Minnesota Mileage Based User Fee Test Results Cory Johnson, PE Office of Traffic, Safety, and Technology MnDOT.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
New Public Transit Alliance (NuPTA) RIPEC Study: Transportation at a Crossroads (2002) Growing Smart with Transit: A Report of the Transit 2020 Working.
Advertisements

I-95/Route 630 Interchange, Alternative E FUNDING (Cumulative) SCHEDULE JULY 2007 JULY 2008 JULY 2009 JULY 2010 JULY 2011 JULY 2012 JULY 2013 JULY 2007.
State Aid Programs An Introduction to: Local Bridge Replacement Program Local Road Improvement.
0 Data Through 2008 Report for Statewide Transportation Plan and Business Plan Performance Measures October 2009 Report to District Engineers Safety 2009.
IntelliDrive for Safety, Mobility, and User Fee Project Cory Johnson Mn/DOT IntelliDrive Program Engineer.
1 Ben Pierce, Battelle March 2, 2010 US DOT IntelliDrive SM Program.
State Aid Programs Legislative Issues - Bonding Local Bridge Replacement Program Local Road Improvement Township Sign Replacement Program.
Minnesotas Congestion Pricing Program Road User Charging Conference January, 2009 By Bernie Arseneau Minnesota (USA) Department of Transportation.
1 Massachusetts Department of Transportation Registry of Motor Vehicles Division Customer Service Experiences Innovation and Improvement December 8, 2011|
R O A D U S E R F E E T A S K F O R C E 1 OREGONS TRANSPORTATION FUNDING CHALLENGE.
1 MAXIMIZING PUBLIC INVESTMENT Ohio Department of Transportation Highway Funding Overview Julie Ray, Deputy Director Division of Finance & Forecasting.
Use of FuelTrac Card for Purchases of Gas for University Vehicles FuelTrac can ONLY be used in State owned Vehicles or those leased through the State Enterprise.
Charging at 120 and 240 Volts 120-Volt Portable Vehicle Charge Cord 240-Volt Home Charge Unit.
 Crashes at rural STOP controlled Intersections  Primary cause where drivers stopped before entering:
 Crashes at rural STOP controlled Intersections  Primary cause where drivers stopped before entering:
Applicants Videoconference January 17,  MnDOT funding began in 2005 with federal transportation bill (SAFETEA-LU)  This solictation uses remaining.
Oregon State Library Transformation Project Launch
30.5.  State funding helps keep tuitions low at public colleges. As a result, more Texans can afford college.  For the years 2000 and 2001, the Texas.
Local Roads Funding in Illinois A County Engineer's Perspective Craig Fink, P.E. County Engineer DeWitt County, Illinois Illinois Asphalt Pavement Association.
Wisconsin Transportation Finance and Policy Commission Freight Rail Day 2012 October 26, 2012.
1 ADA Compliance: Self-evaluations and Transition Plans APA Minnesota State Conference September 28, 2011 Hennepin County’s Experience.
22 October 2013 Latest developments on Distance-based Road Usage Charging “RUC” Jack Opiola D’Artagnan Consulting LLP.
1 This document and its contents are the property of The University of Iowa’s Public Policy Center National Evaluation of a Mileage- Based Road User Charge.
Oregon’s Road User Fee Pilot Program Presented to International Fuel Tax Agreement Managers’ Workshop September 2006 PowerPoint Presentation provided by:
County Transportation Systems Association of MN Counties, MN County Engineers Association, MN Inter-County Association Presentation to MN Senate Transportation.
Counties and Transportation 101 Abbey Bryduck Association of MN Counties Transportation & Infrastructure Policy Analyst March 2015.
Oregon Mileage Fee Concept and Road User Fee Pilot Program Presented to WASHTO Construction and Materials Committee Portland, Oregon April 8, 2008 James.
County Transportation System Governor’s Transportation Advisory Committee September 14, 2012 Abbey Bryduck, AMC Policy Analyst.
Iowa State Association of Counties 2013 Fall School of Instruction November 14, 2013 Stu Anderson Iowa Department of Transportation.
State Aid Design-Build Project Delivery for Minnesota Cities and Counties.
Exploratory Study: Vehicle Mileage Fees in Texas Ginger Goodin Richard T. Baker Texas Transportation Institute Research sponsored by the Texas Department.
1 The Oregon Project: How to Put Together the Pieces of Road Usage Charge Legislation Minnesota Mileage Based User Fee Alliance Workshop St. Paul, Minnesota.
Oregon’s Road Usage Charge Program - SB810 Implementation 2015 AASHTO Audit Conference July 21, 2015.
Vehicle Miles Travelled (VMT) Fees What’s been done? What’s happening? What do you need to know? Trey Baker Texas Transportation Institute, Texas A&M University.
Oregon’s Road User Fee Pilot Program Presented to NEACT LaGrande, Oregon August 4, 2005 James Whitty, Manager Office of Innovative Partnerships and Alternative.
The Challenge of Financing Oregon’s Highways
Funding Your Journey Florida Transportation Economics 101 Presenter’s Name Organization.
MnDOT-ACEC Annual Conference March 5,  Capital planning and programming at MnDOT  Major considerations  A more transparent and collaborative.
The Oregon Road User Fee Concept and Pilot Program Presented to National Surface Transportation Infrastructure Financing Commission Washington DC September.
Metro Cities Transportation Policy Committee August 10, 2015 Overview of Minnesota Highway and Transit Finance.
Construction Conference Construction Conference NDDOT’s: NDDOT’s: Future Federal Funding Future Federal Funding State Legislative & Budget issues.
ABC POLICY DEVELOPMENT IOWA DOT Norman McDonald, PE Iowa Department of Transportation Office of Bridges and Structures MID-CONTINENT TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH.
Mileage based user fees and sustainable transportation funding Dr. Adrian Moore Vice President Reason Foundation.
State Public Transportation Partnership Conference Reauthorization of the Surface Transportation Programs Jack Basso Director of Program Finance and Management.
Greater Minnesota Transit. Greater MN Transit Service (2010) 59 transit agencies –6 Large Urban (more than 50,000 population) –13 Small Urban –40 Rural.
“People should have transportation options.” TRANSPORTATION MOVING PEOPLE AND COMMERCE WHERE THEY WANT AND NEED TO GO.
Textbook Pilots Chief Finance and Facilities Officers Meeting, January 2009.
Agricultural Industries Transportation Services Project.
Liberating road users: Options for progress. Liberating road users at ADC 2 September 24, 2010 How are road users constrained? Governments determine 
IFTA Annual Business Meeting Virginia Beach, VA August 17, 2011 Federal Highway Administration.
Wisconsin Transportation Finance and Policy Commission Transportation Day at the Capitol February 23, 2012.
Transportation Finance Advisory Committee May 18, 2012.
Status of Funding and Authorization Subcommittee's of Traffic Engineering and Operations and Management Manchester NH 2009 Ken Kobetsky.
Value Pricing Study January 22, 2015, MPOAC Meeting.
AMPO October 22, South Florida Region.
Public Transportation Coordination – Barriers, Constraints & Opportunities Texas Transportation Commission November 16, 2006.
Discussion of Crime Control Prevention District Telecommunications Services Sales Tax & Legislative Changes Related to Local Sales & Use Tax on Residential.
PUBLIC WORKS FY 2012 Proposed Budget May 24, 2012.
FUNDING AVAILABILITY & SAFETY PROGRAMS 3//21/2013.
Transportation Revenue Sources Presentation to the Discovery Institute October 6, 2004 Amy Arnis Deputy Director Strategic Planning and Programming Washington.
Road Services Funding Options Bridges and Roads Task Force October 28,
43 RD ASECAP STUDY & INFORMATION DAYS 2015 A Multimodal, Smart and Safe European Transport System: The Key Role of Motorways Epic Sana Hotel May.
Public Transit & Transportation Network Companies
Alternative Financing
Connected Vehicle Activities at MnDOT
Minnesota County Highway Accountant’s Conference April 26, 2018
Alternative Solutions to Shrinking Tax Revenues
RELIABLE, & AFFORDABLE ENERGY SOLUTIONS
Sarah Tracy, P.E., PTOE Assistant Traffic Engineer
How to Put Together the Pieces of Road Usage Charge Legislation
Presentation transcript:

Minnesota Mileage Based User Fee Test Results Cory Johnson, PE Office of Traffic, Safety, and Technology MnDOT

How Did MnDOT start? 2007 Legislative Directive via MnDOT Appropriations Bill “$5,000,000 is for a pilot project to demonstrate technologies that will allow for the future replacement of the gas tax with a fuel neutral mileage charge.” 1990’s several small university research studies exploring alternative financing concepts Early 2000’s large market research MBUF project lead by MnDOT planning and policy office 2007 I-35W Bridge Collapse and Gas Tax debate

Reaction to the Directive Effort was assigned to MnDOT’s Traffic Office Initially scoped but decided to “HOLD” BUT THEN …. $ was allowed to rollover budget years New scope was developed and approved –broaden scope with ITS and TZD efforts –followed systems engineering approach –required a data practices temp classification –allowed for a concurrent policy project

Policy Effort –25 person task force with large data collection effort –Resulted in identifying 2 defining MBUF objectives 1)GENERATE TRANSPORTATION FUNDING 2)PROMOTE EQUALITY AS A USER PAY SYSTEM –Generated 6 recommendation to the DOT Commissioner and a minority opinion. Hired the U of MN to engage key MN stakeholders and consider MBUF issues

Technology Demonstration Hired Mixon/Hill, Battelle and SAIC to design, build, operate and evaluate: –500 volunteers from Wright County MN –For a 13 month field test (Sept Nov 2012) –3 waves, each of about 175 people (each wave was 6 months long) –Each paid an average of $320 –Using COTS Smart phones with 3 custom built Apps –MBUF, Safety Signs, and Trip data –Testing the “Opt-In” concept –Multiple privacy options –3 odometer readings –Billed monthly for miles: –$0.03/mile in metro area peak period –$0.01/mile in rural MN –$0.00/mile out of MN

Demonstration Findings Satisfied the legislative directive. System was operational and collected alot of data (660 million trip data points, 4 million miles, and 500,000 trips for 478 persons) The technology worked, but has it’s limits. GPS availability was the most limiting factor Vehicle electrical systems and odometer are not perfect Test participants used the system, shared their data, and paid their bills. 82% of the participants share their trip data 77% opt–in rate and received discounted mileage rate $32,000 collected = 95.5% collection rate System administration was labor intensive and focused on individual customers. 8 software versions and 3 generations of hardware upgrades Averaged 4.5 help line calls per day.

Next Steps 1)Share results and learn from other MBUF efforts 2)Destroy private MBUF project data as mandated by the 2013 Mn State Legislature 3)Lead a Pooled Fund Project to continue to research the other MBUF concepts and related national issues. 4)Respond to legislative requests – Possible October 2013 Hearing

Minnesota Mileage Based User Fee Program QUESTIONS or COMMENTS? Reports Available at: