Review of Fiscal Law December 6, 2002 Judith S. Boyd.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Transportation Funding Alternatives and Outreach
Advertisements

WELCOME BUDGET MANAGERS AND CHIEF FISCAL OFFICERS
Evaluation at NRCan: Information for Program Managers Strategic Evaluation Division Science & Policy Integration July 2012.
1. 2 Partners in Procurement Steve Hagar Deputy Director Central Purchasing Division Department of Central Services August 24th, 2009.
Manatt manatt | phelps | phillips New York State Health Information Technology Summit Initiative Overview and Update Rachel Block, Project Director United.
OMB Regulatory Requirements Regulatory Requirements 2. Written Policies & Procedures 3. Documen- tation of Expenses 4. Managing Cash 5. Efficient.
Page /27/2001http:// Department of Defense Change Management Center Financial Management.
Page /31/2001 Department of Defense Change Management Center Financial Management Business Reform Initiative Mary Margaret Evans Briefing October.
Page /27/2001http:// Department of Defense Change Management Center Financial Management Business.
Fiscal Law Project Planning Session Results December 18, 2002.
Fiscal Law Proposal (Removing Impediments and Defining Financial Management in the 21 st Century) Mary Margaret Evans Director.
Fiscal Law Proposal Mary Margaret Evans Director DRAFT.
Review of Fiscal Law December 4, 2002 DRAFT. Change Management Center 2 DRAFT Overview Purpose & Objective Challenges Assertions Partnership Basic Approach.
DRAFT Fiscal Law Proposal. Fiscal Law Project 2 DRAFT Fiscal law is the body of law that governs the availability and use of federal funds and accountability.
Review of Fiscal Law December 18, 2002 DRAFT. Change Management Center 2 DRAFT Overview Purpose & Objective Challenges Assertions Partnership Basic Approach.
DRAFT Fiscal Law Proposal. Fiscal Law Project 2 DRAFT Fiscal law is the body of law that governs the availability and use of federal funds and accountability.
Review of Fiscal Law December 4, 2002 DRAFT. Change Management Center 2 DRAFT Overview Purpose & Objective Challenges Management Directives Partnership.
WECC/TEPPC Response to DOE Funding Opportunity Status Update June 29, 2009 Bradley Nickell Renewable Integration and Planning Director.
Threshold System Presented by Jan Stanley, State Title I Director Office of Assessment and Accountability Fall Title I Directors Conference October 23-25,
HISPC-Illinois II The Public-Private Partnership Moves Forward on Privacy and Security.
1 Unified Information Technology System Development – Project Overview Board of Early Education and Care February 10, 2009.
Copyright The Info-Tech Research Group Inc. All Rights Reserved. D1-1 by James M. Dutcher Strategic IT Planning & Governance Creation H I G H.
Gaining Senior Leadership Support for Continuity of Operations
Privacy Impact Assessment Future Directions TRICARE Management Activity HEALTH AFFAIRS 2009 Data Protection Seminar TMA Privacy Office.
A-16 Portfolio Management Implementation Plan Update
STATE CONTRACT TRAINING STATE BUDGET AGENCY: APPROVALS AND PROCESSES Jack Mynatt Michael Kos BUDGET ANALYSTS 7/13/11 AND 8/3/11.
Contract Fundamentals at Fresno State Doug Carey, Grants Administrator Office of Research and Sponsored Programs California State University, Fresno.
Financial System Replacement Project
1. 2 August Recommendation 9.1 of the Strategic Information Technology Advisory Committee (SITAC) report initiated the effort to create an Administrative.
Business & Travel Expense Policy: An Overview
Mississippi Special Education Advisory Panel Annual Report to the State Board of Education July 2009.
YES New Mexico Enterprise Eligibility System
How to commence the IT Modernization Process?
Rosemarie Day Deputy Director and Chief Operating Officer Thursday, May 8, 2008 Operations Report Current Priorities and Future Plans.
Service Provider Support of Audit Readiness Office of the Under Secretary of Defense (Comptroller) March 14, 2011.
State of Indiana Business One Stop (BOS) Program Roadmap Updated June 6, 2013 RFI ATTACHMENT D.
Oregon State Library Transformation Project Launch
WIOA Timeline and Action Plan for States
1 Single Audit Legislative Audit Bureau September 2009.
SYSTEM OF EVALUATION AND MANAGEMENT CONTROL RESULTS-BASED BUDGETING THE CHILEAN EXPERIENCE Heidi Berner H Head of Management Control Division Budget Office,
Understanding the Federal Budget Process Tribal Self-Governance Financial Training Session Elizabeth Fowler March 27, 2012.
Subrecipient Monitoring Webcast Presenters Pat O'Rourke, Irene St. Croix, Bridget Ware Department of Health and Human Services Health Resources and Services.
DRAFT 12/18/02 Fiscal Law Briefing. Fiscal Law Project 22 DRAFT  Fiscal law is the body of law that governs the availability and use of federal funds.
Ch Financial Control PIFC in Iceland
DRAFT Fiscal Law Proposal. Fiscal Law Project 22 DRAFT  Fiscal law is the body of law that governs the availability and use of federal funds and accountability.
Congress and Contractor Personal Conflicts of Interest May 21, 2008 Jon Etherton Etherton and Associates, Inc.
OHIO OFFICE OF INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY. Even the agents are suffering…
1 FAA Reform: Congressional Staff Briefing January 24, 1996.
Data Transparency Town Hall September 26, 2014 Christina Ho Acting Deputy Assistant Secretary Accounting Policy U.S. Department of the Treasury Karen F.
UNIFORM GUIDANCE OVERVIEW. OMB Circulars Before and After A-21 Cost principles for Educational Institutions A-21 Cost principles for Educational Institutions.
ZHRC/HTI Financial Management Training
A SOUND INVESTMENT IN SUCCESSFUL VR OUTCOMES FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT.
Foundation Financial Services Post Award Nancy Gomez Post Award Analyst.
Donald R. Rainey, Sr., CPPB/VCO Director, Office of General Services Virginia Department of Social Services.
FISCAL RESPONSIBILITY IN TITLE III AND OTHER SPONSORED PROGRAMS AND GRANTS ADMINISTRATION Presented by Sharon S. Crews, M.Ac., CPA Vice President for Administrative.
1 Deborah Dalton, Elena Gonzalez, and Patrick Field EPA, DOI, CBI Overview - Negotiated Rulemaking.
February 2, 2011 Joe Yew City of Oakland California Debt and Investment Advisory Commission Debt 2: Accessing the Market Debt Policy and Plan of Finance.
How to get Money for your FSA Projects 101 Richard Lucas and Lauren Bloom.
U.S. General Services Administration Andrew Marsh Accountant GSA May 4, 2010 GSA Vendor Payment Update Office of the Chief Financial Officer.
FACA and Ethics Issues ADVISORY COMMITTEE ON WATER INFORMATION 2006 Annual Meeting - January 18.
Workforce Innovation & Opportunity Act Regional and Local Area Designation and Redesignation Local Workforce Investment Board Listening Session February.
Review of Fiscal Law December 18, 2002 DRAFT. Change Management Center 22 DRAFT Overview  Purpose & Objective  Challenges  Assertions  Partnership.
United States 1 Election Assistance Commission 1 Federal Advisory Committee Act (FACA) Overview Standards Board Meeting Carlsbad, Ca – April.
Laura Freeman Department of Energy Contractor Contracts Specialist Policy Analyst Contracting Officer National Aeronautics and Space Administration Contracting.
Module 3: Local Partnership Systems & Accountability Overview
MILTECH Study Update LtCol PJ Zimmerman, USMC
Research Program Strategic Plan
Federal Rulemaking Process for Significant Regulatory Actions
Revolutionize USACE Civil Works
Stakeholder Engagement: Webinar Part I: The Regulatory Development Process for the Government of Canada Part II: Making Technical Regulations Under.
Presentation transcript:

Review of Fiscal Law December 6, 2002 Judith S. Boyd

Change Management Center 22 Overview  Purpose & Objective  Challenges  Management Directives  Partnership Approach  Project Approach  Project Activities & Timeframe  What We Need From You

Change Management Center 33 Purpose & Objective Purpose Comprehensive review of the laws and associated rules, directives and processes governing DoD Financial Management to support the President’s Management Agenda. Objective Recommend the legal changes, modifications and repeals necessary to transform DoD financial management into a coordinated network of laws that will result in a flexible and integrated foundation for the 21st Century.

Change Management Center 44 Challenges  Overlapping / Conflicting Congressional/Administrative financial rules  Limited DoD “Freedom to Manage”  Disconnect between fiscal policy and business processes  No “wall-to-wall” review of Fiscal Law  GAO: DoD financial modernization requires complimentary policy/process modernization

Change Management Center 55  President’s Management Agenda supports change: –“The Financial Management Initiative improves how the Government manages its money – reducing, for instance, the billions in erroneous payments the Government makes every year” –The e-Gov Initiative harnesses the power of the Internet to make the Government more productive  Congress seems receptive to DoD financial streamlining recommendations  SECDEF: Improving Financial Management in “Top Ten” Management Directives

Change Management Center 66 Partnership Approach  Management – Executive Sponsor & DoD Components –Fiscal Law Advisory Panel Identify, justify, and recommend legal, regulatory and process changes – Contractor Support SAIC Keane Financial Management Services, Inc. (FMSI) –Complementary to FMEA/FMMP DoD Executive Sponsor Steering Group Fiscal Law Contractor Support Government Expert Advisors & Working Group Fiscal Law Advisory Panel (“Section 800”) Congress

Change Management Center 77 Project Approach  “Modular” Approach  Final Deliverable: Strategic Plan for Fiscal Law  Develop and Implement Comprehensive Legislative Recommendations  Interim: “Quick Hits” Tactical Opportunities  Process Transformation  Regulatory Changes  Coordinated Project Approach to avoid redundancies and maximize success Review of Fiscal Law in context with FMEA/FMMP and Contract Law/FASA

Change Management Center 88 Project Activities & Timeframe Phase I – Scope Identification (01/01/03 – 6/30/03*)  Identify issues for review –Review and validate project scope –Identify issues –Propose recommendations for change & performance results expected Legislative Non-legislative  Interview Public and Private Stakeholders –DoD managers –Congressional staff, CBO, GAO, OMB, FASAB, & JFMIP –Private sector experts  Analyze and prioritize critical improvement opportunities in statute, regulation and process –Provide Executive Sponsor Initial Findings – “Quick Hits” (60 days following FMEA report release)  Define scope of analysis & Key Performance Indicators *Assumes FMEA report release on 4/30/03 Phase 1: 01/01/03 – 6/30/03

Change Management Center 99 Project Activities & Timeframe Phase II – Recommendation Development ( 05/01/03 – 9/30/03 )  Establish Advisory Panel  Identify Role and Engage OSD Legislative Affairs  Spin off “Quick Hit” opportunities for implementation (ongoing)  Provide IPRs to Steering Group  Provide recommendations for initial Advisory Panel review  Finalize legislative recommendations Phase II: 05/01/03 – 9/30/03Phase 1: 01/01/03 – 6/30/03

Change Management Center  10 Project Activities & Timeframe Phase III – Final Report & Action Model Implementation Plan ( 10/1/03 – 02/28/04 )  Prepare final report –Background –Analysis and justification –Recommendations –Outreach and Communications Plan –Draft Legislative/Regulatory Language –Legislative Strategy  Conduct final Advisory Panel review  Submit recommendations for President’s Budget  Begin Phase IV planning for ongoing Fiscal Law review Phase III: 10/1/03 – 02/28/04Phase II: 05/01/03 – 9/30/03Phase 1: 01/01/03 – 6/30/03

Change Management Center  11 What We Need From You  Continue Advocacy for MID 909  Determine Executive Sponsor  Further Guidance/Your Insights

Change Management Center  12 Back-Up Slides

Change Management Center  13 Alternative Timetables Option 1 FY05 President’s Budget = 70% solution (Feb 04 PB) Option 2 FY05 out-of-cycle = 100% solution possible (May 04) Option 3 FY06 President’s Budget = 100% solution (Feb 05 PB) Option 4 SECDEF mandated “800 Panel” = 100% solution (May 03/May04) Congress affirms the SECDEF actions (???) Option 5 Congressionally mandated “800 Panel” (FY91 NDAA Review of Acquisition Law) = 100% solution (???)

Change Management Center  14 Cost Total Estimated Cost $5.0M (15 months)  Contractor Support  Subject Matter Experts  Internet Web Services Costs  Travel  Total Estimated Cost $2.6M $1.7M $0.5M $0.2M $5.0M

Change Management Center  15 Expected Changes Legislative Change Examples  Anti-Deficiency Act –Problem - Fund managers can not pay vendors for purchases to required to perform work for working capital fund customers. –Possible Solution - Modify over-expenditure requirement to allow “Working Capital Funds” to either 1) over-expend “fund balance with treasury” or authorize borrowing authority from treasury equal to agency accounts receivable balance. –Result – Vendors are: 1`) paid timely, 2) provided increased working capital liquidity, 3) reduced borrowing cost, and 4) either reduced product or service cost or profits to be reinvested or returned to stockholders to be reinvested or used.  Disbursing Officer Act, Executive Order 6166, Prompt Payment Act –Problem – Vendors invoices can not be paid except by authorized government disbursing officers & interest penalties are assessed for late payment (Prompt Payment Act) –Possible Solution – Change Disbursing Officers Act, Executive Order 6166 & Prompt Payment Act to allow vendors to “Electronically PULL” payments from treasury general account equal to one months invoice for products or services and “post audit” paid invoice and adjust next month invoice for discrepancies, –Result - Vendors are: 1) paid timely, 2) provided increased working capital liquidity, 3) either reduced product or service cost or profits to be reinvested or returned to stockholders to be reinvested or used, and 4) Government payment processing cost, invoice examination and disbursing costs are reduced.

Change Management Center  16 Federal Advisory Committee Act (FACA)  FACA Trigger –Private Sector Individuals alone or in conjunction with government employees providing consensus advice at the request of a government agency  Pro –Transparent, High Visibility –Use of Private Sector Recommendations –Led review of acquisition law (FY91 NDAA)  Con –Cumbersome and Time Consuming –Limits use of Private Sector –Limits flexibility of participants  FACA Requirements include (Department of Defense Directive ) –Establish a written charter that explains the mission of the committee; –Give timely notice of committee meetings in the Federal Register; –Have fair and balanced membership on the committee; –Open committee meetings to the public, whenever possible; –Have the sponsoring agency prepare minutes of committee meetings; –Provide public access to the information used by the committee; –Grant to the federal government the authority to convene and adjourn meetings; and –Terminate within two years unless the committee charter is renewed or otherwise