Pilot IG Conformance What is it measuring?. Summary of IG Conformance Scenario IG Conformances1 Number of conformances requiring inspection testing =

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
EDOS Workgroup Update HL7 Orders & Observation WG May 7, 2013 Laboratory Orders Interface Initiative.
Advertisements

Sec. 3-3 Parallel and Perpendicular Lines
Recommending a Strategy Ideas for Today and Tomorrow.
Checking & Corrective Action
Roadmap for Sourcing Decision Review Board (DRB)
Translation and Translation Verification National Research Coordinators Meeting Amsterdam, October 2006.
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE ROUNDTABLE DISCUSSION DECEMBER 12, 2014 Post Registration Proof of Use Pilot Results and Beyond 1.
Patty Helphenstine & Roslyn Thomas, CMS
QuEST Forum 2006 Requirements Handbook 4.0 Overview.
0 Chicago, IL March 6 th, 2007 Use Case Requirements, Design and Standards Selection HITSP Use Case Requirements, Design and Standards Selection Date:
B O N N E V I L L E P O W E R A D M I N I S T R A T I O N Post-2011 Review Workgroup 5: Reporting and Verification of Savings April 1, 2014.
A) 80 b) 53 c) 13 d) x 2 = : 10 = 3, x 3 = 309.
1 Software Testing and Quality Assurance Lecture 2 Software Verification & Validation.
1 REQUIREMENTS ENGINEERING and SYSTEMS ANALYSIS Elements and Definitions.
LRI Validation Suite Meeting November 1st, Agenda Review of LIS Test Plan Template CLIA Testing EHR testing (Juror Document)—Inspection Testing.
Conflict Resolution, Problem Solving, Decision Making Woodbadge Part 1 Group Commissioner.
6  Methodology: DMAIC Robert Setaputra. PDCA / PDSA PDCA / PDSA is a continuous quality improvement tool. PDCA is introduced by Shewhart. PDSA is Deming’s.
DAVID M. KROENKE’S DATABASE PROCESSING, 10th Edition © 2006 Pearson Prentice Hall 12-1 David M. Kroenke’s Chapter Twelve: ODBC Database Processing: Fundamentals,
Computing Sciences CSAC/ITSD Computer Standards Working Group.
Canberra ACT Exercise Management Course PLAN the EXERCISE (Pt 2) PLANNING TEAM.
Standards Analysis Summary vMR – Pros Designed for computability Compact Wire Format Aligned with HeD Efforts – Cons Limited Vendor Adoption thus far Represents.
 decimals/cc-7th-fracs-to-decimals/v/converting-fractions-to-decimals-example.
Dr. Jose Rizal Memorial Hospital
1 Presentation Template: Instructor Comments u The following template presents a guideline for preparing a Six Sigma presentation. An effective presentation.
Debugging Simulation Models CS 780 Spring 2007 Instructor: Peter Kemper Dept of Computer Science, College of William and Mary Prerequisites: A first course.
Project Manager’s Report Biscayne Bay Regional Restoration Coordination Team May 14, 2004.
James Bartholomew, Jenna Benkula, Molly Conley, James Grossman, Mary Hourihan, Becca Jewell, Patti Long.
REVISED May 2009STATE MATERIALS OFFICE Goals in this Session To understand:  The Sampling & Testing process  The Project Certification process  The.
Visual Signature Profile OASIS - DSS-X Session 2.
LRI Validation Suite Meeting Prototype Tool Demonstration December 20th, 2011.
© Michael Crosby and Charles Sacker, 2001 Systematic Software Reviews Software reviews are a “quality improvement process for written material”.
Sixth Power Plan A Public Utility Point of View Bill Gaines, Director, Tacoma Public Utilities Craig Smith, Assistant General Manager, Snohomish PUD Northwest.
NIST Voting Program Activities Update January 4, 2007 Mark Skall Chief, Software Diagnostics and Conformance Testing Division.
STATE OF CALIFORNIA Green Schools in a Red Economy Pacific Energy Center September 21, 2010 Presented by the Office of Public School Construction (OPSC)
Welcome ONC/IWG/IHE-USA/eHEX HPD Providers Directory Task Group Vendor/Industry Feedback Discussion November 22, 2013.
RMSUpdate May 5, 2005 Retail Market Subcommittee Update to TAC.
Data Integrity Management Council F2F Washington, D.C. November 29-30, 2006
Standards Analysis Summary vMR – Pros Designed for computability Compact Wire Format Aligned with HeD Efforts – Cons Limited Vendor Adoption thus far Represents.
1 Ontology Evolution within Ontology Editors Presentation at EKAW, Sigüenza, October 2002 L. Stojanovic, B. Motik FZI Research Center for Information Technologies.
PMP Study Guide Chapter 11: Controlling Work Results.
HUMANITARIAN RESPONSE MONITORING SYSTEM. Humanitarian Response Monitoring System Components  Transport and Logistics cluster  Emergency Food and Nutrition.
6/22/2016 The Philosophy of Personal Assistance or What its all About Anne Pridmore.
HOKLAS th Edition Implementation Schedule 21 Oct 0515 May 0615 Apr 0715 May 07 Assessments:8 th ed. 7 th ed. based applications, reassessment and.
NERC Published Lessons Learned Summary
Software Verification and Validation
External Sorting Chapter 13
Emerging Approaches, Lessons Learned & Key Practices (Part 2)
Recommending a Strategy
Recommending a Strategy
Rail Safety Worker Engineering and Design Competency
SQA Role during Software Requirements Phase
Recommending a Strategy
Replace This Text with Committee Name
Agriculture and Natural Resources
Peer Reviews 11/21/2018.
[INSERT APPLICABLE REGIONAL ENTITY NAME/LOGO]
The FAA’s Weather Research Program
External Sorting Chapter 13
Specification on float equipment
Agriculture and Natural Resources
Project Quality Management
Action Items from the Kidney Transplantation Committee
Recommending a Strategy
Recommending a Strategy
Recommending a Strategy
National Trauma Data Standard: CDA
External Sorting Chapter 13
Software Reviews.
Replace This Text with Committee Name
Presentation transcript:

Pilot IG Conformance What is it measuring?

Summary of IG Conformance Scenario IG Conformances1 Number of conformances requiring inspection testing = 14 conformance statements. Utilized 80 Percentage verified out of the conformance in scope = 97.5 % Inspection tested/verified 66/78 Not in Scope 118 Alternate Approach 25 Request Rewording 66 Request Removal 31 Total Recommended Conformances for UC Scenario 174? Total Conformances 203 Statement that still require inspection testing Percentage of verified conformance statements out of the number utilized How was this number computed?

Suggested Analysis Approach Track the summary – Conformance statements tested – Conformance statements used – Increasing “utilized” number and tested/verified conformance statements Issues for discussion/resolution Items marked for discussion – Input from implementers Items marked “not applicable” – “hide” rows to resolve clutter Change, removal requested for some items – Discussion of pilot recommendations may be needed

Summary Issue (duplicate) Input needed from pilots Partial validation Inspection tested Full validation

Summary Marked for removal Type of verification testing Marked as “NA – not applicable”