1 FAB CE Feasibility Study Operations FAB CE Stakeholders Workshop March 5 th 2008, Prague

Click to edit Master title style Click to edit Master text styles Second level Third level Fourth level Fifth level 01/10/ FAB CE  Introduction  Key results  Airspace  Concept  Civil/Military  Contingency Content  Conclusions

Click to edit Master title style Click to edit Master text styles Second level Third level Fourth level Fifth level 01/10/ FAB CE FAB Development Process Assumptions : 1. Airspace (7States) 2. Route Network (RNDSG 2010+) 3. Common understanding OPERATIONAL CONCEPT DOCUMENT Volume I Initial Airspace Design WG2 OPS WG AREA OF RESPONSIBILITY WG3 WG4 WG5 WG6 OPERATIONAL CONCEPT DOCUMENT Volume II Sector Families Sector Groups TIME FIN WG Master Plan TEC WG HR WG ILR WG SAF WG FAB Scenarios CBA SAF CASE constraints Master Plan OPS Scenarios

Click to edit Master title style Click to edit Master text styles Second level Third level Fourth level Fifth level 01/10/ FAB CE OPS Concept evolution CONCEPT ALIGNMENT Based on FAB Static and Dynamic Scenarios Main driver: Business and Technology Alignment with: SESAR LT Concept Expectations FABCE partners Industry standards Based on FAB Static and Dynamic Scenarios Main driver: Strategic ATM business objectives Operational performance included SAFETY Alignment with: ECIP/LCIP DMEAN SESAR MT Concept Expectations of the FAB partners Based on FAB scenario for initial operations Main driver: Satisfy SES Req. Alignment with: ECIP/LCIP DMEAN. Legal [e.gSES] Expectations of the FAB partners FAB CE 2015 Concept Concept for the future [2020+] Concept for 2009-> Evolution from current situation

Click to edit Master title style Click to edit Master text styles Second level Third level Fourth level Fifth level 01/10/ FAB CE Initial Operations Small scale cross border operations solving 25 critical areas in upper and lower airspace Joint Civil-Military Airspace Co-ordination Body [JCMACB] coordinating airspace use and route network and enabling functional integration of ASM & ATFCM Systematic Application of Direct Routes Contingency Plan for safety critical situations

Click to edit Master title style Click to edit Master text styles Second level Third level Fourth level Fifth level 01/10/ FAB CE Airspace SECTOR Configuration (SC) EST SECTOR GROUP (SG) FAB CE OPS Concept Elements 2015 Elementary SECTOR (ES) EST Traffic 2012 Optimized AAS 07 SECTOR FAMILY (SF) FAMILY GROUP (FG) Airspace design OPS Scenarios OPS Concept Sector Family (SF) - areas containing specific air traffic flows and conflict areas which will consist of strongly interdependent elementary sectors. Family Group (FG) - group of Sector Families made along the major traffic flows (minimum FAB) Sector Configuration (SC) – combination of elementary sectors to satisfy operational requirements Sector Group (SG) – includes one Sector Family or more Sector Families to satisfy single sector configuration management (minimum AoR)

Click to edit Master title style Click to edit Master text styles Second level Third level Fourth level Fifth level 01/10/ FAB CE Sector Groups (FL285 – FL660) and Family Groups Note: FGs borders simplified for purpose of presentations

Click to edit Master title style Click to edit Master text styles Second level Third level Fourth level Fifth level 01/10/ FAB CE Sector Groups (GND – FL285)

Click to edit Master title style Click to edit Master text styles Second level Third level Fourth level Fifth level 01/10/ FAB CE Concept Planning Cycle State/ANSP/ MIL FAB CE Other Network Stakeholders State/ANSP/ MIL NOP SGs/AoR sectors SCP STATIC AoR: 1 ATSU in 1 SG Dynamic AoR: 1+n ATSU in 1 SG Network FAB CE coordinated implementation, training, validation

Click to edit Master title style Click to edit Master text styles Second level Third level Fourth level Fifth level 01/10/ FAB CE Static AoR Operations Extensive cross border sectorisation with ATM provision for GAT (possibly OAT) Sector Configuration Plan (SCP) relating to Sectors Groups which are under the exclusive control of single ATSU SCP part of FAB/European NOP valid/updated minimum for a season ASM/ATFCM integrated processes involve the different actors (ANSPs, CFMU, Airlines, Authorised Agency and civil/military coordinating bodies) FAB AMC(s) (in each FG), ideally combined with FMPs, play a key role in collaborative decision making and in review of the NOP Collaborative decision making process from the strategic phase to the executing phase

Click to edit Master title style Click to edit Master text styles Second level Third level Fourth level Fifth level 01/10/ FAB CE Dynamic AoR Operations Sector Group involves several ATSUs Sector Configuration Plan for several ATSUs relating to Sectors Group as part of FAB/European NOP, valid/updated minimum for a season Sector Configuration Management done within a Sector Group

Click to edit Master title style Click to edit Master text styles Second level Third level Fourth level Fifth level 01/10/ FAB CE Dynamic Area of Responsibility Operations sector 2 ATSU A ATSU B ATSU B provides ATS in Sector 3 and 4 as part of SG B (sec 2 + sec 3 + sec 4) sector 3 ATSU A and ATSU B provide ATS in sector 2 in periods defined by Sector Configuration Plan ATSU B is responsible for Sector Configuration Management in whole SG B including the sec 2 sector 1 ATSU A provides ATS in sector 1 as part of the SG A (sec 1) sector 4

Click to edit Master title style Click to edit Master text styles Second level Third level Fourth level Fifth level 01/10/ FAB CE Civil/Military Strategic ASM/ATFCM Process FAB CE Airspace Plan EUROPEAN NATIONAL REGIONAL Military Airspace Requirements FAB CE Member States Civil Airspace Requirements FAB CE ANSPs EUROPEAN BODIES JCMACB NATIONAL BODIES Supporting Bureau

Click to edit Master title style Click to edit Master text styles Second level Third level Fourth level Fifth level 01/10/ FAB CE FAB AMC Traffic Demand TRAFFIC DATA Civil/Military Pre-tactical ASM/ATFCM Process AUP UUP ACCs Sectors capacities/conf. CFMU Coordination major traffic flows Establish pre-defined modus operandi Establish process and procedures to apply Establish defined priority criteria to use for decision Strategic level decisions Airspace allocation requests * On line definition of airspace requests based on: Fixed areas Predefined areas Requested shapes * National decision to identify the Approved Agencies CRAM UCRAM ADR CFMU IFPS AOs: Shortest routes Cheapest routes No-delay routes

Click to edit Master title style Click to edit Master text styles Second level Third level Fourth level Fifth level 01/10/ FAB CE Contingency Concept COST EFFECTIVENESS: Targeted in Dynamic AoR for the whole Contingency cycle SAFETY: FAB mutual assistance achieved in Initial Operations BUSINESS: FAB – ATS delegation achieved in Static AoR Operations

Click to edit Master title style Click to edit Master text styles Second level Third level Fourth level Fifth level 01/10/ FAB CE Conclusions Concept of FAB driven by OPS needs, using existing and planned ATS facilities Incremental, performance driven development and implementation Alignment with SES and European Network Adaptation responding to the evolution of traffic

Click to edit Master title style Click to edit Master text styles Second level Third level Fourth level Fifth level 01/10/ FAB CE FAB CE Feasibility Study OPS WG THANK YOU !