Julie Fletcher Manager Marine Observations, NZ Chair, VOS Panel PMO-III, 23-24 March 2006, Hamburg, Germany. Monitoring Procedures.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
You have been given a mission and a code. Use the code to complete the mission and you will save the world from obliteration…
Advertisements

Last week, we looked at rain, wind and clouds
Advanced Piloting Cruise Plot.
1 Copyright © 2010, Elsevier Inc. All rights Reserved Fig 2.1 Chapter 2.
By D. Fisher Geometric Transformations. Reflection, Rotation, or Translation 1.
Increasing Survey Cooperation: Motivating Chronic Late Responders to an Annual Survey National Science Foundation Division of Science Resources Statistics.
Business Transaction Management Software for Application Coordination 1 Business Processes and Coordination.
World Meteorological OrganizationIntergovernmental Oceanographic Commission of UNESCO Ship Observations Team ~ integrating and coordinating international.
AREP GURME Section 11 Case Studies of Episodes What is a Case Study? How to Conduct Case Studies Examples.
2. The WAM Model: Solves energy balance equation, including Snonlin
Jeopardy Q 1 Q 6 Q 11 Q 16 Q 21 Q 2 Q 7 Q 12 Q 17 Q 22 Q 3 Q 8 Q 13
Jeopardy Q 1 Q 6 Q 11 Q 16 Q 21 Q 2 Q 7 Q 12 Q 17 Q 22 Q 3 Q 8 Q 13
Title Subtitle.
0 - 0.
DIVIDING INTEGERS 1. IF THE SIGNS ARE THE SAME THE ANSWER IS POSITIVE 2. IF THE SIGNS ARE DIFFERENT THE ANSWER IS NEGATIVE.
SUBTRACTING INTEGERS 1. CHANGE THE SUBTRACTION SIGN TO ADDITION
MULT. INTEGERS 1. IF THE SIGNS ARE THE SAME THE ANSWER IS POSITIVE 2. IF THE SIGNS ARE DIFFERENT THE ANSWER IS NEGATIVE.
Addition Facts
The University of Reading Helen Dacre AMS 2010 Air Quality Forecasting using a Numerical Weather Prediction Model ETEX Surface Measurement Sites.
The University of Reading Helen Dacre UM user 2009 Forecasting the transport of pollution using a NWP model ETEX Surface Measurement Sites.
© University of Reading Richard Allan Department of Meteorology, University of Reading Thanks to: Jim Haywood and Malcolm.
ZMQS ZMQS
Richmond House, Liverpool (1) 26 th January 2004.
BT Wholesale October Creating your own telephone network WHOLESALE CALLS LINE ASSOCIATED.
Graeme Ball VOS Program Manager, Australia Chairman, Ship Observations Team PMO-III, March 2006, Hamburg, Germany. Information Exchange & VOS Promotion.
Using Family Connection Online Resource for Planning & Advising.
ABC Technology Project
Page 1 NAE 4DVAR Oct 2006 © Crown copyright 2006 Mark Naylor Data Assimilation, NWP NAE 4D-Var – Testing and Issues EWGLAM/SRNWP meeting Zurich 9 th -12.
VOORBLAD.
PMO-III, March 2006, Hamburg PMO-III March 2005 Hamburg, Germany Report by United States Robert Luke VOS Operations Manager NOAA/National Weather.
PMO-III, March 2006, Hamburg, Germany. Other PMO Activities.
VOS Quality Monitoring Tools
1 RA III - Regional Training Seminar on CLIMAT&CLIMAT TEMP Reporting Buenos Aires, Argentina, 25 – 27 October 2006 Status of observing programmes in RA.
23-24 March 2006PMO-III workshop Hamburg TurboWin New developments.
METEOROLOGICAL SERVICES FOR LOW LEVEL FLIGHTS IN ROMANIA
Julie Fletcher Manager Marine Observations, NZ Chair, VOS Panel PMO-III, March 2006, Hamburg, Germany. Ship Inspections.
Squares and Square Root WALK. Solve each problem REVIEW:
Lets play bingo!!. Calculate: MEAN Calculate: MEDIAN
1 Verification of wave forecast models Martin Holt Jim Gunson Damian Holmes-Bell.
VOS Communications Problems and Errors World Meteorological OrganizationIntergovernmental Oceanographic Commission of UNESCO Ship Observations Team ~ integrating.
World Meteorological OrganizationIntergovernmental Oceanographic Commission of UNESCO Ship Observations Team ~ integrating and coordinating international.
World Meteorological OrganizationIntergovernmental Oceanographic Commission of UNESCO Ship Observations Team ~ integrating and coordinating international.
Chapter 5 Test Review Sections 5-1 through 5-4.
GG Consulting, LLC I-SUITE. Source: TEA SHARS Frequently asked questions 2.
Addition 1’s to 20.
25 seconds left…...
Week 1.
We will resume in: 25 Minutes.
PSSA Preparation.
Weekly Attendance by Class w/e 6 th September 2013.
1 PART 1 ILLUSTRATION OF DOCUMENTS  Brief introduction to the documents contained in the envelope  Detailed clarification of the documents content.
How Cells Obtain Energy from Food
1 NOAA’S NATIONAL CLIMATIC DATA CENTER – ASHEVILLE, NORTH CAROLINA NCDC Report to US Port Meteorological Officers August 2014 Eric Freeman 1,2, Scott.
4YI // Click on highlighted numbers to advance to next.
Voluntary Observing Ship (VOS) Program John Wasserman VOS Operations Manager Stennis Space Center, MS.
~METSERVICE |\ MetService NZ Marine Programme ~METSERVICE |\ MetService NZ Marine Programme Julie Fletcher Manager Marine Observations.
Julie Fletcher Manager Marine Observations, NZ Chair, VOS Panel PMO-III, March 2006, Hamburg, Germany. Ship Recruitment.
Julie Fletcher Manager Marine Observations, NZ Chair, VOS Panel PMO-III, March 2006, Hamburg, Germany. Status of the VOS Scheme & PMO Network.
MetService NZ Marine Programme MetService NZ Marine Programme Julie Fletcher Manager Marine Observations.
Page 1© Crown copyright Report of the Global Collecting Centres Elanor Gowland, GCC UK SOT-IV, 16 th - 21 st April 2007.
SYNOPTIC OBSERVATIONS DECODING & PLOTTING. ENCODING WEATHER INFORMATION In order for people to send information around the world using the WMO discussed.
© Crown copyright Met Office Note ~ 39 ships send obs using TurboWin Concept of Remote PMO Inspections Each PMO is assigned responsibility for a.
© Crown copyright Met Office Upgrading VOS to VOSClim Sarah North.
IN THE NAME OF GOD SYNOPTIC METEOROLOGY CHAPTER ONE: METEOROLOGICAL STATIONS AND DATA SUMMER, 2011.
Voluntary Observing Ship Scheme
Upper Air Reports.
Presentation transcript:

Julie Fletcher Manager Marine Observations, NZ Chair, VOS Panel PMO-III, March 2006, Hamburg, Germany. Monitoring Procedures

PMO-III, March 2006, Hamburg. 2 Outline  UKMO Quality Monitoring Tools for VOS  Onboard QM TurboWin Tool  The Value of Feedback

PMO-III, March 2006, Hamburg. 3 Delayed-mode UK Met Office VOS monitoring tools:  Monthly Monitoring Statistics  Monthly Timeliness of Receipt (TOR)  Coming….. Monthly time series plots UKMO Monitoring Tools

PMO-III, March 2006, Hamburg. 4 Monthly Monitoring Stats  Available from Exeter at start of each month  Compares SHIP data with UK model  Bias & SD Statistics prepared for a range of variables: Air pressure Air Temperature Wind Speed Wind Direction Relative Humidity Sea Surface Temperature  Example: NZ VOS Stats for February 2006NZ VOS Stats for February 2006

PMO-III, March 2006, Hamburg. 5 TOR for All VOS

PMO-III, March 2006, Hamburg. 6 TOR for National VOS

PMO-III, March 2006, Hamburg. 7 UKMO Monitoring Tools  Monthly Stats for individual National VOS are available on request from Gareth Dow  Since Jan 2006, the Monthly Stats for all VOS listed in Pub 47 have been published on the web by the UKMO normally available in 2nd week of each month useful extra - stats include list of ships for which Nil Obs recv’d  Monthly VOS TOR also available on web

PMO-III, March 2006, Hamburg. 8  Gareth advises that UKMO plan to have monthly Obs minus baseline(O-B) timeseries plots for each ship listed in Pub 47 available on line  planned start date June 2006 Future UKMO Monitoring Tool

PMO-III, March 2006, Hamburg. 9 Coming…time series plots

PMO-III, March 2006, Hamburg. 10 Onboard QM TurboWin Tool  From TurboWin Ver3.6 there is the ability for the PMO to view the Obs on screen in traditional logbook coded format whilst on board the ship  IMMT data not easily readable, but new option allows PMO to view the Obs for monitoring purposes

PMO-III, March 2006, Hamburg. 11 Move Ship Coded Log

PMO-III, March 2006, Hamburg. 12 group-00 = SHIP_report_identifier group-0 = call_sign_or_identification_number group-1 = day_of_month(YY)[UTC]-UTC(GG)-wind_speed_indicator(iw) group-2 = position_indicator(99)-latitude(LaLaLa)[degrees_and_tenths] group-3 = Quadrant(Qc)-longitude(LoLoLoLo)[degrees_and_tenths] group-4 = indicator_precipitation_group(ir)-indicator_weather_group(ix)-height_of_lowest_cloud(h)-visibility(VV) group-5 = total_cloud_amount(N)-wind_direction_true(dd)[tens_of_degrees]-wind_speed(ff)[units_see_iw] group-6 = group_indicator(1)-sign_of_temp(sn)[code]-air_temp(TTT)[degrees_and_tenths] group-7 = group_indicator(2)-sign_of_temp(sn)[code]-dew_point(TdTdTd)[degrees_and_tenths] group-9 = group_indicator(4)-corrected_pressure(PPPP)[omitting_thousands] group-10 = group_indicator(5)-characteristic_pressure_change(a)-amount_pressure_change(ppp) group-12 = group_indicator(7)-present_weather(ww)-past_weather(W1)-past_weather(W2) group-13 = group_indicator(8)-amount_low_clouds_or_medium_if_no_low(Nh)-type_low(Cl)-type_medium(Cm)-type_high(Cm) group-15 = selection_indicator(222)-course_made_good(Ds)-average_speed(vs) group-16 = group_indicator(0)-sign_and_type_sea_temp(ss)-sea_temp(TwTwTw)[degrees_and_tenths] group-18 = group_indicator(2)-period_wind_waves(PwPw)[seconds]-height_wind_waves(HwHw)[half_metres] group-19 = group_indicator(3)-1st_swell_waves_dir_from(dw1dw1)[tens_of_degrees]-2nd_swell_waves_dir_from(dw2dw2)[tens_of_degrees] group-20 = group_indicator(4)-1st_swell_waves_period(Pw1Pw1)[seconds]-1st_swell_waves_height(Hw1Hw1)[half_metres] group-21 = group_indicator(5)-2nd_swell_waves_period(Pw2Pw2)[seconds]-2nd_swell_waves_height(Hw2Hw2)[half_metres] group-22 = group_indicator(6)-type_ice_accretion(Is)-tickness_ice(EsEs)[cm]-rate_ice_accretion(Rs) group-23 = group_indicator(8)-sign_and_type_wet_bulb_temp(sw)-wet_bulb_temp(TbTbTb)[degrees_and_tenths] group-24 = concentration_or_arrangement_ice(ci)-stage_development_ice(Si)-ice_land_origin(bi)-bearing_ice_edge(Di)-ice_situation(zi) - group-00 group group-1 group-2 group-3 group-4 group-5 group-6 group-7 group-9 group-10 group-12 group-13 group-15 group-16 group-189 ……. BBXX callsign Year Month YYGGiw 99LaLaLa QcLoLoLoLo irixhVV Nddff 1snTTT 2snTdTdTd 4PPPP 5appp 7wwW1W2 8NhClCmCh 222Dsvs 0ssTwTwTw 2PwPwHwHw ……. BBXX SMMO //// 4//// 5//// 6//// ICE /////

PMO-III, March 2006, Hamburg. 13 QM Feedback to Ships  Vital that NMS provide feedback on Obs quality and quantity to National VOS  Real-time feedback via PMO visit, , or phone call is most effective as targets current observers  Feedback on problems should be done in a manner to encourage and assist observers  Most ships view feedback whether good or bad as positive as it demonstrates their Obs are being used  Always include some thanks and encouragement in feedback messages

PMO-III, March 2006, Hamburg. 14 Use of the Monitoring Tools and timely feedback to ships to correct problems will improve the quality and quantity of Obs provided by VOS