IHIC 2011 – Orlando, FL Amnon Shabo (Shvo), PhD HL7 Clinical Genomics WG Co-chair and Modeling Facilitator HL7 Structured Documents WG.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Advanced Piloting Cruise Plot.
Advertisements

1 End-User Programming to Support Classroom Activities on Small Devices Craig Prince University of Washington VL/HCC 2008.
Chapter 7 System Models.
Copyright © 2011, Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. Chapter 5 Author: Julia Richards and R. Scott Hawley.
1 Copyright © 2010, Elsevier Inc. All rights Reserved Fig 2.1 Chapter 2.
By D. Fisher Geometric Transformations. Reflection, Rotation, or Translation 1.
September, 2005What IHE Delivers 1 CDA-based content integration profiles Philippe Lagouarde, Cegedim Co-chair Vendor, IHE-France.
September, 2005What IHE Delivers 1 IHE-Cardiology Technical Committee EP Key Data Elements February 21, 2011 Bryan Jennings - Medical Micrographics Nick.
Helmut König, Siemens Medical Solutions
September, 2005What IHE Delivers 1 Francois Macary, Agfa HealthCare co-chair Lab Technical Committee co-chair Lab Technical Committee Sharing Laboratory.
June 28-29, 2005IHE Interoperability Workshop 1 Integrating the Healthcare Enterprise Cross-enterprise Document Sharing for Imaging (XDS-I) Rita Noumeir.
Collaboration The Key to Interoperability Chuck Meyer Chair, HL7.
FpML REPORTING WORKING GROUP Copyright © 2010 International Swaps and Derivatives Association, Inc. JANUARY 2010 – SLIDE 1 ISDA FpML Update Brian Lynn.
EDOS Workgroup Update July 16, 2013 Laboratory Orders Interface Initiative.
HL7 V2 Implementation Guide Authoring Tool Proposal
EDOS Workgroup Update June 18, 2013 Laboratory Orders Interface Initiative.
1 HL7 Jan 2007 Working Group MeetingsPharmacogenomics Update RCRIM TC Philip M. Pochon Covance Enterprise Architecture.
1 Intermountain Healthcare Clinical Genetics Institute Marc S. Williams, M.D. Director Grant M. Wood Senior IT Strategist Introduction to HL7 Clinical.
Catalogue, synthesise Templates, forms, data sets used in real, diverse health settings Formal representation of clinical business object REQUIREMENTS.
1 HL7 Jan 2010 Working Group MeetingsCTLAB Pharmacogenomics Update JOINT RCRIM and CG Session CTLAB Message Pharmacogenomics Results Overview.
HL7 Clinical Genomics and Structured Documents Work Groups CDA Implementation Guide: Genetic Testing Report DRAFT PROPOSAL Amnon Shabo (Shvo), PhD
HL7 Project Management Tool Overview for HL7 Project Facilitators
HL7 Clinical Genomics – RIM Constraining Issues May 2008 The HL7 Clinical Genomics SIG Amnon Shabo (Shvo), PhD HL7 Clinical Genomics SIG Co-chair and Modeling.
Moving from V2 to V3 – Consequences of the RIM RIMBAA Presentation November 14,
HL7 Clinical-Genomics SIG: Tissue-Typing Models and a Reusable Genotype Module HL7 V3 Compliant HL7 Clinical-Genomics SIG Facilitator Amnon Shabo (Shvo)
HL7 v3 Clinical Genomics – Overview
Business Transaction Management Software for Application Coordination 1 Business Processes and Coordination.
18 Copyright © 2005, Oracle. All rights reserved. Distributing Modular Applications: Introduction to Web Services.
Jeopardy Q 1 Q 6 Q 11 Q 16 Q 21 Q 2 Q 7 Q 12 Q 17 Q 22 Q 3 Q 8 Q 13
Jeopardy Q 1 Q 6 Q 11 Q 16 Q 21 Q 2 Q 7 Q 12 Q 17 Q 22 Q 3 Q 8 Q 13
Title Subtitle.
Determine Eligibility Chapter 4. Determine Eligibility 4-2 Objectives Search for Customer on database Enter application signed date and eligibility determination.
0 - 0.
DIVIDING INTEGERS 1. IF THE SIGNS ARE THE SAME THE ANSWER IS POSITIVE 2. IF THE SIGNS ARE DIFFERENT THE ANSWER IS NEGATIVE.
Addition Facts
Year 6 mental test 5 second questions
ZMQS ZMQS
Week 2 The Object-Oriented Approach to Requirements
BT Wholesale October Creating your own telephone network WHOLESALE CALLS LINE ASSOCIATED.
Configuration management
© 2011 TIBCO Software Inc. All Rights Reserved. Confidential and Proprietary. Towards a Model-Based Characterization of Data and Services Integration Paul.
ABC Technology Project
Heppenheim Producer-Archive Interface Specification Status of standardisation project Main characteristics, major changes, items pending.
Squares and Square Root WALK. Solve each problem REVIEW:
© 2012 National Heart Foundation of Australia. Slide 2.
Chapter 5 Test Review Sections 5-1 through 5-4.
GG Consulting, LLC I-SUITE. Source: TEA SHARS Frequently asked questions 2.
The European Organisation for the Safety of Air Navigation AIRM Review Forum AIRM Status Report.
Addition 1’s to 20.
25 seconds left…...
Week 1.
1 © 2004, Cisco Systems, Inc. All rights reserved. CCNA 1 v3.1 Module 11 TCP/IP Transport and Application Layers.
We will resume in: 25 Minutes.
©Brooks/Cole, 2001 Chapter 12 Derived Types-- Enumerated, Structure and Union.
A SMALL TRUTH TO MAKE LIFE 100%
1 Unit 1 Kinematics Chapter 1 Day
1 PART 1 ILLUSTRATION OF DOCUMENTS  Brief introduction to the documents contained in the envelope  Detailed clarification of the documents content.
From Model-based to Model-driven Design of User Interfaces.
4/12/2015 7:43 AM HL7 Interoperability Paradigms September 2007 WGM, Atlanta, GA John Koisch, OCTL Consulting Alan Honey, Kaiser Permanente Grahame Grieve,
LinkEHR Studio: a tool for archetype-based data transformations David Moner Biomedical Informatics Group (IBIME) ITACA Institute, Technical.
More Than You Think HL7 is people, HL7 is ideas, HL7 is collaboration.
Electronic Submission of Medical Documentation (esMD) Clinical Document Architecture R2 and C-CDA Comparison April 24, 2013.
HL7 Clinical Genomics – Implementation Roadmap The HL7 Clinical Genomics SIG Amnon Shabo (Shvo), PhD HL7 Clinical Genomics SIG Co-chair and Modeling Facilitator.
Agenda Introduction to MDHT MDHT Capabilities MDHT support using Consolidated CDA 1.
Clinical Genomics Work Group (HL7) Mukesh Sharma Washington University in St. Louis June 16, 2011.
CDA Clinical Document Architecture Charlie Bishop.
HL7 v3 Clinical Genomics – Overview The HL7 Clinical Genomics Work Group Prepared by Amnon Shabo (Shvo), PhD HL7 Clinical Genomics WG Co-chair and Modeling.
HL7 Clinical-Genomics SIG: Tissue-Typing Models and a Reusable Genotype Module HL7 V3 Compliant IBM Research Lab in Haifa together with Hadassah University.
THE DICOM 2014 INTERNATIONAL SEMINAR August 26Chengdu, China HL7 and DICOM: Complementary Standards, Collaborating Organizations Bao Yongjian Principal.
HL7 Clinical Genomics – Domain Information Model The HL7 Clinical Genomics Work Group Prepared by Amnon Shabo (Shvo), PhD HL7 Clinical Genomics WG Co-chair.
Presentation transcript:

IHIC 2011 – Orlando, FL Amnon Shabo (Shvo), PhD HL7 Clinical Genomics WG Co-chair and Modeling Facilitator HL7 Structured Documents WG CDA R2 Co-editor CCD Implementation Guide Co-editor CDA Implementation Guide for Genetic Testing Report (GTR): Towards a Clinical Genomic Statement

Haifa Research Lab 2 GTR & HL7 Clinical Genomics v3 Static Models Family History Genetic Loci Utilize Genetic Locus Constrained GeneticVariation Phenotype (utilizing the HL7 Clinical Statement) Utilize Implementation Topic Normative DSTU Constrained Gene Expression Implementation Topic Comments RCRIMLAB Other domains Utilize CDA IG GTR Reference Domain Information Model: “Genome”

Haifa Research Lab 3 CG and EHR: Encapsulate & Bubble-up! Clinical Practices Genomic Data Sources EHR System HL7 CG Messages with mainly Encapsulating HL7 Objects HL7 CG Messages with encapsulated data associated with HL7 clinical objects (phenotypes) Bubble up the most clinically-significant raw genomic data into specialized HL7 objects and link them with clinical data from the patient EHR Decision Support Applications Knowledge (KBs, Ontologies, registries, reference DBs, Papers, etc.) the challenge… Encapsulation by predefined & constrained bioinformatics schemas Bubbling-up is done continuously by specialized CDS applications Human-readable GTR document

Haifa Research Lab 4 CDA IG: Genetic Testing Report (GTR)  Define an implementation guide for genetic testing reports that is both human readable and machine- processable  Target at all types of GTR producers, e.g., genetic labs, clin. geneticists  Readable content is larger in scope  E.g., detailed description of the tests performed along with references  Machine-processable should be limited, e.g., exclude raw data  Ballot a Universal IG; derive it to specific types of GTR:  Healthcare & Research  Realm-specific guides  Omic-specific guides  Developed using the MDHT open source tool (OHT)

Haifa Research Lab 5 GTR - Design Principles  Follow existing report formats commonly used in healthcare & research  Emphasize interpretations & recommendations  Provide general background information on tests performed  Reference HL7 Clinical Genomics instances (e.g., GeneticVariation and Pedigree) as the place holders of full-blown raw genomic data and fully-structured family history data  Utilize patterns of ‘genotype-phenotype’ associations in the HL7 v3 Clinical Genomics Domain  Implement them as ‘clinical genomic statement’ entry-level templates (see next slide)

Haifa Research Lab 6 The Clinical Genomic Statement  An abstract Clinical Genomic Statement (CGS) template that  Has at its core a genomic observation (e.g., a DNA sequence variation)  If it’s a reportable finding, then it should be associated with indications and interpretations, specimen and genomic source class  The major finding can be associated with associated observation (e.g., amino acid change)  Optionally, performers may be specified (overriding header performers)  The CGS abstract template is instantiated by specialized CGS’s, e.g., for genetic variations or cytogenetics, as well as for their associated observation IndicationsInterpretations Genomic Observation Performers Specimen Genomic Source Clinical Genomic Statement Associated Observations

Haifa Research Lab 7 Narrative and Structured Data  All CGS structured data items shall be part of clinical genomic statement (CGS) instances so that parsing applications can find the full semantics explicitly represented in one coherent structure  Sub-sections such as Indications, Interpretations and Specimen are mainly for presenting narrative, but they may also contain structured data  In this way, it is possible to have less redundant documents, e.g., in the case where all tests reported in a GTR document have the same indication, an Indications section in the Summary section consists of a full-blown indication observation which all CGS indication observations reference  CGS structured data may point to the respective narrative in sub- sections (by means of XML ID)

Haifa Research Lab 8 GTR Rendered – The Header Draft that has not been clinically validated

Haifa Research Lab 9 GTR Rendered – Summary Section Summary Section continues in next slide… Draft that has not been clinically validated

Haifa Research Lab 10 GTR Rendered – Summary Section (cont.) Draft that has not been clinically validated

Haifa Research Lab 11 GTR Rendered – Genetic Variation Sections Draft that has not been clinically validated

Haifa Research Lab 12 GTR UML Model - Section Outline

Haifa Research Lab 13 GTR UML Model - Summary Section

Haifa Research Lab 14 GTR Main Hierarchies Test Details Section specimen indications Interpretations test performed findings test information Genetic Variations Section Genetic variations CGS Cytogenetic Section Genetic variations CGS Gene Expression Section Gene Expression CGS Clinical Genomic Statement (CGS) Genetic Variations CGS GV Associated Observations GV Interpretive Phenotypes Cytogenetic CGS Cyt Associated Observations Cyt Interpretive Phenotypes Gene Expression CGS GE Associated Observations GE Interpretive Phenotypes Abstract section template w/common sub-sections: Extended by specialized sections Abstract CGS template: Extended by specialized CGS’s

Haifa Research Lab 15 GTR Genetic Variation Section

Haifa Research Lab 16 Clinical Genomic Statement Extended by specialized Clinical Genomic Statements

Haifa Research Lab 17 Interpretive Phenotype Observation

Haifa Research Lab 18 GTR XML Snippets – Indications Section Indication’s narrative Indication’s structured data Summary Section

Haifa Research Lab 19 GTR XML Snippets – Specimen Section Specimen’s narrative Specimen’s structured data

Haifa Research Lab 20 GTR XML Snippets – Overall Interpretation Section Interpretation’s narrative Structured Interpretation

Haifa Research Lab 21 GTR XML Snippets – Genetic Variation Section Genetic Variation Genetic Variation associated observations

Haifa Research Lab 22 GTR XML Snippets – Genetic Variation Section (cont.) Genetic Variation indication Genetic Variation interpretation

Haifa Research Lab 23 uHealth: Patient Empowerment System  Joint project between IBM and Gil Hospital (Korea)  5 years project, currently in 2 nd year  3 IBM centers are involved:  IBM Korea  IBM Research in China  IBM Research in Haifa  Building an open platform and services  Web-based rich portal  Testing the system with patients and physicians from the hospital  Support integration with external PHR (e.g. Google Health)

Haifa Research Lab 24 uHealth: PHR / EHR Hybrid System Using CCD + GTR

Haifa Research Lab 25 The End Thank you for your attention… Questions?