TNO MACC-II European emissions Model-ready emission set for 2003-2009 Jeroen Kuenen, Hugo Denier van der Gon, Antoon Visschedijk TNO, Utrecht, The Netherlands.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Reporting sheet no.4 Emissions of pollutants Peter Kristensen SoE meeting 12 June 2007, Copenhagen.
Advertisements

Reporting sheet no.4 Emissions of pollutants Peter Kristensen, EEA Joint Eionet NRC Freshwater and Drafting group State of the Environment and Trends meeting.
1 Emissions of air pollutants and greenhouses by world country on 0.1 x 0.1 degree grid The EDGAR team: John van Aardenne, Ulrike Doering, Greet Maenhout,
T European particulate matter emissions Jan Berdowski, Antoon Visschedijk, Tinus Pulles.
Signatur A web-based tool to test Current and Future perspectives in Air Pollution Forward-Looking Information in Environment Assessment Copenhagen.
On the Gridding Emissions Globally Muntean M. , Pagliari V
Hugo Denier van der Gon & Tinus Pulles PM update EU 2000 PM2.5 Inventory project Task Force on Emission Inventories and Projections' (TFEIP) Expert Panel.
European Environment Agency GlobEmissions User Consultation Workshop, November 2009, Frascati, Italy Emission inventory reporting within Europe –
Results of CAFE Consultations Wilfried Winiwarter, Janusz Cofala, Zbigniew Klimont, Markus Amann,... 5 th Joint UNECE Task Force & EIONET Workshop on Emission.
Tinus Pulles How to establish the uncertainties? Particulate Emission Inventory for Europe.
CLRTP PMEG Third meeting, 13 & 14 March 2006, Dessau.
Workshop to Promote the Ratification of the UN-ECE CLRTAP HM Protocol May 2008, Yerevan, Armenia. 1 Additional technical measures, their reduction.
Workshop to Promote the Ratification of the UN-ECE CLRTAP HM Protocol May 2008, Yerevan, Armenia. 1 emissions reduction (and costs) The effectiveness.
Global bottom-up emission inventories: methodologies, application in atmospheric chemistry modeling and possible verification through satellite measurements.
Science questions How will source-receptor relations change due to expected changes in emissions? How should future emission scenarios be constructed?
A high resolution emission inventory of particulate EC and OC for Europe Hugo Denier van der Gon, Antoon Visschedijk, Rianne Dröge, Maarten Mulder, Jeroen.
Title EMEP Unified model Importance of observations for model evaluation Svetlana Tsyro MSC-W / EMEP TFMM workshop, Lillestrøm, 19 October 2010.
From experience of emission inventory preparation in Belarus JOINT ACCENT/GEIA Workshop on Anthropogenic emissions for non-OECD countries in global inventories.
Improving regional air quality model results at the city scale : results from the EC4MACS project INERIS : Bertrand Bessagnet, Etienne Terrenoire, Augustin.
C&I feedback to TFEIP Expert Panel meeting 14 May 2013 Jeroen Kuenen, Carlo Trozzi.
NATIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH INSTITUTE AARHUS UNIVERSITY Marlene Plejdrup, MSc. physical geography Stockholm 4/ SPATIAL DISTRIBUTION OF EMISSIONS.
BC, EC and OC Metrics, emissions and trends Jeroen Kuenen, Hugo Denier van der Gon, Bas Henzing, Antoon Visschedijk EC emissions from diesel-fuelled vehicles,
Simulation of European emissions impacts on particulate matter concentrations in 2010 using Models-3 Rob Lennard, Steve Griffiths and Paul Sutton (RWE.
Exploring the Sensitivity of the OMI ‐ NO 2 Product to emission Changes Across Europe using a Chemistry Transport Model M. Schaap, L. Curier, R. Kranenburg,
Compilation of emission inventories The situation in the Netherlands Special Session of the UNCEEA on Climate Change (New York, 25 June afternoon)
Reported emissions for models Perspectives from MACC & MACC-II projects, and the use of the LOTOS-EUROS AQ model Jeroen Kuenen, Hugo Denier van der Gon,
Norwegian Meteorological Institute met.no 7 th Joint UNECE Task Force & EIONET WS on Emission Inventories and Projections, Thessaloniki 31 Oct – 2 Nov.
Plans for functioning and responsibilities of the new EMEP emissions data centre Party expectations: Spain 8 th Joint TFEIP/EIONET meeting Ireland 23 and.
Modelling perspective: Key limitations of current country projection data in transboundary modelling activities. What improvements are needed? Jan Eiof.
| Folie 1 GHG inventory and energy balance data: experiences from Austria Bernd Gugele Workshop “Official statistics for better climate change.
Reporting and use of air pollutant emission data under the ECE CONVENTION ON LONG-RANGE TRANBOUNDARY AIR POLLUTION Krzysztof Olendrzynski ECE/Air Secretariat.
Hugo Denier van der Gon Hugo Denier van der Gon, Maarten van het Bolscher & Antoon Visschedijk Uncertainties in POP emission data.
TFEIP-Meeting May 2010 Jochen Theloke 1/ 5 E-PRTR – spatial mapping of diffuse emission sources project Jochen Theloke, Thomas Gauger, Balendra Thiruchittampalam,
Data sources for GAINS Janusz Cofala and Stefan Astrom.
T TNO Environment, Energy and Process Innovation A study to the effectiveness of the HM and POP Protocols and costs of additional measures Task Force on.
E-PRTR dataflows and SEIS in the Netherlands Pollutant Release and Transfer Register Wim van der Maas.
Air Quality Governance in the ENPI East Countries Training on emission inventories Nomenclature for reporting December, 2013, Tbilisi, Georgia.
Quality of current PM emission inventories Kristin Rypdal, Chair of Task Force on Emission Inventories and Projections With input from Zbigniew Klimont.
A study to the effectiveness of the HM & POP Protocols and costs of additional measures Phase II - Emission reduction and cost of a possible revision of.
TFEIP Workshop, Istanbul, May 2013 Emissions data for of heavy metal and POP modelling Oleg Travnikov, Alexey Gusev, Ilia Ilyin, Olga Rozovskaya, Victor.
GlobEmission (ITT 6721) new ESA contract starting on Oct. 11 KNMI/BIRA/FMI/TNO/VITO.
UNECE Reporting Guidelines Approval – impact on future reporting Katarina Mareckova, 11 May 2009, Vienna TFEIP/EIONET meeting.
Tinus Pulles, Jeroen Kuenen & Justin Goodwin What has been achieved? The draft Revised Guidebook.
PAGE 1 An adaptation of SMOKE for Europe Johannes Bieser Armin Aulinger, Volker Matthias, Markus Quante GKSS Research Center Geesthacht, Germany.
Data BaseCompareVerifyDrivers EDGARv4 UNFCCC EMEP GAINS REAS MICS-Asia PKU VULCAN TNO-MACC EPRTR HTAP_V2 Econo- metrics Decom- position Inverse modeling.
Dutch environmental accounts: implementation and compilation Bram Edens Statistics Netherlands.
A study to the effectiveness of the HM & POP Protocols and costs of additional measures Phase II – Emission reduction and cost of a possible revision of.
How official national inventory data is used as input data for EMEP models Katarina Mareckova, Robert Wankmueller CEIP - Centre on Emission Inventories.
To support the reanalysis exercise in EU FP7 MACC a consistent, high resolution anthropogenic emission database for is needed TNO-MACC emission.
Evaluation of pollution levels in urban areas of selected EMEP countries Alexey Gusev, Victor Shatalov Meteorological Synthesizing Centre - East.
European Environment Agency WG1 – Guidance The role of modelling in the AQ Directive(s) Anke Lükewille Air and Climate Change Programme European Environment.
Impact of various emission inventories on modelling results; impact on the use of the GMES products Laurence Rouïl
Air Quality Emission inventories
Spatial allocation of diffuse emissions sources
Urszula Parra Maza, Peter Suppan
Forum for Air quality Modelling FAIRMODE ew. eea
Progress in assessment of POP pollution in EMEP region.
Emissions of Pollutants into the Atmospheric Air
Pilot Sectoral Chapter (2A1 Cement)
Steve Griffiths, Rob Lennard and Paul Sutton* (*RWE npower)
A. Aulinger, V. Matthias, M. Quante, Institute for Coastal Research
EMEP Case study: Assessment of HM pollution levels with fine spatial resolution in Belarus, Poland and UK Ilia Ilyin, Olga Rozovskaya, Oleg Travnikov.
M. Schaap + TNO and RIVM teams
Emissions What are the most sensitive parameters in emissions to improve model results (chemical species, spatio-temporal resolution, spatial distribution,
Report on the EEA workshop dedicated to the use of GMES data for emission inventories John Van Aardenne (EEA), Justin Goodwin (Aether), Peter de Smet.
TFMM – Trends Emissions of air pollutants for
Projections expert panel agenda
Experience with the new 0.1°x0.1° EMEP emissions
Model assessment of HM and POP pollution of the EECCA region
Assessment of LRT contribution to cities in Europe using uEMEP?
Presentation transcript:

TNO MACC-II European emissions Model-ready emission set for Jeroen Kuenen, Hugo Denier van der Gon, Antoon Visschedijk TNO, Utrecht, The Netherlands

Outline Motivation Emission database PM split in components Spatial distribution Conclusions and future work Jeroen Kuenen MACC-II European emissions

Motivation Air quality models needs good quality emission input, which should... describe all (anthropogenic) sources be consistent in time and space provide the best (scientific) estimate for the emission Why develop this inventory? Good emissions are the start of any environmental assessment However, simply taking EMEP (gridded) emissions does not work Gridded data are 50x50 km 2 and not always available Reported emissions is following guidelines, which is not necesserily applying the best science Often not consistent between (neighbouring) countries Jeroen Kuenen MACC-II European emissions

TNO_MACC-II emission inventory Updating and improving TNO_MACC inventory Improved point source representation Improved variation between years, adding Harmonization with latest reporting to the extent possible Spatial resolution 1/8 x 1/16 degrees (lon/lat) ~ 7x7km Pollutants covered: NOx, SO2, NMVOC, NH3 CH4, CO PM10, PM2.5 (and components) Jeroen Kuenen MACC-II European emissions

In the ideal case, reported emissions from countries would be directly usable as input for AQ modelling This means that the largest contributing sectors are as expected, or else the difference can be explained This also means that trends in time series are understandable This works fine for a country like Germany... But... Reported emissions Jeroen Kuenen MACC-II European emissions A thorough check of availability and quality of reported data is crucial! Differences from (e.g.) -Errors in the data -Resubmissions by countries -Every historical year is reported every year, and methods change!

Methodology in a nutshell Make use of official reported emissions (as of end 2011) where possible (staying as close as possible to what is used in policy) Reported emissions by source category (NFR/CRF) Disaggregated using IIASA GAINS emissions to 75 source categories Direct use of IIASA GAINS emissions in cases where reported data is not available or is not good enough Corrections for specific sectors/pollutants, e.g.: NOx and NMVOC from agriculture excluded Agricultural waste burning from GAINS for all countries CO not in GAINS; use of TNO internal bottom-up database Armenia, Azerbaijan, Georgia not in GAINS: data from EDGAR International shipping added from CEIP; additional in-port emissions from TNO expert judgement Jeroen Kuenen MACC-II European emissions

Results Consistent emission dataset for Europe (43 countries, 5 seas) and 8 pollutants, for 77 different source & fuel combinations Jeroen Kuenen MACC-II European emissions SNAP source categories: 1 energy industry 2 residential combustion 3-4 industry 5 extraction/distribution FF 6 product use 7 road transport 8 other mobile sources 9 waste 10 agriculture

Change in emission Jeroen Kuenen MACC-II European emissions

PM components PM is a mix of many things, models need underlying information (PM split) Generic PM split (per SNAP) not good enough, because different fuels result in very different PM composition PM split defined per detailed source/fuel combination underlying the dataset (>200 categories) For both coarse & fine mode, split in EC, OC (full molecular mass), SO4, Na, other minerals Split based on literature where available, and expert judgement where needed Jeroen Kuenen MACC-II European emissions SNAP source categories: 1 energy industry 2 residential combustion 3-4 industry 5 extraction/distribution FF 6 product use 7 road transport 8 other mobile sources 9 waste 10Agriculture

Jeroen Kuenen MACC-II European emissions

Spatial distribution Use generic spatial distribution system throughout Europe All emission sources distributed using proxy parameters, e.g. Population density (total, rural, urban) Road network for non-urban emissions Jeroen Kuenen MACC-II European emissions

Point sources Use of European Pollutant Release and Transfer Register (and predecessor EPER): EPER: 2001 and 2004 E-PRTR: annual data from 2007 onwards Used in TNO-MACC-II as relative proxy for distributing emissions for specific sector/fuel combinations (2004 proxy for years , 2007 also for 2006) Where E-PRTR data not available or not suitable, TNO PS info from TNO_MACC-I has been used as proxy for distributing emissions Jeroen Kuenen MACC-II European emissions

Resulting emission maps Jeroen Kuenen MACC-II European emissions NH3 in 2003 SO2 in 2009

Jeroen Kuenen MACC-II European emissions EC 2009 NOx 2009 EC 2009 – 2003 NOx 2009 – 2003

Conclusion and outlook TNO_MACC-II: consistent and complete emission inventory for UNECE-Europe, in line with official emissions and suitable for policy analysis and support using AQ models Already used in various research activities involving modelling e.g. MACC-II, AQMEII-2 model intercomparison study Outlook; what we would like to do more Add more years (2010) Various semi-natural sources exist that are important for modelling AQ but not (well) covered in the reported emissions Examples: Agricultural waste burning, resuspension by road transport, Soil NOx emissions “on the side” we aim to make data on semi-natural sources available as model input in the same format Jeroen Kuenen MACC-II European emissions

Poster: E. Dammers et al., “ A regional analysis of biogenic soil NO x emissions across Europe” Soil NOx adds Tg N for Europe (~10%) Jeroen Kuenen MACC-II European emissions Thank you for your attention! This work was funded by Interested in using TNO_MACC-II data? Please contact us!