants Presented by Kevin Culligan Office of Air Quality Planning And Standards Office of Air and Radiation.
Reaching Clean Power Plan Goals at ‘No’ Cost: Securing the Smart Grid’s Potential.
Clean Power Plan EW Tim Wilson Director of Energy Supply Services.
© 2015 Haynes and Boone, LLP Overview of the EPA Clean Power Plan Suzanne Beaudette Murray February 19, 2016 Tulane Environmental Law Summit.
Viability of Carbon Capture and Sequestration Retrofits for Existing Coal- fired Power Plants under an Emission Trading Scheme CEDM Annual Meeting May.
Clean Power Plan Kyra Moore Director, Air Pollution Control Program Prepared for: Midwest Energy Policy Conference October 6, 2015.
 Final Plan published on October 23, 2015  Employs different method to develop state targets  Uses the proposal’s first three building blocks ◦ BB1.
The Clean Power Plan.  Standards of Performance for GHG Emissions from New, Modified, and Reconstructed Stationary Sources (111(b)).  Carbon Pollution.
Western State Targets and Key Issues Patrick Cummins, CNEE September 10, 2015.
Integrated Resource Plan 2016
NSPS Rulemakings for Greenhouse Gas Emissions
Summary Climate change is a threat in the U.S. -- We are already feeling the dangerous and costly effects of a changing climate – affecting people’s.
Clean Air Act Section 111(d)
Presentation transcript:

EPA’S DRAFT GUIDELINES TO STATES FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF STATE 111(d) PLANS MIDWESTERN POWER SECTOR COLLABORATIVE JUNE 17, 2014 FRANZ LITZ PROGRAM CONSULTANT

The Federal-State Framework EPA issues standards for new sources (under §111(b) of the Clean Air Act) EPA’s guidelines under 111(d) State 111(d) plans: – Single state plans; or – Regional plans If state fails to submit plan, or the plan is inadequate, EPA must impose federal plan 2

Summary of EPA 111(d) Guidelines Dubbed EPA’s “Clean Power Plan” Sets minimum stringency for a state—called “state goals” that apply in aggregate to the state’s “affected” electric generating units Establishes a compliance time period of ten years, with an interim target to apply on average between 2020 and 2029, and a final target in 2030 Guidelines give states very broad flexibility to achieve state goals through any “efficacious means” 3

4 Source: Bloomberg New Energy Finance State Goals as Tons Reduced from 2012

State Goals as % Reduction from Source: Bloomberg New Energy Finance

“Adjusted Output-Weighted Average CO2 Emission Rates” TOTAL CO 2 EMISSIONS from Coal-, Oil- & Gas-fired Steam, Natural Gas Combined Cycle & “Other” Units (Affected EGUs) TOTAL NET ENERGY OUTPUT From Affected EGUs + Renewables + New Nuclear + 6% at-risk nuclear + cumulative annual EE savings Lbs MWh

Heat Rate Improvements at Coal Plants 6% through both O&M and plant upgrades Increased Utilization of Existing Natural Gas Plants Dial up existing NGCC to 70% capacity factor Increased Utilization of Zero Carbon Resources, Including Nuclear and Renewables Operate New Nuclear Plants, Preserve the 6% of Existing Nuclear capacity that EIA projects would retire; & Achieve renewables generation consistent with average regional renewables target Achieve 1.5% Energy Savings through End-Use Energy Efficiency Starting where a state is, increase energy savings at a rate of 0.2% per year until state reaches 1.5% BUILDING BLOCKS

Heat Rate Improvements at Coal Plants Increased Utilization of Existing Natural Gas Plants Increased Utilization of Zero Carbon Resources, Including Nuclear and Renewables Achieve 1.5% Energy Savings through End-Use Energy Efficiency OTHER “BUILDING BLOCKS” Co-firing lower carbon fuels Retirements New Natural Gas Plants Distributed Generation, Combined Heat and Power Carbon capture & storage (e.g. EOR-related) Gains from Trade/Regional Compliance

State Approaches in 111(d) Plans Work with rate-based goal or convert rate to mass-based goal; Broad flexibility in the approach taken by states EPA says flexibility allows states to recognize “remaining useful life” 9

Direct vs. “Portfolio” Measures Direct emissions limits apply to affected units. “Portfolio” measures are enforceable obligations on a 3 rd party—either a private or govt. entity that is not the owner/operator of affected units; they present enforcement issues 10

Rulemaking Timeline Draft guideline published in Federal Register ( ) 120-day Public Comment Period (≈ ) Final Rule June 2015

Required Elements in State Plan From the Preamble (p.117): 1.Enforceable measures that reduce EGU CO 2 emissions; 2.Projected achievement of emission performance equivalent to goals established by the EPA, on a timeline equivalent to that in the emission guidelines; 3.Quantifiable and verifiable emission reductions; 4.A process for reporting on plan implementation, progress toward achieving CO 2 goals, and implementation of corrective actions, if necessary.

State Planning Timeline Final Rule June 2015 State plan timing: – Initial state submittal in June 2016 – One-year extension possible for adopting single- state plans – Two-year extension possible for adopting regional plans Programs go into effect upon adoption of state plans, unless superseded by federal plan