Educator Effectiveness 101 Senate Bill 10-191 Overview [Insert your name]

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Understanding Student Learning Objectives (S.L.O.s)
Advertisements

Teacher Effectiveness Evaluation Pilot September 1, 2011 – September 30, 2012 NJ State Board of Education, July 13, 2011.
The Readiness Centers Initiative Early Education and Care Board Meeting Tuesday, May 11, 2010.
Discuss the charge of the Michigan Council for Educator Effectiveness (MCEE) Summarize the MCEE Interim Report Provide an Overview of the Pilot.
Overview of the New Massachusetts Educator Evaluation Framework October 2011.
Strategic Visioning Process Pleasant Valley District #62
Overview of the Teacher Professional Growth and Effectiveness System KY Council of Administrators of Special Education Summer Conference July 9th, 2013.
WELCOME! SB 191 Pilot and Integration Summit Katy Anthes Executive Director of Educator Effectiveness.
Overview of SB 191 Ensuring Quality Instruction through Educator Effectiveness Colorado Department of Education Updated: July 2011.
SEED – CT’s System for Educator and Evaluation and Development April 2013 Wethersfield Public Schools CONNECTICUT ADMINISTRATOR EVALUATION Overview of.
This document is an editable template. Please make sure to customize it for your district before distributing. district before distributing. Copyright.
NJDOE TALENT DIVISION OVERVIEW prepared for: New Jersey Association of School Administrators April 30,
North Carolina Educator Evaluation System. Future-Ready Students For the 21st Century The guiding mission of the North Carolina State Board of Education.
Sub-heading ADMINISTRATOR EVALUATION AND SUPPORT SYSTEM Curriculum, Instruction and Assessment Leader Proposed Adaptations.
Introduction to Teacher Evaluation August 20, 2014 Elizabeth M. Osga, Ph.D.
Teacher Evaluation A Metric for Performance
Teacher Practice in  In 2012, the New Jersey Legislature unanimously passed the TEACHNJ Act, which mandates implementation of a new teacher.
Educator Effectiveness Teacher Quality Standards Expert Office Hours
Colorado Department of Education, Educator Effectiveness
PUSD Teacher Evaluation SY12/13 Governing Board Presentation May 10, 2012.
Most current teacher evaluations provide little information that can be used to give teachers the training and tools they need to be effective; better.
April 6, 2011 DRAFT Educator Evaluation Project. Teacher Education and Licensure DRAFT The ultimate goal of all educator evaluation should be… TO IMPROVE.
NJDOE TALENT DIVISION OVERVIEW prepared for: NJPSA ANNUAL LEGISLATIVE CONFRENCE AND MEMBERSHIP MEETING March 30,
Colorado Department of Education, Dept. of Higher Education and Educator Effectiveness Fall 2013 Educator Effectiveness Principal Quality Standards Expert.
Massachusetts Department of Education EDUCATOR DATABASE Informational Sessions Overview: September 2005 Web:
Violeta Garcia, PhD STEM Education Coordinator STEM Education in Colorado April 2013.
Woodland Park School District Educator Effectiveness 101 August 2014.
Transforming Education in Kentucky EPSB and TEK 1.
1 GENERAL OVERVIEW. “…if this work is approached systematically and strategically, it has the potential to dramatically change how teachers think about.
Educator Effectiveness in Colorado State Policy Framework & Approach October 2014.
Educator Effectiveness: Connecting Coursework to Career Success / End of Year Self-Assessment May 15, 2014.
October 3, 2012 SPECIAL SCEE WEBINAR The Principal’s Role in Evaluating Teachers.
Pilot of State Model Principal Evaluation System Year One Pilot of S.B. 191 Colorado Department of Education Educator Effectiveness September 12, 2012.
SCPS is…  We are a high-performing district  We are focused on student achievement  We are committed to achieving excellence and equity through continuous.
What does Educator Effectiveness (aka SB 191) mean for us?
Agenda Overview of evaluation Timeline Next steps.
The Colorado Department of Education Educator Effectiveness 2013 Teacher Librarians and S.B Where Do We Fit In? An information session for all.
ACEE May 17, 2013 Christina Wirth-Hawkins Assessment Update.
Interim Joint Committee on Education June 11, 2012.
Learner-Ready Teachers  More specifically, learner-ready teachers have deep knowledge of their content and how to teach it;  they understand the differing.
Iowa’s Teacher Quality Program. Intent of the General Assembly To create a student achievement and teacher quality program that acknowledges that outstanding.
1 Orientation to Teacher Evaluation /15/2015.
PRESENTED BY THERESA RICHARDS OREGON DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION AUGUST 2012 Overview of the Oregon Framework for Teacher and Administrator Evaluation and.
The Professional Learning and Evaluation Model. Missouri Essential Principles of Effective Evaluation Measures educator performance against research-based,
Elliott Asp Special Assistant to the Commissioner Colorado Department of Education Assistant Superintendent Cherry Creek Schools Reflections on “Student.
HEE Hui For Excellence in Education June 6, 2012
Teacher Quality Standards Beginning of The Year Self-Assessment.
Woodland Park School District Educator Effectiveness 101 September 2015.
Educator Effectiveness Update January Agenda 1.Overview of CDE’s Educator Effectiveness Work 2.Focusing Funding Streams to Support Educator Effectiveness.
Agenda Introductions Objectives and Agenda Review Research Review Taking Stock Collect evidence Principal Practices & the Rubric End-of-the-Year Looking.
EVALUATIONS FOR PROFESSIONAL GROWTH Ohio TIF and OTES.
TPEP Teacher & Principal Evaluation System Prepared from resources from WEA & AWSP & ESD 112.
Connecticut PEAC meeting Today’s meeting Discussion of draft principal evaluation guidelines (1 hour) Evaluation and support system document.
Our Theory of Action and Multi-Tiered Framework are anchored in the Vision and Mission for the Superintendent of Public Instruction. Office of Student.
Presented at the OSPA Summit 2012 January 9, 2012.
About District Accreditation Mrs. Sanchez & Mrs. Bethell Rickards Middle School
Overview of SB 191 Ensuring Quality Instruction through Educator Effectiveness Colorado Department of Education September 2010.
S.B. 191 Overview and Update Katy Anthes, PhD Executive Director of Educator Effectiveness Colorado Department of Education For the ELC January 2012.
Colorado Department of Education Katy Anthes March 2014 Educator Effectiveness & Teacher Librarians.
Overview of SB 191 Ensuring Quality Instruction through Educator Effectiveness Colorado Department of Education Updated: June 2012.
Phyllis Lynch, PhD Director, Instruction, Assessment and Curriculum
Woodland Park School District Educator Effectiveness 101
Woodland Park School District Educator Effectiveness
Five Required Elements
Colorado Council on Assessment
Moving Forward with the New State Assessment System
Woodland Park School District Educator Effectiveness Initial Training
Campus Improvement Plans
Administrator Evaluation Orientation
Colorado Department of Education
Presentation transcript:

Educator Effectiveness 101 Senate Bill Overview [Insert your name]

Agenda Colorado’s Goals and Priorities Educator Effectiveness Research Senate Bill Review Guiding Principles of State Model Evaluation System CDE Model Evaluation System Pilot Timeline for Implementation of S.B CDE Contacts

Vision All students in Colorado will become educated and productive citizens capable of succeeding in a globally competitive workforce. Mission The mission of CDE is to shape, support, and safeguard a statewide education system that prepares students for success in a globally competitive world. Together We Can

Successful students Ensure every student is on track to graduate postsecondary and workforce ready. Increase achievement for all students and close achievement gaps. Ensure students graduate ready for success in postsecondary education and the workforce. Increase national and international competitiveness for all students. Great teachers and leaders Increase and support the effectiveness of all educators. Optimize the preparation, retention, and effectiveness of new educators. Eliminate the educator equity gap. Outstanding schools and districts Increase school and district performance. Foster innovation and expand access to a rich array of high quality school choices for students. Best education system in the nation Lead the nation in policy, innovation, and positive outcomes for students. Operate with excellence, efficiency, and effectiveness to become the best SEA in the nation. Attract and retain outstanding talent to CDE. Students Educators Schools/ Districts State GOALS

PowerPoint Template Driving Questions What do we want students, educators, schools, and districts to know and be able to do? How will we know if expectations are met? How will we respond when help is needed and to support continued growth? Colorado Academic Standards Assessments RTI PBSI Targeted interventions IEPs Educator quality standards Educator evaluations Induction Mentoring Professional development plans Remediation plans Performance indicators School and district performance frameworks Unified planning Priority Turnaround Students Educators Schools/ Districts Schools/ Districts

Expanding Student Learning

Measures of educator effectiveness and student postsecondary and workforce readiness Effectiveness Management Increase and support the effectiveness of all educators Talent Pipeline Attract and develop the best educators Strategic Partnerships/ Committees Policy, Metrics and Monitoring Recruitment Educator Preparation Licensure Hiring/ Placement Induction Professional Dev. Evaluation And Support Retention Equity Initiatives Vision: Effective educators for every student and effective leaders for every school Mike CDE Educator Effectiveness Unit

Agenda Colorado’s Goals and Priorities Educator Effectiveness Research Senate Bill Review Guiding Principles of State Model Evaluation System CDE Model Evaluation System Pilot Timeline for Implementation of S.B CDE Contacts

Why Focus on Educator Effectiveness? “We know that the quality of our educators is by far the single most important factor in driving student achievement and closing the achievement gap.” -Kati Haycock, Good Teaching Matters – How Well Qualified Teachers Can Close the Gap, Education Trust. 1998

Educator Effectiveness Research

Educator Effectiveness Research

Agenda Colorado’s Goals and Priorities Educator Effectiveness Research Senate Bill Review Guiding Principles of State Model Evaluation System CDE Model Evaluation System Pilot Timeline for Implementation of S.B CDE Contacts

Senate Bill : The Big Picture Requires statewide minimum standards for what it means to be an “effective” teacher or principal Requires annual evaluation of all teachers and principals Changes non-probationary status from one that is earned based upon years of service to one that is earned based upon three consecutive years of demonstrated effectiveness Provides that non-probationary status may be lost based upon consecutive years of ineffectiveness. Requires that all teachers and principals be evaluated at least 50 percent on the academic growth of their students Prohibits forced placement of teachers Makes non-probationary status “portable”

Senate Bill10-191: Teacher Evaluation From Evaluations based on principal judgment alone with little inter-rater reliability and inconsistent implementation Multiple parts but with summative results being binary (“Satisfactory”/ “Unsatisfactory”) Development opportunities not adequately linked to identified areas for improvement (one-size fits all PD) To Multiple measures aligned to Quality Standards with student achievement at the core and steps in place to ensure evaluator consistency (inter-rater agreement) Differentiated ratings reflecting a continuum of performance Meaningful and ongoing feedback identifying growth areas and ability to access individualized professional development Impact Teachers agree that the evaluation process is meaningful and results in accurate assessment of performance Evaluation process promotes teachers’ professional growth and impacts student learning Teachers are supported in their ongoing professional growth.

Agenda Colorado’s Goals and Priorities Educator Effectiveness Research Senate Bill Review Guiding Principles of State Model Evaluation System CDE Model Evaluation System Pilot Timeline for Implementation of S.B CDE Contacts

Guiding Principles of State Evaluation System 1.Data should inform decisions, but human judgment will always be an essential component of evaluations. 2.The implementation and evaluation of the system must embody continuous improvement. 3.The purpose of the system is to provide meaningful and credible feedback that improves performance. 4.The development and implementation of educator evaluation systems must continue to involve all stakeholders in a collaborative process. 5.Educator evaluations must take place within a larger system that is aligned and supportive.

Continuous Improvement State model system developed Local evaluation systems implemented CDE collects data State Council makes recommendations Rules reviewed and revised

Agenda Colorado’s Goals and Priorities Educator Effectiveness Research Senate Bill Review Guiding Principles of State Model Evaluation System CDE Model Evaluation System Pilot Timeline for Implementation of S.B CDE Contacts

Pilot Period Is used to develop, identify and/or test the following:  Principal and teacher rubrics  Measures of student academic growth  Method to collect teacher input for principal evaluations  Method to collect student and family perception data  Method to aggregating measures and assign final evaluation ratings  CDE monitoring methods

Agenda Colorado’s Goals and Priorities Educator Effectiveness Research Senate Bill Review Guiding Principles of State Model Evaluation System CDE Model Evaluation System Pilot Timeline for Implementation of S.B CDE Contacts

Year One Development and Beta Testing CDE ACTIVITIES Develop State Model Systems for teachers and principals Beta-testing of rubrics and tools Develop technical guidelines on Professional Practices and Student Growth Provide differentiated support for districts Populate and launch online Resource Bank Develop state data collection and monitoring system Develop tools for district implementation of system Year Two Pilot and Rollout CDE ACTIVITIES Usability study of rubrics Support pilot districts through resources, training, tools, etc. Convene pilot districts to share lessons learned Analyze pilot district data and make adjustments as needed Train ALL non-pilot districts that are using the state model Make Recommendations on other licensed personnel (OLP) to State Board of Education (SBE) Year Three Pilot and Rollout CDE ACTIVITIES Statewide assistance on rollout of evaluation systems Develop evaluation system for other licensed personnel Support all districts through resources, trainings, tools, etc. Convene pilot districts to share lessons learned Analyze state data and make adjustments to the system as needed Validate teacher and principal rubrics Develop criteria for evaluation training courses for approval by CDE Year Four Full Statewide Implementation CDE ACTIVITIES Finalize statewide implementation of teacher/principal systems Pilot OLP rubrics Continue support to districts via resources and training Ensure there are evaluator training courses throughout the state Analyze data and make adjustments as needed Make recommendations to SBE this year and all following years for Continuous Improvement Timeline of Implementation

Agenda Colorado’s Goals and Priorities Educator Effectiveness Research Senate Bill Review Guiding Principles of State Model Evaluation System CDE Model Evaluation System Pilot Timeline for Implementation of S.B CDE Contacts

Contact Information Katy Anthes Toby King Michael Gradoz Britt Wilkenfeld Jean Williams Dawn Paré Courtney Cabrera Amy Skinner Katie Lams For more information, please visit: