W. Shannon Black Manager, Standards Processes Results Based Drafting 2013.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Standards Development: An Overview
Advertisements

March 2010 Plenary Session Slides for Governance Review IEEE 802 Presentation Submission Template (Rev. 9) Document Number: ec EC Date Submitted:
1 Balloting/Handling Negative Votes September 11, 2006 ASTM Training Session Bob Morgan Brynn Iwanowski.
September 2013 ASTM Officers Training Workshop September 2013 ASTM Officers Training Workshop MAIN COMMITTEE OFFICERS DUTIES AND RESPONSIBILITIES September.
1 Balloting/Handling Negative Votes September 22 nd and 24 th, 2009 ASTM Virtual Training Session Christine DeJong Joe Koury.
September 2013 ASTM Officers Training Workshop September 2013 ASTM Officers Training Workshop Membership & Roster Maintenance September 2013 ASTM Officers.
Task Group Chairman and Technical Contact Responsibilities ASTM International Officers Training Workshop September 2012 Scott Orthey and Steve Mawn 1.
Doc.: IEEE /XXXr0 Submission March, 2004 Matthew Sherman, BAE SystemsSlide 1 LMSC Policy and Procedures Update Date: March 14 th, 2005 Author:
1 Standards Development: An Overview Discovery to Delivery Topic Committee Meeting October 30, 2007 Karen A. Wetzel NISO Standards Program Manager
Business Practices Subcommittee Update August 17, 2010.
NAESB Coordinate Interchange
Aviation Security Training Module 4 Design and Conduct Exercise II 1.
1 Session 9 – Government-to-government dispute settlement procedures WTO Dispute Settlement Understanding Vesile Kulaçoglu, WTO Secretariat Dar es Salaam,
WECC Board of Directors April 21-23, 2004 Seattle, Washington WECC Procedure for Reporting of System Events Disturbance Reports Rod Maslowski OC Vice Chairperson.
Governance & Nominating Committee (GNC) Report WECC Board Meeting – December 6-7, 2007.
Standards Development and Approval Process Steve Rueckert Director of Standards Joint Guidance Committee WECC Leadership Annual Training Session Salt Lake.
1 TSS Report PCC Meeting Salt Lake City, UT October 26-27, 2006.
Process for Developing and Approving WECC Regional Criteria Preschedule Process Regional Criteria Drafting Team Meeting Conference Call - Webinar October.
WECC Response to BAL-002-WECC-1 Remand Order December 10, 2010 WECC Board of Directors Meeting Steve Rueckert Director of Standards.
Document Categorization Steve Ashbaker Director of Operations Joint Guidance Committee WECC Leadership Annual Training Session Salt Lake City, UT May 6-7,
INT-008-WECC-RBP-2 Mike Pfeister Salt River Project Joint Session January 10, 2013.
NERC Orientation Joint Guidance Committee WECC Leadership
BAL-002-WECC-1 Contingency Reserves
WECC-0074 Power Flow Base Case and Dynamic Stability Data Prep Procedure W. Shannon Black Manager, Business Practices and Standards Processes November.
WECC-0065 Steve Rueckert WECC Director of Standards.
Interpreting Regional Criteria and Regional Standards Brian Silverstein Board of Directors April, 2010.
Interchange Scheduling and Accounting Subcommittee Update October 2008 Gary Nolan ISAS Vice-Chair.
0 - 0.
Addition Facts
Chapter 12: Congress in Action Section 3
The UEA House of Delegates Directing YOUR Association through the democratic process. 1.
1. 2 Anyone can suggest an idea for a law. Only Members of Congress can introduce a proposed law to the House or Senate. 3.
WECC-0083 Order 740 Remand BAL-002-WECC-1 W. Shannon Black Manager, Business Practices and Standards Processes.
WECC-0071 System Performance Criterion Standards Processes.
* 07/16/96 *.
Doc.: IEEE wng0 Submission November, 2013 Pat Kinney, Kinney ConsultingSlide 1 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal.
1 FL EDI R3 Test Requirements Rule 69L , F.A.C.
BAL-001-TRE-1 Primary Frequency Response Update for Texas RE RSC
Addition 1’s to 20.
BY-LAWS COMMITTEE PRESENTATION MARCH 2007 PRESIDENTS CONFERENCE.
Week 1.
We will resume in: 25 Minutes.
District Leadership Team Stakeholder Involvement in the District Strategic Plan! Session #4 April 12th, 2011.
W. Shannon Black Manager, Standards Processes New Chair Orientation.
Robert’s Rules of Order
Meeting in Vermont Vermont Department of Libraries.
2009 Performance Assessment Member Representatives Committee Meeting October 28, 2008.
Ontario Overview Dave Short Senior Regulatory Analyst, Regulatory Affairs IESO’s ERO Workshop – June 28, 2006.
TAC July 2, 2003 Market Design Implementation Process Recommendation.
Texas Regional Entity Update Sam Jones Interim CEO and President Board of Directors July 18, 2006.
Standards Update Steve Rueckert – Director of Standards W ESTERN E LECTRICITY C OORDINATING C OUNCIL.
May 13, 2008 COPS Commercial Operations Subcommittee (COPS) Procedures Review ERCOT Market Rules.
TEXAS NODAL Board Review and Approval August 19, 2003.
Item 5d Texas RE 2011 Budget Assumptions April 19, Texas RE Preliminary Budget Assumptions Board of Directors and Advisory Committee April 19,
DICOM to ISO-DICOM Report to joint ISO TC215/WG2 – DICOM WG10 meeting January 24, 2004, San Diego.
WECC Standards Update Steve Rueckert Director of Standards W ESTERN E LECTRICITY C OORDINATING C OUNCIL.
SAR 001 DT Presentation Texas RE Presentation to SAR-001 Drafting Team Farzaneh Tafreshi Manager, Reliability Standards Texas Regional Entity.
TEXAS NODAL Market Design Structure and Process August 19, 2003.
RFC Webinar April 24, 2009 and May 1, 2009 Presented By: Mark Kuras Chair, Generator Verification SDT.
1 Summary of TAC Procedures May 5, Revision of TAC Procedures Project began in October 2004 to incorporate the Commercial Operations Subcommittee.
WECC – NERC Standards Update
Merrill Brimhall – Engineer, Staff
Robert’s Rules of Order
W. Shannon Black Manager, Standards Processes
Robert’s Rules of Order
Steve Rueckert – Director of Standards
Meetings.
IEEE Standards Development
Steve Rueckert Director of Standards WSC Meeting Overview
Standards Development Process
Presentation transcript:

W. Shannon Black Manager, Standards Processes Results Based Drafting 2013

2 Who? o Define the DT  The team is subject to open What? o Draft a WECC Regional Reliability Standard When? o Six months or six years The Basics

3 Where? o Rarely face-to-face o Usually Webinar Why? o Reliability o Wear your “WECC Hat” not your “Firm Hat” How? o In accordance with the “Procedures” and NERC Rules Why are we Here?

Who Does What?

5 Chair o Primary  Create work product  Ensure the team keeps moving forward  Facilitate within the four-corners of the Procedures  “Voice” of the team o Secondary  Subject Matter Expert Team Members o SME with a WECC purpose The Chair and the Team

6 WECC Staff o Manage the Procedures  Stay within the Procedures  Keep the team moving o Manage the document  Document control  First tier quality review  Facilitator plus Technical Writer  Language and Procedure SME o Manage the website WECC Staff

7 Procedural Oversight o Need approval for most everything  Scope  Posting of work product (Versions/Response)  Forward to WECC Board The Standing Committee no longer control the development process. The WSC

8 NERC o Quality Review Board o Approves, remands or rejects NERC – again o Board of Trustees o Legal – multiple reviews of the filing FERC o Approve, remand or reject o Their own calendar Board / NERC / FERC

“Procedures” And Principles

10 WECC/NERC/FERC Approved Document Exhibit “C” of the Delegation Agreement o Basically a Contract o Contains specifics of delegated authority o Is not all inclusive  Needs interpretation  Staff will assist The “Procedures”

11 Meetings require 15 days notice Comment o 45 days followed by 30 days – until done Response o 30 days to respond Impact Statement o Addresses Costs & “Other” Don’t forget the WSC o Allow WSC “Time” Procedural Mandates

12 Posted 30 days before a Ballot Pool Posted 30 days before the Board Ballot Body/Ballot Pool Joint Session – 3 days notice Vote “at least” 7 days after Session Vote covers 15 “Business” days “No” votes require a reason o Added to the record Procedural Mandates

13 Each Comment o Requires a Response o Can be aggregated Forwarded to WSC o They officially approve and post o 30 days to get Responses posted Repeat until done Responses

14 Requires 2/3 quorum of “Pool” o Abstentions and incomplete votes count o Vote “at least” 7 days after Session o Vote 15 calendar days or extended as needed If accepted o To the Board “via” the WSC If rejected o WSC can rewrite, re-ballot or recycle to Session, terminate Vote

Development Principles

16 The Procedures do not require a quorum of the DT to be present before a DT vote is taken. The Procedures do not require notice that a DT subset group will meet. It takes only a simple majority to carry a vote on any DT issue. Development Principles

17 All meetings of the DT shall be open to the public and broad participation is encouraged. Nothing in these Development Principles shall infringe on an individual’s rights to appeal o Among other reasons…  Can appeal for procedural or technical error All DT members are encouraged to always be present; proxy voting by a DT member is not allowed. Development Principles

18 DT voting may take place face-to-face, electronically, in real-time or within a scheduled window. Voting on which position to adopt on a drafting issue is reserved for the DT members. Voting on inclusion or exclusion of specific language in the document under development is reserved for the DT members. Voting on minutes and related business motions is reserved for the DT members. Straw Polls are of excellent advisory value but the DT is not obligated to abide by a straw poll. Development Principles

A Note on Drafting

20 Follow the ERO or RRO templates Applicable Entities o NERC Functional Model dictates Requirement and Measures o Each X shall do Y. Evidence may include… Avoid o Adjective, pronouns, adverbs o Do not incorporate by reference o Don’t use “C”aps unless defined Regulatory - Speak

21 Review the SAR and other documents Draft the Purpose o This overall document is designed to….  Fill in that blank  The body should match the Purpose statement Draft a set of goals o Things we want entities to do Draft the tasks that need to be done o Can assign entities later Draft the sequence of those tasks Where do we start?

22 o Now we can draft Pen to Paper

Questions?