1 1 AIPLA Firm Logo American Intellectual Property Law Association Inventor Compensation in the U.S. Soonhee Jang Vice President and Chief IP Counsel DuPont.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Legal Issues and Recent Developments in Serbia Ljubljana, November Enterprise Management Incentives Ms Jelena Edelman, Senior Associate, Prica.
Advertisements

University Industry Collaboration Guven Yalcintas, Ph.D. Vice President Technology Transfer Office The Research Foundation of SUNY Alfred, NY-April 27,
Intellectual Property Rights, Investment and Transfer of Technology in the Pharmaceutical Sector Patrizia Carlevaro Head of the International Aid Unit.
DEVELOPMENT OF AN INNOVATION CENTER WIPO/INN/MCT/04/3 WIPO NATIONAL WORKSHOP ON INNOVATION SUPPORT SERVICES AND THEIR MANAGEMENT Muscat, April 20, 2004.
SOME KEY ISSUES FOR CONSIDERATION IN A NATIONAL IP STRATEGY PART SIX – IP Policy for R&D Institutions and Universities OGADA TOM Innovation and Technology.
Support program for SME IP activity in Japan Naohiko YOKOSHIMA WIPO forum on intellectual property and small and medium-sized enterprises 13 September.
Intellectual Property HEY Trusts New IP Policy and Role of Medipex Will it enable me to turn this…. into.
Financial Conflict of Interest July 2012 rev
Case Study in Potential Conflicts of Interest for Startup Companies J. Mark Meacham, CEO OpenCell Technologies October 20,
Atlanta, GA October 7-9, 2013 It Only Counts Once: Bridging theGAAP Financial Management and Human Resources Forum.
1 WIPO/INV/BEI/02/3.a The Role of Universities in the Innovation Cycle Document prepared by Ms. Kirsten Leute, Licensing Associate Office of Technology.
Managing Conflicts of Interest
1 U.S. Department of Labor Office of Labor-Management Standards (OLMS) Filing Form LM-30 An Overview of Union Officer and Employee Reporting.
Addition 1’s to 20.
Employee Recognition Training for Supervisors Presenter’s Name Date.
By Joseph P. Allen 2014 AUTM Eastern Regional Meeting.
1 1 1 AIPLA Firm Logo American Intellectual Property Law Association Obviousness-Type Double Patenting The Pitfalls Heather Champion Brady IP Practice.
1 UMass Dartmouth Conflicts of Interest Policies UMass Dartmouth Liz Rodriguez February 17, 2011.
Technology and Economic Development Intellectual Property Issues in Research Jim Baker Director Office of Technology and Economic Development
Tech Tuesday Bryan Ritchie, Executive Director, TVC March 10, 2015.
Patent or Perish? Presented By: John F. Letchford Archer & Greiner, P.C. October 19, 2006.
Building on Research Innovation A new resource in the Faculty of Science since Spring 2006.
Patent Portfolio Management By: Michael A. Leonard II.
Air Force Materiel Command I n t e g r i t y - S e r v i c e - E x c e l l e n c e Developing, Fielding, and Sustaining America’s Aerospace Force INTELLECTUAL.
Technology Transfer University of Colorado Denver Rick Silva, Ph.D., M.B.A. -- Director Senior Licensing Managers David Poticha, M.S., J.D. Paul Tabor,
Technology Transfer at UIC © 2009 by the Board of Trustees of the University of Illinois Presentation to the Software Commercialization Symposium April.
Industrial Partnerships & Technology Transfer Keeping Your Name Out Of The Gossip Columns Of Nature and Science BC Cancer AgencyJ. D. Litster March 24,
February 25, 2014 SERIES 4, SESSION 2 OF AAPLS APPLICANTS & ADMINISTRATORS PREAWARD LUNCHEON SERIES Material Transfer and Confidentiality Agreements.
Ronald J. Huss Associate Vice President for Research and Technology Transfer Director, Office of Technology Management phone:
Intellectual Property: Kenneth Kirkland, Ph.D. Executive Director, Iowa State University Research Foundation (ISURF) Director, Office of Intellectual Property.
RESEARCH PRODUCTS AND INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS OGADA T. and MBAYAKI A. CAMPUS BASED RESEARCH WORKSHOPS TOWN CAMPUS 3 May 2006.
Kurt G. Hammerle JSC Office Of the Chief Counsel Intellectual Property Attorney 20 January Got Ideas?- Protecting and Reporting Inventions.
Technology Transfer at Rice
WIPO Dispute Resolution in International Science & Technology April 25, 2005 Ann M. Hammersla Senior Counsel, Intellectual Property Massachusetts Institute.
Tech Launch Arizona Tech Transfer Arizona Rakhi Gibbons, Asst. Director for Biomedical and Life Sciences Licensing.
Overview OTL Mission Inventor Responsibility Stanford Royalty Sharing Disclosure Form Patent View Inventor Agreements Patent.
Review of Technology Transfer at The University of Texas System Margaret Sampson Partner, Vinson & Elkins LLP U. T. System Board of Regents’ Meeting Technology.
10/19/2011F. B. Bramwell1.  Thanks to conversations with: ◦ HU Office of General Counsel  John Gloster  Dan McCabe ◦ University of Kentucky Intellectual.
1 Knowledge | Innovation | Technology Overview of Risk Management in University Technology Transfer David N. Allen, Ph.D. Associate Vice President for.
1 Overview of Legal Issues in Early Stage Financings (Energy Efficiency and Renewables) August 11, 2006 Michael Jay Brown Dorsey & Whitney LLP (206)
Organizing a Technology Licensing Office (TLO) Jon Sandelin Senior Associate Emeritus
USA Perspectives & Success Stories: TTO-Science Park-Incubator Dr. Brad Zehner PBICA Conference Gliwice, Poland May 2011.
Policies Promoting IP Development in Universities and Higher Institutions of Learning In Africa OGADA Tom WIPO National Workshop on Intellectual Property.
POLICY INCENTIVES FOR INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY DEVELOPMENT PEREZ W.J ODERO LEGAL CONSULTANT 5 TH JUNE 2005.
The structure of an IP Institutional Policy “Ten Questions Method” Sofia, Bulgaria November 25 and 26, 2015.
Academic Technology Transfer Operations and Practice Knowledge Economy Forum IV Istanbul, Turkey March 22-25, 2005 Alistair Brett Oxford Innovation.
Moscow, Russia, 10 September 2012 HSE Intellectual Property Policy Aliya Ermakova, Head of IP Department, Innovation and Enterprise Office, HSE
Nadya Reingand, PhD Yan Hankin, Esq. Washington DC, USA © Copyright. All rights reserved. Intellectual Property and Business Aspects of Digital Holography.
NATIONAL CONFERENCE Intellectual Property Policies for Universities and Innovation dr. sc. Vlatka Petrović Head, Technology Transfer Office Acting Head,
INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY 101 CHASE KASPER, DIRECTOR OFFICE OF TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT
Intellectual Property at USC October 27, 2003 Dr. Michael Muthig.
HOW DO PATENTING AND LICENSING AFFECT RESEARCH? JOAN S. LEONARD VICE PRESIDENT AND GENERAL COUNSEL HOWARD HUGHES MEDICAL INSTITUTE The National Academies.
Lecture 27 Intellectual Property. Intellectual Property simply defined is any form of knowledge or expression created with one's intellect. It includes.
Compensation of Employees for Service Inventions: View from the Trenches by Adv. Barry Levenfeld Tel Aviv Stock Exchange Conference Center January 10,
Managing Compensation By Muhammad Zohaib Sufyan SZABIST.
US University Patenting and Licensing: Historical Evolution and Recent Trends David C. Mowery Haas School of Business U.C. Berkeley.
 New Employee Invention System & Guidelines therefor in Japan Pre-Meeting AIPLA Mid-Winter Institute January 26, 2016 La Quinta Sumiko Kobayashi 1.
WIPO Guidance – Intellectual Property Policy for Universities and Research Institutions for Countries in Transitions Prague, April 21 and 22, 2016 Mr.
Intellectual Property 101
IRB Open House Conflicts of Interest and Financial Conflicts of Interest in Research May 19, 2017 Office of Policy Coordination, Division of Outside.
Towards a roadmap for collaborative R&D
Universities and the Commercial World
Nicholas S. Argyres and Julia Porter Liebeskind
Gilbert Nicolaon Kiev June 10, 2008
Technology Commercialization Office
Taking Discoveries from Lab to Marketplace
Intellectual Property 101
IP Ownership, Benefit Sharing and Incentive for Researchers
Obligation to contribute to R&D costs Use of pharmaceutical inventions without authorization of patent owners James Love. CPTech 16 April 2004 Twelfth.
Presentation transcript:

1 1 AIPLA Firm Logo American Intellectual Property Law Association Inventor Compensation in the U.S. Soonhee Jang Vice President and Chief IP Counsel DuPont Industrial Biosciences, DuPont JPO VISIT AIPLA DELEGATION April

2 2 AIPLA Firm Logo Inventor Compensation Law  There is no statutory requirement to compensate inventors in the U.S.  Inventor compensation is “not” required in the U.S. No Federal law No State Law  Under U.S. law, a patent is owned initially by the inventor(s) 2

3 3 AIPLA Firm Logo Employment Agreements  Employees of companies produce most of the inventions in the United States  Employment agreement controls inventions made by employees within the scope of work, and signing of an employment agreement is generally a condition for employment  “Employee agrees to and does hereby grant and assign to Company or its nominee his entire right, title and interest in and to ideas, inventions and improvements…” 3

4 4 AIPLA Firm Logo Ownership of Invention  Most employment agreements state that when an employee makes an invention in the course of the employment that: the invention belongs to the employer employee must assign the rights to the invention to the employer  Many states limit reach of employment agreements for inventions made outside the scope of work (e.g., California, Delaware, Washington, North Carolina, Kansas, etc.)  A number of companies/institutions have allowed ownership in an invention to revert to employee inventor if the company itself is not interested 4

5 5 AIPLA Firm Logo Compensation at the Employer Company’s Discretion  Employee compensation for an invention is set by the employer Salary is the main consideration for any inventions made in the course of the employment  Some U.S. companies choose to compensate their inventors as a means of rewarding and fostering innovation Typically for filed patent applications and/or issued patents As a small percentage of the resulting revenue 5

6 6 AIPLA Firm Logo Inventor Compensation in the U.S.  Compensation and recognition typically in consideration of: Invention Disclosure Patent application filed Patent issuance The number of inventions Revenue stream from patents Assessment of patent value 6

7 7 AIPLA Firm Logo Inventor Compensation in the U.S.  Compensation and recognition typically involve : Grant of stocks / stock options Cash bonuses Promotions Awards and company-wide recognition Awards and recognition from outside the company, e.g., IPO’s Inventor of the Year Award, Inventor hall of fame 7

8 8 AIPLA Firm Logo Examples of Inventor Compensation  A major high tech company: First patent: $1500 when the application is filed Additional $500 if the patent is granted Any subsequent patents: $750 for filing and $500 if patent is granted Every 4 patents get an extra bonus of $1250 on top of other awards  Majority of companies tend not to provide any significant monetary compensation 8

9 9 AIPLA Firm Logo Industry Examples  Employee inventor compensation varies by industry sectors IndustryInvention Disclosure Filed ApplicationIssued Patent Pharmaceutical/ Biotech Nothing40% Nothing 60% up to $ % Nothing 15% up to $500 Consumer Products Basic Manufacturing Nothing84% Nothing 16% up to $1,500 40% Nothing 60% up to $2,000 High Tech60% Nothing 40% up to $200 20% up to $500 80% between $500 and $3,000 60% Nothing 40% up to $2,000 From IPO survey for Inventor Compensation; percentages based on those who responded 9

10 AIPLA Firm Logo  Most companies also give some kind of recognition for patent filings and/or issuance: Plaques / innovation inductee hall of fame (3M, IBM) Banquets, luncheons, dinners Promotions related to patenting effort Stock grants / stock options / cash bonuses Minor token gifts (Silver dollar, engraved mugs, pens) Company Recognition 10

11 AIPLA Firm Logo  Multiple inventors are involved and they had a lot of help from other employees who are not compensated  Equity, competition, envy, jealousy  Luck of the project assigned e.g., the one compound among 1000’s that were screened becomes the next blockbuster drug  Difficulty in measuring an individual inventor’s contribution and patent’s worth  Patent’s value is often realized much later Inventor Compensation Difficulties 11

12 AIPLA Firm Logo  Universities compensate inventors through the receipt of licensing income generated from their patent(s); awards among: Principal Investigator / Inventor Principal Investigator’s department and/or school General Research Funds Administrating the tech transfer office  The Bayh-Dole Act greatly increased licensing activities of Research Institutions / Universities – many have Tech Transfer Offices  How each institution divides patent income varies widely Inventor Compensation in Academic Institutions / Universities 12

13 AIPLA Firm Logo  Stanford ◦ after costs and admin  MIT  1/3 to inventor  1/3 to inventor's department  1/3 to inventor's school  1/3 to inventor (after costs / admin)  1/2 of total program contribution to departments proportional to their contribution  Remaining to general fund 13 Inventor Compensation in Academic Institutions / Universities

14 AIPLA Firm Logo  United States law does not mandate inventor compensation for their inventive contribution and employment agreement takes care of inventions made by employee inventors  United States has one of most prolific inventive environments and have generated many breakthrough innovations and transformative technologies without inventor compensation law  Companies foster and encourage innovation by providing various form of incentives and recognitions  Some U.S. companies and universities provide monetary compensation; companies do not base compensation on value of the patents Conclusions 14

15 AIPLA Firm Logo Thanks for your attention. Questions? Soonhee Jang Vice President and Chief IP Counsel DuPont Industrial Biosciences, DuPont 925 Page Mill Road Palo Alto, California USA (office) (cell) 15