F. Debbasch (LERMA-ERGA Université Paris 6) and M. Bustamante, C. Chevalier, Y. Ollivier Statistical Physics and relativistic gravity (2003-2005)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Gravitational Wave Astronomy Dr. Giles Hammond Institute for Gravitational Research SUPA, University of Glasgow Universität Jena, August 2010.
Advertisements

DM density profiles in non-extensive theory Eelco van Kampen Institute for Astro- and Particle Physics Innsbruck University In collaboration with Manfred.
ICHEP conference, Paris, 22/07/10. Emergence Current Paradigm FUNDAMENTAL FORCES: carried by elementary particles.
Ch2. Elements of Ensemble Theory
Introduction to Black Hole Thermodynamics Satoshi Iso (KEK)
ASYMPTOTIC STRUCTURE IN HIGHER DIMENSIONS AND ITS CLASSIFICATION KENTARO TANABE (UNIVERSITY OF BARCELONA) based on KT, Kinoshita and Shiromizu PRD
Cosimo Stornaiolo INFN-Sezione di Napoli MG 12 Paris July 2009.
F. Debbasch LERMA-ERGA Université Paris 6 Relativistic Stochastic Dynamics: A Review.
July 2005 Einstein Conference Paris Thermodynamics of a Schwarzschild black hole observed with finite precision C. Chevalier 1, F. Debbasch 1, M. Bustamante.
Non-Localizability of Electric Coupling and Gravitational Binding of Charged Objects Matthew Corne Eastern Gravity Meeting 11 May 12-13, 2008.
The attractor mechanism, C-functions and aspects of holography in Lovelock gravity Mohamed M. Anber November HET bag-lunch.
How do we transform between accelerated frames? Consider Newton’s first and second laws: m i is the measure of the inertia of an object – its resistance.
Gerard ’t Hooft Spinoza Institute Utrecht University CMI, Chennai, 20 November 2009 arXiv:
General Relativity Physics Honours 2007 A/Prof. Geraint F. Lewis Rm 557, A29 Lecture Notes 8.
Black Holes Written for Summer Honors Black Holes Massive stars greater than 10 M  upon collapse compress their cores so much that no pressure.
Holographic Dark Energy Preety Sidhu 5 May Black Holes and Entropy Black holes are “maximal entropy objects” Entropy of a black hole proportional.
LESSON 4 METO 621. The extinction law Consider a small element of an absorbing medium, ds, within the total medium s.
The 2d gravity coupled to a dilaton field with the action This action ( CGHS ) arises in a low-energy asymptotic of string theory models and in certain.
CERN Colloquium, 28/04/11. Matter and Forces Current Paradigm FUNDAMENTAL FORCES: carried by elementary particles.
Black Holes Matthew Trimble 10/29/12.
Is Black Hole an elementary particle? By Hoi-Lai Yu IPAS, Oct 30, 2007.
1 Yasushi Mino Theoretical AstroPhysics Including Relativity (TAPIR), CalTech Index 1: Introduction: LISA project 2: MiSaTaQuWa.
Forming Nonsingular Black Holes from Dust Collapse by R. Maier (Centro Brasileiro de Pesquisas Físicas-Rio de Janeiro) I. Damião Soares (Centro Brasileiro.
Holographic Description of Quantum Black Hole on a Computer Yoshifumi Hyakutake (Ibaraki Univ.) Collaboration with M. Hanada ( YITP, Kyoto ), G. Ishiki.
An introduction to the Gravity/Fluid correspondence and its applications Ya-Peng Hu College of Science, Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics,
Louisville March 22, 2006 Andrew Chamblin Memorial An AdS Thermal Properties of Strongly Coupled Gauge Theories with Fundamental Matter from Gauge/Gravity.
Einstein Field Equations and First Law of Thermodynamics Rong-Gen Cai (蔡荣根) Institute of Theoretical Physics Chinese Academy of Sciences.
Thermodynamics of Apparent Horizon & Dynamics of FRW Spacetime Rong-Gen Cai (蔡荣根) Institute of Theoretical Physics Chinese Academy of Sciences.
International Workshop on Astronomical X-Ray Optics Fingerprints of Superspinars in Astrophysical Phenomena Zdeněk Stuchlík and Jan Schee Institute of.
Ch 9 pages Lecture 22 – Harmonic oscillator.
Artificial black hole singularities M. Cadoni, University of Cagliari COSLAB 2005, Smolenice, August Based on M.C., Class. and Quant. Grav. 22.
KINEMATICS Kinematics describes fluid flow without analyzing the forces responsibly for flow generation. Thereby it doesn’t matter what kind of liquid.
QGP and Hadrons in Dense medium: a holographic 2nd ATHIC based on works with X. Ge, Y. Matsuo, F. Shu, T. Tsukioka(APCTP), archiv:
Shear viscosity of a highly excited string and black hole membrane paradigm Yuya Sasai Helsinki Institute of Physics and Department of Physics University.
General Relativity Physics Honours 2005 Dr Geraint F. Lewis Rm 557, A29
Fundamental Principles of General Relativity  general principle: laws of physics must be the same for all observers (accelerated or not)  general covariance:
General Relativity Physics Honours 2009
Hawking radiation for a Proca field Mengjie Wang (王梦杰 ) In collaboration with Carlos Herdeiro & Marco Sampaio Mengjie Wang 王梦杰 Based on: PRD85(2012)
A Metric Theory of Gravity with Torsion in Extra-dimension Kameshwar C. Wali (Syracuse University) Miami 2013 [Co-authors: Shankar K. Karthik and Anand.
1 Black-Hole Thermodynamics PHYS 4315 R. S. Rubins, Fall 2009.
Gerard ’t Hooft, quant-ph/ Erice, September 6, 2006 Utrecht University 1.
On the unit of mass: The mass of a macroscopic object is the sum of that of all its microscopic constituents and of a weak approximately calculable.
Characteristic vibrations of the field. LL2 section 52.
General Relativity Physics Honours 2008 A/Prof. Geraint F. Lewis Rm 560, A29 Lecture Notes 9.
Gravitational collapse of massless scalar field Bin Wang Shanghai Jiao Tong University.
The Meaning of Einstein’s Equation*
General Relativity and Cosmology The End of Absolute Space Cosmological Principle Black Holes CBMR and Big Bang.
Unit 13 Relativity.
KERR BLACK HOLES Generalized BH description includes spin –Later researchers use it to predict new effects!! Two crucial surfaces –inner surface = horizon.
Yoshinori Matsuo (KEK) in collaboration with Hikaru Kawai (Kyoto U.) Yuki Yokokura (Kyoto U.)
1 Bhupendra Nath Tiwari IIT Kanpur in collaboration with T. Sarkar & G. Sengupta. Thermodynamic Geometry and BTZ black holes This talk is mainly based.
Gauge/gravity duality in Einstein-dilaton theory Chanyong Park Workshop on String theory and cosmology (Pusan, ) Ref. S. Kulkarni,
DPG Conference, Hamburg
A TEST FOR THE LOCAL INTRINSIC LORENTZ SYMMETRY
Dept.of Physics & Astrophysics
Quantum Mechanical Models for Near Extremal Black Holes
Equation of State and Unruh temperature
Formation of universe, blackhole and 1st order phase transition
Institut d’Astrophysique de Paris
Thermodynamic Volume in AdS/CFT
Einstein’s Zurich Notebook
A rotating hairy BH in AdS_3
QUASI-SPHERICAL GRAVITATIONAL COLLAPSE Ujjal Debnath Department of Mathematics, Bengal Engineering and Science University, Shibpur, Howrah , India.
Charged black holes in string-inspired gravity models
Solutions of black hole interior, information paradox and the shape of singularities Haolin Lu.
Based on the work submitted to EPJC
The Cosmological Constant Problem & Self-tuning Mechanism
A New Approach to Equation of Motion for a fast-moving particle
Hysteresis Curves from 11 dimensions
Graviton Emission in The Bulk from a Higher Dimensional Black Hole
Presentation transcript:

F. Debbasch (LERMA-ERGA Université Paris 6) and M. Bustamante, C. Chevalier, Y. Ollivier Statistical Physics and relativistic gravity ( )

1.Why extend conventional statistical physics to include the gravitational field? 2.Standard mean field theories of Newtonian gravity and Maxwell electromagnetism 3.A new mean field theory for relativistic gravitation 4.Classical black hole thermodynamics 5.Statistical ensembles of classical black holes 6.Conclusion

To achieve a fully consistent treatment of non- quantal self-gravitating systems To properly take into account the finite resolutions with which many astrophysical and cosmological observations are carried out Because black hole thermodynamics suggests an intimate link between relativistic gravity, statistical physics, and quantum physics Because it is a first step towards a better understanding of quantum fluctuations of the space- time geometry Why extend conventional statistical physics to include the gravitational field?

Gravitation is encoded in a potential  (t, r) The potential is generated by the mass distribution:   = - 4  G  The trajectory of a point mass is modified by gravity: Standard mean field theories of Newtonian gravity and Maxwell electromagnetism 1. Newtonian gravity: Non statistical treatment drdr dt m = p dpdp dt = - grad  = F

Statistical ensemble of self-consistent potentials  (t, r,  ) and mass densities  (t, r,  ) For each ,   (  ) = - 4  G  (  ) For each , The mean gravitational field is described by the potential Standard mean field theories of Newtonian gravity and Maxwell electromagnetism 2. Newtonian gravity: statistical treatment dpdp dt ()() = - grad  (  ) = F (  )  (t, r) = where = mean value over 

Since all equations are linear: with and Standard mean field theories of Newtonian gravity and Maxwell electromagnetism 2. Newtonian gravity: statistical treatment dpdp dt ()() = - grad  = F (t, r)   = - 4  G   (t, r) = < > for any test-mass located at point r at time t t, r

Standard mean field theories of Newtonian gravity and Maxwell electromagnetism A  (  ), F  (  ) = ∂  A (  ) - ∂ A  (  ), j  (  ) and, for all  :   ∂  F  (  ) = - 4    j  3. Maxwell electromagnetism: statistical treatment dp  ds = q F  (  ) u ()()

Standard mean field theories of Newtonian gravity and Maxwell electromagnetism For all (t, r) = x, A  (x) =, F  (x) = j  (x) =   ∂  F  = - 4    j 3. Maxwell electromagnetism: statistical treatment dp  ds = = q F  (x) u ()() < > x,u for any charged test particle situated at point x with velocity u

A general relativistic space-time is equipped with two different structures, a metric g and a connection or covariant derivative operator Given a coordinate system, the connection is represented by a set of position-dependent numbers The `source’ of gravity is energy-momentum, represented by a stress-energy tensor field T    A new mean field theory for relativistic gravitation

Choose a fixed base manifold M Consider a statistical ensemble of metrics g(  ), connections (  ) and stress-energy tensor fields T(  ) defined on M Have these fields satisfy, for each , the equations of general relativity: A new mean field theory for relativistic gravitation

 (  ) g  (  ) = 0 (1) G  ( (  ), g(  )) =  g  (  ) g  (  ) T  (  ) (2) (1) (  ) is entirely determined by g(  ) (Levi- Civita connection) The  (  )’s are the Christoffel symbols of g(  ); they depend non linearly on g(  ) Equation (2) is also non linear in g(  ) (at fixed T(  ), which generally also depends on g(  )) A new mean field theory for relativistic gravitation

Problem: Define a mean metric, a mean connection and a mean stress-energy tensor that satisfy Einstein’s theory Theorem: In general, the connection represented by the coefficients is not compatible with any metric Consequence : The only natural and simple solution seems to be: g  (x) = and = Levi-Civita connection of g Is this definition physically reasonable?   A new mean field theory for relativistic gravitation

The motion of test point masses is governed by the geodesics equation: Therefore dp  d = 1 2 ∂  g  (  ) v  v  with v  = ()() dx  d x, v x dp  d x, v ()() 1 2 ∂  g  v  v  < > = x A new mean field theory for relativistic gravitation

Einstein equation then fixes the stress-energy tensor field of the mean space-time: G  (, g) =  g  g  T  In general, T is different from The difference describes how the small-scale fluctuations of the gravitational field add up as an effective `source’ to the large-scale averaged field A new mean field theory for relativistic gravitation

A few general remarks: The theory can accomodate other gauge fields, for example the Maxwell field The apparent large-scale values of the gauge charge densities depend on the `real’ small-scale values of these charges and on the small-scale fluctuations of the gravitational field The theory may have important cosmological consequences, but only if non linearity turns out to play an important role on cosmological scales A new mean field theory for relativistic gravitation

A black hole is a space-time with a future event horizon. An event horizon is a null surface and, therefore, can only be crossed in one direction (`no escape out of the region inside the horizon’) by non quantum matter All stationary black hole solutions of the vacuum Einstein-Maxwell equations are known These solutions depend on three parameters only: their masses M, their charges q and their angular momenta J= j M. They describe a black hole if (j/j P ) 2 + (q/q P ) 2 < (M/m P ) 2 Classical black hole thermodynamics

Quantum field theory in curved space-times has revealed that all stationary black holes exhibit thermodynamical properties, i.e. they have an entropy and (generically) a temperature One can write dM = TdS + Vdq +  dJ, S(M, q, J), T(M, q, J), etc… For a Schwarzschild black hole: q = 0, J = 0, V = 0,  = 0 and R H = 2 M (l P /m P ) T = (1/8  M) m P T P S = 4  M 2 /m P 2

Quite generally, in Planck units 2  T (M, q, j) =  /[2M(M +  ) - q 2 ] and S(M, q, j) =  (M +  ) 2 with  (M, q, j) = (M 2 - j 2 - q 2 ) 1/2 (with j = J/M) Extreme black holes correspond to  = 0 They have no temperature but a non vanishing entropy Note that S is not extensive and T is not intensive: S(  M,  q,  j) =  2 S(M, q, j) T(  M,  q,  j) = T(M, q, j)  1 Classical black hole thermodynamics

Classical black holes are thus to be considered as statistical ensembles The fact that their entropies and temperatures involve h (via m P ) suggests that the involved `microscopic’ degrees of freedom partake of quantum gravity Indeed, it is possible to derive the values of black hole entropies by considering them as microcanonical ensembles of strings/branes Classical black hole thermodynamics

1. A toy model for finite precision observations of a Schwarzschild black hole Let R 4 = (t, r) be the base manifold and consider (t, r) as Kerr- Schild coordinates for the usual Schwarzschild space-time, associated to metric coefficients g  (t, r) Consider the statistical ensemble of metrics g(  ) defined by g  (t, r,  ) = g  (t, r +  ) where  3-ball of radius a and p(  ) uniform Remark: Typical current observations of Sgr A* are associated to x = (a/M) (m P /l P ) ~ 400. Near future ones (10 years) should have x ~ a few units For all x < 2: Statistical ensembles of classical black holes

1. A toy model for finite precision observations of a Schwarzschild black hole The mean space-time still describes a black hole The horizon radius of this black hole reads R H (M, x) = 2M (1+ x 2 /20) 1/2 The total energy of the mean space-time is still M but The stress-energy tensor field does not vanish outside the horizon and decreases as R -6 at infinity. It describes apparent matter of negative energy density. The radial pressure is negative and the angular pressures are identical and positive. All energy conditions are violated, yet The mean space-time is thermal Statistical ensembles of classical black holes

1. A toy model for finite precision observations of a Schwarzschild black hole T(M, x) ~ (1/8  M) (1 + x 2 /20) for small x S(M, x) ~ 4  M 2 (1 + x 4 /800) The mean space-time is governed by a two-parameter thermodynamics. Natural choices are (T, R H ) and (T, A H ) S(T/ ,  R H ) =  2 S(T, R H ) but M(T/ ,  R H ) =  M(T, R H ) dM = T dS + f dR H = TdS +  dA H f ~ - x 2 /40,  ~ - x 2 /(640  M) Thus, a standard averaging over the non quantum space-time degrees of freedom modifies the black hole thermodynamics Statistical ensembles of classical black holes

2. Generating thermal space-times by averaging non thermal solutions of the classical Einstein equations Some ensembles of classical extreme black holes, analytically extended into complex space-times, can be interpreted as finite temperature real black holes The finite temperature apparently traces a `Zitter-Bewegung’ in at least some of the complex degrees of freedom The calculations permit, in theory, the identification of the system’s proper modes Statistical ensembles of classical black holes

Conclusion The apparent properties of astrophysical objects depend on the finite resolutions with which they are observed Systematic biases in cosmology due to large-scale averagings? Possible links with the dark matter problem? What do the calculations performed on classical black holes tell us about quantum gravity? Link with superstring theory? Link with spinor and/or twistor formalism? Link with emergent gravity? `Genericity’ of black hole thermodynamics

Conclusion Links with Galilean hydrodynamics, solid state physics/elasticity, superconductivity and optics The propagation of acoustic waves (phonons) in potential flows of Galilean barotropic fluids is governed by an acoustic Lorentzian metric Because flows can get supersonic, acoustic waves can get trapped in some regions of space called dumb holes A surface `gravity’ can be associated to the boundary of the dumb holes What is the hydrodynamical equivalent of the classical averaging procedure and of the black hole calculations presented here? Link with the general investigation of real and complex singularities in Euler flows?

l P 2 = G h/2  c 3 m P = l P c 2 /G q P = l P c/G 1/2 (c.g.s. units)