Unit A Informational Meeting Unit A MOA Summary and S/E Summary.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Presented by Hardy Murphy, Ph.D. Superintendent of Schools Evanston/Skokie School District 65 Professional Appraisal System.
Advertisements

Elements of High Quality Preschool Programs New Jersey Administrative Code N.J.A.C. 6A:13A.
Training for Teachers and Specialists
Workplace Safety and Insurance Board | Commission de la sécurité professionnelle et de lassurance contre les accidents du travail Safety Groups Validation.
Discuss the charge of the Michigan Council for Educator Effectiveness (MCEE) Summarize the MCEE Interim Report Provide an Overview of the Pilot.
Promotion and Tenure Workshop 1. Evaluation Procedure There is only one evaluation procedure leading to recommendations regarding promotion, tenure and.
Promotion and Tenure Faculty Senate May 8, To be voted on.
Overview of the New Massachusetts Educator Evaluation Framework October 2011.
The SCPS Professional Growth System
In August, the historic CORE district waiver was approved allowing these districts to pursue a new robust and holistic accountability model for schools.
Regulation and Credit Framework for the Conferment of Awards Quality and Standards Office.
Credit for Demonstrated Mastery (CDM): Policy Overview & Conversation WS/FCS Board of Education Meeting Paula B. Wilkins & Kenneth Simington January 28,
Human Capital Investment Programme Disability Activation Project (DACT) WELCOME Support Workshop Thursday 7 th February
Contract Faculty Evaluations. AGENDA Review of Information Packet Ground Rules Purpose of Evaluation Evaluation Procedures Evaluation Criteria Time Line.
New Hanover County Schools Board of Education Presentation November 5, 2013.
Course Enrollment Guidelines for Masters Students, for the Fall Semester of 2011/12 For more information you may contact the School Office: Sunday through.
1 Monthly Rules Education Session January 2012 Transfer Eligibility.
Evaluation Orientation Meeting Teacher Evaluation System
Santa Rosa County District Schools Evaluation Systems.
Overview of SB 191 Ensuring Quality Instruction through Educator Effectiveness Colorado Department of Education Updated: July 2011.
What You Must Know About Teacher Extension and Renewal Presented by: Maureen Sloane Dianna Hanlon.
SEED – CT’s System for Educator and Evaluation and Development April 2013 Wethersfield Public Schools CONNECTICUT ADMINISTRATOR EVALUATION Overview of.
Wethersfield Teacher Evaluation and Support Plan
DPAS II Jessica Baker & Cheryl Cresci MED 7701 Dr. Joseph Massare.
... and what it means for teachers of non-tested subjects Johanna J. Siebert, Ph.D. NAfME Symposium on Assessment June 24-25, 2012.
SLG Goals, Summative Evaluations, and Assessment Guidance Training LCSD#7 10/10/14.
Osceola School District’s Classroom Instructor Evaluation The Ins and Outs of Our Classroom Instructor Evaluation
Compass: Module 3 Student Growth.
Sub-heading ADMINISTRATOR EVALUATION AND SUPPORT SYSTEM Curriculum, Instruction and Assessment Leader Proposed Adaptations.
TEACHER EVALUATION What it is going to look like….
Introduction to Teacher Evaluation August 20, 2014 Elizabeth M. Osga, Ph.D.
Teacher Practice in  In 2012, the New Jersey Legislature unanimously passed the TEACHNJ Act, which mandates implementation of a new teacher.
Teacher Evaluation System LSKD Site Administrator Training August 6, 2014.
PUSD Teacher Evaluation SY12/13 Governing Board Presentation May 10, 2012.
PROCEDURES TO USE TO ESTABLISH STANDARDS DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEES TO REPLACE COMMON CORE'S STANDARDS 1.
PUSD Teacher Evaluation SY 13/14 Governing Board Presentation May 9, 2013 Dr. Heather Cruz, Deputy Superintendent.
C ONTRA C OSTA P ROFESSIONAL D EVELOPMENT P ROGRAM FOR AB212 S TATE F UNDED P ROGRAM P ARTICIPANTS
Instructional Hours Required Instructional Time / OAR
AGREEMENT BETWEEN The Robbinsville Board of Education and The Robbinsville Education Association
OTES & OPES DEADLINES/REQUIREMENTS/CHANGES
Freehold Borough Teacher Evaluation System Freehold Intermediate School Friday – February 15, 2013 Rich Pepe Director of Curriculum & Instruction.
Overview of the New Massachusetts Educator Evaluation Framework Opening Day Presentation August 26, 2013.
Educator Evaluation Regulations, Mandatory Elements & Implementation MTA Center for Education Policy and Practice August 2014.
Arlington Effective Educator Development System. Philosophy Statement The new evaluation system should be centered on Educators and Evaluators learning.
October 12, College- and Career-Ready Expectations for All Students 2. State-Developed Differentiated Recognition, Accountability, and Support.
For Staff Who Are NOT Administrators & For Whom TPGES/OPGES Does NOT Apply Certified Evaluation Orientation For Staff Who Are NOT Administrators & For.
Marco Ferro, Director of Public Policy Larry Nielsen, Field Consultant With Special Guest Stars: Tammy Pilcher, President Helena Education Association.
WEA General Membership Meeting March 12, 2013 WHS Auditorium.
Collective Bargaining Retreat for Management Discussion of the Impact of Measuring Teacher and Leader Effectiveness on Collective Bargaining August 17,
First Session of the Annual Meeting Deliberative Session February 5, 2015.
The New Massachusetts Principal Evaluation
Sabbatical Workshop Sabbatical Workshop Friday, April 13, :30 – 4:45 p.m. Room N28 Dr. Wallace Smith, VPAA Dr. Elizabeth K. Hawthorne, Chair, Faculty.
Teacher SLTs General Format for Teacher SLTs with a District-wide Common Assessment The percent of students scoring proficient 1 in my 8 th.
HIRING PRACTICES & CRITICAL SHORTAGE LEGISLATION KISA RETREAT JANUARY 15, 2016.
CCCLOC’s Contract Team Presentation of CCCLOC’s Ask and CCC’s Last and Best Offer August 2015 Loretta A. Ragsdell, President Nancey Epperson, Membership.
For Staff Who Are NOT Administrators & For Whom TPGES Does NOT Apply Certified Evaluation Orientation For Staff Who Are NOT Administrators & For Whom TPGES.
Lenoir County Public Schools New North Carolina Principal Evaluation Process 2008.
Educator Supervision and Evaluation Clarke and Diamond MS September 2013.
Introduction to Teacher Evaluation
Sebago Elementary School Withdrawal Committee
BATA Contract Proposals
Introduction to the Marzano Teacher Evaluation Model for USD 259
Teacher SLTs
2007 Article VII # ELFA 8 Education, Labor, and Family Assistance
Rockingham County Public Schools Teacher Evaluation Process
Teacher SLTs
Bonnie R. Nelson Professor Associate Librarian for Information Systems
Teacher SLTs
Teacher SLTs
Sabbatical and Difference-in-Pay Leaves Office of Faculty Advancement
Presentation transcript:

Unit A Informational Meeting Unit A MOA Summary and S/E Summary

Memorandum of Agreement Article 2: Negotiation Procedure Add the following sentence to Paragraph C: “Alternatively, this Agreement may be posted on-line.”

Memorandum of Agreement Article 11: Class Size -- Add the following: 1. The Committee and the Association recognize that class size guidelines for core academic subjects are an important factor in supporting quality education. Class size guidelines PK-8 and average class size guidelines at the high school will be targeted as indicated below: Pre-K22K (average per teacher) 2. Classroom aides may be assigned to classrooms in Pre-K, K and 1 st grades that reach the maximum guidelines for their level if funds are designated for this purpose by the Superintendent and if an aide is recommended by the classroom teacher and the principal and appointed by the Superintendent. 3. If any class in the District exceeds the maximum of the class size guidelines, the administration will: (A) Look at existing school space available to open an additional classroom; (B) Determine whether or not the School District has the financial resources to fund an additional teaching position; (C) If the class size guidelines above are exceeded in any given building or at any particular time, the Principal shall advise the Superintendent that the class size in the particular classroom exceeds the above guidelines. The Superintendent shall thereafter report at the November or March School Committee meeting (whichever may be applicable) in public session that the class size exceeds the guidelines and the excess number of students in each classroom. (D) If the class size guidelines above are exceeded in any given building or at any particular time, the Superintendent shall notify the President of the Association of the particular classroom that exceeds the above guidelines. 4. The District’s final determination shall be final provided that the terms of paragraph 3(C) and (D) above shall be grievable under the provisions of Article III. Grievances may be initiated at Level 3. This Article shall not be subject to the arbitration provisions of the Agreement.”

Memorandum of Agreement Article 30: Sick Leave Modify Paragraph H by deleting the reference to “five (5)” days and replacing with “eight (8)”. Delete the last sentence of Paragraph H. ***Family Sick leave will be 8 days***

Memorandum of Agreement Article 34: Adoption Delete the second paragraph and replace with the following: “Any employee who adopts a child may use up to ten (10) days of his/her sick leave for that purpose. In the case of an international adoption, any employee may use an additional five (5) days for a total of fifteen (15) days for that purpose.”

Memorandum of Agreement Article 53 – Tuition Reimbursement Delete the second sentence that reads, “No teacher may receive more than Four Hundred Dollars ($400.00) per year under this article” and replace with the following: “Teachers may receive tuition reimbursement of up to one thousand dollars ($1,000.00) per school year. An eligible teacher may receive a second grant (of up to $1,000.00) of tuition reimbursement for additional coursework in the same year if there are additional funds that remain in the annual tuition reimbursement allotment for that school year. Eligibility is defined for this paragraph as current enrollment in a degree granting program at an accredited college or university.”

Memorandum of Agreement New Article 56: Workshop Reimb. for Non DESE License Positions Beginning in the school year, the School Committee will set aside a maximum of ten thousand dollars ($10,000.00) for workshop for reimbursement for relicensure of bargaining unit members who only hold a Board of Allied Health or other non DESE license. The maximum reimbursement to an eligible employee, is an amount of five hundred dollars ($500.00) per year for the cost of attending an approved workshop.

Memorandum of Agreement Appendix A: Sunset of Salary Credits The parties agree that the Side letter of Agreement regarding salary credits will sunset at the end of the school year. Appendix A: timing of lane changes Add the following to Paragraph 1: “Lane advancement will be retroactive to the first day of school if a teacher submits all of the completed documentation on or before October 1. Lane advancement will be retroactive to the 93 rd day of school if a teacher submits all of the completed documentation after October 1 but on or before February 1 of the year in which advancement is sought.”

Memorandum of Agreement Appendix A: Masters Equivalency The parties agree to eliminate the Masters Equivalency Lane for all new hires (commencing with the school year). Bargaining unit members who are on the payroll as of the execution of this Agreement shall be grandfathered and have access to the Masters Equivalency Lane for nine (9) years (until the end of the 2022 school year). In addition, anyone who has advanced on the salary schedule due to a Master’s equivalency shall maintain said advancement. Appendix A: Stipends The parties agree to establish a joint committee to review stipends and make recommendations. All parties will abide by their ratification process for any acceptance of the recommendations from the joint committee

Memorandum of Agreement Appendix A Salary Schedules Year One: Effective September 1, 2012, increase the Teacher Salary Schedule by 1%. (Retroactive to the first day of school) Year Two: Effective September 1, 2013, increase the Teacher Salary by 1.5%. Effective September 1, 2013, add new Steps 1 and 2 to the salary schedule. Both steps shall be calculated at 3% below the next higher step. The M45 lane shall not be available to any employee not on the payroll as of the execution of this Agreement. Bargaining unit members who are on the payroll as of the execution of this Agreement but have not yet attained the M45 advancement will have until February 1, 2018 to attain advancement to the M45. No employee shall advance to the M45 lane after February 1, Effective September 1, 2013, individual cells on the salary schedule that are greater than 5.5% from the preceding cell at the next lower step shall be reduced to 5.5% and the cells in the column shall be adjusted appropriately. Effective September 1, 2013 a professional development day shall be added to the annual school calendar for a total of 184 work days for teachers.

Memorandum of Agreement Salaries Cont. Year 3: Effective September 1, 2014, increase the Teacher Salary Schedule by one and a half percent (1.5%). Increase Masters + 30 Step 12 by an additional 0.5% and increase Masters + 60 Step 12 by an additional 1%. Effective on the 93 rd day of the school year, increase the Teacher Salary Schedule by one half percent (.5%). Effective September 1, 2014, a professional development day shall be added to the annual school calendar for a total of 185 work days for teachers.

Supervision and Evaluation

New 2-year Self Directed Plan: Self-Assessment completed by 12/1 Goals and Plan in place by 12/31 *** Goals can be same or similar to current goals *** ***but they MUST be approved by evaluator*** One unannounced observation of at least 15 minutes should occur during the school year

Supervision and Evaluation Second Year of 2-year Self Directed Plan: Formative Assessment meeting by 12/17 and report by 12/31 – Educator Provides: Progress on goals Evidence on the standards (I and II only) – Evaluator Provides: Additional Evidence on Standards (from unannounced observation – if applicable) Feedback on progress Guidance for additional progress – The Educator shall sign and return within 5 days One unannounced Observation of at least 15 minutes during the school year. Summative Evaluation meeting by 4/3. Educator provides evidence and progress on goals. Summative Report by 5/1. Evaluator completes rubrics to justify ratings. Only Standards I and II will be used in

Supervision and Evaluation Non-PTS Developing Educator Plan Self-Assessment completed by 10/1 Goals and Plan in place by 10/15 *** Goals can be same or similar to current goals *** ***but they MUST be approved by evaluator*** Two unannounced observations of at least 15 minutes should occur during the school year One announced observation during the school year (with pre & post conferences) Formative Assessment due by 4/17 Summative Assessment due by 5/1

Supervision and Evaluation Directed Growth Plan Self-Assessment completed by 11/1 Goals and Plan in place by 11/15 *** Goals can be same or similar to current goals *** ***but they MUST be approved by evaluator*** Two unannounced observations of at least 15 minutes should occur during the school year Two announced observations during the school year (with pre & post conferences) Formative Assessment due by 12/31 and 4/17 Summative Assessment due by 5/1

Questions?